Views
404
Replies
3
Status
Closed
Hi All.
I haven’t found this subject anywhere, which seems weird to me because I can’t imagine that such a silly behaviour has never been noticed by anyone before. So I just would like to confirm the existence of the behaviour.
Here’s the description:
Make a new document of say 5000×5000 pix and zoom out to 12.5% or less. Now set the eyedropper tool to 5 by 5 average and use it…
At 12.5%, it yields 197/197/197 and at 8.33% it yields 236/235/236 etc. Strangely, the 3 by 3 average and point sample settings do yield correct values at these zoom levels.
I wonder if this is normal and if it isn’t, if it has been fixed in CS3.
It ‘t not a really big problem, but it took me at least half an hour before I realized the incorrect readout was due to the zoom factor and I was amazed I couldn’t find this strange bug/feature described anywhere. :-/
Regards,
Frank
I haven’t found this subject anywhere, which seems weird to me because I can’t imagine that such a silly behaviour has never been noticed by anyone before. So I just would like to confirm the existence of the behaviour.
Here’s the description:
Make a new document of say 5000×5000 pix and zoom out to 12.5% or less. Now set the eyedropper tool to 5 by 5 average and use it…
At 12.5%, it yields 197/197/197 and at 8.33% it yields 236/235/236 etc. Strangely, the 3 by 3 average and point sample settings do yield correct values at these zoom levels.
I wonder if this is normal and if it isn’t, if it has been fixed in CS3.
It ‘t not a really big problem, but it took me at least half an hour before I realized the incorrect readout was due to the zoom factor and I was amazed I couldn’t find this strange bug/feature described anywhere. :-/
Regards,
Frank
Related Tags
MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥
– in 4 materials (clay versions included)
– 12 scenes
– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups
– 6000 x 4500 px