is this pic doctored?
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
:: E-mail to friend 
http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
I think it is fake. What do you think?
--
Gregor
  |
  |
> I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
I
>
> think it is fake. What do you think?
Why would you think that?
Checking with the web site noted in the image, and the source of your
image, it seems pretty legit to me.
http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Plane t_Desert
Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
| |
|
On 14.09.2011 17:30, Savageduck wrote:
>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
> Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
> question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
> the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
I am asking a sincere question.
Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
The wet parts of the vehicle body (red line) are just a few inches above
the water line. In a strong current like this, I'd expect more of the
vehicle to be wet.
And the driver's knee is entirely dry, I thought that was unlikely.
--
Gregor
>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
> Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
> question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
> the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
I am asking a sincere question.
Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
The wet parts of the vehicle body (red line) are just a few inches above
the water line. In a strong current like this, I'd expect more of the
vehicle to be wet.
And the driver's knee is entirely dry, I thought that was unlikely.
--
Gregor
| |
|
Mainly because of the water flowing from under the front wheel well, I think
it's legit.
it's legit.
| |
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, Greg N. wrote in
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eter nal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news. solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.graphics.photoshop
> Subject: is this pic doctored?
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200
> Organization: solani.org
> Lines: 9
> Message-ID: <j4qeck$2iq$1@solani.org>
> Reply-To: yodel_dodel@yahoo.com
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Trace: solani.org 1316011221 2650 eJwNxsEBgEAIA7CVQGiFcfAs+4+geQVB57mTYGKxYrHwHMEtYqV6/yhqRtYK oXklzGE9tvsBGhkQ0w== (14 Sep 2011 14:40:21 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC)
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
> X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwEAIAzBLwEo5O7z+JSzxj8oO0Ak/v8sbnhEZvHaUei0tV57aDhDd lOoUgcyTHzJ8EXo=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:zgYvJGpYw0cWMjZlHAruMMb6iBM=
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLPAkFOZQy/xJ2Rw+NOQgG+PE7FJlTldUZxeuUK/kxaNjV eEZBv3HF3p20gUHyth+N5gt7CW/thtVm/ZQhGNU=
> Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org alt.graphics.photoshop:4345
>
> I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
> I think it is fake. What do you think?
Real.
I'll tell you what's fake.
http://wallpaperpassion.com/upload/8917/olivia-wilde-hot-wal lpaper.jpg
Nobody looks that good!
;)
--
idle
I have yet to decided whether to use my power for good...or for evil.
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eter nal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news. solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.graphics.photoshop
> Subject: is this pic doctored?
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200
> Organization: solani.org
> Lines: 9
> Message-ID: <j4qeck$2iq$1@solani.org>
> Reply-To: yodel_dodel@yahoo.com
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Trace: solani.org 1316011221 2650 eJwNxsEBgEAIA7CVQGiFcfAs+4+geQVB57mTYGKxYrHwHMEtYqV6/yhqRtYK oXklzGE9tvsBGhkQ0w== (14 Sep 2011 14:40:21 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC)
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
> X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwEAIAzBLwEo5O7z+JSzxj8oO0Ak/v8sbnhEZvHaUei0tV57aDhDd lOoUgcyTHzJ8EXo=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:zgYvJGpYw0cWMjZlHAruMMb6iBM=
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLPAkFOZQy/xJ2Rw+NOQgG+PE7FJlTldUZxeuUK/kxaNjV eEZBv3HF3p20gUHyth+N5gt7CW/thtVm/ZQhGNU=
> Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org alt.graphics.photoshop:4345
>
> I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
> I think it is fake. What do you think?
Real.
I'll tell you what's fake.
http://wallpaperpassion.com/upload/8917/olivia-wilde-hot-wal lpaper.jpg
Nobody looks that good!
;)
--
idle
I have yet to decided whether to use my power for good...or for evil.
| |
|
"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:j4qij4$hbg$1@solani.org...
> On 14.09.2011 17:30, Savageduck wrote:
>
>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
>> Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
>> question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
>> the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
>
> I am asking a sincere question.
>
> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here is
> what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>
> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>
> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>
> The wet parts of the vehicle body (red line) are just a few inches above
> the water line. In a strong current like this, I'd expect more of the
> vehicle to be wet.
I thought it was real because of the wet higher up on the motorcycle.
I've had people send me pictures and ask what I thought, too.
>
> And the driver's knee is entirely dry, I thought that was unlikely.
>
> --
> Gregor
news:j4qij4$hbg$1@solani.org...
> On 14.09.2011 17:30, Savageduck wrote:
>
>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
>> Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
>> question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
>> the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
>
> I am asking a sincere question.
>
> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here is
> what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>
> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>
> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>
> The wet parts of the vehicle body (red line) are just a few inches above
> the water line. In a strong current like this, I'd expect more of the
> vehicle to be wet.
I thought it was real because of the wet higher up on the motorcycle.
I've had people send me pictures and ask what I thought, too.
>
> And the driver's knee is entirely dry, I thought that was unlikely.
>
> --
> Gregor
| |
|
"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:j4qeck$2iq$1@solani.org...
>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
> I think it is fake. What do you think?
>
>
> --
> Gregor
I googled it (the image) and found a page of links. Didn't go over them to
see what people were saying, or possible info about the actual picture. It
looks like there are other pictures (not in the water) of the same setting.
_
http://tinyurl.com/65cfenx
news:j4qeck$2iq$1@solani.org...
>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
> I think it is fake. What do you think?
>
>
> --
> Gregor
I googled it (the image) and found a page of links. Didn't go over them to
see what people were saying, or possible info about the actual picture. It
looks like there are other pictures (not in the water) of the same setting.
_
http://tinyurl.com/65cfenx
| |
|
In article <j4qeck$2iq$1@solani.org>, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Pl
> anet_Desert%207.jpg
>
> I think it is fake. What do you think?
If it is not faked, then it is the moment before the motorcycle
completely fails because the carburetors (or fuel injectors) are
under-water and dysfunctional. Another hint is the borderline of the
water and earth which defies depth-of-field.
It is either a fake or a picture of the motorcyclist about to bail out
--
Thirty years of BMW riding and ten more as a computer analyst.
wrote:
> I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Pl
> anet_Desert%207.jpg
>
> I think it is fake. What do you think?
If it is not faked, then it is the moment before the motorcycle
completely fails because the carburetors (or fuel injectors) are
under-water and dysfunctional. Another hint is the borderline of the
water and earth which defies depth-of-field.
It is either a fake or a picture of the motorcyclist about to bail out
--
Thirty years of BMW riding and ten more as a computer analyst.
| |
|
"John J Stafford" <john@stafford.invalid> wrote in message
news:john-85231E.20403414092011@news.supernews.com...
> In article <j4qeck$2iq$1@solani.org>, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>
>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Pl
>> anet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>> I think it is fake. What do you think?
>
> If it is not faked, then it is the moment before the motorcycle
> completely fails because the carburetors (or fuel injectors) are
> under-water and dysfunctional. Another hint is the borderline of the
> water and earth which defies depth-of-field.
>
> It is either a fake or a picture of the motorcyclist about to bail out
If it's real it probably wouldn't be very good for the motorccycle LOL
>
> --
>
> Thirty years of BMW riding and ten more as a computer analyst.
news:john-85231E.20403414092011@news.supernews.com...
> In article <j4qeck$2iq$1@solani.org>, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>
>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Pl
>> anet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>> I think it is fake. What do you think?
>
> If it is not faked, then it is the moment before the motorcycle
> completely fails because the carburetors (or fuel injectors) are
> under-water and dysfunctional. Another hint is the borderline of the
> water and earth which defies depth-of-field.
>
> It is either a fake or a picture of the motorcyclist about to bail out
If it's real it probably wouldn't be very good for the motorccycle LOL
>
> --
>
> Thirty years of BMW riding and ten more as a computer analyst.
| |
|
In article <j4qpoh$k86$1@dont-email.me>,
idle <idle@mycomputer.com> wrote:
> I'll tell you what's fake.
> http://wallpaperpassion.com/upload/8917/olivia-wilde-hot-wal lpaper.jpg
> Nobody looks that good!
That is not *good* unless you think plastic or alabaster doll
surface is some sort of ideal skin for a woman. But your point
about it not being real is good!
--
dorayme
idle <idle@mycomputer.com> wrote:
> I'll tell you what's fake.
> http://wallpaperpassion.com/upload/8917/olivia-wilde-hot-wal lpaper.jpg
> Nobody looks that good!
That is not *good* unless you think plastic or alabaster doll
surface is some sort of ideal skin for a woman. But your point
about it not being real is good!
--
dorayme
| |
|
In article <j4qij4$hbg$1@solani.org>,
"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 14.09.2011 17:30, Savageduck wrote:
>
> >> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
> >> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
> > Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
> > question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
> > the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
>
> I am asking a sincere question.
>
> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>
> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>
> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>
If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
plane is unreliable
> The wet parts of the vehicle body (red line) are just a few inches above
> the water line. In a strong current like this, I'd expect more of the
> vehicle to be wet.
This too is flawed reasoning, because there would be a moment at
which the water had splashed to what you see, why could the snap
have not been taken at that point?
--
dorayme
"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 14.09.2011 17:30, Savageduck wrote:
>
> >> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
> >> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
> > Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
> > question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
> > the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
>
> I am asking a sincere question.
>
> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>
> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>
> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>
If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
plane is unreliable
> The wet parts of the vehicle body (red line) are just a few inches above
> the water line. In a strong current like this, I'd expect more of the
> vehicle to be wet.
This too is flawed reasoning, because there would be a moment at
which the water had splashed to what you see, why could the snap
have not been taken at that point?
--
dorayme
| |
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
>I think it is fake. What do you think?
No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
Talker
wrote:
>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>
> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
>I think it is fake. What do you think?
No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
Talker
| |
|
"dorayme" <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:dorayme-8081ED.18184715092011@c-50-133-29-211.hsd1.mi.comcast.net...
> In article <j4qij4$hbg$1@solani.org>,
> "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14.09.2011 17:30, Savageduck wrote:
>>
>> >> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>> >> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>> > Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
>> > question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
>> > the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
>>
>> I am asking a sincere question.
>>
>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>
>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>
>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>
>
> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
> plane is unreliable
>
>> The wet parts of the vehicle body (red line) are just a few inches above
>> the water line. In a strong current like this, I'd expect more of the
>> vehicle to be wet.
>
> This too is flawed reasoning, because there would be a moment at
> which the water had splashed to what you see, why could the snap
> have not been taken at that point?
>
I thought the bike was just sitting still in the water, having been ridden
or pushed in till it died and came to a stop. Also, where is the person
taking the picture- out on the water in a boat?
> dorayme
news:dorayme-8081ED.18184715092011@c-50-133-29-211.hsd1.mi.comcast.net...
> In article <j4qij4$hbg$1@solani.org>,
> "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14.09.2011 17:30, Savageduck wrote:
>>
>> >> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>> >> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>> > Of course you might be doing one of three things, asking a sincere
>> > question, trolling the group to provoke a pointless debate, or spamming
>> > the group to promote www.ultimatemotocycling.
>>
>> I am asking a sincere question.
>>
>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>
>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>
>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>
>
> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
> plane is unreliable
>
>> The wet parts of the vehicle body (red line) are just a few inches above
>> the water line. In a strong current like this, I'd expect more of the
>> vehicle to be wet.
>
> This too is flawed reasoning, because there would be a moment at
> which the water had splashed to what you see, why could the snap
> have not been taken at that point?
>
I thought the bike was just sitting still in the water, having been ridden
or pushed in till it died and came to a stop. Also, where is the person
taking the picture- out on the water in a boat?
> dorayme
| |
|
<Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>
>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>
> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>
> Talker
Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>
>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>
> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>
> Talker
Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
| |
|
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
scribbled:
>
><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>
>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>
>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>
>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>
>> Talker
>
> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
circle.
scribbled:
>
><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>
>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>
>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>
>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>
>> Talker
>
> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
circle.
| |
|
On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>
>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>
>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>
>
> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
> plane is unreliable
So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current
coming from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the
pannier, the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these
two. Instead, it stands there like a wall.
--
Gregor
>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>
>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>
>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>
>
> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
> plane is unreliable
So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current
coming from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the
pannier, the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these
two. Instead, it stands there like a wall.
--
Gregor
| |
|
"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>
>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>
>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>
>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>
>>
>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>> plane is unreliable
>
> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
> it stands there like a wall.
>
> --
> Gregor
Interesting topic for discussion, overall. So much now is doctored, there's
even a word for it now (outside of graphic design/art) "photoshopped".
(well I'm sure everyone here knows this.)
news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>
>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>
>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>
>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>
>>
>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>> plane is unreliable
>
> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
> it stands there like a wall.
>
> --
> Gregor
Interesting topic for discussion, overall. So much now is doctored, there's
even a word for it now (outside of graphic design/art) "photoshopped".
(well I'm sure everyone here knows this.)
| |
|
"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>
>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>
>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>
>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>
>>
>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>> plane is unreliable
>
> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
> it stands there like a wall.
>
> --
> Gregor
I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
"artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
art.
news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>
>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>
>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>
>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>
>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>
>>
>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>> plane is unreliable
>
> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
> it stands there like a wall.
>
> --
> Gregor
I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
"artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
art.
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:04 -0400, Carrie wrote in
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>
>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>
>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>
>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>> plane is unreliable
>>
>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
>> it stands there like a wall.
>>
>> --
>> Gregor
>
> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
> or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
> "artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
> art.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/236808/julia_roberts_ad_banne d_in_the_uk_for_abuse_of_photoshop.html
--
idle
I have yet to decided whether to use my power for good...or for evil.
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>
>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>
>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>
>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>> plane is unreliable
>>
>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
>> it stands there like a wall.
>>
>> --
>> Gregor
>
> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
> or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
> "artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
> art.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/236808/julia_roberts_ad_banne d_in_the_uk_for_abuse_of_photoshop.html
--
idle
I have yet to decided whether to use my power for good...or for evil.
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:04 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
scribbled:
>
>"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>
>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>
>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>
>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>> plane is unreliable
>>
>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
>> it stands there like a wall.
>>
>> --
>> Gregor
>
> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
>or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
>"artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
>art.
ENhancing, you stupid cunt. Learn to spell.
scribbled:
>
>"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>
>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>
>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>
>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>
>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>> plane is unreliable
>>
>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
>> it stands there like a wall.
>>
>> --
>> Gregor
>
> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
>or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
>"artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
>art.
ENhancing, you stupid cunt. Learn to spell.
| |
|
Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>scribbled:
>
>>
>><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>
>>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>>
>>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>>
>>> Talker
>>
>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
>
>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>circle.
>
Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
>On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>scribbled:
>
>>
>><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>
>>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>>
>>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>>
>>> Talker
>>
>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
>
>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>circle.
>
Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:45:39 -0700, Sir F. A. Rien
<jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> scribbled:
>Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>>scribbled:
>>
>>>
>>><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>>>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>>>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Talker
>>>
>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
>>
>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>circle.
>>
>Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
<jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> scribbled:
>Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>>scribbled:
>>
>>>
>>><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>>>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>>>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Talker
>>>
>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
>>
>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>circle.
>>
>Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:17:17 -0400, Voivod wrote in
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:04 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
> scribbled:
>
>>
>>"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>
>>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>>> plane is unreliable
>>>
>>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
>>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
>>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
>>> it stands there like a wall.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gregor
>>
>> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
>>or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
>>"artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
>>art.
>
> ENhancing, you stupid cunt. Learn to spell.
Enhancing, you stupid fudge packer. Learn capitalization.
--
idle
Medically speaking, how does giving marijuana to a terminally ill
patient cause damage?
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:04 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
> scribbled:
>
>>
>>"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>
>>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>>> plane is unreliable
>>>
>>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
>>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
>>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
>>> it stands there like a wall.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gregor
>>
>> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
>>or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
>>"artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
>>art.
>
> ENhancing, you stupid cunt. Learn to spell.
Enhancing, you stupid fudge packer. Learn capitalization.
--
idle
Medically speaking, how does giving marijuana to a terminally ill
patient cause damage?
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
come out, you lash out.
--
idle
Mama say, everybody little bit gay.
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
come out, you lash out.
--
idle
Mama say, everybody little bit gay.
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle <idle@mycomputer.com>
scribbled:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>
>Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>come out, you lash out.
Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
century!
Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
the fuck up.
scribbled:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>
>Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>come out, you lash out.
Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
century!
Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
the fuck up.
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:18:36 -0700, idle <idle@mycomputer.com>
scribbled:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:17:17 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:04 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>> scribbled:
>>
>>>
>>>"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>>>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>
>>>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>>>> plane is unreliable
>>>>
>>>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>>>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
>>>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
>>>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
>>>> it stands there like a wall.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gregor
>>>
>>> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
>>>or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
>>>"artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
>>>art.
>>
>> ENhancing, you stupid cunt. Learn to spell.
>
>Enhancing, you stupid fudge packer. Learn capitalization.
TWO! Two gay lames in the same day! Someone's repressing! What will you
do for an ENcore?
scribbled:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:17:17 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:04 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>> scribbled:
>>
>>>
>>>"Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>>>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>
>>>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>>>> plane is unreliable
>>>>
>>>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>>>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current coming
>>>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the pannier,
>>>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two. Instead,
>>>> it stands there like a wall.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gregor
>>>
>>> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is changed
>>>or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
>>>"artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form of
>>>art.
>>
>> ENhancing, you stupid cunt. Learn to spell.
>
>Enhancing, you stupid fudge packer. Learn capitalization.
TWO! Two gay lames in the same day! Someone's repressing! What will you
do for an ENcore?
| |
|
"idle" <idle@mycomputer.com> wrote in message
news:j4vntf$29a$1@dont-email.me...
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:04 -0400, Carrie wrote in
> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>
>>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>>> plane is unreliable
>>>
>>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current
>>> coming
>>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the
>>> pannier,
>>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two.
>>> Instead,
>>> it stands there like a wall.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gregor
>>
>> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is
>> changed
>> or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
>> "artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form
>> of
>> art.
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/236808/julia_roberts_ad_banne d_in_the_uk_for_abuse_of_photoshop.html
The L'Oreal TV ads in this country (for hair color, too) are "unreal". Of
course, the lighting, and such might also help. For one thing, they show a
model (or known actress) with long, thick hair, suppoosedly colored with
L'Oreal hair color. When one box of hair color is about enough for hair that
might be shoulder length. A person would have to buy 2 boxes to color the
long thick hair like they show. But I don't think it says this on the
commercials.
At one time, the person in the commercial supposedly had to actually use
the product they were showing. I wonder if some of these famous celebrities
(with the long thick hair) actually colored it (themselves) with one box of
L'Oreal.
Not really the topic (Photoshop) but related.
>
> --
> idle
> I have yet to decided whether to use my power for good...or for evil.
news:j4vntf$29a$1@dont-email.me...
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:04 -0400, Carrie wrote in
> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:4e734911$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net...
>>> On 15.09.2011 10:18, dorayme wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin
>>>>>>> _Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>
>>>>> Seems to me as if the surf in front of the motorcycle is a patch. Here
>>>>> is what I think is the outline of the patch (yellow line):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://coolhaus.de/misc/this-pic-is-doctored.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> The surf is an almost straight line, in reality it should align better
>>>>> with the shape of the pannier, the vehicle frame, the driver's knee.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the bike is moving forward, your expectation that the surf
>>>> would not appear roughly as a straight line perp to the 'film'
>>>> plane is unreliable
>>>
>>> So deeply immersed in Water, a bike can move only very slowly. The surf
>>> appears not to be caused by the bike's movement, but by the current
>>> coming
>>> from the left. Therefore, the surf should align closely with the
>>> pannier,
>>> the driver's knee and especially with the gap between these two.
>>> Instead,
>>> it stands there like a wall.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gregor
>>
>> I'm surprised there isn't a law passed now saying anything that is
>> changed
>> or "photoshopped" has to be marked that. Though it could also be seen as
>> "artistic license". Inhancing and changing- creating pictures is a form
>> of
>> art.
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/236808/julia_roberts_ad_banne d_in_the_uk_for_abuse_of_photoshop.html
The L'Oreal TV ads in this country (for hair color, too) are "unreal". Of
course, the lighting, and such might also help. For one thing, they show a
model (or known actress) with long, thick hair, suppoosedly colored with
L'Oreal hair color. When one box of hair color is about enough for hair that
might be shoulder length. A person would have to buy 2 boxes to color the
long thick hair like they show. But I don't think it says this on the
commercials.
At one time, the person in the commercial supposedly had to actually use
the product they were showing. I wonder if some of these famous celebrities
(with the long thick hair) actually colored it (themselves) with one box of
L'Oreal.
Not really the topic (Photoshop) but related.
>
> --
> idle
> I have yet to decided whether to use my power for good...or for evil.
| |
|
"Sir F. A. Rien" <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote in message
news:d8v677tfcejid4r05j51t851ejn35456bo@4ax.com...
> Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>>scribbled:
>>
>>>
>>><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>>>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>>>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Talker
>>>
>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and
>>> ask?
>>
>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>circle.
I'v have Voivod blocked from the first post, so it's sometimes hard to
figure out who's writing what on here.
But, I've been around others like her.
I know, we don't really know it's a woman, but I can't imagine a man
writing stuff like that. Like being bothered with it.
It's hard to believe there's more than one person online like that, but
there probably are. They must get something out of it, feel better about
themselves in some way.
>>
> Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
>
news:d8v677tfcejid4r05j51t851ejn35456bo@4ax.com...
> Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>>scribbled:
>>
>>>
>>><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>>>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>>>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Talker
>>>
>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and
>>> ask?
>>
>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>circle.
I'v have Voivod blocked from the first post, so it's sometimes hard to
figure out who's writing what on here.
But, I've been around others like her.
I know, we don't really know it's a woman, but I can't imagine a man
writing stuff like that. Like being bothered with it.
It's hard to believe there's more than one person online like that, but
there probably are. They must get something out of it, feel better about
themselves in some way.
>>
> Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
>
| |
|
It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
What a maroon.
On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
> scribbled:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>
>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>
>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>> come out, you lash out.
>
> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
> century!
>
> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
> the fuck up.
>
>
What a maroon.
On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
> scribbled:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>
>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>
>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>> come out, you lash out.
>
> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
> century!
>
> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
> the fuck up.
>
>
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:12:06 -0400, Craig Schiller wrote in
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>> scribbled:
>>
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>
>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>
>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>> come out, you lash out.
>>
>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>> century!
>>
>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>> the fuck up.
>>
>>
> It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
> What a maroon.
Top posting fixed ;)
BTW, Vulva was referring to his /viral/ video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhmKX3JsSK4
He just misspelled it.
--
idle
Medically speaking, how does giving marijuana to a terminally ill
patient cause damage?
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>> scribbled:
>>
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>
>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>
>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>> come out, you lash out.
>>
>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>> century!
>>
>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>> the fuck up.
>>
>>
> It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
> What a maroon.
Top posting fixed ;)
BTW, Vulva was referring to his /viral/ video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhmKX3JsSK4
He just misspelled it.
--
idle
Medically speaking, how does giving marijuana to a terminally ill
patient cause damage?
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:35:24 -0700, idle wrote in
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:12:06 -0400, Craig Schiller wrote in
> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>>> scribbled:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>>
>>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>>
>>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>>> come out, you lash out.
>>>
>>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>>> century!
>>>
>>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>>> the fuck up.
>>>
>>>
>> It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
>> What a maroon.
>
> Top posting fixed ;)
>
> BTW, Vulva was referring to his /viral/ video.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhmKX3JsSK4
> He just misspelled it.
His refurbish looks better though.
http://youtu.be/z4t04m0EoXY
I guess all things change... in time.
--
idle
Make awkward sexual advances. Not war.
alt.graphics.photoshop:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:12:06 -0400, Craig Schiller wrote in
> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>>> scribbled:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>>
>>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>>
>>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>>> come out, you lash out.
>>>
>>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>>> century!
>>>
>>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>>> the fuck up.
>>>
>>>
>> It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
>> What a maroon.
>
> Top posting fixed ;)
>
> BTW, Vulva was referring to his /viral/ video.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhmKX3JsSK4
> He just misspelled it.
His refurbish looks better though.
http://youtu.be/z4t04m0EoXY
I guess all things change... in time.
--
idle
Make awkward sexual advances. Not war.
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:12:06 -0400, Craig Schiller
<cschiller1@earthlink.net> scribbled:
>It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
>What a maroon.
I'm sorry. When the opinion of top posting morons matters I'll let you
know.
P.S. YOU DIDN'T GET THE JOKE YOU FUCKING RETARDED IDIOT.
>On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>> scribbled:
>>
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>
>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>
>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>> come out, you lash out.
>>
>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>> century!
>>
>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>> the fuck up.
>>
>>
<cschiller1@earthlink.net> scribbled:
>It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
>What a maroon.
I'm sorry. When the opinion of top posting morons matters I'll let you
know.
P.S. YOU DIDN'T GET THE JOKE YOU FUCKING RETARDED IDIOT.
>On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>> scribbled:
>>
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>
>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>
>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>> come out, you lash out.
>>
>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>> century!
>>
>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>> the fuck up.
>>
>>
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:35:24 -0700, idle <idle@mycomputer.com>
scribbled:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:12:06 -0400, Craig Schiller wrote in
>alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>
>> On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>>> scribbled:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>>
>>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>>
>>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>>> come out, you lash out.
>>>
>>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>>> century!
>>>
>>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>>> the fuck up.
>>>
>>>
>> It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
>> What a maroon.
>
>Top posting fixed ;)
>
>BTW, Vulva was referring to his /viral/ video.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhmKX3JsSK4
>He just misspelled it.
NAME Lames! How cute! It's like 1991 came back and bitch slapped you.
scribbled:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:12:06 -0400, Craig Schiller wrote in
>alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>
>> On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>>> scribbled:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>>
>>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>>
>>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>>> come out, you lash out.
>>>
>>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>>> century!
>>>
>>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>>> the fuck up.
>>>
>>>
>> It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
>> What a maroon.
>
>Top posting fixed ;)
>
>BTW, Vulva was referring to his /viral/ video.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhmKX3JsSK4
>He just misspelled it.
NAME Lames! How cute! It's like 1991 came back and bitch slapped you.
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:47:12 -0700, idle <idle@mycomputer.com>
scribbled:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:35:24 -0700, idle wrote in
>alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:12:06 -0400, Craig Schiller wrote in
>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>
>>> On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>>>> scribbled:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>>>> come out, you lash out.
>>>>
>>>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>>>> century!
>>>>
>>>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>>>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>>>> the fuck up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
>>> What a maroon.
>>
>> Top posting fixed ;)
>>
>> BTW, Vulva was referring to his /viral/ video.
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhmKX3JsSK4
>> He just misspelled it.
>
>His refurbish looks better though.
>http://youtu.be/z4t04m0EoXY
>I guess all things change... in time.
Two homophobic posts. Name lames AND replying to yourself. It's like
you're writing a Usenet Kook manifesto all by yourself. Please, do
continue imagining you have some effect other than being an object to
ridicule and poke fun at.
scribbled:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:35:24 -0700, idle wrote in
>alt.graphics.photoshop:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:12:06 -0400, Craig Schiller wrote in
>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>
>>> On 09/16/2011 3:50 PM, Voivod wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:36:16 -0700, idle<idle@mycomputer.com>
>>>> scribbled:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:50:20 -0400, Voivod wrote in
>>>>> alt.graphics.photoshop:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course we do. I my experience, your kind of hatred only exists due to
>>>>> your not coming to grips and accepting your sexuality. Rather than just
>>>>> come out, you lash out.
>>>>
>>>> Wow, look everyone, one of the last homophobes leftover from the 20th
>>>> century!
>>>>
>>>> Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me mad, amateur? "OOooO
>>>> YOUR GHAY!!! NEENER!" What, are you twelve? Get back to me when you grow
>>>> the fuck up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It's YOU'RE, not YOUR, numbnuts. And you're correcting other people?
>>> What a maroon.
>>
>> Top posting fixed ;)
>>
>> BTW, Vulva was referring to his /viral/ video.
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhmKX3JsSK4
>> He just misspelled it.
>
>His refurbish looks better though.
>http://youtu.be/z4t04m0EoXY
>I guess all things change... in time.
Two homophobic posts. Name lames AND replying to yourself. It's like
you're writing a Usenet Kook manifesto all by yourself. Please, do
continue imagining you have some effect other than being an object to
ridicule and poke fun at.
| |
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:04:06 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
scribbled:
>
>"Sir F. A. Rien" <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote in message
>news:d8v677tfcejid4r05j51t851ejn35456bo@4ax.com...
>> Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>>>scribbled:
>>>
>>>>
>>>><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>>>>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Talker
>>>>
>>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and
>>>> ask?
>>>
>>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>>circle.
>
> I'v have Voivod blocked from the first post, so it's sometimes hard to
>figure out who's writing what on here.
That's because you're too fucking stupid to figure out attributes and
quote levels.
> But, I've been around others like her.
Heh, her.
> I know, we don't really know it's a woman, but I can't imagine a man
>writing stuff like that. Like being bothered with it.
You can't imagine a world where you're a useless harridan whom no one
cares about... Too bad you're in one.
> It's hard to believe there's more than one person online like that, but
>there probably are. They must get something out of it, feel better about
>themselves in some way.
Aww, amateur psychology from a prattling douche who hides behind their
filters.
scribbled:
>
>"Sir F. A. Rien" <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote in message
>news:d8v677tfcejid4r05j51t851ejn35456bo@4ax.com...
>> Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400, "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net>
>>>scribbled:
>>>
>>>>
>>>><Talker@thegood.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:jqk3771atgcg64lc3qau8k0vo81rkto045@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0200, "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I am having a discussion in another newsgroup about this pic:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.ultimatemotorcycling.com/files/2009_BMW_R_1200_GS _Michael_Martin_Planet_Desert%207.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think it is fake. What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, if it was a fake, it would look like this.
>>>>> http://s1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa324/johnnydough1/?acti on=view¤t=2009_BMW_R_1200_GS_Michael_Martin_Planet _Desert7a.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Talker
>>>>
>>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and
>>>> ask?
>>>
>>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>>circle.
>
> I'v have Voivod blocked from the first post, so it's sometimes hard to
>figure out who's writing what on here.
That's because you're too fucking stupid to figure out attributes and
quote levels.
> But, I've been around others like her.
Heh, her.
> I know, we don't really know it's a woman, but I can't imagine a man
>writing stuff like that. Like being bothered with it.
You can't imagine a world where you're a useless harridan whom no one
cares about... Too bad you're in one.
> It's hard to believe there's more than one person online like that, but
>there probably are. They must get something out of it, feel better about
>themselves in some way.
Aww, amateur psychology from a prattling douche who hides behind their
filters.
| |
|
In article <IkJcq.7934$mA3.7517@newsfe19.iad>,
"Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net> wrote:
>
> Interesting topic for discussion, overall. So much now is doctored, there's
> even a word for it now (outside of graphic design/art) "photoshopped".
> (well I'm sure everyone here knows this.)
No. Now it's called PhotoChopped.
"Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net> wrote:
>
> Interesting topic for discussion, overall. So much now is doctored, there's
> even a word for it now (outside of graphic design/art) "photoshopped".
> (well I'm sure everyone here knows this.)
No. Now it's called PhotoChopped.
| |
|
On 2011-09-16 19:07:31 -0700, John J Stafford <john@stafford.invalid> said:
> In article <IkJcq.7934$mA3.7517@newsfe19.iad>,
> "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting topic for discussion, overall. So much now is doctored, there's
>> even a word for it now (outside of graphic design/art) "photoshopped".
>> (well I'm sure everyone here knows this.)
>
> No. Now it's called PhotoChopped.
Only if you are from East L.A. ;-)
--
Regards,
Savageduck
> In article <IkJcq.7934$mA3.7517@newsfe19.iad>,
> "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting topic for discussion, overall. So much now is doctored, there's
>> even a word for it now (outside of graphic design/art) "photoshopped".
>> (well I'm sure everyone here knows this.)
>
> No. Now it's called PhotoChopped.
Only if you are from East L.A. ;-)
--
Regards,
Savageduck
| |
|
"John J Stafford" <john@stafford.invalid> wrote in message
news:john-C01263.21073116092011@news.supernews.com...
> In article <IkJcq.7934$mA3.7517@newsfe19.iad>,
> "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting topic for discussion, overall. So much now is doctored,
>> there's
>> even a word for it now (outside of graphic design/art) "photoshopped".
>> (well I'm sure everyone here knows this.)
>
> No. Now it's called PhotoChopped.
LOL
news:john-C01263.21073116092011@news.supernews.com...
> In article <IkJcq.7934$mA3.7517@newsfe19.iad>,
> "Carrie" <starchild1124@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting topic for discussion, overall. So much now is doctored,
>> there's
>> even a word for it now (outside of graphic design/art) "photoshopped".
>> (well I'm sure everyone here knows this.)
>
> No. Now it's called PhotoChopped.
LOL
| |
|
Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:45:39 -0700, Sir F. A. Rien
>>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
>>>
>>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>>circle.
>>>
>>Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
>
>Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
Au contraire, ma petite.
It's to put down others so that you can rise in your own esteem.
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:45:39 -0700, Sir F. A. Rien
>>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
>>>
>>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>>circle.
>>>
>>Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
>
>Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
Au contraire, ma petite.
It's to put down others so that you can rise in your own esteem.
| |
|
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:30:36 -0700, Sir F. A. Rien
<jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> scribbled:
>Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>
>>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:45:39 -0700, Sir F. A. Rien
>
>>>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
>>>>
>>>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>>>circle.
>>>>
>>>Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
>>
>>Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>
>Au contraire, ma petite.
>
>It's to put down others so that you can rise in your own esteem.
Close, but no cigar!
<jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> scribbled:
>Voivod <Voi@vod.con> found these unused words:
>
>>On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:45:39 -0700, Sir F. A. Rien
>
>>>>> Can we find out the source of the picture, who took it/posted it and ask?
>>>>
>>>>Can you just SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE! Good fucking gods
>>>>you go on and on like some over medicated douche-bag at her knitting
>>>>circle.
>>>>
>>>Still haven't found out how to use your kill filter, eh?
>>
>>Still haven't figured out why I'm here, have you?
>
>Au contraire, ma petite.
>
>It's to put down others so that you can rise in your own esteem.
Close, but no cigar!
| Pages (2): [1 2 › »] | |
| Previous Topic: | Good discussions |
| Next Topic: | Font identification |
Adobe Photoshop plug-ins, tools, tutorials and user discussions