Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home| Forum: Photoshop for Mac | ||
|---|---|---|
| Topic: Faking It |
  |
  |
After scanning the original of a clients old portrait I realize the
restore color function of the scanner is only so good. I appears the
dots are dye that was used to spot the image as most have small white
dust underlaying them. May question is: Is there a work around to gang
remove the color portion using channels or some quick device, it looks
like the worse part are in the Blue and Green channels. So is there a
way to fix this quickly and easily rather than using the healing or
clone tools.
--
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
greg_____photo(dot)com
restore color function of the scanner is only so good. I appears the
dots are dye that was used to spot the image as most have small white
dust underlaying them. May question is: Is there a work around to gang
remove the color portion using channels or some quick device, it looks
like the worse part are in the Blue and Green channels. So is there a
way to fix this quickly and easily rather than using the healing or
clone tools.
--
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
greg_____photo(dot)com
| |
|
Please donate to help five needy families during this holiday season! Even a
one dollar gift will help greatly to provide food and gifts for five selected
under privileged families!
<form action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="cmd" value="_s-xclick">
<input type="image" src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/btn/x-click-but21.gif" border="0" name="submit" alt="Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!">
<img alt="" border="0" src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif" width="1" height="1">
<input type="hidden" name="encrypted" value="-----BEGIN PKCS7-----MIIH6QYJKoZIhvcNAQcEoIIH2jCCB9YCAQExggEwMIIBLAIBAD CBlDCBjjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAkNBMRYwFAYDVQQHEw1Nb3 VudGFpbiBWaWV3MRQwEgYDVQQKEwtQYXlQYWwgSW5jLjETMBEGA1UECxQKbG l2ZV9jZXJ0czERMA8GA1UEAxQIbGl2ZV9hcGkxHDAaBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWDX JlQHBheXBhbC5jb20CAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYAgHuDyzjih8K9shj K8wL+bJnzNriDMw/XbvjBb0rmvhdUW8F81sYqWsWjJw4T9J+ZGJ/0QJ7885Z 9LQdCBNznbPjxoXY/L2qLWsGTvhQ9s7H0+Tyc29NWxfRKlRs4g8xlUm3J6lT CRBLrLJP8weWmqYJlSJwsk78Wum7JF8vUmtzELMAkGBSsOAwIaBQAwggFlBg kqhkiG9w0BBwEwFAYIKoZIhvcNAwcECG/RTpkmQSRmgIIBQGXjtmoiKlGYm1 pnmH1a1IIvI7mdLxmYObqU8V7V4JUPmMJmgwnN1W6E0LcVHyYra25uQmzvXK GXtNrE+4ABR3IYGH9ucSdwcjUObeZtoImTDBQ8zbKttJB2oDpVii35JKwPcY /bAlt9v4rFxJvFntTxP3QkzMSUNWx3d4UxphOaPX/k6qrZx23EYb3NROERw5 cUDt1Q2Au2OgVMlDR3xP2WzIUmK/HS1bDCNDonCLGz9V0va19y0CPDEgkYZj 0T+ij17W1xyg55RecWWmW0Zpc6K61GEXwuNfL/pQ3M3fkCjYnqZI1JNvFEb4 M64jfYuPUXVnzIRuGZEQHRrY2pBiudVMpq361GE6ECbxwaNThWkkYLE2PzxC 4zvn43L6rKdL6meU/ADdbvnYgNhFBUm4kUznWFGPQGPz8QuGcrD3xdoIIDhz CCA4MwggLsoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgY4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAl VTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJDQTEWMBQGA1UEBxMNTW91bnRhaW4gVmlldzEUMBIGA1 UEChMLUGF5UGFsIEluYy4xEzARBgNVBAsUCmxpdmVfY2VydHMxETAPBgNVBA MUCGxpdmVfYXBpMRwwGgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFg1yZUBwYXlwYWwuY29tMB4XDT A0MDIxMzEwMTMxNVoXDTM1MDIxMzEwMTMxNVowgY4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQ swCQYDVQQIEwJDQTEWMBQGA1UEBxMNTW91bnRhaW4gVmlldzEUMBIGA1UECh MLUGF5UGFsIEluYy4xEzARBgNVBAsUCmxpdmVfY2VydHMxETAPBgNVBAMUCG xpdmVfYXBpMRwwGgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFg1yZUBwYXlwYWwuY29tMIGfMA0GCS qGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDBR07d/ETMS1ycjtkpkvjXZe9k+6CieL uLsPumsJ7QC1odNz3sJiCbs2wC0nLE0uLGaEtXynIgRqIddYCHx88pb5HTXv 4SZeuv0Rqq4+axW9PLAAATU8w04qqjaSXgbGLP3NmohqM6bV9kZZwZLR/klD aQGo1u9uDb9lr4Yn+rBQIDAQABo4HuMIHrMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSWn3y7xm8XvV k/UtcKG+wQ1mSUazCBuwYDVR0jBIGzMIGwgBSWn3y7xm8XvVk/UtcKG+wQ1m SUa6GBlKSBkTCBjjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAkNBMRYwFAYDVQ QHEw1Nb3VudGFpbiBWaWV3MRQwEgYDVQQKEwtQYXlQYWwgSW5jLjETMBEGA1 UECxQKbGl2ZV9jZXJ0czERMA8GA1UEAxQIbGl2ZV9hcGkxHDAaBgkqhkiG9w 0BCQEWDXJlQHBheXBhbC5jb22CAQAwDAYDVR0TBAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w 0BAQUFAAOBgQCBXzpWmoBa5e9fo6ujionW1hUhPkOBakTr3YCDjbYfvJEiv/ 2P+IobhOGJr85+XHhN0v4gUkEDI8r2/rNk1m0GA8HKddvTjyGw/XqXa+LSTl DYkqI8OwR8GEYj4efEtcRpRYBxV8KxAW93YDWzFGvruKnnLbDAF6VR5w/cCM n5hzGCAZowggGWAgEBMIGUMIGOMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzELMAkGA1UECBMCQ0 ExFjAUBgNVBAcTDU1vdW50YWluIFZpZXcxFDASBgNVBAoTC1BheVBhbCBJbm MuMRMwEQYDVQQLFApsaXZlX2NlcnRzMREwDwYDVQQDFAhsaXZlX2FwaTEcMB oGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYNcmVAcGF5cGFsLmNvbQIBADAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoF0wGA YJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYxMj ExMTYyMzA3WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUW11R5/zxKwv8JIgxvladB6c/O4 IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYC8WhAS2a8j+J1RpsOxclyXl86FPwjEvhMTwr +Rw1s0WgqysDSHQtFt9jS8ZVn2VRya0GVqI6TCxYRzmzFmyF5Odhyc5iJJ5/ al7kzrMBvIWrpL6mf4O9AGmKyccdMzMBSpSCt1B3+l1I17Nu6Hmv5z3Jjn0H JZuVIr99qT/81WHA==-----END PKCS7-----
">
</form>
Your generous donation is greatly appreciated! If you cannot afford to give,
please forward this message to a few of your friends.
May the Lord bless and keep you safe from harm and danger during this
wonderful holiday season!
--
one dollar gift will help greatly to provide food and gifts for five selected
under privileged families!
<form action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="cmd" value="_s-xclick">
<input type="image" src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/btn/x-click-but21.gif" border="0" name="submit" alt="Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!">
<img alt="" border="0" src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif" width="1" height="1">
<input type="hidden" name="encrypted" value="-----BEGIN PKCS7-----MIIH6QYJKoZIhvcNAQcEoIIH2jCCB9YCAQExggEwMIIBLAIBAD CBlDCBjjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAkNBMRYwFAYDVQQHEw1Nb3 VudGFpbiBWaWV3MRQwEgYDVQQKEwtQYXlQYWwgSW5jLjETMBEGA1UECxQKbG l2ZV9jZXJ0czERMA8GA1UEAxQIbGl2ZV9hcGkxHDAaBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWDX JlQHBheXBhbC5jb20CAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYAgHuDyzjih8K9shj K8wL+bJnzNriDMw/XbvjBb0rmvhdUW8F81sYqWsWjJw4T9J+ZGJ/0QJ7885Z 9LQdCBNznbPjxoXY/L2qLWsGTvhQ9s7H0+Tyc29NWxfRKlRs4g8xlUm3J6lT CRBLrLJP8weWmqYJlSJwsk78Wum7JF8vUmtzELMAkGBSsOAwIaBQAwggFlBg kqhkiG9w0BBwEwFAYIKoZIhvcNAwcECG/RTpkmQSRmgIIBQGXjtmoiKlGYm1 pnmH1a1IIvI7mdLxmYObqU8V7V4JUPmMJmgwnN1W6E0LcVHyYra25uQmzvXK GXtNrE+4ABR3IYGH9ucSdwcjUObeZtoImTDBQ8zbKttJB2oDpVii35JKwPcY /bAlt9v4rFxJvFntTxP3QkzMSUNWx3d4UxphOaPX/k6qrZx23EYb3NROERw5 cUDt1Q2Au2OgVMlDR3xP2WzIUmK/HS1bDCNDonCLGz9V0va19y0CPDEgkYZj 0T+ij17W1xyg55RecWWmW0Zpc6K61GEXwuNfL/pQ3M3fkCjYnqZI1JNvFEb4 M64jfYuPUXVnzIRuGZEQHRrY2pBiudVMpq361GE6ECbxwaNThWkkYLE2PzxC 4zvn43L6rKdL6meU/ADdbvnYgNhFBUm4kUznWFGPQGPz8QuGcrD3xdoIIDhz CCA4MwggLsoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgY4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAl VTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJDQTEWMBQGA1UEBxMNTW91bnRhaW4gVmlldzEUMBIGA1 UEChMLUGF5UGFsIEluYy4xEzARBgNVBAsUCmxpdmVfY2VydHMxETAPBgNVBA MUCGxpdmVfYXBpMRwwGgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFg1yZUBwYXlwYWwuY29tMB4XDT A0MDIxMzEwMTMxNVoXDTM1MDIxMzEwMTMxNVowgY4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQ swCQYDVQQIEwJDQTEWMBQGA1UEBxMNTW91bnRhaW4gVmlldzEUMBIGA1UECh MLUGF5UGFsIEluYy4xEzARBgNVBAsUCmxpdmVfY2VydHMxETAPBgNVBAMUCG xpdmVfYXBpMRwwGgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFg1yZUBwYXlwYWwuY29tMIGfMA0GCS qGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDBR07d/ETMS1ycjtkpkvjXZe9k+6CieL uLsPumsJ7QC1odNz3sJiCbs2wC0nLE0uLGaEtXynIgRqIddYCHx88pb5HTXv 4SZeuv0Rqq4+axW9PLAAATU8w04qqjaSXgbGLP3NmohqM6bV9kZZwZLR/klD aQGo1u9uDb9lr4Yn+rBQIDAQABo4HuMIHrMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSWn3y7xm8XvV k/UtcKG+wQ1mSUazCBuwYDVR0jBIGzMIGwgBSWn3y7xm8XvVk/UtcKG+wQ1m SUa6GBlKSBkTCBjjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAkNBMRYwFAYDVQ QHEw1Nb3VudGFpbiBWaWV3MRQwEgYDVQQKEwtQYXlQYWwgSW5jLjETMBEGA1 UECxQKbGl2ZV9jZXJ0czERMA8GA1UEAxQIbGl2ZV9hcGkxHDAaBgkqhkiG9w 0BCQEWDXJlQHBheXBhbC5jb22CAQAwDAYDVR0TBAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w 0BAQUFAAOBgQCBXzpWmoBa5e9fo6ujionW1hUhPkOBakTr3YCDjbYfvJEiv/ 2P+IobhOGJr85+XHhN0v4gUkEDI8r2/rNk1m0GA8HKddvTjyGw/XqXa+LSTl DYkqI8OwR8GEYj4efEtcRpRYBxV8KxAW93YDWzFGvruKnnLbDAF6VR5w/cCM n5hzGCAZowggGWAgEBMIGUMIGOMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzELMAkGA1UECBMCQ0 ExFjAUBgNVBAcTDU1vdW50YWluIFZpZXcxFDASBgNVBAoTC1BheVBhbCBJbm MuMRMwEQYDVQQLFApsaXZlX2NlcnRzMREwDwYDVQQDFAhsaXZlX2FwaTEcMB oGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYNcmVAcGF5cGFsLmNvbQIBADAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoF0wGA YJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYxMj ExMTYyMzA3WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUW11R5/zxKwv8JIgxvladB6c/O4 IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYC8WhAS2a8j+J1RpsOxclyXl86FPwjEvhMTwr +Rw1s0WgqysDSHQtFt9jS8ZVn2VRya0GVqI6TCxYRzmzFmyF5Odhyc5iJJ5/ al7kzrMBvIWrpL6mf4O9AGmKyccdMzMBSpSCt1B3+l1I17Nu6Hmv5z3Jjn0H JZuVIr99qT/81WHA==-----END PKCS7-----
">
</form>
Your generous donation is greatly appreciated! If you cannot afford to give,
please forward this message to a few of your friends.
May the Lord bless and keep you safe from harm and danger during this
wonderful holiday season!
--
| |
|
I have about 300 photos in a folder that need to be chaned from rgb to cmyk. is there a way to set up an action/batch process to open, change color, save, close, open next <repeat>... in other words i want to automate this task so i don't have to sit in front of the computer for hours.
| |
|
I am trying to crop a lot of pictures all of different sizes to the
same size by automating the task however when I put the size in and
record the process they never seem to come out the same size. What
should I do to make them all the same? Am I missing something somewhere?
same size by automating the task however when I put the size in and
record the process they never seem to come out the same size. What
should I do to make them all the same? Am I missing something somewhere?
| |
|
So.. I'm working on a website last night. I set it up in Photoshop and then move to Imageready to do the final output before I drop it into Dreamweaver.
Working with PS 7 here.
I set up my slices in Photoshop. I move to Imageready and everything looks fine... UNTIL, I click on the "Optimize" tab at the top. When I do that, it MOVES one of the layers/slices from the left to the center of the document. WTF? How do I make it not do that? I cant figure it out.
Chris
edit/ Oh.. and I didnt have a problem with any of the other pages I had done the same thing with. I have 2 photoshop files.. one for the main index page, and another for the product pages. The product pages went just fine for what I was updating. But its this other PSD file that moves once its into Imageready and the Optimize tab is hit.
Working with PS 7 here.
I set up my slices in Photoshop. I move to Imageready and everything looks fine... UNTIL, I click on the "Optimize" tab at the top. When I do that, it MOVES one of the layers/slices from the left to the center of the document. WTF? How do I make it not do that? I cant figure it out.
Chris
edit/ Oh.. and I didnt have a problem with any of the other pages I had done the same thing with. I have 2 photoshop files.. one for the main index page, and another for the product pages. The product pages went just fine for what I was updating. But its this other PSD file that moves once its into Imageready and the Optimize tab is hit.
| |
|
On PS CS2 the Flash Galleries seem impossible to edit. If you open index.htm in DW you get 'You need to enable Javascript to view this page. Flash gives 'Flash cannot open protected movie'. Like most users I want to customise the page to my web site coulr design etc.. The Help Screens I think have not been updated as they only refer to the HTML web galleries.Is everyone else stuck on this or has someone found a solution
| |
|
Seems to me that prior CS2 soft brushes -- 0-50% hardness, say -- tapered gently for the full diameter.
With CS2 they fall off abruptly from a harder center with apparently no effect at the edges. Even my custom brushes from way-back paint differently in CS2. To get a gentle taper I need to make a huge brush, often too huge to be practical.
Or am I nuts here?
With CS2 they fall off abruptly from a harder center with apparently no effect at the edges. Even my custom brushes from way-back paint differently in CS2. To get a gentle taper I need to make a huge brush, often too huge to be practical.
Or am I nuts here?
| |
|
I was wondering if there where anyother good forums for graphic designers like this really helpfull one?
| |
|
I'm making a banner slideshow (changing images) for the first time. I've managed to create one with Image Ready, but the transition is very abrupt. How can I make a dissolve transition.? Also, is this the best program for this technique? I do own LiveMotion, but I've never used it!
Thank you
Thank you
| |
|
Hi all!.
I'm new in this newsgroup and here for one big reason.
I've created a new website for creating free Graphical Polls that you can use on forums, websites and even in your email.
Example:
http://www.gfxpoll.nl/poll.php?id=1&layout=blackgray
and another possible layout (wich we have more!)
http://www.gfxpoll.nl/poll.php?id=1&layout=yellowspeekup
But i'd would like to have some more poll layouts to use on other websites. I'm going to translate the website into english and possible other languages and expand this service... hopefully it stays free for ever... as it has been for over an year now.
If you like to help. please do the following.
Create a nice design for a poll in a PSD or just a JPEG image. Send it to (eric_bruggema-@_hotmail-.-com) remove the spaces and underlines/stripes!
If you like you can add your name/website name in the image...
Thank you alot!
Greetings,
Eric Bruggema
I'm new in this newsgroup and here for one big reason.
I've created a new website for creating free Graphical Polls that you can use on forums, websites and even in your email.
Example:
http://www.gfxpoll.nl/poll.php?id=1&layout=blackgray
and another possible layout (wich we have more!)
http://www.gfxpoll.nl/poll.php?id=1&layout=yellowspeekup
But i'd would like to have some more poll layouts to use on other websites. I'm going to translate the website into english and possible other languages and expand this service... hopefully it stays free for ever... as it has been for over an year now.
If you like to help. please do the following.
Create a nice design for a poll in a PSD or just a JPEG image. Send it to (eric_bruggema-@_hotmail-.-com) remove the spaces and underlines/stripes!
If you like you can add your name/website name in the image...
Thank you alot!
Greetings,
Eric Bruggema
| |
|
Someone mentioned to me, that you can animate the layers of a photoshop
file. In PhotoShop I create multi layered file that is a digital
engraving, which is a narrative scene. It basically a digital collage of
many layers which I flatten and print as a fine art print. I friend of
mine, said I should animate the layers into a small animation. Does
anybody know how to do this easily. Thanks scotto13_1999@yahoo.com
file. In PhotoShop I create multi layered file that is a digital
engraving, which is a narrative scene. It basically a digital collage of
many layers which I flatten and print as a fine art print. I friend of
mine, said I should animate the layers into a small animation. Does
anybody know how to do this easily. Thanks scotto13_1999@yahoo.com
| |
|
Hello,
I wish to adjust the timing of the next image in a Web Photo Gallery (Horizontal Sideshow). I've found the basic web photo gallery html files but which part of the code do I need to adjust to make the slide show go twice as fast as now?
Best regards,
Wim
I wish to adjust the timing of the next image in a Web Photo Gallery (Horizontal Sideshow). I've found the basic web photo gallery html files but which part of the code do I need to adjust to make the slide show go twice as fast as now?
Best regards,
Wim
| |
|
I'm working with this 10,000px x 18337px TIFF file that I've got to
slice up into 110 equal pieces. I divided it into slices, but the file
was too big for ImageReady to handle. So I split up the image manually,
and it took forever.
Is there any way to automate this in Photoshop? It seems like there
should be.
-Porter
slice up into 110 equal pieces. I divided it into slices, but the file
was too big for ImageReady to handle. So I split up the image manually,
and it took forever.
Is there any way to automate this in Photoshop? It seems like there
should be.
-Porter
| |
|
I have made a new color profile for my Apple Cinema 23" using a Monaco
calibrator. The new profile does not appear in the "Color" section in the
"Displays" dialog box under "System Preferences"; only the "Apple Cinema HD"
profile that comes with the system is shown. Thus, I can't select the new
profile to be the standard for the machine.
I know there are several different locations for Profiles in OS 10.4.8
(which I'm using on a PowerPC G4 Dual Processor desktop).
Where should the custom display profile be placed in order to be recognized
by the system?
Thanks!
Ed in Dallas
calibrator. The new profile does not appear in the "Color" section in the
"Displays" dialog box under "System Preferences"; only the "Apple Cinema HD"
profile that comes with the system is shown. Thus, I can't select the new
profile to be the standard for the machine.
I know there are several different locations for Profiles in OS 10.4.8
(which I'm using on a PowerPC G4 Dual Processor desktop).
Where should the custom display profile be placed in order to be recognized
by the system?
Thanks!
Ed in Dallas
| |
|
I'm not really sure whether Wombats are any good.
The picture on Wikipedia looks like a horrid little Pig.
Quite Obscene.
Just not English.
314
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
The picture on Wikipedia looks like a horrid little Pig.
Quite Obscene.
Just not English.
314
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
|
Can someone tell me whether Wombats live only in Australia,
or also on other continents?
Apart from zoos, of course.
We all know that Wombats are to be found in Zoos.
314
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
or also on other continents?
Apart from zoos, of course.
We all know that Wombats are to be found in Zoos.
314
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
|
Can someone tell me whether Wombats live only in Australia,
or also on other continents?
Apart from zoos, of course.
116
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
or also on other continents?
Apart from zoos, of course.
116
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
|
I have been experiencing a 3+ second delay in the toolbox windows opening to hidden tools. When I select the appropriate tool and keep it selected the hidden tools don't show up for several seconds. I have uninstalled and reinstalled CS2 with no help. I am in OS 10.4.8 on a Mac Pro 2.66, 5 gb Ram, 3 250gb hard drives, 2 in a RAID 0. This problem existed on my old machine too, G4, 800, OS 10.3.9.
I don't have this problem on any of my other machines, G4's, G5's and PC's.
Thanks for any help,
Kim
I don't have this problem on any of my other machines, G4's, G5's and PC's.
Thanks for any help,
Kim
| |
|
Every time i open a PS document with layers it says it needs opdating. i say OK .. work and save.. but the opdate request come everytime i open the document ?
Why dos i do that .. anny thing i can do to not get this everytime i open a PS ?
Why dos i do that .. anny thing i can do to not get this everytime i open a PS ?
| |
|
Hi there, all
I am a multi-media artist who just got a record/picture deal, and part of what I will owe is 4 new music videos. One of the ideas that I have incorporates an animated video for which I will need a designer. He/she does not need to know how to do cell-animation. I will be shooting all the characters in a bluescreen studio and matting them into the hand-drawn environment. I'm looking for somebody who is familiar with the Windsor McCay's "Little Nemo In Slumberland" aesthetic.
Anyway, I'm not sure if anyone here is interested. Please email me if you are. fredo (at) fredoviola (dot) com
On top of that, however, I have never searched for a designer and wonder if anyone can give suggestions on how to find a NY-based designer... Are there cool websites? I guess I want to stay away from big agencies, because although there is a relatively healthy budget, it sure ain't no commercial budget!
Any help whatsoever would be very very appreciated! Thanks so much!
Best,
Fredo Viola
<http://www.fredoviola.com>
I am a multi-media artist who just got a record/picture deal, and part of what I will owe is 4 new music videos. One of the ideas that I have incorporates an animated video for which I will need a designer. He/she does not need to know how to do cell-animation. I will be shooting all the characters in a bluescreen studio and matting them into the hand-drawn environment. I'm looking for somebody who is familiar with the Windsor McCay's "Little Nemo In Slumberland" aesthetic.
Anyway, I'm not sure if anyone here is interested. Please email me if you are. fredo (at) fredoviola (dot) com
On top of that, however, I have never searched for a designer and wonder if anyone can give suggestions on how to find a NY-based designer... Are there cool websites? I guess I want to stay away from big agencies, because although there is a relatively healthy budget, it sure ain't no commercial budget!
Any help whatsoever would be very very appreciated! Thanks so much!
Best,
Fredo Viola
<http://www.fredoviola.com>
| |
|
Succes with some 3rd party software like SteerMouse ?
I'm curious about the number of buttons , I would like to be able to
change brush size with those.
I'm on Logitech MX518 now..
( Jeff Schewe recomendation, and good piece of hardware )
I'm curious about the number of buttons , I would like to be able to
change brush size with those.
I'm on Logitech MX518 now..
( Jeff Schewe recomendation, and good piece of hardware )
| |
|
Is Katherine Trimble an envy racist bigot?
A person, mistakenly think that she's in his friend list. However,
rather than denying it, she'll simply give a friendly reply.
>Hi [My Friends' name]
>
>Many thanks for your message.
>
>Remind me what *** is again?
>
>There are some networks that I simply don't bother with anymore.
>
>Best wishes
>
>Katherine
Such mutual communication automatically make each person in the friend
list of another in a social networking site.
Not suspicious of any problem, the person then build his business
network in a friendly manner to many of those in his list, which
unfortunately include the old hag.
Soon, the beldam is engaged in serious slandering campaign the person.
She claimed that never communicated at all with the person, which is
false. She claimed that the person is spamming, the claim that does not
match the official rule. She also claimed that the person is pretending
to be her friend to get her friends.
The accusation is absurd. Who the hell does she think she is that
anyone would pretend to be her friend? What makes her so arrogant?
What sort of idiot cannot tell a different between someone trying to be
friendly to many people and someone trying to fraudulently get extra
credibility by pretending to be someone's friend?
Thinking this is just a friendly misunderstanding, the person simply
explained to Katherine:
>I don't mind your comments about me as long as it is true. So keep in mind that we did chat in a friendly way and we were indeed in
>each other network, which you can check, before saying anything about me. Also, *******'s definition of spamming is trying to sell
>something without intent to network which is far from what I do.
>I'll try to get both of us disconnected. ...you could have understood and tell me privately like Peter did. Then we could have really been
>friend. It's a tragedy, but I got 400+ other friends to concentrate on.
The beldam didn't stop. She got even madder.
She kept making many false claims. She claimed that the person is a
robot with no public information. She said that she had never
communicated in any way to the person. She tried to portray that the
person has some fraudulent intent, friendless, and that nobody trust
the person. She claimed that the person is a nazi.
All these are over a few friendly gestures to her friends.
Now, put your self in the persons' shoe. What can he do to make her
leave him alone?
Expert analysis suggests racism as her real motives. The person is
Asian and Katherine is white.
She kept doing so after being told about the fallacy of the claim.
It's not until the truth is published that her tone start changing.
Then she raised totally different issues.
That didn't left not many amicable options to deal with this kind.
Guess she knew all along that the claim were false. She just didn't
expect anyone would publish the contrary. She's a time bomb. She had
gone the extra miles condemning a person for a few slight friendly
gesture, we'll never know what she'll do to anyone.
It seems that her other much related real motive is best explained by
her very own words:
"I do not like the way you ramp up your connections"
It's quite unfortunate that the world is filled with envy vermins that
just get this thing against those more successful than them.
The truth is they're simply uncompetitive. Hence, they craft lies and
prejudices against those who are. That's why we have so many nonsenses
justifying prohibition against so many consensual acts.
Some have reasonable cases. Most can be appeased. But some, like the
beldam, should get the fuck out of the gene pool for good along with
all her kind for the sake of prosperity for all before they form
another Nazi party.
It's very stupid trying to reason to such bigots for the same reason
we don't reason or negotiate with mosquitoes and germs. We just get
rid them.
More effortlessly we should set one of the vermin as a sample to show
the rest their proper place. They hit, we hit harder; Those maggots
don't deserver higher level of communication.
Currently our world is filled with unfair misery given to those who are
honestly successful. The mere acts of making honest money are
punishable by tax. Getting many chicks is also condemned. Yet, we have
to lock our doors in fear that someone will steal our properties
because governments protect thieves.
Unless those who run the fastest also hit the hardest, success will
then simply be a bridge to gas chamber.
Even if we let the worthless die and kill parasites, the market will
take care of everything anyway. Believing otherwise is practicing envy
bigotry.
Yet, capitalists, out of benevolence have given more and more to those
who oppress them. Only capitalists patiently give the other cheek and
repay hatred and genocide with aids and helps often to ungrateful angry
mobs.
When vermins like Katherine keeps being influential, it should be about
time all of us to stop playing nice. Keep doing otherwise means having
to realize that it's really fear and not benevolent or mercy that
motivate us.
Long live freedom, competition, rationality, meritocracy, prosperity,
and proper alignment between individuals' interests to productivity as
a whole. The world will be a better place if all of her kind went
extinct.
What do you think?
A person, mistakenly think that she's in his friend list. However,
rather than denying it, she'll simply give a friendly reply.
>Hi [My Friends' name]
>
>Many thanks for your message.
>
>Remind me what *** is again?
>
>There are some networks that I simply don't bother with anymore.
>
>Best wishes
>
>Katherine
Such mutual communication automatically make each person in the friend
list of another in a social networking site.
Not suspicious of any problem, the person then build his business
network in a friendly manner to many of those in his list, which
unfortunately include the old hag.
Soon, the beldam is engaged in serious slandering campaign the person.
She claimed that never communicated at all with the person, which is
false. She claimed that the person is spamming, the claim that does not
match the official rule. She also claimed that the person is pretending
to be her friend to get her friends.
The accusation is absurd. Who the hell does she think she is that
anyone would pretend to be her friend? What makes her so arrogant?
What sort of idiot cannot tell a different between someone trying to be
friendly to many people and someone trying to fraudulently get extra
credibility by pretending to be someone's friend?
Thinking this is just a friendly misunderstanding, the person simply
explained to Katherine:
>I don't mind your comments about me as long as it is true. So keep in mind that we did chat in a friendly way and we were indeed in
>each other network, which you can check, before saying anything about me. Also, *******'s definition of spamming is trying to sell
>something without intent to network which is far from what I do.
>I'll try to get both of us disconnected. ...you could have understood and tell me privately like Peter did. Then we could have really been
>friend. It's a tragedy, but I got 400+ other friends to concentrate on.
The beldam didn't stop. She got even madder.
She kept making many false claims. She claimed that the person is a
robot with no public information. She said that she had never
communicated in any way to the person. She tried to portray that the
person has some fraudulent intent, friendless, and that nobody trust
the person. She claimed that the person is a nazi.
All these are over a few friendly gestures to her friends.
Now, put your self in the persons' shoe. What can he do to make her
leave him alone?
Expert analysis suggests racism as her real motives. The person is
Asian and Katherine is white.
She kept doing so after being told about the fallacy of the claim.
It's not until the truth is published that her tone start changing.
Then she raised totally different issues.
That didn't left not many amicable options to deal with this kind.
Guess she knew all along that the claim were false. She just didn't
expect anyone would publish the contrary. She's a time bomb. She had
gone the extra miles condemning a person for a few slight friendly
gesture, we'll never know what she'll do to anyone.
It seems that her other much related real motive is best explained by
her very own words:
"I do not like the way you ramp up your connections"
It's quite unfortunate that the world is filled with envy vermins that
just get this thing against those more successful than them.
The truth is they're simply uncompetitive. Hence, they craft lies and
prejudices against those who are. That's why we have so many nonsenses
justifying prohibition against so many consensual acts.
Some have reasonable cases. Most can be appeased. But some, like the
beldam, should get the fuck out of the gene pool for good along with
all her kind for the sake of prosperity for all before they form
another Nazi party.
It's very stupid trying to reason to such bigots for the same reason
we don't reason or negotiate with mosquitoes and germs. We just get
rid them.
More effortlessly we should set one of the vermin as a sample to show
the rest their proper place. They hit, we hit harder; Those maggots
don't deserver higher level of communication.
Currently our world is filled with unfair misery given to those who are
honestly successful. The mere acts of making honest money are
punishable by tax. Getting many chicks is also condemned. Yet, we have
to lock our doors in fear that someone will steal our properties
because governments protect thieves.
Unless those who run the fastest also hit the hardest, success will
then simply be a bridge to gas chamber.
Even if we let the worthless die and kill parasites, the market will
take care of everything anyway. Believing otherwise is practicing envy
bigotry.
Yet, capitalists, out of benevolence have given more and more to those
who oppress them. Only capitalists patiently give the other cheek and
repay hatred and genocide with aids and helps often to ungrateful angry
mobs.
When vermins like Katherine keeps being influential, it should be about
time all of us to stop playing nice. Keep doing otherwise means having
to realize that it's really fear and not benevolent or mercy that
motivate us.
Long live freedom, competition, rationality, meritocracy, prosperity,
and proper alignment between individuals' interests to productivity as
a whole. The world will be a better place if all of her kind went
extinct.
What do you think?
| |
|
I thought this was just some sort of network problem, for which
Photoshop is somewhat notorious, but it turns out, it's everywhere.
If you use Access Control Lists to provide finer control over file and
folder permissions than the basic Unix permissions structure allows,
Photoshop will ignore them when saving. They work properly for opening a
file. If you've got basic permissions to read a file, but the ACLs are
set to deny you that, you're denied. If you don't have basic permissions
to open a file, but an ACL entry allows it, you're allowed.
But when saving a file, it doesn't matter what the ACLs say, you get
whatever rights the basic Unix permissions allow. If they say you can't
write a file, you can't even if an ACL entry says you can, and if the
basic permissions allow you to write a file, then you can even if the
ACL should bar you from doing so.
What's more, when creating files. Photoshop doesn't properly create
files with inherited permissions. Any ACL entries assigned to the folder
that are supposed to get inherited down to the files, don't get
inherited.
I've just discovered something that is probably involved in all of this.
Unlike other applications, when you save a file in Photoshop, it
actually first tries to create something called "TemporaryItems". How do
I know? Because when I tried to save a file that I had open in PS after
making a change, I got the message, 'Could not save "TemporaryItems"
because you do not have the necessary access privileges". I got it
because I had added an ACL entry to the folder containing that file that
the owner (me) was not allowed to add files to that folder ('owner deny
add_file').
So it looks like every time you save a file in Photoshop, it first
creates a temp file, then does some other stuff that leaves you with a
file that hasn't respected the ACLs where saving/writing and inheriting
are concerned.
I really think that we should expect more out of Adobe than this.
Any thoughts? Does anyone from Adobe monitor this group?
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
Photoshop is somewhat notorious, but it turns out, it's everywhere.
If you use Access Control Lists to provide finer control over file and
folder permissions than the basic Unix permissions structure allows,
Photoshop will ignore them when saving. They work properly for opening a
file. If you've got basic permissions to read a file, but the ACLs are
set to deny you that, you're denied. If you don't have basic permissions
to open a file, but an ACL entry allows it, you're allowed.
But when saving a file, it doesn't matter what the ACLs say, you get
whatever rights the basic Unix permissions allow. If they say you can't
write a file, you can't even if an ACL entry says you can, and if the
basic permissions allow you to write a file, then you can even if the
ACL should bar you from doing so.
What's more, when creating files. Photoshop doesn't properly create
files with inherited permissions. Any ACL entries assigned to the folder
that are supposed to get inherited down to the files, don't get
inherited.
I've just discovered something that is probably involved in all of this.
Unlike other applications, when you save a file in Photoshop, it
actually first tries to create something called "TemporaryItems". How do
I know? Because when I tried to save a file that I had open in PS after
making a change, I got the message, 'Could not save "TemporaryItems"
because you do not have the necessary access privileges". I got it
because I had added an ACL entry to the folder containing that file that
the owner (me) was not allowed to add files to that folder ('owner deny
add_file').
So it looks like every time you save a file in Photoshop, it first
creates a temp file, then does some other stuff that leaves you with a
file that hasn't respected the ACLs where saving/writing and inheriting
are concerned.
I really think that we should expect more out of Adobe than this.
Any thoughts? Does anyone from Adobe monitor this group?
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
| |
|
First of all, there's no way that "Repair Permissions" is ever the answer to a third party permissions error, unless said third party application is resetting OS directory permissions wrong. RP simply ignores everything not in a specific list.
Secondly, Telling people to make files in /Library/Applications world writeable is essentially opening a truck sized hole in file security, and as a sysadmin, the only proper response to such a suggestion is laughter.
Cruel, mocking laugher, and a reply of "No, that's simply not acceptable. How about a real fix that doesn't involve making computer-level directories world writable."
The worst part is REQUIRING this for a folder that holds data only needed on a temporary basis. This is inane, there's already a directory for such things, it's called /tmp. Each user gets their own folder in /tmp.
I thought Adobe learned the "don't require stuff to be world - writable, it's dumb" with the Acrobat 7 Safari modification.
Personally, I'd stop payment on any third party product that required such a thing until it was fixed. That's just ridiculous.
Secondly, Telling people to make files in /Library/Applications world writeable is essentially opening a truck sized hole in file security, and as a sysadmin, the only proper response to such a suggestion is laughter.
Cruel, mocking laugher, and a reply of "No, that's simply not acceptable. How about a real fix that doesn't involve making computer-level directories world writable."
The worst part is REQUIRING this for a folder that holds data only needed on a temporary basis. This is inane, there's already a directory for such things, it's called /tmp. Each user gets their own folder in /tmp.
I thought Adobe learned the "don't require stuff to be world - writable, it's dumb" with the Acrobat 7 Safari modification.
Personally, I'd stop payment on any third party product that required such a thing until it was fixed. That's just ridiculous.
| |
|
Is it possible to change the frame rate when I export a gif animation as a png sequence. The defalt seems to be 30fps.
Thanks
Thanks
| |
|
Chris,
Thanks so much. That did the trick! It seems odd that window isn't even discussed in the photoshop manual or the photoshop help menu. I was even at the Photo Expo in NY last week and asked 3 Adobe reps about it, and they never heard of it.
Thanks again.
Thanks so much. That did the trick! It seems odd that window isn't even discussed in the photoshop manual or the photoshop help menu. I was even at the Photo Expo in NY last week and asked 3 Adobe reps about it, and they never heard of it.
Thanks again.
| |
|
I'm helping someone use Photoshop 7 on a new macbook. He's been using
Photoshop 7 for about a month now on the new mac and went to make some
alterations to 'color settings' and found photoshop seemed to crash.
Edit/Color Settings then greyed out - and had to use 'force quit'.
Anyone know why this might have happened? What we can try? He has
opened color settings successfully before this happened.
Photoshop 7 for about a month now on the new mac and went to make some
alterations to 'color settings' and found photoshop seemed to crash.
Edit/Color Settings then greyed out - and had to use 'force quit'.
Anyone know why this might have happened? What we can try? He has
opened color settings successfully before this happened.
| |
|
Hey all,
I am trying to figure out why my colors look washed out in newspaper print. I work in both CMYK and spot color modes, but when I look at my ads in the paper the colors look washed out compared to all of the other ads. Even ads on the same page. Is there a trick or a setting that I am missing? What should my color settings be? Any help will be great!
Matt
I am trying to figure out why my colors look washed out in newspaper print. I work in both CMYK and spot color modes, but when I look at my ads in the paper the colors look washed out compared to all of the other ads. Even ads on the same page. Is there a trick or a setting that I am missing? What should my color settings be? Any help will be great!
Matt
| |
|
Sorry, I'm new to the forums but haven't seen this in any other threads or in the FAQ.
I'm attempting to design layered files for a client who is using Photoshop 5 on a PC running Windows NT with 512mb ram (estimated, I haven't actually seen the machine). I'm saving to PSD format using Photoshop CS on OS 10.4 with Maximize Compatibility turned on. The resulting file sizes are no more than 8.2mb with no color information (all the files are grayscale) but contain up to 26 layers. When he attempts to open them in 5, he receives a memory error (not enough memory), even though he's able to open much larger files regularly (although it doesn't appear that he's working with any other layered files). Does anyone have a work around for this? I can't really merge the layers any further (they are all type layers) and I've tried saving as Tiff with layer information to no avail.
I'm attempting to design layered files for a client who is using Photoshop 5 on a PC running Windows NT with 512mb ram (estimated, I haven't actually seen the machine). I'm saving to PSD format using Photoshop CS on OS 10.4 with Maximize Compatibility turned on. The resulting file sizes are no more than 8.2mb with no color information (all the files are grayscale) but contain up to 26 layers. When he attempts to open them in 5, he receives a memory error (not enough memory), even though he's able to open much larger files regularly (although it doesn't appear that he's working with any other layered files). Does anyone have a work around for this? I can't really merge the layers any further (they are all type layers) and I've tried saving as Tiff with layer information to no avail.
| |
|
A heads up for you G5 users:
<http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2209>
<http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2209>
| |
|
I'm pretty sure you can export the data you need using iView <http://www.iview-multimedia.com/>
You'll need to create an iView catalog of all your images then export the required data. The iView manual explains how to do this and even includes a screen shot of an Excel document as an example.
There's a demo download version you might want to try for 21 days! <http://www.iview-multimedia.com/downloads/>
--
David Gordon
You'll need to create an iView catalog of all your images then export the required data. The iView manual explains how to do this and even includes a screen shot of an Excel document as an example.
There's a demo download version you might want to try for 21 days! <http://www.iview-multimedia.com/downloads/>
--
David Gordon
| |
|
Does anyone know why CS 2 is truncating keyword information in my files. Any operation on a file with keywords seems to clip them to about 60 characters. This applies whether I put the keywords in through Bridge, Lightroom or what have you. This is destroying my workflow since I have to keep re-entering keywords.
I use Mac OS x 10.4.4
Thanks
Bill
I use Mac OS x 10.4.4
Thanks
Bill
| |
|
I've added animation to my website using ImageReady CS. All looks good except that I want the animation to play in a continuous loop without pause, even after another button has been selected. Now the animation begins anew each time a button is selected. Does this make sense? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
| |
|
I use CS2 on a G5 running v10.4.8. Occassionally, a find CS2 opening an image with its default settings, ie. cursors and printer dialogue settings. It's easy enough to fix it but I have no clue if I'm executing a command I don't intend to. Any clues? Thanks.
| |
|
I was just considering getting the 400D.
| |
|
does anyone have a clue when pshop for intel macs will be ready?
Adobe says Q2 2007. How fast it will run we will have to wait and see. PSCS2 runs OK on Mac Pros under Rosetta now if they have enough RAM.
Adobe says Q2 2007. How fast it will run we will have to wait and see. PSCS2 runs OK on Mac Pros under Rosetta now if they have enough RAM.
| |
|
I recently posted a logo library with copies of all of my company's logos in TIFF and EPS format. I wanted it available so that media, distributors and dealers could easily get the images they need to sell the products, write articles, etc. I used relatively small thumbnails (150 px wide) on the page so they know what they're getting, but there is some concern that people who don't know any better might download the small, low res thumbnail and use it inappropriately. A co-worker mentioned that he saw a website where the thumbnail was watermarked but that the watermark didn't show up in the browser, only if you downloaded it and tried to open it in imaging software. Does anyone know how or if this is possible? He couldn't remember where he saw it used, but I can't think of any way to do this.
Any help is appreciated.
Any help is appreciated.
| |
|
I have something like the following in an AppleScript:
tell application "Adobe Photoshop 7.0"
activate
...
set ruler units of settings to pixel units
translate layer "Layer 1" of current document delta x 100 delta y 50
This worked correctly with Photoshop 7 in OS 9, but in CS2 on OS X Photoshop moves the layer in points instead of pixels (at least that's what it seems to do--at 300 dpi stuff is moving approx. 4+ times further than specified).
How do I make the layer move in pixels, the way it's supposed to?
tell application "Adobe Photoshop 7.0"
activate
...
set ruler units of settings to pixel units
translate layer "Layer 1" of current document delta x 100 delta y 50
This worked correctly with Photoshop 7 in OS 9, but in CS2 on OS X Photoshop moves the layer in points instead of pixels (at least that's what it seems to do--at 300 dpi stuff is moving approx. 4+ times further than specified).
How do I make the layer move in pixels, the way it's supposed to?
| |
|
This is a bummer. I am merrily dusting a still life iamge and suddenly , the Spot Healing brush locks up. I have purged, checked my layers, flattened my layers , and have shut down PsCS2 and am getting ready to relaunch. Working on a G4 .
Help!
Help!
| |
|
Current Time: Sat May 19 19:14:21 EDT 2012
