Photoshop CS for FREE

R
Posted By
Rich
Dec 25, 2003
Views
1983
Replies
88
Status
Closed
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Rich

How to Improve Photoshop Performance

Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!

N
nospam
Dec 25, 2003
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a competition.
DZ
dame_zumari
Dec 25, 2003
Povl H. Pedersen wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a competition.

You probably don’t have a very large monitor, so you can’t set the resolution high enough to read further down that scrollbar-less column. As it is, I can’t get significantly further than: "…I have WON – i get my copy of Photoshop CS directly from Adobe in a couple of weeks", so I don’t really have any more info about it.

____________________________________________________________ ____________ Louise Bremner (log at gol dot com)
If you want a reply by e-mail, don’t write to my Yahoo address!
TS
Tony Spadaro
Dec 26, 2003
Truly ugly site there. You NEED photoshop — and someone to work it for you.


http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist’s Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from my novel "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich

S
Stephan
Dec 26, 2003
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a competition.

He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I can’t believe he won with such average beginner work.
Oh well, terrible pet or sunset pictures always make it first in photo competitions, same thing I guess.

Stephan
S
stacey
Dec 26, 2003
Stephan wrote:

Oh well, terrible pet or sunset pictures always make it first in photo competitions, same thing I guess.

Yep.


Stacey
S
stacey
Dec 26, 2003
Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

I’d be ashamed to post pictures like the butterfly on that building..



Stacey
S
Si
Dec 26, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich

Spammer.

Si.
R
Rich
Dec 26, 2003
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I can’t

snip::::

IT DOES hehe

believe he won with such average beginner work.
Oh well, terrible pet or sunset pictures always make it first in photo competitions, same thing I guess.

Stephan

R
Rich
Dec 26, 2003
how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..

Rich

"Si" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich

Spammer.

Si.

SB
Sally Beacham
Dec 26, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY for himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So he’s still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
R
Rich
Dec 26, 2003
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY for himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So he’s still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?

Rich
BV
Branko Vukelic
Dec 26, 2003
Rich wrote:

how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..

Not after we’ve seen the photos. 😉

Rich

"Si" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich

Spammer.

Si.


Branko Vukelic ()
SI
stupid_idiot
Dec 26, 2003
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know who the posers are and who is the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years and can say that stephan and sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.

For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your attitude is appropriate for someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself and everyone else is.

"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY for himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So he’s still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?

Rich

S
Stephan
Dec 26, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
for
himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
he’s
still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.

Stephan
S
Stephan
Dec 26, 2003
"Branko Vukelic" wrote in message
Rich wrote:

how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..

Not after we’ve seen the photos. 😉

Ouch! ;-))

Stephan
R
Rich
Dec 26, 2003
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how
i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous,
I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
for
himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
he’s
still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.
Stephan

Oooooo now i’m really scared.

Rich
R
Rich
Dec 26, 2003
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.

Rich

"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how
i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous,
I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
for
himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
he’s
still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?

Rich


R
Rich
Dec 26, 2003
All i was trying to say is that i won a copy of PSCS – can’t you just be happy for me?

Rich

"Rich" wrote in message
how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..
Rich

"Si" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich

Spammer.

Si.

JG
James Gifford
Dec 26, 2003
"Si" wrote:
I’d personally prefer to see the NG feature less of this type of posting, which is IMHO spam.

There are any number of .photo. groups where posting one’s site for review is acceptable. I agree that PS groups shouldn’t have such posting.


| James Gifford * FIX SPAMTRAP TO REPLY |
| So… your philosophy fits in a sig, does it? |
| Heinlein stuff at: www.nitrosyncretic.com/rah |
S
Si
Dec 26, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..

You are clearly using the NG to advertise your poorly designed site…

I’d personally prefer to see the NG feature less of this type of posting, which is IMHO spam.

Si.
S
Stephan
Dec 26, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.

Photographers are not like Bordeaux wines.
You "went" through several models, OK, but it doesn’t look like you progressed a bit.

Stephan
V
Voivod
Dec 26, 2003
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:54:14 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.

And you still suck that bad?
R
Rich
Dec 26, 2003
blow me V

"Voivod" wrote in message
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:54:14 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and
have
progressed thru several models.

And you still suck that bad?

SB
Sally Beacham
Dec 27, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
for
himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
he’s
still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Nobody. Cares.

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?

Oh damn. Now you’ve gone and found us out. That suave and debonair French photographer guy in the tropical paradise is carrying on a torrid affair with this ahem… "seasoned" Yankee in coldest Maine.

How shall I ever show my face in Usenet again? Oh the shame the shame.

Hecate, you better get over here and REALLY help me liven things up for this guy.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
SB
Sally Beacham
Dec 27, 2003
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how
i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous,
I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
for
himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
he’s
still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.
Stephan

SB
Sally Beacham
Dec 27, 2003
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how
i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous,
I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
for
himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
he’s
still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.

Dammit, I told him we were lovers. Do you mean to tell me I should be getting paid, too?

Sally
J
john
Dec 27, 2003
In article , "Sally Beacham"
wrote:

I swear you are a virus. Would you learn to trim and quit the friggin cross posts, child?
H
Hecate
Dec 27, 2003
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 20:15:23 -0500, "Sally Beacham" wrote:

Oh damn. Now you’ve gone and found us out. That suave and debonair French photographer guy in the tropical paradise is carrying on a torrid affair with this ahem… "seasoned" Yankee in coldest Maine.
How shall I ever show my face in Usenet again? Oh the shame the shame.
Hecate, you better get over here and REALLY help me liven things up for this guy.

OK. Just went and looked at the site. First off Rich, get yourself some professional hosting. Tiscali just doesn’t crack it. Very amateurish. Secondly, I don’t appreciate having to kill unknown Java applets, even though my Firewall does catch them. Again, very amateurish. And the final thing that marks this as an amateur site – the use of the status bar at the bottom as attempted advertising. I say attempted because most people I know will instantly go elsewhere if they see that on a site. it tends to be used by porn sites to cover their jumping you to an unknown and possibly malicious URL (usually run which runs a dialer program).

As for the site design, it’s OK, average, the sort of thing one sees for a family web site. You know, "visit the Family Robinson and see their holiday pictures" type of thing. You really need to address the design if you wish to make it look professional. But don’t do that until you’ve got decent hosting – it’s be a waste of time. One more thing, if you are planning to try and get work with your portfolio, ditch the guest book. It’s fine on a family site, not on a portfolio site.

Now, the photography. I’m not going to criticise them individually, that would take far too long. (And if you think I mean tear them apart please check your dictionary for alternate meanings of criticise). Some are good, most are Ok and a few really shouldn’t be there. (The sunrise for example far too much black at the bottom which ways the picture down – it would work far better as a letter box shape with the bottom third of the frame cropped off).

You really need to take a web design course and you could probably do with reading a few issues of Practical Photography and it’s sister magazine Digital Photo. To give you a clue, I’ve been taking photographs for over 20 years and using PS for over 5 and I still find things in the magazines that are helpful, particularly the criticism pages.

Incidentally,. I saw a picture in DP which looked almost exactly like the Angel of the North picture of yours, down to the manipulation and the use of a different sky. Was that yours?

Anyway, best of luck and remember, practice makes perfect.



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
SB
Sally Beacham
Dec 27, 2003
"jjs" wrote in message
In article , "Sally Beacham"
wrote:

I swear you are a virus. Would you learn to trim and quit the friggin cross posts, child?

So you trimmed. You still cross-posted.

;-P~~~, John!

But thanks for the "child" – I’m lovin’ it!

Sally
DL
Donald Link
Dec 27, 2003
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a competition.

Or mugged someone from ADOBE!
U
Uni
Dec 27, 2003
Rich wrote:
All i was trying to say is that i won a copy of PSCS – can’t you just be happy for me?

I can. Congratulations!

🙂

Uni

Rich

"Rich" wrote in message

how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..
Rich

"Si" wrote in message

"Rich" wrote in message

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich

Spammer.

Si.

DL
Donald Link
Dec 27, 2003
Bull! 21 inch monitor and 1280 x 864 and still can not see anything. Try the word HUSSLER.

" Louise Bremner" wrote in message
Povl H. Pedersen wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
You probably don’t have a very large monitor, so you can’t set the resolution high enough to read further down that scrollbar-less column. As it is, I can’t get significantly further than: "…I have WON – i get my copy of Photoshop CS directly from Adobe in a couple of weeks", so I don’t really have any more info about it.

____________________________________________________________ ____________ Louise Bremner (log at gol dot com)
If you want a reply by e-mail, don’t write to my Yahoo address!
S
Stephan
Dec 27, 2003
"Hecate" wrote in message
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 20:15:23 -0500, "Sally Beacham" wrote:

Anyway, best of luck and remember, practice makes perfect.

My tennis teacher says: "practice doesn’t make perfect, it makes permanent" To meditate…

Stephan
V
Voivod
Dec 27, 2003
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:24:57 GMT, "Donald Link" scribbled:

Bull! 21 inch monitor and 1280 x 864 and still can not see anything. Try the word HUSSLER.

Try spelling "hustler" right, moron. Or did you mean Husserl, the Austrian-born German philosopher and mathematician?
BV
Branko Vukelic
Dec 27, 2003
Voivod wrote:

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:54:14 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.

And you still suck that bad?

Adobe must be very desperate handing out PS to… well, you know. Hope it works out for them. OTOH, they might be doing so well that they simply don’t give a shit.


Branko Vukelic ()
SB
Sally Beacham
Dec 27, 2003
"Branko Vukelic" wrote in message
Voivod wrote:

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:54:14 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years
and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.

And you still suck that bad?

Adobe must be very desperate handing out PS to… well, you know. Hope it works out for them. OTOH, they might be doing so well that they simply don’t give a shit.

Well, in all honesty, it probably went like this….

Magazine marketing person contacts Adobe marketing person, they make nice, do virtual lunch, Adobe marketing person commits to giving free copy of PS CS to magazine winner, contest of their choice.

Editorial department sets up contest. Person wins, based on …. whatever (I once was the prize administrator where a completely undeserving soul won two prizes because… there were no other entries in those categories! When they use the term "there are no winners, and no losers"… now you know why.)

It’s doubtful Adobe had any smidgen of control over the quality of said winning material. And magazines, particularly British ones, sometimes have some "unusual" concepts for what constitutes a great print photo.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
R
Rich
Dec 27, 2003
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out
how
i
got
a
legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
competition.
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just
jealous,
I
can’t
snip::::

IT DOES hehe

A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to
PAY
for
himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
he’s
still not jealous.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?

Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid
secret
you’d like to share with the group?
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.

Dammit, I told him we were lovers. Do you mean to tell me I should be getting paid, too?

Sally

hehehe

Rich
R
Rich
Dec 27, 2003
thankyou.

Rich

"Uni" wrote in message
Rich wrote:
All i was trying to say is that i won a copy of PSCS – can’t you just be happy for me?

I can. Congratulations!

🙂

Uni

Rich

"Rich" wrote in message

how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..
Rich

"Si" wrote in message

"Rich" wrote in message

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich

Spammer.

Si.

R
Rich
Dec 28, 2003
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Branko Vukelic" wrote in message
Voivod wrote:

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:54:14 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while
know
who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years
and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams
and
have progressed thru several models.

And you still suck that bad?

Adobe must be very desperate handing out PS to… well, you know. Hope
it
works out for them. OTOH, they might be doing so well that they simply don’t give a shit.

Well, in all honesty, it probably went like this….

Magazine marketing person contacts Adobe marketing person, they make nice, do virtual lunch, Adobe marketing person commits to giving free copy of PS CS to magazine winner, contest of their choice.

Editorial department sets up contest. Person wins, based on …. whatever (I once was the prize administrator where a completely undeserving soul
won
two prizes because… there were no other entries in those categories!
When
they use the term "there are no winners, and no losers"… now you know why.)

It’s doubtful Adobe had any smidgen of control over the quality of said winning material. And magazines, particularly British ones, sometimes
have
some "unusual" concepts for what constitutes a great print photo.


Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com

Bit anti UK that isn’t it?

Rich
SB
Sally Beacham
Dec 28, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
It’s doubtful Adobe had any smidgen of control over the quality of said winning material. And magazines, particularly British ones, sometimes
have
some "unusual" concepts for what constitutes a great print photo.

Bit anti UK that isn’t it?

Rich

Well, you can look at it one of two ways….

1. Facts is facts.

2. I AM married to an Aussie, who hangs with a bunch of other Aussies – give ’em a barbie, some grog and about 20 minutes, and every day becomes "Punch-a-Pom Day."

3. Nah, Hecate’s cool, as is my editor – facts is facts.

Sally
JK
Julian K
Dec 28, 2003
"Rich" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.

Rich

But obviously you haven’t progressed enough to use your own work as a teaser background for your links
instead of stealing it from this
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=74742&ref=aut hor pro.
H
Hecate
Dec 29, 2003
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0500, "Sally Beacham" wrote:

3. Nah, Hecate’s cool, as is my editor – facts is facts.
LOL! <blush> 😉



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
S
Stephan
Dec 29, 2003
"Julian K" wrote in message
"Rich" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years
and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and
have
progressed thru several models.

Rich

But obviously you haven’t progressed enough to use your own work as a
teaser
background for your links
instead of stealing it from this
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=74742&ref=aut hor pro.
Ouch again for Ritchie
It really is a small world Ritchie, isn’t it?

Stephan
JK
Julian K
Dec 29, 2003
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂


www.julian-kenning.com
"Stephan" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
"Julian K" wrote in message
"Rich" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while
know
who
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years
and
can say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
attitude is appropriate for
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
yourself
and everyone else is.

your name sums it up nicely mate.

i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and
have
progressed thru several models.

Rich

But obviously you haven’t progressed enough to use your own work as a
teaser
background for your links
instead of stealing it from this
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=74742&ref=aut hor pro.
Ouch again for Ritchie
It really is a small world Ritchie, isn’t it?

Stephan

S
Stephan
Dec 29, 2003
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂

Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉

Stephan
R
Rich
Dec 29, 2003
you sad, sad people.

just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.

"Stephan" wrote in message
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂

Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉

Stephan

JK
Julian K
Dec 29, 2003
nono, we are nnot sad. we are bad!
slur, slur, slur!
😉

www.julian-kenning.com
"Rich" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
you sad, sad people.

just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.

"Stephan" wrote in message
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂

Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉

Stephan

R
Rich
Dec 29, 2003
you pathetic little man.

"Julian K" wrote in message
nono, we are nnot sad. we are bad!
slur, slur, slur!
😉

www.julian-kenning.com
"Rich" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
you sad, sad people.

just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to
slur
me.

"Stephan" wrote in message
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂

Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉

Stephan

V
Voivod
Dec 29, 2003
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:51:16 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

you sad, sad people.

just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.

No, really, there’s more than enough reasons to ‘slur’ you beyond your pitiful bragging that you won some software.

"Stephan" wrote in message
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂

Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉

Stephan
S
Stephan
Dec 29, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
you sad, sad people.

just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.
You won PS but you stole somebody’s photo.

Stephan
H
Hecate
Dec 30, 2003
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:10:01 GMT, "Stephan"
wrote:

"Rich" wrote in message
you sad, sad people.

just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.
You won PS but you stole somebody’s photo.

Stephan
And that’s not all. Readers (in the UK) of the magazine Digital Photo will find his picture of the Angel of the North bears a striking resemblance to a picture in December 03 (issue 49) of that magazine. The magazine is excellent and provides tutorials on CD by professionals. For those tutorials, again on the CD, they kindly provide all the elements to make up the ,montage, or whatever, to illustrate the technique, along with a video tutorial you can watch at the same time. Rich’s picture of the ANgel of the North looks remarkably like the one in the tutorial only reversed laterally. I wonder how that happened?



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
R
RTM
Dec 30, 2003
Its this sort of thing that made me take down my website, quite q while ago now.
Four times in 18 months ideas from my site appeared in 2 different digital photography (type/genre not title!) magazines (3 times in one and once in another).
Once could be a coincidence, i.e. someone had a similar idea to mine, Twice MIGHT have been coincidence, but 4 times in a year and a half? I don’t think so.
Put something on my site and lo & behold, 2-3 months later a tutorial appears for an INCREDIBLY SIMILAR idea.

(Just for clarity I am NOT implying that Rich was involved in any way.) —

Ron.

Hecate wrote in message
And that’s not all. Readers (in the UK) of the magazine Digital Photo will find his picture of the Angel of the North bears a striking resemblance to a picture in December 03 (issue 49) of that magazine. The magazine is excellent and provides tutorials on CD by professionals. For those tutorials, again on the CD, they kindly provide all the elements to make up the ,montage, or whatever, to illustrate the technique, along with a video tutorial you can watch at the same time. Rich’s picture of the ANgel of the North looks remarkably like the one in the tutorial only reversed laterally. I wonder how that happened?



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
R
Rich
Dec 30, 2003
I’d just like to point out that the Angel of the north photo is entirely my own work, the sky being added from a picture taken in the canaries.

would anyone like to see the original? i can send it to you.

Stephan – big case of sour grapes i fear. 🙁

Rich

www.digitalmood.co.uk

"RTM" wrote in
message
Its this sort of thing that made me take down my website, quite q while
ago
now.
Four times in 18 months ideas from my site appeared in 2 different digital photography (type/genre not title!) magazines (3 times in one and once in another).
Once could be a coincidence, i.e. someone had a similar idea to mine, Twice MIGHT have been coincidence, but 4 times in a year and a half? I
don’t
think so.
Put something on my site and lo & behold, 2-3 months later a tutorial appears for an INCREDIBLY SIMILAR idea.

(Just for clarity I am NOT implying that Rich was involved in any way.) —

Ron.

Hecate wrote in message
And that’s not all. Readers (in the UK) of the magazine Digital Photo will find his picture of the Angel of the North bears a striking resemblance to a picture in December 03 (issue 49) of that magazine. The magazine is excellent and provides tutorials on CD by professionals. For those tutorials, again on the CD, they kindly provide all the elements to make up the ,montage, or whatever, to illustrate the technique, along with a video tutorial you can watch at the same time. Rich’s picture of the ANgel of the North looks remarkably like the one in the tutorial only reversed laterally. I wonder how that happened?



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui

R
Rich
Dec 30, 2003
do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised from that mag??? – its been on my site since last march.

dumbass.

"Hecate" wrote in message
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:10:01 GMT, "Stephan"
wrote:

"Rich" wrote in message
you sad, sad people.

just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to
slur
me.
You won PS but you stole somebody’s photo.

Stephan
And that’s not all. Readers (in the UK) of the magazine Digital Photo will find his picture of the Angel of the North bears a striking resemblance to a picture in December 03 (issue 49) of that magazine. The magazine is excellent and provides tutorials on CD by professionals. For those tutorials, again on the CD, they kindly provide all the elements to make up the ,montage, or whatever, to illustrate the technique, along with a video tutorial you can watch at the same time. Rich’s picture of the ANgel of the North looks remarkably like the one in the tutorial only reversed laterally. I wonder how that happened?



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
R
RTM
Dec 30, 2003
As I haven’t seen either your picture or the magazine image I am obviously in no position to comment.
I was simply trying to avoid any confusion between my experiences and other matters under discussion in the same thread.


Ron.

Rich wrote in message
I’d just like to point out that the Angel of the north photo is entirely
my
own work, the sky being added from a picture taken in the canaries.
would anyone like to see the original? i can send it to you.
Stephan – big case of sour grapes i fear. 🙁

Rich

www.digitalmood.co.uk

"RTM" wrote in
message
Its this sort of thing that made me take down my website, quite q while
ago
now.
Four times in 18 months ideas from my site appeared in 2 different
digital
photography (type/genre not title!) magazines (3 times in one and once
in
another).
Once could be a coincidence, i.e. someone had a similar idea to mine, Twice MIGHT have been coincidence, but 4 times in a year and a half? I
don’t
think so.
Put something on my site and lo & behold, 2-3 months later a tutorial appears for an INCREDIBLY SIMILAR idea.

(Just for clarity I am NOT implying that Rich was involved in any way.) —

Ron.
V
Voivod
Dec 30, 2003
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:17:34 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

I’d just like to point out that the Angel of the north photo is entirely my own work, the sky being added from a picture taken in the canaries.
would anyone like to see the original? i can send it to you.
Stephan – big case of sour grapes i fear. 🙁

The only soured grapes are ones that have been exposed to your ‘art’.
H
Hecate
Dec 31, 2003
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:39:00 -0000, "Rich" wrote:

do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised from that mag??? – its been on my site since last march.

dumbass.
As you’d already copied something else, it wasn’t too great a leap to assume you’d copied that. You see, once you get a reputation…



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
V
Voivod
Dec 31, 2003
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:34:22 +0000, Hecate
scribbled:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:39:00 -0000, "Rich" wrote:
do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised from that mag??? – its been on my site since last march.

dumbass.
As you’d already copied something else, it wasn’t too great a leap to assume you’d copied that. You see, once you get a reputation…

I am ever so enjoying his ‘objects and people who don’t cast’ shadows….
S
Stephan
Dec 31, 2003
"Rich" wrote in message
I’d just like to point out that the Angel of the north photo is entirely
my
own work, the sky being added from a picture taken in the canaries.
would anyone like to see the original? i can send it to you.
Stephan – big case of sour grapes i fear. 🙁

Fear not as I don’t give a s**t that at least one of the pics is yours. You are still a loser with a very ugly site and stolen images.

Stephan
S
Stephan
Dec 31, 2003
"Voivod" wrote in message
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:34:22 +0000, Hecate
scribbled:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:39:00 -0000, "Rich" wrote:
do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised from
that
mag??? – its been on my site since last march.

dumbass.
As you’d already copied something else, it wasn’t too great a leap to assume you’d copied that. You see, once you get a reputation…

I am ever so enjoying his ‘objects and people who don’t cast’ shadows….
I enjoyed most where he said he "is not commercially for hire". Same with me, I am not for hire for space missions of for neuro surgery.

Stephannot commercially available for hire
R
Rich
Jan 1, 2004
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your* sites so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

Rich

www.digitalmood.co.uk

btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own work. but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are as good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.

"Stephan" wrote in message
"Voivod" wrote in message
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:34:22 +0000, Hecate
scribbled:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:39:00 -0000, "Rich" wrote:
do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised
from
that
mag??? – its been on my site since last march.

dumbass.
As you’d already copied something else, it wasn’t too great a leap to assume you’d copied that. You see, once you get a reputation…

I am ever so enjoying his ‘objects and people who don’t cast’ shadows….
I enjoyed most where he said he "is not commercially for hire". Same with me, I am not for hire for space missions of for neuro surgery.
Stephannot commercially available for hire

V
Voivod
Jan 1, 2004
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your* sites so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…

btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own work. but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are as good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.

Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?
MC
MArtin Chiselwitt
Jan 1, 2004
Voivod wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your* sites so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…

btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own work. but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are as good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.

Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?

man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??

I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank
S
Stephan
Jan 1, 2004
"Rich" wrote in message
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your* sites so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

I show my site only to people I trust and to potential clients. Not to scumbags like you because they do steal photos as you know.

Stephan
R
Rich
Jan 1, 2004
potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?

hehehe

"Stephan" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
sites
so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

I show my site only to people I trust and to potential clients. Not to scumbags like you because they do steal photos as you know.
Stephan

R
Rich
Jan 1, 2004
hi martin – mail me from the site – we’ll sort summat

Rich

"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message
Voivod wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
sites
so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…

btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own
work.
but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are
as
good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.

Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?

man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??
I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank
S
Stephan
Jan 2, 2004
"Rich" wrote in message
potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?

hehehe

Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.

Stephan
S
Stephan
Jan 2, 2004
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message
Voivod wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
sites
so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…

btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own
work.
but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are
as
good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.

Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?

man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??
I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank

There are enough people stupid enough to think "modeling" starts with showing photos (tits) anywhere and getting "discovered" So even losers like Rich can get to shoot some not too pretty girls because he might have bought a camera big enough to look "pro" or even a strobe! Then in Richie’s case you add a very 90’s looking site, a few stolen photos, a good dose of bad taste and a total lack of photographic talent. To make it complete you place an other loser like yourself in front of it admiring Adele (the girl with no shadow).
Adele gets to dream of modeling, you get to jerk off on your keyboard and Rich even wins a copy of Photoshop and makes new friends on the www. Isn’t it wonderful?

Stephan
MC
MArtin Chiselwitt
Jan 2, 2004
Stephan wrote:
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message

Voivod wrote:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*

sites

so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…

btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own

work.

but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are

as

good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.

Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?

man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??
I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank

There are enough people stupid enough to think "modeling" starts with showing photos (tits) anywhere and getting "discovered" So even losers like Rich can get to shoot some not too pretty girls because he might have bought a camera big enough to look "pro" or even a strobe! Then in Richie’s case you add a very 90’s looking site, a few stolen photos, a good dose of bad taste and a total lack of photographic talent. To make it complete you place an other loser like yourself in front of it admiring Adele (the girl with no shadow).
Adele gets to dream of modeling, you get to jerk off on your keyboard and Rich even wins a copy of Photoshop and makes new friends on the www. Isn’t it wonderful?

Stephan
man, get a fuckin sense of humour
MC
MArtin Chiselwitt
Jan 2, 2004
Stephan wrote:

"Rich" wrote in message

potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?

hehehe

Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.

Stephan
have u found a ‘sense of humour’ yet? you know.. of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.
S
Stephan
Jan 2, 2004
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message
Stephan wrote:

"Rich" wrote in message

potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?

hehehe

Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t,
doesn’t
matter.

Stephan
have u found a ‘sense of humour’ yet? you know.. of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.

You, on the other hand, are very much hilarious.
Can you teach me funny boy?

Stephan
GK
George Kerby
Jan 2, 2004
On 1/1/04 6:32 PM, in article l_2Jb.39170$,
"Stephan" wrote:

"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message
Voivod wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:

Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
sites
so we can take the rise out of them.

i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.

At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…

btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own
work.
but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are
as
good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.

Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?

man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??
I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank

There are enough people stupid enough to think "modeling" starts with showing photos (tits) anywhere and getting "discovered" So even losers like Rich can get to shoot some not too pretty girls because he might have bought a camera big enough to look "pro" or even a strobe! Then in Richie’s case you add a very 90’s looking site, a few stolen photos, a good dose of bad taste and a total lack of photographic talent. To make it complete you place an other loser like yourself in front of it admiring Adele (the girl with no shadow).
Adele gets to dream of modeling, you get to jerk off on your keyboard and Rich even wins a copy of Photoshop and makes new friends on the www. Isn’t it wonderful?

Stephan
Not as wonderful as this happy "dudeette" with the BIG box… http://community.webshots.com/photo/73223636/108387409wDEAuc

____________________________________________________________ ___________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
JK
Julian K
Jan 2, 2004
hehe.. that thread really starts to carry some entertainment value 🙂


www.julian-kenning.com
"Stephan" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message
Stephan wrote:

"Rich" wrote in message

potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?

hehehe

Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t,
doesn’t
matter.

Stephan
have u found a ‘sense of humour’ yet? you know.. of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.

You, on the other hand, are very much hilarious.
Can you teach me funny boy?

Stephan

MC
MArtin Chiselwitt
Jan 3, 2004
Stephan wrote:
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message

Stephan wrote:

"Rich" wrote in message

potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?

hehehe

Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t,

doesn’t

matter.

Stephan

have u found a ‘sense of humour’ yet? you know.. of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.

You, on the other hand, are very much hilarious.
Can you teach me funny boy?

Stephan
oh aii
are u german?
first off, start posting sarcastic replies in response to the posting of feeble, 70’s style, starsky & hutch fucking websites, claiming that you are spunking all over your keyboard [NOT] at obvious and not very well executed montages of the photographers wife’s sister[s] stuck on top of a picture of Tintern Abbey and subtitled "Taken in Florida" or "The Phillipines" probably in a freebie of Paintshop Pro with the twattin’ samples
arse cheese bollox
Adele has superb knockers though innit? i .. unnhhh.. ahhhh… can’t..err… uuhhh.. stop mysellffffff….
*spurt*
&
"pioe[rmv]"
Jan 19, 2004
Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
GK
George Kerby
Jan 19, 2004
On 1/19/04 2:42 AM, in article kGMOb.649$, "pioe[rmv]" <"pioe[rmv]"@coldsiberia.org> wrote:

Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…

____________________________________________________________ ___________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
R
Roberto
Jan 19, 2004
Don’t get to excited. It will come next for the Mac and the rest of the Adobe programs. Photoshop CS on the PC was a test run to see how activation went before they did it to everyone and every program.

Jerry

"George Kerby" wrote in message
On 1/19/04 2:42 AM, in article kGMOb.649$, "pioe[rmv]" <"pioe[rmv]"@coldsiberia.org> wrote:

Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
____________________________________________________________ ________________ ___
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 –
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
<><><><><><><><>
SL
Susan Lee
Jan 20, 2004
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.

Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
____________________________________________________________ __________________ > _
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
B
bebe
Jan 20, 2004
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your attitude is appropriate for someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself and everyone else is.

LOL! This guy is using a java applet menu on his lame-o site. No one but pitiful amaturs uses that crap. The "untitled document" text in the top bar of the sub pages is a nice touch too.
R
Rich
Jan 21, 2004
Chritst – this has got a bit deep and meaningful – all i said was that i won a copy. Of course its worth having – especially for free. Rich
www.digitalmood.co.uk
R
Rich
Jan 21, 2004
just click the news link – duh?

Rich

www.digitalmood.co.uk

"Susan Lee" wrote in message
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.
Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
____________________________________________________________ ________________ __>
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
N
nospam
Jan 21, 2004
On 2004-01-20, themaltesebippy wrote:
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your attitude is appropriate for someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself and everyone else is.

LOL! This guy is using a java applet menu on his lame-o site. No one but pitiful amaturs uses that crap. The "untitled document" text in the top bar of the sub pages is a nice touch too.

Nothing wrong with Java these days. Of course it requires you to have 128MB of memory, and 300MHz CPU to get OK performance.

I prefer Java over Active-X any time. And when it comes down to runtime, .NOT and Java is about the same.
SL
Susan Lee
Jan 22, 2004
On 21/1/04 9:02 am, in article 400e3fb1$,
"Rich" wrote:
Having clicked the news link again there is still only the top of the frame visible and no way to move down the frame. Thus, we’ll never know how you got your legit copy for free.

Think about investing the money you saved on not buying Photoshop in a Web design course.

just click the news link – duh?

Rich

www.digitalmood.co.uk

"Susan Lee" wrote in message
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.
Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
____________________________________________________________ ________________ __>
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

FL
Fuzzy Logic
Jan 22, 2004

[posted and mailed]

Susan Lee wrote in
news:BC35BC69.DED9%:

On 21/1/04 9:02 am, in article
400e3fb1$, "Rich" wrote:
Having clicked the news link again there is still only the top of the frame visible and no way to move down the frame. Thus, we’ll never know how you got your legit copy for free.

Think about investing the money you saved on not buying Photoshop in a Web design course.

The site works for me. He got his copy for free buy winning a photo contest.

just click the news link – duh?

Rich

www.digitalmood.co.uk

"Susan Lee" wrote in message
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.
Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
____________________________________________________________ ____________
____ __>
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

he won it
Susan Lee …
On 21/1/04 9:02 am, in article 400e3fb1$,
"Rich" wrote:
Having clicked the news link again there is still only the top of the frame visible and no way to move down the frame. Thus, we’ll never know how you got your legit copy for free.

Think about investing the money you saved on not buying Photoshop in a Web design course.

just click the news link – duh?

Rich

www.digitalmood.co.uk

"Susan Lee" wrote in message
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.
Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
____________________________________________________________ ________________ __>
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

R
Rich
Feb 13, 2004
no it isn’t – you just click on ‘news’

easy?

"Susan Lee" wrote in message
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.
Rich wrote:

visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free

Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?

Because of its Product Activation.

Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?

Per Inge Oestmoen
Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
____________________________________________________________ ________________ __>
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
R
realdan
Feb 15, 2004
Instead of scrolling, clicking and this and that..beating about th bush…why don’t you just post in here how u won it …instead o telling people to click on the links…

realdan
———————————————————— ———– Posted via http://www.forum4designers.co
———————————————————— ———– View this thread: http://www.forum4designers.com/message25564.htm
R
realdan
Feb 15, 2004
One more thing about the site.. frankly it is not a good design…UI i bad…where is the ease of navigation…how do u get back to the mai page, etc,, etc

Another thing stop marketing ur site..using ur photoshop win man…yea congrats on ur win…u can blare ur win but don’t blare ur sit

realdan
———————————————————— ———– Posted via http://www.forum4designers.co
———————————————————— ———– View this thread: http://www.forum4designers.com/message25564.htm

How to Improve Photoshop Performance

Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections