seeking intellihance thing

"Anne Hewitt" wrote:

I got a demo version of this intellihance programme a few years ago and then managed to upgrade to the next version quite cheaply, but I’ve bust me disc (CD) and now I have gone back to being a rubbish photoshop user – help me if you can – where can I get this programme now? no one seems to stock it anymore – looking forward to hearing from some kind soul who can point me in the right direction 🙂 Anne

You didn’t look very hard, did you? Simply typing "Intellihance" into Google, the very first link is direct to the Extensis web page providing prices and information on the current version. ——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

"Anne Hewitt" wrote in message

I got a demo version of this intellihance programme a few years ago and then
managed to upgrade to the next version quite cheaply, but I’ve bust me disc
(CD) and now I have gone back to being a rubbish photoshop user –

Spam? AFAIK Intellihance is a plug-in to photoshop.

"jjs" wrote:

Spam? AFAIK Intellihance is a plug-in to photoshop.

More likely a troll I suppose. Given the remark about "rubbish photoshop" and then a second post asking for direct response to a different e-mail address. Seems unlikely to me that Extensis would bother spamming the Photoshop group, since Intellihance (a stand alone, by the way) has about 1/1000th of Photoshop’s functionality. ——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

Tom Thomas wrote:

Seems unlikely to me that Extensis would
bother spamming the Photoshop group, since Intellihance (a stand alone, by the way) has about 1/1000th of Photoshop’s functionality.

Oops … my bad. Have to correct my own comment. It is still a plug-in. Sorry.
——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

Is it a good one?

"Tom Thomas" wrote in message

Tom Thomas wrote:

Seems unlikely to me that Extensis would
bother spamming the Photoshop group, since Intellihance (a stand alone, by the way) has about 1/1000th of Photoshop’s functionality.

Oops … my bad. Have to correct my own comment. It is still a plug-in. Sorry.
——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

"Scraphead" <Watashee@{deletethis}one.net> wrote in message

Is it a good one?

IMHO the Intellihance plug-in is a waste of money. Period. Anyone with the smarts to noodle out its settings can do the very same with Photoshop.

thanks.

"jjs" wrote in message

"Scraphead" <Watashee@{deletethis}one.net> wrote in message

Is it a good one?

IMHO the Intellihance plug-in is a waste of money. Period. Anyone with the smarts to noodle out its settings can do the very same with Photoshop.

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:44:06 -0500, "jjs" wrote:

"Scraphead" <Watashee@{deletethis}one.net> wrote in message

Is it a good one?

IMHO the Intellihance plug-in is a waste of money. Period. Anyone with the smarts to noodle out its settings can do the very same with Photoshop.

Absolutely. There are very few must have plug ins, and the ones that are useful are not things you can’t do yourself, but ones that save you a lot of time and do things correctly as well. Intellihance isn’t one of them.

—

Hecate – The Real One

veni, vidi, reliqui

Ultra sharpen 6.1 is about the only one I use. Oh, and photowiz sepia.

"Hecate" wrote in message

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:44:06 -0500, "jjs" wrote:

"Scraphead" <Watashee@{deletethis}one.net> wrote in message

Is it a good one?

IMHO the Intellihance plug-in is a waste of money. Period. Anyone with

the

smarts to noodle out its settings can do the very same with Photoshop.

Absolutely. There are very few must have plug ins, and the ones that are useful are not things you can’t do yourself, but ones that save you a lot of time and do things correctly as well. Intellihance isn’t one of them.

—

Hecate – The Real One

veni, vidi, reliqui

In article , says…

"Scraphead" <Watashee@{deletethis}one.net> wrote in message

Is it a good one?

IMHO the Intellihance plug-in is a waste of money. Period. Anyone with the smarts to noodle out its settings can do the very same with Photoshop.

Having used it when introduced at about PS v3-4, I agree. I have not had it installed on any machine since that first ver (could have gotten better, but I kinda’ doubt it). That said, however, I do use their PhotoTools quite a bit. Even though I have most of those operations covered with included PS filters, and Eye Candy, I like the working on a few, and always install it on new machines, or with new PS’s.

Hunt