Hecate wrote in
news::
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 02:19:32 GMT, Eric Gill
wrote:
Hecate wrote in
news::
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 17:35:02 GMT, Eric Gill
wrote:
"Poch" wrote in binary.blueyonder.co.uk:
Can you run Photoshop on Windows Server 2003?
Yes.
But why would you want to? 🙂
3GB of application memory instead of 2.
Waitaminute, you know this.
Cut me some slack, woman. I’m fighting some sort of low-grade respitory infection and am about as sharp as a baseball bat.
Sorry. 😉 But I always see server OSs as something you don’t run apps like PS on.
The base of all modern Windows is a server OS. Though I never want to see NT again in this lifetime.
Hope you’re better soon 🙂
Well, it got worse, now seems to be lot better, thanks.
You won’t get it to recognize more than 2GB of RAM, though.
Have to wait for Longhorn 🙂
Ech. Don’t say that word in a public forum.
LOL! I’m really looking forward to having access to a terabyte of RAM. Even PS should speed up with that 🙂
64-bit WindowsXP, due out "any time now" should give you that, plus being able to use other 64-bit features.
Like I said, though – Photoshop will have to re-coded to use it, too.
Mind you, I have seen screen shots of the new GUI, so I can understand why you said that 🙂
Oh, you just don’t know. I’ve played with a recent beta. Gack.
I slam Apple for making pretty first and everything else second, but M$ has gone off the deep end and cannot make "pretty" to save their lives. Longhorn’s UI is horrid beyond belief, both ugly and unfunctional.
I weep for the future.