PS 7 slows after handling many images

S
Posted By
sethmopod
Dec 22, 2003
Views
453
Replies
23
Status
Closed
I have been using PS 7.0 to create collages from digital photos. I find that after I have opened, cropped, moved selections, and transformed images enough times PS becomes unbearably slow. When I reach this stage, I have been making sure my work is saved, quitting the application and then restarting it. After this, it returns to a normal speed and the cycle begins anew. I seldom have more than two files open simultaneously.

I was wondering what causes this slowdown and if there is a better way to get the performance back than quitting and starting the program over.

Peace,
Seth

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

MM
Mac_McDougald
Dec 22, 2003
Purge/All might help.
Are you running Win98/ME?
How much RAM?
If over 256MB do you have a MaxFileCache statement in system.ini?

Mac
S
sethmopod
Dec 22, 2003
I am running win98se
I have 192MB of RAM

Purge/All sounded like a great idea. Alas, it had no effect.

Could this be related to scratch disk usage?

Seth
MM
Mac_McDougald
Dec 22, 2003
Yes, could be scratch filling up.
Might be because it doesn’t have enough contiguous space for it also, might try defragging and/or freeing up some HD space.

Since you have less than 256MB RAM, the
[vcache]
MaxFileCache=
statement in system.ini is unlikely to help.

Mac
CW
Colin_Walls
Dec 22, 2003
I have wondered if PS 7 has a memory leek. That would cause this phenomenon. Certainly PS 5 LE was awful in this respect.
BB
brent_bertram
Dec 22, 2003
I had the same problem with Win98 and Photoshop, but oddly it got cured by switching to Win2k . That tells me where the memory leak was ! <G>

🙂
CW
Colin_Walls
Dec 22, 2003
Brent

You could have a point there. I’m on XP now …
BB
brent_bertram
Dec 22, 2003
There’s no doubt that Win2k and XP are substantially better OS’s. The problem is that moving to XP generally involves new hardware expenses as well. Win98 SE is the best of the Win 9X varietals, but you have to suffer with its insufficiencies until you can afford more machine .

🙁
SG
shecky_greene
Dec 22, 2003
I had the same problem with Win98 and Photoshop, but oddly it got cured by switching to Win2k .

Since recently moving from Win98 to Win2kPro I get a lot of spoolvc.exe errors in Photoshop.
The print spooler shuts down and then the system tells me I have no printer installed. Manually restarting print the print spooler doesn’t resolve the problem; only a reboot does.
DM
dave_milbut
Dec 22, 2003
shecky did you upgrade right over win98? that’s a no no and can lead to all kinds of wierdness like you describe. best thing to do is backup, format and reinstall win2k (or xp) clean.
SG
shecky_greene
Dec 22, 2003
shecky did you upgrade right over win98? that’s a no no and can lead to all kinds of wierdness like you describe. best thing to do is backup, format and reinstall win2k (or xp) clean.

No. Complete reformat of drive and clean install.
BB
brent_bertram
Dec 22, 2003
Shecky, possibly too little contiguous space on the spool drive ? Old print drivers ? Windows printer drivers as opposed to manufacturer’s latest drivers for the printer ?

😕

Brent
SG
shecky_greene
Dec 23, 2003
Shecky, possibly too little contiguous space on the spool drive ?

Don’t know what that means.

Old print drivers ? Windows printer drivers as opposed to manufacturer’s
latest drivers for the printer ?

Relatively new Canon i950 printer so I’m assuming the printer drivers are up to date.
BB
brent_bertram
Dec 23, 2003
Shecky,
If you have a single hard drive , does it have a lot of space and is it frequently defragged ? Scratching here for a reason for the curious behavior of your print driver. (?)
SG
shecky_greene
Dec 23, 2003
Yes, single hard drive. A great deal of free space. Over 3/4 of the disk unused. Recent complete format and install of OS less than a month ago, so I wouldn’t think fragmentation would be an issue; would it?

Thanks for your interest. It’s getting increasingly annoying, especially with larger Photoshop files. 15 MB and up.
SG
shecky_greene
Dec 23, 2003
Whose thread is this anyway!? ;+)

Apologies for hijacking your topic.
S
sethmopod
Dec 23, 2003
Whose thread is this anyway!? ;+)

I have to stick with win98 for hardware reasons. My main high-demand computer use is music recording and editing and I have way too much dough stuffed into things that don’t go well beyond 98se.

I have just over 35GB of free HD space. I’ll try a defrag and see if that helps.

Seth
BB
brent_bertram
Dec 23, 2003
You’re not using Bitware, are you ?
<http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=257859>

😕
BB
brent_bertram
Dec 23, 2003
Seth,
I’m thinking your problem is very common in Win98 boxes, it certainly was for me when I ran that system. Solution is upgrade or do what you’re doing , reboot when necessary , I suspect .

🙂
SG
shecky_greene
Dec 23, 2003
You’re not using Bitware, are you ?

No. Never heard of it before you posted the link.
SG
shecky_greene
Dec 23, 2003
" The Spooler service then stops, but can be restarted. While the spooler is stopped, the following error message is generated:

Printer operation cannot continue due to lack of resources. "

I too get this error message. But printer operation is not restored if I start the spooler manually. After the error occurs, the control panel doesn’t even show any printers installed at all.
S
sethmopod
Dec 24, 2003
RE: slow PS 7 in win98 portion of thread

After defrag I have a noticable increase in performance. Now I can process about twice as many files before PS slows to the point that I have to restart it.

Thanks for the suggestions,
Seth
Y
YrbkMgr
Dec 24, 2003
Seth,

You don’t have a lot of ram to work with but I run win98SE with PS7 and 256 MB RAM on a 700 MHz Athalon processor and have never experienced that problem. I have run it on machines with as little as 128 Meg and 150 MHz processor and don’t have that problem – it’s slow, but it doesn’t get slower.

Earlier suggestions pointed to HD issues, and I would agree. If defragging helped, then it’s possible you simply don’t have a whole lot of free HD space. It might also have something to do with the drive interface – IDE or SCSI? Interface on MOBO or a card?

If you don’t have a lot of HD space and if it’s an older machine, I couldn’t say I’d be surprised to hear what you’re reporting.

Peace,
Tony
S
sethmopod
Dec 27, 2003
I’m using an IDE interface which is integrated on the MOBO.

I’ve purchased a SCSI card and HD which I plan to use for my OS and programs, but haven’t gotten up the time + nerve to install it yet.

My main HD partition is 52GB of which 35GB is free.

My processor is a Celeron 1.3GHz

The problem continues, and although it’s an annoyance, I’m managing to live through it.

Seth

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections