Come and Visit Meadows Studio.com, tutorials, presets and tubes available for download

"brodee" wrote in message

Come and visit Meadows Studio.com.

We specialize in all aspects of Paint Shop Pro. Come in

How kind of you to spam us and invite subscribers to a PhotoShop NG to and PSP website.
I think we’ll be sticking with our proper software, not some cheap toy lookalike thanks.

Hannah wrote:

"brodee" wrote in message

Come and visit Meadows Studio.com.

We specialize in all aspects of Paint Shop Pro. Come in

How kind of you to spam us and invite subscribers to a PhotoShop NG to and PSP website.
I think we’ll be sticking with our proper software, not some cheap toy lookalike thanks.

Spam is pathetic and unwanted, no question about it, but that comment on toy look alike was a little strong Hannah. From what I can remember it does not really look like PS at all. Secondly, in the hands of the right person, someone could probably produce better work with PSP than ‘you’ can in PS!
Attack spammers for sure, but never knock other people’s products, especially if you are not proficient in their product to even be in a position to criticise.

Brian wrote:

Hannah wrote:

"brodee" wrote in message

Come and visit Meadows Studio.com.

We specialize in all aspects of Paint Shop Pro. Come in

How kind of you to spam us and invite subscribers to a PhotoShop NG to and
PSP website.
I think we’ll be sticking with our proper software, not some cheap toy lookalike thanks.

Spam is pathetic and unwanted, no question about it, but that comment on toy look alike was a little strong Hannah. From what I can remember it does not really look like PS at all. Secondly, in the hands of the right person, someone could probably produce better work with PSP than ‘you’ can in PS!
Attack spammers for sure, but never knock other people’s products, especially if you are not proficient in their product to even be in a position to criticise.

Just for the record, I do not use PSP at all and I certainly do not advocate spam. I just believe it it wrong to criticise something because it is not what we use. I have seen fabulous works done in MANY different image editing programmes. At the end of the day, the final image could have been created in "any" programme….you would never know.

Have a great day Hannah.

"Brian" wrote in message

Attack spammers for sure, but never knock other people’s products, especially if you are not proficient in their product to even be in a position to criticise.

Are you the group moderator now?

"Brian" wrote in message

Just for the record, […]

We got it, already.

jjs wrote:

"Brian" wrote in message

Attack spammers for sure, but never knock other people’s products, especially if you are not proficient in their product to even be in a position to criticise.

Are you the group moderator now?

Noooo. Sorry if I came across that way, not my intention at all jjs. I just believe too many people in all industries criticise other’s products. If you make or use the best product, be proud of it, but why knock others? In my experiences, people who knock other products are most often the ones who have never used the other product.

Just my 2 cents worth, sorry if it offended anyone. I agree with Hannah that morons should not be trying to promote another product in here!

Happy Easter by the way, to jjs, Hannah and everyone else in this NG!!!!

Brian.

"Brian" wrote in message

Hannah wrote:

Spam is pathetic and unwanted, no question about it, but that comment on toy look alike was a little strong Hannah. From what I can remember it does not really look like PS at all. Secondly, in the hands of the right person, someone could probably produce better work with PSP than ‘you’ can in PS!
Attack spammers for sure, but never knock other people’s products, especially if you are not proficient in their product to even be in a position to criticise.

I don’t see how you can possibly know, or even guess, what magic I can or cannot do with PS. For the record, I don’t "produce work" using PS; as a photographer in the digital realm I use it to knock things into size or shape after C1P has done its business, so I don’t think that counts as producing, at least not in terms of producing original material.

I have been the PSP route some time ago, before I could afford PS, and frankly there is no comparison. Lookalike was the wrong word, perhaps pretender to the throne would be better words, but <personal opinion>I stick with the word ‘toy’.</personal opinion>

"Brian" wrote in message

Just for the record, I do not use PSP at all and I certainly do not advocate spam. I just believe it it wrong to criticise something because it is not what we use. I have seen fabulous works done in MANY different image editing programmes. At the end of the day, the final image could have been created in "any" programme….you would never know.

I refer the honourable member to my previous reply.

Have a great day Hannah.

I am doing so thanks, and I wish you the same!
H.;

Hannah wrote:

"Brian" wrote in message

Hannah wrote:

Spam is pathetic and unwanted, no question about it, but that comment on toy look alike was a little strong Hannah. From what I can remember it does not really look like PS at all. Secondly, in the hands of the right person, someone could probably produce better work with PSP than ‘you’ can in PS!
Attack spammers for sure, but never knock other people’s products, especially if you are not proficient in their product to even be in a position to criticise.

I don’t see how you can possibly know, or even guess, what magic I can or cannot do with PS. For the record, I don’t "produce work" using PS; as a photographer in the digital realm I use it to knock things into size or shape after C1P has done its business, so I don’t think that counts as producing, at least not in terms of producing original material.
I have been the PSP route some time ago, before I could afford PS, and frankly there is no comparison. Lookalike was the wrong word, perhaps pretender to the throne would be better words, but <personal opinion>I stick with the word ‘toy’.</personal opinion>

Hi Hannah,

Well I am glad you ended up with the programme you wanted (PS). I am sort of evaluating PS at the moment, I have custody of a friend’s computer while she is overseas for a few months and PS CS is on her computer. It is a great programme. I will buy the ‘next’ version if I choose to go ahead with it, otherwise after only a short period of time it will be out of date (so to speak).

What sort of photography are you into? I am a photographer myself, amongst other things.

Brian.

"Brian" wrote in message

Hi Hannah,

Well I am glad you ended up with the programme you wanted (PS). I am sort of evaluating PS at the moment, I have custody of a friend’s computer while she is overseas for a few months and PS CS is on her computer. It is a great programme. I will buy the ‘next’ version if I choose to go ahead with it, otherwise after only a short period of time it will be out of date (so to speak).

I’m on PS7; couldn’t see the benefits of a switch to CS frankly. I don’t use PS for RAW developing (C1Pro but investigating RSE) and didn’t really detect much in the way of improvements in CS over 7 which would help me. PS7 can resample and crop as adequately as CS as far as I can see. I hear mutterings about CS2 soon!

What sort of photography are you into? I am a photographer myself, amongst other things.

Mainly commercial and a few model portfolios, but always keeping an eye open for those shots which might sit nicely on Alamy, which has been a source of some nice pocket money the last few months since I started up with them. Weddings out of my bank manager’s necessity but not by choice! What are you photographing, and why?

Brian.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:08:15 -0000, "Hannah"
wrote:

"Brian" wrote in message

Hi Hannah,

Well I am glad you ended up with the programme you wanted (PS). I am sort of evaluating PS at the moment, I have custody of a friend’s computer while she is overseas for a few months and PS CS is on her computer. It is a great programme. I will buy the ‘next’ version if I choose to go ahead with it, otherwise after only a short period of time it will be out of date (so to speak).

I’m on PS7; couldn’t see the benefits of a switch to CS frankly. I don’t use PS for RAW developing (C1Pro but investigating RSE) and didn’t really detect much in the way of improvements in CS over 7 which would help me. PS7 can resample and crop as adequately as CS as far as I can see. I hear mutterings about CS2 soon!

Hannah, take a look at the *free* RAWshooter software:

http://www.pixmantec.com/products/rawshooter.html

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:43:17 GMT, brodee wrote:

Come and visit Meadows Studio.com.

We specialize in all aspects of Paint Shop Pro. Come in
and find tutorials, tons of BladePro and Super BladePro
presets plus new and unique tubes. Visit our forum and

meet people that can answer your questions. We would

love to see you!!

http://www.meadowsstudio.com

And the address required for the spam bots is:

Just in case, that’s:

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

"Hecate" wrote in message

I’m on PS7; couldn’t see the benefits of a switch to CS frankly. I don’t use PS for RAW developing (C1Pro but investigating RSE) and didn’t really detect much in the way of improvements in CS over 7 which would help me.

PS7

can resample and crop as adequately as CS as far as I can see. I hear mutterings about CS2 soon!

Hannah, take a look at the *free* RAWshooter software:

That’s what I meant by RSE above Hecate. I’m still undecided about which I like better, good ole C1Pro or RSE. It’s certainly a very different way of working, that’s for sure, and I’m finding that one product suits some pics better, and the other is better for other types. Still unsure.
H.

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:43:22 -0000, "Hannah"
wrote:

"Hecate" wrote in message

I’m on PS7; couldn’t see the benefits of a switch to CS frankly. I don’t use PS for RAW developing (C1Pro but investigating RSE) and didn’t really detect much in the way of improvements in CS over 7 which would help me.

PS7

can resample and crop as adequately as CS as far as I can see. I hear mutterings about CS2 soon!

Hannah, take a look at the *free* RAWshooter software:

That’s what I meant by RSE above Hecate. I’m still undecided about which I like better, good ole C1Pro or RSE. It’s certainly a very different way of working, that’s for sure, and I’m finding that one product suits some pics better, and the other is better for other types. Still unsure.
H.

Ah, sorry. I didn’t realise that was what you meant. Yet another TLA I didn’t know 😉

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

"Hecate" wrote in message

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:43:22 -0000, "Hannah"
wrote:

Ah, sorry. I didn’t realise that was what you meant. Yet another TLA I didn’t know 😉

Ah! You need a RED PENCIL: a reliable electronic device for printing every name composed of initial letters!!
H.

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 11:31:53 +0100, "Hannah"
wrote:

"Hecate" wrote in message

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:43:22 -0000, "Hannah"
wrote:

Ah, sorry. I didn’t realise that was what you meant. Yet another TLA I didn’t know 😉

Ah! You need a RED PENCIL: a reliable electronic device for printing every name composed of initial letters!!
H.

LOL!

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…