Jagged Edges From Rotating Image…

<maria> wrote in message

As I said above, I was getting a diiferent size image
when I was rotating an image of a statue taken with the
camera in vertical position. I can correct the situation by choosing Pixel/Aspect Ratio/D1/DV NTSC Widescreen (1.2) from the Image menu. However, I now have slightly jagged edges for the statue. How can I smoothen up those edges? Is there some kind of anitaliasing that I can apply? I know that antialiasing is available for various tools. But how can it be used on a given image without using such tools (like lasso, etc.)?
Thanks!

maria

Is your monitor an LCD? If so you are probably not using the native resolution, which is causing the appearance of jaded lines – check your monitors manual for what the native resolution should be. Are you viewing the image at 100% resolution?

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:54:58 +0100, Hecate wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:00:30 -0500, maria <> wrote:

As I said above, I was getting a diiferent size image
when I was rotating an image of a statue taken with the
camera in vertical position. I can correct the situation by choosing Pixel/Aspect Ratio/D1/DV NTSC Widescreen (1.2) from the Image menu. However, I now have slightly jagged edges for the statue. How can I smoothen up those edges? Is there some kind of anitaliasing that I can apply? I know that antialiasing is available for various tools. But how can it be used on a given image without using such tools (like lasso, etc.)?
Thanks!

Is it a widescreen? Is it an LCD? What resolution do you have the monitor set at?

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:00:30 -0500, maria <> wrote:

As I said above, I was getting a diiferent size image
when I was rotating an image of a statue taken with the
camera in vertical position. I can correct the situation by choosing Pixel/Aspect Ratio/D1/DV NTSC Widescreen (1.2) from the Image menu. However, I now have slightly jagged edges for the statue. How can I smoothen up those edges? Is there some kind of anitaliasing that I can apply? I know that antialiasing is available for various tools. But how can it be used on a given image without using such tools (like lasso, etc.)?
Thanks!

Is it a widescreen? Is it an LCD? What resolution do you have the monitor set at?

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

maria <> wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:54:58 +0100, Hecate wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:00:30 -0500, maria <> wrote:

As I said above, I was getting a diiferent size image
when I was rotating an image of a statue taken with the
camera in vertical position. I can correct the situation by choosing Pixel/Aspect Ratio/D1/DV NTSC Widescreen (1.2) from the Image menu. However, I now have slightly jagged edges for the statue. How can I smoothen up those edges? Is there some kind of anitaliasing that I can apply? I know that antialiasing is available for various tools. But how can it be used on a given image without using such tools (like lasso, etc.)?
Thanks!

Is it a widescreen? Is it an LCD? What resolution do you have the monitor set at?

My monitor is set at 1024×768.

But is it a normal 3:4 ratio monitor? The jagged edges are almost certainly not real. They are caused by a wrong setting of your monitor, so you shouldn’t try to ‘fix’ them but ‘fix’ that setting.

—
Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.nl/

As I said above,

Um, if I look above this post on my monitor, I’m looking into the future relative to this post.

that I can apply? I know that antialiasing is available for various tools. But how can it be used on a given image without using such tools (like lasso, etc.)?

The default interpolation method is set in Preferences->General.

Andrew

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0500, maria <> wrote:

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

Yes, but is it a 4:3 ratio monitor or is it a widescreen?

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

Hecate wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0500, maria <> wrote:

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

Yes, but is it a 4:3 ratio monitor or is it a widescreen?

1024 x 768 = 4/3 ratio.

—
John McWilliams

"John McWilliams" wrote in message

Hecate wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0500, maria <> wrote:

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

Yes, but is it a 4:3 ratio monitor or is it a widescreen?

1024 x 768 = 4/3 ratio.

Not an answer to the question….

Also what size is the monitor? For instance for most non-widescreen 17" and 19" LCD monitors have a native resolution of 1280×1024, but many people set them at different resolutions – which can cause problems. 1024×768 is NOT the same resolution (1.333 vs. 1.25), so if your native resolution is 1280×1024 you will be looking at distorted images. It took me a week of nagging, and demonstrating with scanned images to convince someone at work that they were looking at elongated people in their scans – remarkably a lot of people are insensitive to such distortions – hence the number of people who willingly watch a 4×3 TV image stretched on a widescreen TV

<maria> wrote in message

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

That ain’t the point. Use View Actual Pixels.

Caitlin wrote:

"John McWilliams" wrote in message

Hecate wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0500, maria <> wrote:

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

Yes, but is it a 4:3 ratio monitor or is it a widescreen?

1024 x 768 = 4/3 ratio.

Not an answer to the question….

No, it wasn’t a full answer. I guess I was just annoyed at hecate’s replying off a post by John E., repetitously and needlessly.

Also what size is the monitor? For instance for most non-widescreen 17" and 19" LCD monitors have a native resolution of 1280×1024, but many people set them at different resolutions – which can cause problems. 1024×768 is NOT the same resolution (1.333 vs. 1.25), so if your native resolution is 1280×1024 you will be looking at distorted images.

Yes, your statements are all correct. But I can’t imagine a wide screen even offering a setting of 4:3 or 5:4 when the true ratio would be more like 2:1. But, I don’t have access to one right now, so I don’t know. It took me a week of

nagging, and demonstrating with scanned images to convince someone at work that they were looking at elongated people in their scans – remarkably a lot of people are insensitive to such distortions – hence the number of people who willingly watch a 4×3 TV image stretched on a widescreen TV

Yes, I hate when that happens! I also hate it when a broadcaster says its showing in HD, and then put out a crumby quality 720p picture- probably "studio enhanced NTSC" or something….

Back to the OP:

Maria- What choices do you have for setting monitor resolution? —

John McWilliams

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:11:56 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

Hecate wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0500, maria <> wrote:

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

Yes, but is it a 4:3 ratio monitor or is it a widescreen?

1024 x 768 = 4/3 ratio.

IF the pixels are square!

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:11:56 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

Hecate wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0500, maria <> wrote:

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

Yes, but is it a 4:3 ratio monitor or is it a widescreen?

1024 x 768 = 4/3 ratio.

No, that’s the resolution she’s using. It doesn’t describe the size of the screen which may be in a different ratio.

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:02:17 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

1024 x 768 = 4/3 ratio.

Not an answer to the question….

No, it wasn’t a full answer. I guess I was just annoyed at hecate’s replying off a post by John E., repetitously and needlessly.

It wasn’t any answer, except that of showing that you don’t understand the difference between screen size and screen resolution.

If someone wishes to comment, I have the right to reply. If you don’t like that you should go somewhere where your feelings are better protected.

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

Hecate wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:11:56 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

Hecate wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0500, maria <> wrote:

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

Yes, but is it a 4:3 ratio monitor or is it a widescreen?

1024 x 768 = 4/3 ratio.

No, that’s the resolution she’s using. It doesn’t describe the size of the screen which may be in a different ratio.

Of course, as I said later and which you also replied to.

But there’s no wide screen involved, and your question misses the mark.

—

John McWilliams

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:47:08 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

Hecate wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:11:56 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

Hecate wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0500, maria <> wrote:

My monitor is set at 1024×768.
Thanks!

Yes, but is it a 4:3 ratio monitor or is it a widescreen?

1024 x 768 = 4/3 ratio.

No, that’s the resolution she’s using. It doesn’t describe the size of the screen which may be in a different ratio.

Of course, as I said later and which you also replied to.

ER, no actually. Caitlin pointed it to you before you said anything.

But there’s no wide screen involved, and your question misses the mark.

How do you know as she hasn’t stated to anyone who’s asked whether she’s using a widescreen or not. Mindreading?

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…