ThmbsPlus Question

X
Posted By
xDsrtRat
May 16, 2004
Views
646
Replies
17
Status
Closed
This may be the wrong forum for this, but I think it was here I first heard about ThumbsPlus. Bear with me while I set up the situation . . .

I’ve been looking for a better way to manage my graphics files and search them for the appropriate image. I purchased a canned collection that has searchable catalogs, but the catalog is static: you can not add to it. Once you locate the image, you need to exit the and manually located the image from within your working program.

I heard about ThumbsPlus and decided to check it out. Looks perfect: you can build a dynamic database of images and search by keywords, etc. and overcomes the other limitations I was running into. I downloaded the demo version. I used it for bit, just as a browser, and I really liked it. I then added some of my images to the database, so I could test the search features.

I started with a canned collection of 550,000+ images and added another 40,000 of my own collection. This gave me in the neighborhood of 600,000 images and a total of 13 Gb of data. That did not include my photo collections or other images I had. The scan process to create the database took quite a while, overnight in fact, to complete. This is not a big deal as this is, I think and hope, a one time operation.

The problems began when I entered keywords for the second entry I wanted to catalog. I was prompted with an error message that the database had reached maximum size and nothing could be added. I checked and the database created by the initial search was in excess of 2.0 Gb. I still had 50+ Gb free on the drive, so my disk size is not an issue, just the database size.

I did some poking around and discovered a Compact Database function. I’ve used something like this before, so I tried to reduce the database size using this function. My database shrank from 2.01 Gb to 1.97 Gb . . . not very much.

My basic question is: Is this because it is the demo version? Supposedly the only difference is the demo is valid for 30 days.

I don’t consider my canned collection that large. Is anyone else running ThumbsPlus with thus many images or more?

Hopefully, I’m just hitting the upside of the learning curve and there are ways around these problems.

MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥

– in 4 materials (clay versions included)

– 12 scenes

– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups

– 6000 x 4500 px

X
xDsrtRat
May 16, 2004
"R. Hughes" wrote in message
Why not go right to the source? Call them.

I’ve used ThumbPlus for a few years now and so far it does everything I
need
to do as far as cataloging images and much more than that. I don’t have anywhere near the number you’re talking about, but if that’s what is keeping you from purchasing the software, I know they will be happy to
help
you with it. They have been more than helpful the couple of times I didn’t understand how to get Thumbs+ to something.
I seem to have stumbled onto the fix. I ran the Fix Database operation and then the Compact another time. The size of the database is not too much reduced, but I am able to enter keywords and search. As long as it works, I really don’t care about the physical size of the database. I’m going to play with this one a while before I make up my mind. I want to see if I can batch add keywords to make searching easier. I’ve only had time to enter a couple of dozen keyword entries so far.
H
hugh2596
May 16, 2004
Why not go right to the source? Call them.

I’ve used ThumbPlus for a few years now and so far it does everything I need to do as far as cataloging images and much more than that. I don’t have anywhere near the number you’re talking about, but if that’s what is keeping you from purchasing the software, I know they will be happy to help you with it. They have been more than helpful the couple of times I didn’t understand how to get Thumbs+ to something.
H
Husky
May 16, 2004
On Sun, 16 May 2004 16:12:32 -0400, "xDsrtRat" wrote:

news.cerious.com
join the tp new server above.
and 2 gigs is the limit.
I seem to have stumbled onto the fix. I ran the Fix Database operation and then the Compact another time. The size of the database is not too much reduced, but I am able to enter keywords and search. As long as it works, I really don’t care about the physical size of the database. I’m going to play with this one a while before I make up my mind. I want to see if I can batch add keywords to make searching easier. I’ve only had time to enter a couple of dozen keyword entries so far.

more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html
H
Hecate
May 17, 2004
On Sun, 16 May 2004 14:52:00 -0400, "xDsrtRat" wrote:

The problems began when I entered keywords for the second entry I wanted to catalog. I was prompted with an error message that the database had reached maximum size and nothing could be added. I checked and the database created by the initial search was in excess of 2.0 Gb. I still had 50+ Gb free on the drive, so my disk size is not an issue, just the database size.
The database uses the Microsoft JET format as used in Access. The size limit of an Access database is 2Gb.

However, there are plenty of ways of having databases which are larger:

1. Use MS SQL
2. Use Filemaker Pro (possibly, I’m investigating this at the moment)
3. Use MySQL
4. And a number of others. I just gave you the expensive, the not too expansive and the cheap (i.e. free) solutions.

It’s the same with the other major database software – Extensis Portfolio also uses Microsoft JET.

If you want help though, you’d be better off accessing the correct newsgroups. Cerious run their own. Just go to news.cerious.com, get the list of groups, download and ask your questions. People there are very helpful, and the programmers actually answer questions too.



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
D
Don
May 17, 2004
The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB, leading to what Hecate stated. Some of the database managers get around this by using multiple linked files, but that is the exception. It is probably possible to use Thumbs Plus by breaking your collection up into multiple databases in different subdirectories, but it may not fit what you need to do that.

If Thumbs Plus uses M$ Access to manage the database, it may be very slow with large collections anyway, as Access is very unwieldly.

Don

"Hecate" wrote in message
On Sun, 16 May 2004 14:52:00 -0400, "xDsrtRat" wrote:

The problems began when I entered keywords for the second entry I wanted
to
catalog. I was prompted with an error message that the database had
reached
maximum size and nothing could be added. I checked and the database
created
by the initial search was in excess of 2.0 Gb. I still had 50+ Gb free on the drive, so my disk size is not an issue, just the database size.
The database uses the Microsoft JET format as used in Access. The size limit of an Access database is 2Gb.

However, there are plenty of ways of having databases which are larger:

1. Use MS SQL
2. Use Filemaker Pro (possibly, I’m investigating this at the moment)
3. Use MySQL
4. And a number of others. I just gave you the expensive, the not too expansive and the cheap (i.e. free) solutions.

It’s the same with the other major database software – Extensis Portfolio also uses Microsoft JET.

If you want help though, you’d be better off accessing the correct newsgroups. Cerious run their own. Just go to news.cerious.com, get the list of groups, download and ask your questions. People there are very helpful, and the programmers actually answer questions too.


Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
V
Voivod
May 17, 2004
On Sun, 16 May 2004 21:13:28 -0700, "Don" scribbled:

The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB

No, it’s not.

http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/ all/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/wi ndows/xp/all/reskit/en-us/prkc_fil_tdrn.asp
EG
Eric Gill
May 17, 2004
"Don" wrote in
news::

The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB,

Not really.

Under the FAT16 file system only. On FAT32 it’s 4GB, but NTFS’ limit is something ridiculous (16 exabytes); in ripping double-layer DVDs I routinely make 7GB files.

I’m willing to bet it has to do with JET’s data structure.

<snip>
N
nospam
May 17, 2004
On Sun, 16 May 2004 21:13:28 -0700, "Don" wrote (with possible editing):

The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB, leading to what Hecate stated. Some of the database managers get around this by using multiple linked files, but that is the exception. It is probably possible to use Thumbs Plus by breaking your collection up into multiple databases in different subdirectories, but it may not fit what you need to do that.
If Thumbs Plus uses M$ Access to manage the database, it may be very slow with large collections anyway, as Access is very unwieldly.
Don

Don,

No flame, but I’m fairly sure you’re wrong. Perhaps the maximum size Access database is 2 gb, but Windows can go much higher, providing the user is not running Windows 95, 98, or ME. Postgre and MySql (both free) go way beyond and are free. I believe the largest file size under FAT 16 is 4 gb (under Windows NT, 2000, or XP, and single disk under NTFS it’s huge (something like 256 terabytes).



Larry
Email to rapp at lmr dot com
X
xDsrtRat
May 17, 2004
"Husky" wrote in message
On Sun, 16 May 2004 16:12:32 -0400, "xDsrtRat"
wrote:
news.cerious.com
join the tp new server above.
and 2 gigs is the limit.

Thank you for the link!

I seem to have stumbled onto the fix. I ran the Fix Database operation
and
then the Compact another time. The size of the database is not too much reduced, but I am able to enter keywords and search. As long as it works,
I
really don’t care about the physical size of the database. I’m going to
play
with this one a while before I make up my mind. I want to see if I can
batch
add keywords to make searching easier. I’ve only had time to enter a
couple
of dozen keyword entries so far.

more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html
X
xDsrtRat
May 17, 2004
"Hecate" wrote in message
On Sun, 16 May 2004 14:52:00 -0400, "xDsrtRat" wrote:
Thanks for the help. I got the link to their server from a post above.
The problems began when I entered keywords for the second entry I wanted
to
catalog. I was prompted with an error message that the database had
reached
maximum size and nothing could be added. I checked and the database
created
by the initial search was in excess of 2.0 Gb. I still had 50+ Gb free on the drive, so my disk size is not an issue, just the database size.
The database uses the Microsoft JET format as used in Access. The size limit of an Access database is 2Gb.

However, there are plenty of ways of having databases which are larger:

1. Use MS SQL
2. Use Filemaker Pro (possibly, I’m investigating this at the moment)
3. Use MySQL
4. And a number of others. I just gave you the expensive, the not too expansive and the cheap (i.e. free) solutions.

It’s the same with the other major database software – Extensis Portfolio also uses Microsoft JET.

If you want help though, you’d be better off accessing the correct newsgroups. Cerious run their own. Just go to news.cerious.com, get the list of groups, download and ask your questions. People there are very helpful, and the programmers actually answer questions too.


Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
X
xDsrtRat
May 17, 2004
"Don" wrote in message
The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB, leading to what Hecate stated. Some of the database managers get around this by using multiple linked files, but that is the exception. It is probably possible to use Thumbs Plus by breaking your collection up into multiple databases in different subdirectories, but it may not fit what you need to do that.
If Thumbs Plus uses M$ Access to manage the database, it may be very slow with large collections anyway, as Access is very unwieldly.
Don
You nailed that in one, Don. Some others have sugested a different daabase engine, but I need to learn to work within the program first.
"Hecate" wrote in message
On Sun, 16 May 2004 14:52:00 -0400, "xDsrtRat" wrote:

The problems began when I entered keywords for the second entry I
wanted
to
catalog. I was prompted with an error message that the database had
reached
maximum size and nothing could be added. I checked and the database
created
by the initial search was in excess of 2.0 Gb. I still had 50+ Gb free
on
the drive, so my disk size is not an issue, just the database size.
The database uses the Microsoft JET format as used in Access. The size limit of an Access database is 2Gb.

However, there are plenty of ways of having databases which are larger:

1. Use MS SQL
2. Use Filemaker Pro (possibly, I’m investigating this at the moment)
3. Use MySQL
4. And a number of others. I just gave you the expensive, the not too expansive and the cheap (i.e. free) solutions.

It’s the same with the other major database software – Extensis Portfolio also uses Microsoft JET.

If you want help though, you’d be better off accessing the correct newsgroups. Cerious run their own. Just go to news.cerious.com, get the list of groups, download and ask your questions. People there are very helpful, and the programmers actually answer questions too.


Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui

D
Don
May 17, 2004
Yeah, you’re right. But I believe that many applications are not set up to take advantage of the larger files yet, perhaps for backward compatability reasons.

Don

"Eric Gill" wrote in message
"Don" wrote in
news::

The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB,

Not really.

Under the FAT16 file system only. On FAT32 it’s 4GB, but NTFS’ limit is something ridiculous (16 exabytes); in ripping double-layer DVDs I routinely make 7GB files.

I’m willing to bet it has to do with JET’s data structure.
<snip>
EG
Eric Gill
May 17, 2004
"Don" wrote in
news::

"Eric Gill" wrote in message
"Don" wrote in
news::

The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB,

Not really.

Under the FAT16 file system only. On FAT32 it’s 4GB, but NTFS’ limit is something ridiculous (16 exabytes); in ripping double-layer DVDs I routinely make 7GB files.

I’m willing to bet it has to do with JET’s data structure.
<snip>

Yeah, you’re right. But I believe that many applications are not set up to take advantage of the larger files yet, perhaps for backward compatability reasons.

Including Photoshop, sure. Pretty annoying that M$ software is like this, though.
H
Hecate
May 18, 2004
On Sun, 16 May 2004 21:13:28 -0700, "Don" wrote:

The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB, leading to what Hecate stated.

No, it’s the max size of Access databases.

Some of the database managers get around this by using multiple linked files, but that is the exception. It is probably possible to use Thumbs Plus by breaking your collection up into multiple databases in different subdirectories, but it may not fit what you need to do that.
If Thumbs Plus uses M$ Access to manage the database, it may be very slow with large collections anyway, as Access is very unwieldly.
No, it’s not. It’s very well designed software and whilst a 2 Gb database will slow it down a little it’s actually far faster than an equivalent Access database despite using the same format.



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui
HM
Harold Morgan
May 18, 2004
One tip: Check that you are saving your thumbnails in jpeg format and NOT the default lossless format. You’ll get a ton more pictures in your 2 GB limit and you won’t be able to tell the difference from the thumbnails.

I think there’s an option to change both the default behavior and the existing thumbnails to a compressed format in the menus.

"xDsrtRat" wrote in message
This may be the wrong forum for this, but I think it was here I first
heard
about ThumbsPlus. Bear with me while I set up the situation . . .

I’ve been looking for a better way to manage my graphics files and search them for the appropriate image. I purchased a canned collection that has searchable catalogs, but the catalog is static: you can not add to it.
Once
you locate the image, you need to exit the and manually located the image from within your working program.

I heard about ThumbsPlus and decided to check it out. Looks perfect: you
can
build a dynamic database of images and search by keywords, etc. and overcomes the other limitations I was running into. I downloaded the demo version. I used it for bit, just as a browser, and I really liked it. I
then
added some of my images to the database, so I could test the search features.

I started with a canned collection of 550,000+ images and added another 40,000 of my own collection. This gave me in the neighborhood of 600,000 images and a total of 13 Gb of data. That did not include my photo collections or other images I had. The scan process to create the database took quite a while, overnight in fact, to complete. This is not a big deal as this is, I think and hope, a one time operation.

The problems began when I entered keywords for the second entry I wanted
to
catalog. I was prompted with an error message that the database had
reached
maximum size and nothing could be added. I checked and the database
created
by the initial search was in excess of 2.0 Gb. I still had 50+ Gb free on the drive, so my disk size is not an issue, just the database size.
I did some poking around and discovered a Compact Database function. I’ve used something like this before, so I tried to reduce the database size using this function. My database shrank from 2.01 Gb to 1.97 Gb . . . not very much.

My basic question is: Is this because it is the demo version? Supposedly
the
only difference is the demo is valid for 30 days.

I don’t consider my canned collection that large. Is anyone else running ThumbsPlus with thus many images or more?

Hopefully, I’m just hitting the upside of the learning curve and there are ways around these problems.

B
Bryce
May 18, 2004
"Voivod" wrote in message
On Sun, 16 May 2004 21:13:28 -0700, "Don" scribbled:
The maximum size of a file under Windoze is 2GB

No, it’s not.
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/ all/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/wi ndows/xp/all/reskit/en-us/prkc_fil_tdrn.asp

Interesting.

Volumes larger than 2 terabytes are possible and the "file size" is limited only by the size of the volume!

I did not know this.
H
Hecate
May 19, 2004
On Mon, 17 May 2004 20:53:22 -0500, "Harold Morgan" wrote:

One tip: Check that you are saving your thumbnails in jpeg format and NOT the default lossless format. You’ll get a ton more pictures in your 2 GB limit and you won’t be able to tell the difference from the thumbnails.
I think there’s an option to change both the default behavior and the existing thumbnails to a compressed format in the menus.
Yes. You can change thumbnail size, quality and type (i.e. tiff or jpg).



Hecate

veni, vidi, reliqui

How to Improve Photoshop Performance

Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections