Strange CS2 problem

E
Posted By
embee
Jan 30, 2006
Views
328
Replies
5
Status
Closed
I’m running a P4 system with 1Gb RAM, Windows XP Home SP2. I’ve run previous versions of PS on this machine with no problem – plenty of speed. Having upgraded to CS2 (from CS) I’m now experiencing a very frustrating problem which is affecting my work. Basically, whenever I use the eyedropper tool to sample a colour (or when I Ctrl and drag over an image with Curves open on a channel to sample colour range) my system takes a long time to calculate the result. There’s lots of hard drive spinning for about 2 minutes before I can use CS2 again. I’m using a seperare scratch disc and, like I’ve said, have never had any issues with running PS on this system before. Any ideas on what’s going on? Thanks.

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

TN
Tesco News
Jan 31, 2006
"Mike" wrote in message
I’m running a P4 system with 1Gb RAM, Windows XP Home SP2. I’ve run previous
versions of PS on this machine with no problem – plenty of speed. Having upgraded to CS2 (from CS) I’m now experiencing a very frustrating problem which is affecting my work. Basically, whenever I use the eyedropper tool to
sample a colour (or when I Ctrl and drag over an image with Curves open on a
channel to sample colour range) my system takes a long time to calculate the
result. There’s lots of hard drive spinning for about 2 minutes before I can
use CS2 again. I’m using a seperare scratch disc and, like I’ve said, have never had any issues with running PS on this system before. Any ideas on what’s going on? Thanks.
Hi.

I can’t help much, but I felt that after moving from 7 to CS, my machine also slowed down considerably.

This was being discussed recently, and someone said that PS is now even more heavily dependant on the amount of RAM, than it used to be. Where 1gig used to be considered enough, more folks are now having to install 2 or 3 gig. There seemed to be some confusion as to when the change was made 7 to CS or CS to CS2.

No doubt some of the real tecchies will soon let us know exactly what is going on.

Roy G
E
embee
Jan 31, 2006
Hi.

I can’t help much, but I felt that after moving from 7 to CS, my machine also slowed down considerably.

This was being discussed recently, and someone said that PS is now even
more
heavily dependant on the amount of RAM, than it used to be. Where 1gig
used
to be considered enough, more folks are now having to install 2 or 3 gig. There seemed to be some confusion as to when the change was made 7 to CS
or
CS to CS2.

No doubt some of the real tecchies will soon let us know exactly what is going on.

Roy G
I’ve heard about the extra demands CS2 places on RAM as well, but almost everything else seems to work at about the same speed on my machine EXCEPT when I ask it to sample a colour. I don’t believe this is a particularly resource-hungry process, so it seems like there’s something else going on here.
Many thanks for the reply.
J
john
Feb 1, 2006
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:55:38 -0000, "Mike"
wrote:

Hi.

I can’t help much, but I felt that after moving from 7 to CS, my machine also slowed down considerably.

This was being discussed recently, and someone said that PS is now even
more
heavily dependant on the amount of RAM, than it used to be. Where 1gig
used
to be considered enough, more folks are now having to install 2 or 3 gig. There seemed to be some confusion as to when the change was made 7 to CS
or
CS to CS2.

No doubt some of the real tecchies will soon let us know exactly what is going on.

Roy G
I’ve heard about the extra demands CS2 places on RAM as well, but almost everything else seems to work at about the same speed on my machine EXCEPT when I ask it to sample a colour. I don’t believe this is a particularly resource-hungry process, so it seems like there’s something else going on here.
Many thanks for the reply.
This is not goint to help you but I "only" have 1 GB on my machine, Athlon 64 based, and CS2 is fine in all respects. However I now cannot use WinAmp. It takes at least 20 seconds or so to start each MP3 file. All the other players I have tried are fine. COMPUTERS !!!!!

John
C
Clyde
Feb 1, 2006
Mike wrote:
I’m running a P4 system with 1Gb RAM, Windows XP Home SP2. I’ve run previous versions of PS on this machine with no problem – plenty of speed. Having upgraded to CS2 (from CS) I’m now experiencing a very frustrating problem which is affecting my work. Basically, whenever I use the eyedropper tool to sample a colour (or when I Ctrl and drag over an image with Curves open on a channel to sample colour range) my system takes a long time to calculate the result. There’s lots of hard drive spinning for about 2 minutes before I can use CS2 again. I’m using a seperare scratch disc and, like I’ve said, have never had any issues with running PS on this system before. Any ideas on what’s going on? Thanks.

I used 1 GB of RAM on 7 and CS, but CS2 was noticeably slower. I put another gig in to bring it to 2 GB. That was great! CS2 really likes 2 GB of memory. Spend the money; you won’t be sorry.

Clyde
E
embee
Feb 1, 2006
I used 1 GB of RAM on 7 and CS, but CS2 was noticeably slower. I put another gig in to bring it to 2 GB. That was great! CS2 really likes 2 GB of memory. Spend the money; you won’t be sorry.

Clyde

Thanks, I may well end up spending some cash on extra RAM. But I still don’t understand why CS2 seems to perform pretty well on my 1GB machine EXCEPT for this one, relatively simple, function. I can build an image with dozens of layers and perform some quite resource intensive tasks and CS2 doesn’t complain. Then, when I try to sample a colour it hangs for ages, like I am asking it to do something very demanding.

Mike

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections