photobooth

On 13 Jun 2004 19:28:00 -0700, (Roger Mexico)
scribbled:

Does anyone know how I can take 5 photos and put them into photoshop and make them into one long photo like something that you would get from a photobooth. Thanks for any help.

Yes.

What solutions have YOU tried already?

create a new document very elongated, something like 200wide by 1600 high. position your pictures into this doc. Edit> transform to size each image. Theres other ways like cropping to size, but this way will work. pretty basic positioning with the move tool and guides.

"Roger Mexico" wrote in message

Does anyone know how I can take 5 photos and put them into photoshop and make them into one long photo like something that you would get from a photobooth. Thanks for any help.

http://www.arcsoft.com/en/products/photoprinter/

Voivod wrote:

On 13 Jun 2004 19:28:00 -0700, (Roger Mexico)
scribbled:

Does anyone know how I can take 5 photos and put them into photoshop and make them into one long photo like something that you would get from a photobooth. Thanks for any help.

Yes.

What solutions have YOU tried already?

Why don’t you help people if you know the answer to a specific question? You always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer? If you have a solution to this question help the guy. After reading this ng it seems like you ahd a very unpleasent childhood.

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:37:48 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Voivod wrote:

On 13 Jun 2004 19:28:00 -0700, (Roger Mexico)
scribbled:

Does anyone know how I can take 5 photos and put them into photoshop and make them into one long photo like something that you would get from a photobooth. Thanks for any help.

Yes.

What solutions have YOU tried already?

Why don’t you help people if you know the answer to a specific question? You

Why should I or anyone else GUESS what the person may or may not have already tried (not that many of these people ever TRY anything before asking simplistic questions). I could waste my time typing out in detail how to create an image that’s larger than all the images heights combined (plus a little) and wider than the widest image and then copying and pasting the individual images onto the larger one. But what if they’ve tried that already?

always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

I’ll gladly help if the person asking for help supplies even a MINIMUM of details about what they’ve tried on their OWN to solve the problem. I’m not about to waste my time on lazy fucks who can’t even be bothered to try before asking a stupid question like "How do I cut/copy and paste into a new image" there’s fucking help files and tutorials galore for basic Photoshop operation out there:

About 1,170,000 for photoshop tutorial:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=photos hop+tutorial

About 572,000 for photoshop basics:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=photos hop+basics

About 1,620,000 for photoshop learning:
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&i e=UTF-8&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=photoshop+learning

Combined that’s about 3,362,000 links to look through for BASIC Photoshop information.

On top of that there’s; about 132,000 for photoshop copy paste: http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&i e=UTF-8&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=photoshop+copy+paste

If you have a solution to this question help the guy. After reading this ng it seems like you ahd a very unpleasent childhood.

Ah, a fucking fake amateur psychologist, how sad. I thought you might be able to grasp a clue (see above) but you’re just drifting into idiotic lames.

4th tip
http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc-sci/netiquette.html

Smeltsmoke

in article 0Lizc.95891$
wrote on 06/14/2004 7:37 AM:

If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

So that crybabies like you will start blubbering.

Well…I didn’t do it in PS….a page layout program will be faster. I scanned a strip of film and in PS took out the photos that were there…then I used InDesign to put in my digital photos. Nice effect and a good way to use lots of pictures in a publication in very little space. In PS…its been said….make a blank file the size of the finished product….cut and paste the images into that…use guides to make them fall in the right place….its too easy….easier to do than to write about.

"Roger Mexico" wrote in message

Does anyone know how I can take 5 photos and put them into photoshop and make them into one long photo like something that you would get from a photobooth. Thanks for any help.

Why should I or anyone else GUESS what the person may or may not have already tried (not that many of these people ever TRY anything before asking simplistic questions).

You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

I could waste my time typing out in detail

how to create an image that’s larger than all the images heights combined (plus a little) and wider than the widest image and then copying and pasting the individual images onto the larger one.

There you see you can answer good.

But what
if they’ve tried that already?

If they tried that do you think they asked the question then?

always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

I’ll gladly help if the person asking for help supplies even a MINIMUM of details about what they’ve tried on their OWN to solve the problem.

But please Voivod He/She asked a specific question.You don’t need to know what he/she had done. If you have a solution help he/she otherwise you don’t need to answer at all.

I’m not about to waste my time on lazy fucks who can’t even be bothered to try before asking a stupid question like "How do I cut/copy and paste into a new image" there’s fucking help files and tutorials galore for basic Photoshop operation out there:

¨BUt you could waste the time on being rude in answers whitout giving any answers?

Ah, a fucking fake amateur psychologist, how sad. I thought you might be able to grasp a clue (see above) but you’re just drifting into idiotic lames.

And here starts the bad language as usual.

//BR Dräparn

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:19:38 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Why should I or anyone else GUESS what the person may or may not have already tried (not that many of these people ever TRY anything before asking simplistic questions).

You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

You don’t get to tell me what I do or don’t need to do at any point in time, ever.

I could waste my time typing out in detail

how to create an image that’s larger than all the images heights combined (plus a little) and wider than the widest image and then copying and pasting the individual images onto the larger one.

There you see you can answer good.

You don’t seem to grasp what I was saying.

But what
if they’ve tried that already?

If they tried that do you think they asked the question then?

You’re new here, huh? The question on how to place multiple images into one image is asked and answered on average of once a week. I’m not here, as I’ve said, to help lazy shits who can’t be bothered to help themselves BEFORE asking for help.

always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

I’ll gladly help if the person asking for help supplies even a MINIMUM of details about what they’ve tried on their OWN to solve the problem.

But please Voivod He/She asked a specific question.You don’t need to know what he/she had done. If you have a solution help he/she otherwise you don’t need to answer at all.

Again, you don’t get to say what I do or don’t need, do, write, whatever, you’re not my mom, wife or the moderator of this newsgroup.

I’m not about to waste my time on lazy fucks who can’t even be bothered to try before asking a stupid question like "How do I cut/copy and paste into a new image" there’s fucking help files and tutorials galore for basic Photoshop operation out there:

¨BUt you could waste the time on being rude in answers whitout giving any answers?

Asking someone what they’ve already tried, since they should have tried before asking, is not being rude it’s eliminating the processes that have already been done.

Ah, a fucking fake amateur psychologist, how sad. I thought you might be able to grasp a clue (see above) but you’re just drifting into idiotic lames.

And here starts the bad language as usual.

So it’s ok for you to lame my childhood but it’s not ok for me to flame you for your idiotic fake psychoanalysis? Any more rules you want me to laugh at or is that about it for you?

Voivod wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:19:38 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Why should I or anyone else GUESS what the person may or may not have already tried (not that many of these people ever TRY anything before asking simplistic questions).

You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

You don’t get to tell me what I do or don’t need to do at any point in time, ever.

OK english is not my mother tounge. I’ll put it this way. One don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

You don’t seem to grasp what I was saying.

I do, you just gave a correct answer.

But what
if they’ve tried that already?

If they tried that do you think they asked the question then?

You’re new here, huh? The question on how to place multiple images into one image is asked and answered on average of once a week. I’m not here, as I’ve said, to help lazy shits who can’t be bothered to help themselves BEFORE asking for help.

No I’m not new here. I have been reading this ng quite long time now. Maybe they’re new to this ng. Then they will not se old answers. For example the oldest messages I can se posted in May.

always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

I’ll gladly help if the person asking for help supplies even a MINIMUM of details about what they’ve tried on their OWN to solve the problem.

But please Voivod He/She asked a specific question.You don’t need to know what he/she had done. If you have a solution help he/she otherwise you don’t need to answer at all.

Again, you don’t get to say what I do or don’t need, do, write, whatever, you’re not my mom, wife or the moderator of this newsgroup.

I have never said that i was. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere in this ng.

Asking someone what they’ve already tried, since they should have tried before asking, is not being rude it’s eliminating the processes that have already been done.

Again but if you know a correct way to solve their problem. Why do you need to know what they have done?

Ah, a fucking fake amateur psychologist, how sad. I thought you might be able to grasp a clue (see above) but you’re just drifting into idiotic lames.

And here starts the bad language as usual.

So it’s ok for you to lame my childhood but it’s not ok for me to flame you for your idiotic fake psychoanalysis?

Flame on my friend flame on. But I don’t use bad language.

Any more rules you want me to
laugh at or is that about it for you?

I have not given you any rules to follow. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere here in this ng.

//BR Dräparn

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:55:51 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Voivod wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:19:38 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Why should I or anyone else GUESS what the person may or may not have already tried (not that many of these people ever TRY anything before asking simplistic questions).

You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

You don’t get to tell me what I do or don’t need to do at any point in time, ever.

OK english is not my mother tounge. I’ll put it this way. One don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

Again, you do not get to dictate the terms by which anyone other than yourself posts by.

You don’t seem to grasp what I was saying.

I do, you just gave a correct answer.

That’s proof you didn’t get what I was saying.

But what
if they’ve tried that already?

If they tried that do you think they asked the question then?

You’re new here, huh? The question on how to place multiple images into one image is asked and answered on average of once a week. I’m not here, as I’ve said, to help lazy shits who can’t be bothered to help themselves BEFORE asking for help.

No I’m not new here. I have been reading this ng quite long time now. Maybe they’re new to this ng. Then they will not se old answers. For example the oldest messages I can se posted in May.

Never heard of Google?

always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

I’ll gladly help if the person asking for help supplies even a MINIMUM of details about what they’ve tried on their OWN to solve the problem.

But please Voivod He/She asked a specific question.You don’t need to know what he/she had done. If you have a solution help he/she otherwise you don’t need to answer at all.

Again, you don’t get to say what I do or don’t need, do, write, whatever, you’re not my mom, wife or the moderator of this newsgroup.

I have never said that i was. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere in this ng.

Asking someone what they’ve already tried, since they should have tried before asking, is not being rude it’s eliminating the processes that have already been done.

Again but if you know a correct way to solve their problem. Why do you need to know what they have done?

So I don’t give waste my time giving an answer they’ve already tried. We’ve covered this several times, get someone who does English better to help you with whatever you can’t understand.

Ah, a fucking fake amateur psychologist, how sad. I thought you might be able to grasp a clue (see above) but you’re just drifting into idiotic lames.

And here starts the bad language as usual.

So it’s ok for you to lame my childhood but it’s not ok for me to flame you for your idiotic fake psychoanalysis?

Flame on my friend flame on. But I don’t use bad language.

You just carry a huge double standard.

Any more rules you want me to
laugh at or is that about it for you?

I have not given you any rules to follow. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere here in this ng.

Tough shit.

Voivod wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:55:51 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Voivod wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:19:38 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Why should I or anyone else GUESS what the person may or may not have already tried (not that many of these people ever TRY anything before asking simplistic questions).

You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

You don’t get to tell me what I do or don’t need to do at any point in time, ever.

OK english is not my mother tounge. I’ll put it this way. One don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

Again, you do not get to dictate the terms by which anyone other than yourself posts by.

I’m not dictating anything. I’m just saying You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer
..

You don’t seem to grasp what I was saying.

I do, you just gave a correct answer.

That’s proof you didn’t get what I was saying.

That’s proof nothing.What was wrong in the answer you wrote? Explain please.

"I could waste my time typing out in detail
how to create an image that’s larger than all the images heights combined (plus a little) and wider than the widest image and then copying and pasting the individual images onto the larger one"

But what
if they’ve tried that already?

If they tried that do you think they asked the question then?

You’re new here, huh? The question on how to place multiple images into one image is asked and answered on average of once a week. I’m not here, as I’ve said, to help lazy shits who can’t be bothered to help themselves BEFORE asking for help.

No I’m not new here. I have been reading this ng quite long time now. Maybe they’re new to this ng. Then they will not se old answers. For example the oldest messages I can se posted in May.

Never heard of Google?

Yes I have.

always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

I’ll gladly help if the person asking for help supplies even a MINIMUM of details about what they’ve tried on their OWN to solve the problem.

But please Voivod He/She asked a specific question.You don’t need to know what he/she had done. If you have a solution help he/she otherwise you don’t need to answer at all.

Again, you don’t get to say what I do or don’t need, do, write, whatever, you’re not my mom, wife or the moderator of this newsgroup.

I have never said that i was. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere in this ng.

Asking someone what they’ve already tried, since they should have tried before asking, is not being rude it’s eliminating the processes that have already been done.

Again but if you know a correct way to solve their problem. Why do you need to know what they have done?

So I don’t give waste my time giving an answer they’ve already tried. We’ve covered this several times, get someone who does English better to help you with whatever you can’t understand.

They can’t have tried a correct way to do it.If so they haven’t asked the question

Any more rules you want me to
laugh at or is that about it for you?

I have not given you any rules to follow. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere here in this ng.

Tough shit.

Do you think that’s bad?

//BR Dräparn

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:06:49 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Voivod wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:55:51 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Voivod wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:19:38 GMT, Dräparn scribbled:

Why should I or anyone else GUESS what the person may or may not have already tried (not that many of these people ever TRY anything before asking simplistic questions).

You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

You don’t get to tell me what I do or don’t need to do at any point in time, ever.

OK english is not my mother tounge. I’ll put it this way. One don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

Again, you do not get to dictate the terms by which anyone other than yourself posts by.

I’m not dictating anything. I’m just saying You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer

YOU don’t get to make that decision for me.

You don’t seem to grasp what I was saying.

I do, you just gave a correct answer.

That’s proof you didn’t get what I was saying.

That’s proof nothing.What was wrong in the answer you wrote? Explain please.

You didn’t read the words around it.

"I could waste my time typing out in detail
how to create an image that’s larger than all the images heights combined (plus a little) and wider than the widest image and then copying and pasting the individual images onto the larger one"

But what
if they’ve tried that already?

If they tried that do you think they asked the question then?

You’re new here, huh? The question on how to place multiple images into one image is asked and answered on average of once a week. I’m not here, as I’ve said, to help lazy shits who can’t be bothered to help themselves BEFORE asking for help.

No I’m not new here. I have been reading this ng quite long time now. Maybe they’re new to this ng. Then they will not se old answers. For example the oldest messages I can se posted in May.

Never heard of Google?

Yes I have.

Good for you, here, have a biscuit.

always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

I’ll gladly help if the person asking for help supplies even a MINIMUM of details about what they’ve tried on their OWN to solve the problem.

But please Voivod He/She asked a specific question.You don’t need to know what he/she had done. If you have a solution help he/she otherwise you don’t need to answer at all.

Again, you don’t get to say what I do or don’t need, do, write, whatever, you’re not my mom, wife or the moderator of this newsgroup.

I have never said that i was. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere in this ng.

Asking someone what they’ve already tried, since they should have tried before asking, is not being rude it’s eliminating the processes that have already been done.

Again but if you know a correct way to solve their problem. Why do you need to know what they have done?

So I don’t give waste my time giving an answer they’ve already tried. We’ve covered this several times, get someone who does English better to help you with whatever you can’t understand.

They can’t have tried a correct way to do it.If so they haven’t asked the question

And knowing what they’ve tried narrows down the possible answers. You don’t do logic well at all, do you?

Any more rules you want me to
laugh at or is that about it for you?

I have not given you any rules to follow. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere here in this ng.

Tough shit.

Do you think that’s bad?

You just don’t get it.

in article rlCzc.2671$
wrote on 06/15/2004 5:55 AM:

Again but if you know a correct way to solve their problem. Why do you need to know what they have done?

Because that is how he chooses to respond to stupid questions that have been asked before.

I have not given you any rules to follow. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere here in this ng.

What you want is not important.

Why should I or anyone else GUESS what the person may or may not have already tried (not that many of these people ever TRY anything before asking simplistic questions).

You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

You don’t get to tell me what I do or don’t need to do at any point in time, ever.

OK english is not my mother tounge. I’ll put it this way. One don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer.

Again, you do not get to dictate the terms by which anyone other than yourself posts by.

I’m not dictating anything. I’m just saying You don’t need to know what they tried to give a correct answer

YOU don’t get to make that decision for me.

Do you really got to know what they have done to give a correct answer?

You don’t seem to grasp what I was saying.

I do, you just gave a correct answer.

That’s proof you didn’t get what I was saying.

That’s proof nothing.What was wrong in the answer you wrote? Explain please.

You didn’t read the words around it.

Explain again please what was wrong with your answer.

"I could waste my time typing out in detail
how to create an image that’s larger than all the images heights combined (plus a little) and wider than the widest image and then copying and pasting the individual images onto the larger one"

But what
if they’ve tried that already?

If they tried that do you think they asked the question then?

You’re new here, huh? The question on how to place multiple images into one image is asked and answered on average of once a week. I’m not here, as I’ve said, to help lazy shits who can’t be bothered to help themselves BEFORE asking for help.

No I’m not new here. I have been reading this ng quite long time now. Maybe they’re new to this ng. Then they will not se old answers. For example the oldest messages I can se posted in May.

Never heard of Google?

Yes I have.

Good for you, here, have a biscuit.

Thanks do you have more?

always give replies like this.If you don’t want to help why bother answer?

I’ll gladly help if the person asking for help supplies even a MINIMUM of details about what they’ve tried on their OWN to solve the problem.

But please Voivod He/She asked a specific question.You don’t need to know what he/she had done. If you have a solution help he/she otherwise you don’t need to answer at all.

Again, you don’t get to say what I do or don’t need, do, write, whatever, you’re not my mom, wife or the moderator of this newsgroup.

I have never said that i was. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere in this ng.

Asking someone what they’ve already tried, since they should have tried before asking, is not being rude it’s eliminating the processes that have already been done.

Again but if you know a correct way to solve their problem. Why do you need to know what they have done?

So I don’t give waste my time giving an answer they’ve already tried. We’ve covered this several times, get someone who does English better to help you with whatever you can’t understand.

They can’t have tried a correct way to do it.If so they haven’t asked the question

And knowing what they’ve tried narrows down the possible answers. You don’t do logic well at all, do you?

OK so if they explain 5 wrong ways to do it. How could that help you to narrow down the possible answers? If there are X ways to do it correct there are X ways to do it correct independent of how many ways they have done it wrong.

Any more rules you want me to
laugh at or is that about it for you?

I have not given you any rules to follow. I just wanted a nicer atmosphere here in this ng.

Tough shit.

Do you think that’s bad?

You just don’t get it.

So you don’t want a nicer atmosphere in this ng or? You didn’t answer my question.

//BR Dräparn

Fan jag driver ju bara med dig för att du är så otrevlig mot dom flesta i den här gruppen.

in article 4RGzc.2690$
wrote on 06/15/2004 11:02 AM:

OK so if they explain 5 wrong ways to do it. How could that help you to narrow down the possible answers? If there are X ways to do it correct there are X ways to do it correct independent of how many ways they have done it wrong.

There are hundreds of ways to get "The Void" to see your point of view, which ones have you tried?

Oh, you tried to tell him what the newsgroup is for.

You tried to tell him how to respond to people that ask silly questions.

You tried to tell him what you want the atmosphere to be in the newsgroup.

Did any of those ways work?

NO?

Then try this… stop reading his messages.

See if that works.