pixel

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 02:28:00 -0500, prafulla
scribbled:

What is a pixel? Does it have a specific shape and size?

What is a search engine? What is doing your own research?

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:28:17 GMT, "OnlyMe"
wrote:

www.whatis.com – is a great site for all sorts of computer related questions… add it to your favourites/bookmark it!

Cheers

OnlyMe

Thanks for the wonderful link

E

remove those pesky SPOTTEDELEPHANTS to reply

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:28:17 GMT, "OnlyMe"
scribbled:

OK – first of all, ignore the resident trolls – they seem to spend their

Yeah, whatever you do, DON’T bother to do your own minimal research since some idiotic ‘do gooder’ will come along and do it for you.

lives in here, they get their kicks from giving rude replies to questions. You can bet your life they wouldn’t dare be as rude in real life…

You’d lose that bet.

I guess you are completely new to computer graphics and maybe even computers, possibly don’t know what a search engine is? Although (generally) asking a question in a newsgroup is just as valid as any other method of research – this one has a lot of trolls just waiting to leap on the back of anyone who isn’t an expert and dares to ask (what they consider to be) too simple a question!

You don’t need to be an ‘expert’ to type ‘pixel’ into a search engine. All you really need is a pulse and an IQ above room temperature.

Anyway, we all have to start somewhere – just click on this link and all will be explained regarding pixels:

http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci212793,00 .html

See, you don’t need to think. You don’t need to learn! Some idiot will come along do it all for you!

OK – first of all, ignore the resident trolls – they seem to spend their lives in here, they get their kicks from giving rude replies to questions. You can bet your life they wouldn’t dare be as rude in real life…

I guess you are completely new to computer graphics and maybe even computers, possibly don’t know what a search engine is? Although (generally) asking a question in a newsgroup is just as valid as any other method of research – this one has a lot of trolls just waiting to leap on the back of anyone who isn’t an expert and dares to ask (what they consider to be) too simple a question!

Anyway, we all have to start somewhere – just click on this link and all will be explained regarding pixels:

http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci212793,00 .html

www.whatis.com – is a great site for all sorts of computer related questions… add it to your favourites/bookmark it!

Cheers

OnlyMe

"prafulla" wrote in message

Dear All,

What is a pixel? Does it have a specific shape and size? If NO, how to modify it in Photoshop?

How to fix the size of an image in photoshop that would accupy whole screen in Dreamweaver, that is, an image which gets displayed on the whole screen when viewed in IE browser.

Thanks
Prafulla

—
prafulla
———————————————————— ———— Posted via http://www.forum4designers.com
———————————————————— ———— View this thread: http://www.forum4designers.com/message107663.html

I wouldn’t go as far as "new to computers" since OP can evidently read newgroups. 😉

OnlyMe wrote:

[sic]

I guess you are completely new to computer graphics and maybe even computers…

[sic]

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

Voivod wrote:

[sic]

Yeah, whatever you do, DON’T bother to do your own minimal research since some idiotic ‘do gooder’ will come along and do it for you.

[sic]

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Learning HOW to learn is one of the most important things people can learn and they’re not going to do it if people answer simple, stupid questions that can be answered on their own in 30 seconds or less.

Voivod wrote:

[sic]

Yeah, whatever you do, DON’T bother to do your own minimal research since some idiotic ‘do gooder’ will come along and do it for you.

[sic]

"Voivod" scribbled:

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Learning HOW to learn is one of the most important things people can learn and they’re not going to do it if people answer simple, stupid questions that can be answered on their own in 30 seconds or less.

Voivod wrote:

[sic]

Yeah, whatever you do, DON’T bother to do your own minimal research since some idiotic ‘do gooder’ will come along and do it for you.

[sic]

Don’t be late for your anger management class. You’ve obviously missed quite a few.
Now, breeaatthhhhh!!!!

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:03:40 -0400, " TooSano4U" <watashee@{delete}one.net> scribbled:

"Voivod" scribbled:

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Learning HOW to learn is one of the most important things people can learn and they’re not going to do it if people answer simple, stupid questions that can be answered on their own in 30 seconds or less.

Voivod wrote:

[sic]

Yeah, whatever you do, DON’T bother to do your own minimal research since some idiotic ‘do gooder’ will come along and do it for you.

[sic]

Don’t be late for your anger management class. You’ve obviously missed quite a few.
Now, breeaatthhhhh!!!!

Don’t quit your day job, you’ll never make it as a comic..

in article 5kpTc.843$, OnlyMe at
wrote on 08/14/2004 7:28 AM:

OK – first of all, ignore the resident trolls …

Then you can ignore the resident idiots with a "Jesus Complex" that want to save you.

Back in the first days of the public internet when I first moved on from the BBSs I found my first search engine…one of the first things I put into it was "search engine"….the best move I ever made. Learned all kinds of things. Still works….though Google is amazing and will get most of the information available now a days.

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Learning HOW to learn is one of the most important things people can learn and they’re not going to do it if people answer simple, stupid questions that can be answered on their own in 30 seconds or less.

Voivod wrote:

[sic]

Yeah, whatever you do, DON’T bother to do your own minimal research since some idiotic ‘do gooder’ will come along and do it for you.

[sic]

Good one – to subtle for him though :o)

OnlyMe

" TooSano4U" <watashee@{delete}one.net> wrote in message

"Voivod" scribbled:

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Learning HOW to learn is one of the most important things people can learn and they’re not going to do it if people answer simple, stupid questions that can be answered on their own in 30 seconds or less.

Voivod wrote:

[sic]

Yeah, whatever you do, DON’T bother to do your own minimal research since some idiotic ‘do gooder’ will come along and do it for you.

[sic]

Don’t be late for your anger management class. You’ve obviously missed

quite

a few.
Now, breeaatthhhhh!!!!

You see what I mean? :o)

Cheers

OnlyMe

"prafulla" wrote in message

Dear All,

What is a pixel? Does it have a specific shape and size? If NO, how to modify it in Photoshop?

How to fix the size of an image in photoshop that would accupy whole screen in Dreamweaver, that is, an image which gets displayed on the whole screen when viewed in IE browser.

Thanks
Prafulla

—
prafulla
———————————————————— ———— Posted via http://www.forum4designers.com
———————————————————— ———— View this thread: http://www.forum4designers.com/message107663.html

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Through the course of time, many new questions asked may well be repeats of questions once asked. So what if the question was similar to one that was asked sometime in the past. The news group is not your domain.

Learning HOW to learn is one of the most important things people can learn and they’re not going to do it if people answer simple, stupid questions that can be answered on their own in 30 seconds or less.

Voivod wrote:

[sic]

Yeah, whatever you do, DON’T bother to do your own minimal research since some idiotic ‘do gooder’ will come along and do it for you.

[sic]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 05:34:50 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Through the course of time, many new questions asked may well be repeats of questions once asked. So what if the question was similar to one that was

Which means a quick search of Google’s usenet archive means you don’t HAVE to ask the same question again since it’s, more than likely, already been answered.

asked sometime in the past. The news group is not your domain.

But my answers and my opinions are and if you don’t like them you’re welcome to learn how to use your filters. I stand by my comment that doing a minimum of research before asking a question is a good way to do things. Learning HOW to learn is just as important as learning something specific.

in article _ZWUc.150320$
wrote on 08/18/2004 10:34 PM:

So what if the question was similar to one that was
asked sometime in the past.

You will not get help for your questions if you keep that attitude and if you don’t attempt to Google for the answers yourself. Most simple answers have already been answered in the newsgroup. Google – Groups for the answers.

Now run along, newbie.

"TheOne" wrote in message

in article _ZWUc.150320$, Nick C at

wrote on 08/18/2004 10:34 PM:

So what if the question was similar to one that was
asked sometime in the past.

You will not get help for your questions if you keep that attitude and if you don’t attempt to Google for the answers yourself. Most simple answers have already been answered in the newsgroup. Google – Groups for the answers.

Now run along, newbie.

Newbie?

LOL ……

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 05:34:50 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Through the course of time, many new questions asked may well be repeats

of

questions once asked. So what if the question was similar to one that was

Which means a quick search of Google’s usenet archive means you don’t HAVE to ask the same question again since it’s, more than likely, already been answered.

asked sometime in the past. The news group is not your domain.

But my answers and my opinions are and if you don’t like them you’re welcome to learn how to use your filters. I stand by my comment that doing a minimum of research before asking a question is a good way to do things. Learning HOW to learn is just as important as learning something specific.

I’ll stand by my comment "so what if the question is similar to one that has been asked in the past." That is my response back to you and if you don’t like it learn to use your filters.

You ought to feel complimented when some one asks a question to which you have an answer. If you feel it’s beneath your dignity or tedious to respond to a post, then don’t respond. A questioner does not post a question expecting to be rebuked but does expect to receive a civil answer. Besides, someone else may chose to answer the question thereby leaving you appearing as though you lack civility.

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:50:20 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 05:34:50 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Through the course of time, many new questions asked may well be repeats

of

questions once asked. So what if the question was similar to one that was

Which means a quick search of Google’s usenet archive means you don’t HAVE to ask the same question again since it’s, more than likely, already been answered.

asked sometime in the past. The news group is not your domain.

But my answers and my opinions are and if you don’t like them you’re welcome to learn how to use your filters. I stand by my comment that doing a minimum of research before asking a question is a good way to do things. Learning HOW to learn is just as important as learning something specific.

I’ll stand by my comment "so what if the question is similar to one that has been asked in the past." That is my response back to you and if you don’t like it learn to use your filters.

You’re almost as good as a half trained parrot! Ok, now say, ‘polly want a fuckwit’.

You ought to feel complimented when some one asks a question to which you

Who the fuck are you to tell me or anyone else how they should feel about anything?

have an answer. If you feel it’s beneath your dignity or tedious to respond to a post, then don’t respond. A questioner does not post a question expecting to be rebuked but does expect to receive a civil answer. Besides,

Now ask me if I care.

someone else may chose to answer the question thereby leaving you appearing as though you lack civility.

No, really, ask me if I care.

Dumb.

in article MD6Vc.282062$
wrote on 08/19/2004 11:50 AM:

I’ll stand by my comment "so what if the question is similar to one that has been asked in the past."

Then it does not need to be answered again.

You ought to feel complimented when some one asks a question to which you have an answer.

Your fantasies about what other people should feel is irrelevant.

If you feel it’s beneath your dignity or tedious to respond to a post, then don’t respond.

You don’t understand how newsgroups work. Any response is allowed. Even rude ones.

A questioner does not post a question
expecting to be rebuked but does expect to receive a civil answer.

Your fantasies about what "questioners" want or expect is also irrelevant.

Besides,
someone else may chose to answer the question thereby leaving you appearing as though you lack civility.

Your fantasies about "appearances" is also irrelevant.

in article , Voivod at
wrote on 08/19/2004 12:47 PM:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:50:20 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 05:34:50 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers, but for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the 1st 20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to ask questions like that.

Through the course of time, many new questions asked may well be repeats

of

questions once asked. So what if the question was similar to one that was

Which means a quick search of Google’s usenet archive means you don’t HAVE to ask the same question again since it’s, more than likely, already been answered.

asked sometime in the past. The news group is not your domain.

But my answers and my opinions are and if you don’t like them you’re welcome to learn how to use your filters. I stand by my comment that doing a minimum of research before asking a question is a good way to do things. Learning HOW to learn is just as important as learning something specific.

I’ll stand by my comment "so what if the question is similar to one that has been asked in the past." That is my response back to you and if you don’t like it learn to use your filters.

You’re almost as good as a half trained parrot! Ok, now say, ‘polly want a fuckwit’.

You ought to feel complimented when some one asks a question to which you

Who the fuck are you to tell me or anyone else how they should feel about anything?

have an answer. If you feel it’s beneath your dignity or tedious to respond to a post, then don’t respond. A questioner does not post a question expecting to be rebuked but does expect to receive a civil answer. Besides,

Now ask me if I care.

someone else may chose to answer the question thereby leaving you appearing as though you lack civility.

No, really, ask me if I care.

This Newbie Nick has potential to be a good "Net Toy" if he does not run away.

hahahahaha.

in article dx8Vc.282419$
wrote on 08/19/2004 1:59 PM:

Dumb.

Maybe you should go back to school.

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:59:53 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

Dumb.

Yes, you most certainly are.

"TheOne" wrote in message

in article , Voivod at
wrote on 08/19/2004 12:47 PM:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:50:20 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 05:34:50 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers,

but

for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the

1st

20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to

ask

questions like that.

Through the course of time, many new questions asked may well be

repeats

of

questions once asked. So what if the question was similar to one that

was

Which means a quick search of Google’s usenet archive means you don’t HAVE to ask the same question again since it’s, more than likely, already been answered.

asked sometime in the past. The news group is not your domain.

But my answers and my opinions are and if you don’t like them you’re welcome to learn how to use your filters. I stand by my comment that doing a minimum of research before asking a question is a good way to

do

things. Learning HOW to learn is just as important as learning

something

specific.

I’ll stand by my comment "so what if the question is similar to one

that has

been asked in the past." That is my response back to you and if you

don’t

like it learn to use your filters.

You’re almost as good as a half trained parrot! Ok, now say, ‘polly want a fuckwit’.

You ought to feel complimented when some one asks a question to which

you

Who the fuck are you to tell me or anyone else how they should feel about anything?

have an answer. If you feel it’s beneath your dignity or tedious to

respond

to a post, then don’t respond. A questioner does not post a question expecting to be rebuked but does expect to receive a civil answer.

Besides,

Now ask me if I care.

someone else may chose to answer the question thereby leaving you

appearing

as though you lack civility.

No, really, ask me if I care.

This Newbie Nick has potential to be a good "Net Toy" if he does not run away.

hahahahaha.

A simple mind finds pleasure in simple things.

Be careful, if you laugh hard enough you’ll wet your diapers again.

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:59:53 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

Dumb.

Yes, you most certainly are.

Shrug.

I wonder, did you do your Google searches to become a self taught idiot?

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 22:45:11 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

I wonder

I’m sure you do, a lot.

in article UZ9Vc.282722$
wrote on 08/19/2004 3:38 PM:

A simple mind finds pleasure in simple things.

Thus you come back for more.

in article X3aVc.287509$%
wrote on 08/19/2004 3:45 PM:

I wonder, did you do your Google searches to become a self taught idiot?

Too bad about your lack of knowledge of how newsgroups work and anything to do with Photoshop.

All you are left with is rude comments and name calling.

"TheOne" wrote in message

in article X3aVc.287509$%, Nick C at

wrote on 08/19/2004 3:45 PM:

I wonder, did you do your Google searches to become a self taught idiot?

Too bad about your lack of knowledge of how newsgroups work and anything

to

do with Photoshop.

BS. There is such a thing as netiquette, which you have chosen to ignore.

I’ll quote from one of your stupid posts "You don’t understand how newsgroups work. Any response is allowed. Even rude ones."

The application of netiquette does not encourage the use of rude replies. I suggest it is you who should become more familiar with the working processes of newsgroups for it’s obvious you are not familiar with the rule of netiquette. It is apparent you like being rude to others but you dislike being treated in a like-kind rude manner. Tough

All you are left with is rude comments and name calling.

A review of this thread will disclose I was posting in a gentlemanly manner, complying with the rule of netiquette, until you decided to insert uncalled for mockery. Try your idiotic frivolity on me and you will incur a reply obviously not to your liking.

in article k%rVc.44805$ wrote on
08/20/2004 12:09 PM:

Too bad about your lack of knowledge of how newsgroups work and anything to do with Photoshop.

BS.

Just as you can write "bs" when you choose to, so can I. Your need for what you think is good "netiquette" is not my need. Your standards are not mine. You have yet to learn that what you think is correct and "good" may not be universal.

There is such a thing as netiquette…

Which you are choosing to ignore.

I’ll quote from one of your stupid posts "You don’t understand how newsgroups work. Any response is allowed. Even rude ones."
The application of netiquette does not encourage the use of rude replies. I suggest it is you who should become more familiar with the working processes of newsgroups for it’s obvious you are not familiar with the rule of netiquette.

"Netiquette" is not a law, not a rule, not even a "must do". It is only a suggestion and I don’t care what your fantasies about "netiquette" are. Obviously you don’t care enough about "netiquette" to follow it yourself, so I see no reason to.

It is apparent you like being rude to others but you dislike being treated in a like-kind rude manner. Tough

I enjoy goofy people like you. You are not harming me in the least. You are not treating me in a rude manner because I expect your kind to respond as you are responding. That is what makes the game worth playing.

Your kind thinks they know what is best, and you will be as rude as you can be to prove your point. Which negates your "point" in the process.

Which find totally amusing.

All you are left with is rude comments and name calling.

I was posting in a gentlemanly manner,
complying with the rule of netiquette, until you decided to insert uncalled for mockery.

Which forced you how to throw away your sacred "netiquette" I am sure.

Tell me again how you were forced to do that…

hahahahaha.

Try your idiotic frivolity on me and you will incur a reply obviously not to your liking.

You have yet to write a reply that I have not enjoyed. You are a goofball, you can’t do anything but be a goofy person, and write goofy things.

And what did I tell you… that you would be back for more… and here you are.

hahahahaha.

"NoOne" wrote in message

in article k%rVc.44805$ wrote

on

08/20/2004 12:09 PM:
And what did I tell you… that you would be back for more… and here you are.

hahahahaha.

No, it’s you that comes back for more, looooooser.

in article , The Wild, Wild West at
wrote on 08/20/2004 1:13 PM:

No, it’s you that comes back for more, looooooser.

I have always been here. You are the newbie. Otherwise you would have known about me and not had such a fit about how I choose to write in the newsgroup.

hahahahaha.

"TheOne" wrote in message

in article k%rVc.44805$ wrote

on

08/20/2004 12:09 PM:

Too bad about your lack of knowledge of how newsgroups work and

anything

to do with Photoshop.

BS.

Just as you can write "bs" when you choose to, so can I. Your need for

what

you think is good "netiquette" is not my need. Your standards are not

mine.

You have yet to learn that what you think is correct and "good" may not be universal.

From the manner of your posts and the thought processes you display in your posts, the only conclusion one can reach is that you lack the intelligence to know right from wrong. You, being the moronic idiot that you are, do not deserve to be treatred as an adult.

I gather you are the ng’s resident clown. A much too higher rating at that.

Snip

"TheOne" wrote in message

in article , The Wild, Wild West at
wrote on 08/20/2004 1:13 PM:

No, it’s you that comes back for more, looooooser.

I have always been here. You are the newbie. Otherwise you would have known about me and not had such a fit about how I choose to write in the newsgroup.

hahahahaha.

(A Hyena laughs)

Just taking up space does not mean you have been productive.

in article s9AVc.199977$
wrote on 08/20/2004 9:26 PM:

the only conclusion one can reach is that you lack the intelligence to know right from wrong.

I know enough to hook you right in the eye, 3 days running.

You keep coming back and keep telling me your smallest thoughts, like I am supposed to care about your thoughts.

It is so cute.

You, being the moronic idiot that you are, do not
deserve to be treatred as an adult.

And you are doing this because you are so adult and not moronic or idiotic?

I do enjoy goofy kids like you.

As if you writing your silly messages is going to do anything but show how silly you can be — if you allow yourself to write as you wish.

There really is nothing for you to be concerned about. I write as I wish and so can you. You name call and I write rude messages … no difference.

Tell me again how adult you are.

hahahaha.

I gather you are the ng’s resident clown.

You are my trained doggy.

Now do a nice trick for the audience.

hahahaha.

in article 8eAVc.57170$
wrote on 08/20/2004 9:31 PM:

Just taking up space does not mean you have been productive.

There is no need for "productive" messages. Each person decides how they will use the newsgroup, and I choose to use it to find — and then play with goofballs like you.

Trolling is a sport, and you are a good catch.

"TheOne" wrote in message

in article , The Wild, Wild West at
wrote on 08/20/2004 1:13 PM:

No, it’s you that comes back for more, looooooser.

I have always been here. You are the newbie. Otherwise you would have known about me and not had such a fit about how I choose to write in the newsgroup.

Presence of space does not mean presence of mind.

"TheOne" wrote in message

in article 8eAVc.57170$
wrote on 08/20/2004 9:31 PM:

Just taking up space does not mean you have been productive.

There is no need for "productive" messages. Each person decides how they will use the newsgroup, and I choose to use it to find — and then play

with

goofballs like you.

SO, are you saying that if everyone ignored you, you would just go away??? Highly unlikely. Your addictions won’t let you.

in article , The Wild, Wild West at
wrote on 08/21/2004 6:19 AM:

SO, are you saying that if everyone ignored you, you would just go away??? Highly unlikely.

There is no need to "go away"… there will always be another silly person like you that comes along and thinks he knows what is best for the newsgroup and what I should be doing or not doing. Then I get to play with them just like I am playing with you.

naughty Nick C tsk tsk

The One means no harm merely inspriring insight

Hang loose, be cool and be amazed – these are emotions. Do not let them sidetrack you like a badly designed website

You too will soon worship (all hail) the Might One too

Artio

"Nick C" wrote in message

"TheOne" wrote in message

in article , Voivod at
wrote on 08/19/2004 12:47 PM:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:50:20 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 05:34:50 GMT, "Nick C"
scribbled:

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:35:43 +0200, Branko Vukelic
<name+> scribbled:

You’re talking to a buch of bricks in a brickwall again, huh? 😉

You know I’ve got no problem with questions with obscure answers,

but

for fuck’s sake; "what is a pixel?" Christ, 10 seconds with Google returns Results 1 – 100 of about 678 for "what is a pixel" and the

1st

20 links ALL have good definitions. It’s sheer fucking laziness to

ask

questions like that.

Through the course of time, many new questions asked may well be

repeats

of

questions once asked. So what if the question was similar to one

that

was

Which means a quick search of Google’s usenet archive means you

don’t

HAVE to ask the same question again since it’s, more than likely, already been answered.

asked sometime in the past. The news group is not your domain.

But my answers and my opinions are and if you don’t like them you’re welcome to learn how to use your filters. I stand by my comment that doing a minimum of research before asking a question is a good way

to

do

things. Learning HOW to learn is just as important as learning

something

specific.

I’ll stand by my comment "so what if the question is similar to one

that has

been asked in the past." That is my response back to you and if you

don’t

like it learn to use your filters.

You’re almost as good as a half trained parrot! Ok, now say, ‘polly

want

a fuckwit’.

You ought to feel complimented when some one asks a question to which

you

Who the fuck are you to tell me or anyone else how they should feel about anything?

have an answer. If you feel it’s beneath your dignity or tedious to

respond

to a post, then don’t respond. A questioner does not post a question expecting to be rebuked but does expect to receive a civil answer.

Besides,

Now ask me if I care.

someone else may chose to answer the question thereby leaving you

appearing

as though you lack civility.

No, really, ask me if I care.

This Newbie Nick has potential to be a good "Net Toy" if he does not run away.

hahahahaha.

A simple mind finds pleasure in simple things.

Be careful, if you laugh hard enough you’ll wet your diapers again.

sk! that’s not nice

Artio

"Hecete" wrote in message

in article 5kpTc.843$, OnlyMe at
wrote on 08/14/2004 7:28 AM:

OK – first of all, ignore the resident trolls …

Then you can ignore the resident idiots with a "Jesus Complex" that want

to

save you.