In article , says…
Hunt wrote:
In article <91rmd.3537$ says…
Matrox
"Mark" wrote in message
I just bought a new monitor and I was wondering what benefit if any
there
would be in getting a better Video card. Right now if I create a black
to
white gradient across the display I see significant banding, for
instance.
Would this be an issue of the screen or the card delivering the signal
to
it? Would a better card enable me to properly calibrate the display with
a
product like the BasICColor Squid?
Right now the ‘puter has an Intel 82865G graphics controller. Any recommendations?
Thanks all,
Mark
I second that opinion. Starting with whatever their 450 series is now to
the
Parhalia. Multi-monitor support, even if you are not using it now, is a big plus with PS. I still have an older 450G 64MB Matrox that is functioning beautifully at 1280×1024 on two 21" screens in PS CS. It will actually push the main beyond that, but then the toolbox gets too small for my working distance. The newer cards are faster via processor and offer more VRAM, but that is less important in 2-D. Beyond Matrox, most of the current crop of nVidia cards will work, but most of the $ in them is for 3-D apps, and
gaming.
Not a bottleneck for PS, just relatively useless.
Hunt
How much vram do you need for 2D only? Do you really need 64MB?
Probably not, but that was the "gold standard" when I bought that card. I also do some light 3-D stuff with it, so I went with the "best" that Matrox offered then. I have two 128 cards on other machines and don’t see a whit of difference with PS, and I’m pushing *about* the same rez on single monitors with them. I would be interested in seeing some emperical tests of vid-cards and vid-RAM with PS, as this is a much discussed issue, and all I have seen are the, "this worked for me" comments, just like my own.
OTOH, it might be difficult to find a vid-card with less than 64MB, except at a swap meet, or e-bay.
Hunt