What would you change in this photo?

B
Posted By
burt
Oct 27, 2007
Views
1632
Replies
41
Status
Closed
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

OK, I am throwing myself at your mercy — and hopefully helpful discussion. I am very new to photography, having purchased my first camera (a Canon 5D) 2 months ago after a 30 year hiatus from photography. (I have done dozens of commercial videos in the interim, 52 of which can be viewed and purchased from my web site in my link or from Amazon).

At any rate, I recently took a weekend trip to Mono Lake in California. With 500 or so shots, I deleted about half, and am happy with maybe half a dozen. This is one that I am happy with.

I am interested to hear what others here have to say about this shot.

1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? I couldn’t control the weather, so don’t bother with that. Given the conditions, what would you have done different?

2) What could I have done better/different in Lightroom/Photoshop to improve it?

For the record, this was shot in Raw format. The result was leveled (my tripod was 4 degrees out of kilter in the sand — I need a level on it), and the exposure/clarity very slightly tweaked in Lightroom. It was then cropped to be a tad shorter vertically than the camera made it. Other than that, it is pretty much as my camera recorded it.

If you just want to say it is terrible or boring, don’t bother wasting the bandwidth. I am interested in learning, not in hearing some snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is (drop dead UC — you are on my killfile anyway)


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/

Must-have mockup pack for every graphic designer 🔥🔥🔥

Easy-to-use drag-n-drop Photoshop scene creator with more than 2800 items.

SN
Snot Nosed Kid
Oct 27, 2007
Burt Johnson wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

OK, I am throwing myself at your mercy — and hopefully helpful discussion. I am very new to photography, having purchased my first camera (a Canon 5D) 2 months ago after a 30 year hiatus from photography. (I have done dozens of commercial videos in the interim, 52 of which can be viewed and purchased from my web site in my link or from Amazon).

At any rate, I recently took a weekend trip to Mono Lake in California. With 500 or so shots, I deleted about half, and am happy with maybe half a dozen. This is one that I am happy with.
I am interested to hear what others here have to say about this shot.
1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? I couldn’t control the weather, so don’t bother with that. Given the conditions, what would you have done different?

2) What could I have done better/different in Lightroom/Photoshop to improve it?

For the record, this was shot in Raw format. The result was leveled (my tripod was 4 degrees out of kilter in the sand — I need a level on it), and the exposure/clarity very slightly tweaked in Lightroom. It was then cropped to be a tad shorter vertically than the camera made it. Other than that, it is pretty much as my camera recorded it.
If you just want to say it is terrible or boring, don’t bother wasting the bandwidth. I am interested in learning, not in hearing some snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is (drop dead UC — you are on my killfile anyway)

The distant background seems a bit obtrusive to me . Perhaps if you had managed to get your camera right down to water level it would have placed the rock formation against the sky and made the shot even more dramatic.

Love
Snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is
B
burt
Oct 27, 2007
Snot Nosed Kid wrote:

The distant background seems a bit obtrusive to me . Perhaps if you had managed to get your camera right down to water level it would have placed the rock formation against the sky and made the shot even more dramatic.

Interesting idea. I’m sad I didn’t think of it while there, as it seems obvious in retrospect, now that you mention it.

I considered bluring the background a bit in Photoshop, but decided that would be even more distracting, so I opted to leave it "natural."

Love
Snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is

I am 50+ myself, and very glad to say I don’t know anyone as stupid, ignorant or rude as that kid.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
BC
Big Craigie
Oct 27, 2007
"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

OK, I am throwing myself at your mercy — and hopefully helpful discussion. I am very new to photography, having purchased my first camera (a Canon 5D) 2 months ago after a 30 year hiatus from photography. (I have done dozens of commercial videos in the interim, 52 of which can be viewed and purchased from my web site in my link or from Amazon).

At any rate, I recently took a weekend trip to Mono Lake in California. With 500 or so shots, I deleted about half, and am happy with maybe half a dozen. This is one that I am happy with.

I am interested to hear what others here have to say about this shot.
1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? I couldn’t control the weather, so don’t bother with that. Given the conditions, what would you have done different?

2) What could I have done better/different in Lightroom/Photoshop to improve it?

For the record, this was shot in Raw format. The result was leveled (my tripod was 4 degrees out of kilter in the sand — I need a level on it), and the exposure/clarity very slightly tweaked in Lightroom. It was then cropped to be a tad shorter vertically than the camera made it. Other than that, it is pretty much as my camera recorded it.
If you just want to say it is terrible or boring, don’t bother wasting the bandwidth. I am interested in learning, not in hearing some snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is (drop dead UC — you are on my killfile anyway)


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/

A very nice photo. I’m no pro but my preference in these types of shots is to try and make the image more balanced i.e where the large rock meets the water , have the same distance to the top of the frame as to the bottom. Sorry if I am not explaining myself, but I would have a little bit more sky. However, great photo all the same.

Craig


Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
TC
tony cooper
Oct 27, 2007
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:05:53 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

OK, I am throwing myself at your mercy — and hopefully helpful discussion. I am very new to photography, having purchased my first camera (a Canon 5D) 2 months ago after a 30 year hiatus from photography. (I have done dozens of commercial videos in the interim, 52 of which can be viewed and purchased from my web site in my link or from Amazon).

At any rate, I recently took a weekend trip to Mono Lake in California. With 500 or so shots, I deleted about half, and am happy with maybe half a dozen. This is one that I am happy with.

I am interested to hear what others here have to say about this shot.
1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? I couldn’t control the weather, so don’t bother with that. Given the conditions, what would you have done different?

2) What could I have done better/different in Lightroom/Photoshop to improve it?

For the record, this was shot in Raw format. The result was leveled (my tripod was 4 degrees out of kilter in the sand — I need a level on it), and the exposure/clarity very slightly tweaked in Lightroom. It was then cropped to be a tad shorter vertically than the camera made it. Other than that, it is pretty much as my camera recorded it.
If you just want to say it is terrible or boring, don’t bother wasting the bandwidth. I am interested in learning, not in hearing some snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is (drop dead UC — you are on my killfile anyway)

The photo’s OK, but you don’t have enough terms and conditions in your request for a critique. Please supply an approved format for replies. —

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL
B
burt
Oct 27, 2007
Big Craigie wrote:

A very nice photo. I’m no pro but my preference in these types of shots is to try and make the image more balanced i.e where the large rock meets the water , have the same distance to the top of the frame as to the bottom. Sorry if I am not explaining myself, but I would have a little bit more sky. However, great photo all the same.

Thanks. Interestingly, that is the way it was in the camera. The cropping I described was partly to remove that balance. Seemed too static to me. I decided the sky was bland (clear day with no clouds), so concentrated on the water.

I toyed with the idea of putting some clouds in the sky (I have several cloudy sky shots for just that purpose), but then decided that would fight with the reflection in the water.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
B
burt
Oct 27, 2007
tony cooper wrote:

The photo’s OK, but you don’t have enough terms and conditions in your request for a critique. Please supply an approved format for replies.

Huh???

I am assuming you were just trying to be funny and the humor was lost in the mail. Please let me know if I am wrong and you are actually trying to communicate something…


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
BC
Big Craigie
Oct 27, 2007
"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
Big Craigie wrote:

A very nice photo. I’m no pro but my preference in these types of shots is
to try and make the image more balanced i.e where the large rock meets the
water , have the same distance to the top of the frame as to the bottom. Sorry if I am not explaining myself, but I would have a little bit more sky.
However, great photo all the same.

Thanks. Interestingly, that is the way it was in the camera. The cropping I described was partly to remove that balance. Seemed too static to me. I decided the sky was bland (clear day with no clouds), so concentrated on the water.

I toyed with the idea of putting some clouds in the sky (I have several cloudy sky shots for just that purpose), but then decided that would fight with the reflection in the water.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

Burt

I understand what you are saying about bland skies but i think the photo has enough interest especially in the middle of the scene and the reflections. Its just a personal thang when I do shots like that. I prefer balance. Keep up the good work
Craig


Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
TC
tony cooper
Oct 27, 2007
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:21:21 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

tony cooper wrote:

The photo’s OK, but you don’t have enough terms and conditions in your request for a critique. Please supply an approved format for replies.

Huh???

I am assuming you were just trying to be funny and the humor was lost in the mail. Please let me know if I am wrong and you are actually trying to communicate something…

I am trying to communicate that you should put more time into photo composition than you do into dictating the terms of what you feel to be acceptable in the way of a critique.

You have a run-of-the-mill vacation photo that is poorly composed. It’s not a bad picture, but it’s not a "Wow!" picture either. If it’s the best of 500 taken, you need to take 1,000 next time out.

If you are interesting in learning, then learn not to add paragraphs like:

"If you just want to say it is terrible or boring, don’t bother wasting the bandwidth. I am interested in learning, not in hearing some snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is (drop dead UC — you are on my killfile anyway)"

Post your image and be prepared to be complimented or to be criticized and take either with equanimity.



Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL
B
burt
Oct 27, 2007
tony cooper wrote:

You have a run-of-the-mill vacation photo that is poorly composed. It’s not a bad picture, but it’s not a "Wow!" picture either. If it’s the best of 500 taken, you need to take 1,000 next time out.

Thanks for adding to my killfile. Being new here, I am still filtering on who is interested in helping and who just likes to pretend they know some Great Secret that the rest of us have to labor to discover.

I now have one less buffoon to bother having to read…


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
TC
tony cooper
Oct 27, 2007
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:46:50 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

tony cooper wrote:

You have a run-of-the-mill vacation photo that is poorly composed. It’s not a bad picture, but it’s not a "Wow!" picture either. If it’s the best of 500 taken, you need to take 1,000 next time out.

Thanks for adding to my killfile. Being new here, I am still filtering on who is interested in helping and who just likes to pretend they know some Great Secret that the rest of us have to labor to discover.
I now have one less buffoon to bother having to read…

I just love a guy who says "I am interested to hear what others here have to say about this shot." and then huffs off in a snit when the answer isn’t what he wants to hear.

Jeez, Burt, save us the trouble of trying to figure out what comments to offer and supply multiple-choice rave comments.

It’s an OK picture that isn’t composed particularly well. Nice enough for your own album, but wouldn’t sell on a postcard.



Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL
M
MisterMax
Oct 27, 2007
Burt Johnson wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/
Burt –
Minimizing the background mountains by shooting from lower down is a good suggestion.

The photo is too evenly divided in half by the waterline. It would be better with more lake at the bottom.

The left edge of the tufo tapers down to a nicely relaxed end. The right edge would be better if it wasn’t just chopped off at a substantial height.

The colors are pretty dull. I would brighten them, possibly add red, possibly increase contrast.

Hope these suggestions help your future photos.
– Max

http://buten.net
http://pbase.com/mistermax


Tips for Healthy Brain Aging from the Alzheimer’s Disease Center at Penn – – * Cognitively stimulating activities – Read, do crossword puzzles, play cards or a board game every day.
* Education – Take a class or attend lectures. Advise the next generation to stay in school.
* Exercise – Talk to your doctor about designing an exercise program, even as simple as walking, geared just for you. Individual sessions should be at least 30 minutes long.
* Avoid head injury – Always buckle your seatbelt. Wear a helmet when biking.
* Good nutrition – Eat a heart-healthy diet; it may benefit your brain as well.
* Cholesterol and blood pressure – Maintain your cholesterol and blood pressure within normal limits.
B
burt
Oct 29, 2007
MisterMax </max> wrote:

Minimizing the background mountains by shooting from lower down is a good suggestion.

Yeah. Others have said that, and I wish I had done. I plan on returning there in a few months for Winter shots, and will try it then.

The photo is too evenly divided in half by the waterline. It would be better with more lake at the bottom.

The original shot had he divider at the far shore line. I cropped to move it where you see it now, giving less sky. I can kinda see where it now looks too evenly divded at the waterline of the tufo. Not really sure what to do there, other than change perspective next time and see if that helps.

The left edge of the tufo tapers down to a nicely relaxed end. The right edge would be better if it wasn’t just chopped off at a substantial height.

I have another version that avoids that right-side crop. Unfortunately, it then has another tufo just behind this one that mars the image. I decided it was better to crop there than introduce part of another one. Short of getting in a boat, there was no angle to avoid both problems.

The colors are pretty dull. I would brighten them, possibly add red, possibly increase contrast.

hmmm… I’ll have to play with that and see. They are pretty close to what was shot (using white card in prior shot to give balance). I did tweak the ‘clarity’ a tad in LightRoom, which I did feel helped a bit.

I’ll play with the color some, and see if more red would help.

Hope these suggestions help your future photos.

Absolutely, and thanks!


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
P
pico
Oct 29, 2007
"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

Have you seen the hundreds of photos aready made of the Mono Lake area and teh structure in particular? Do any of them give you clues as to what makes them more attractive, evocative, enticing?
P
pico
Oct 29, 2007
"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
tony cooper wrote:

You have a run-of-the-mill vacation photo that is poorly composed. It’s not a bad picture, but it’s not a "Wow!" picture either. If it’s the best of 500 taken, you need to take 1,000 next time out.

Thanks for adding to my killfile. Being new here, I am still filtering on who is interested in helping and who just likes to pretend they know some Great Secret that the rest of us have to labor to discover.

If you are so sensitive then it might be best to return to http://photo.net where sycophantic comments are utterly required lest one be booted from the site.
B
burt
Oct 30, 2007
pico wrote:

Thanks for adding to my killfile. Being new here, I am still filtering on who is interested in helping and who just likes to pretend they know some Great Secret that the rest of us have to labor to discover.

If you are so sensitive then it might be best to return to http://photo.net where sycophantic comments are utterly required lest one be booted from the site.

Not at all. I can take _constructive_ criticism with constructive comments on how to improve the photos. That is exactly what I asked for.

Jerks like UC and tony are not providing that though. Off handed insults with no suggestions for how to improve do nobody any good, and leave everyone else with the feeling that the pompous fools really have no idea what they are talking about. They just go into my killfile, so I don’t waste time trying to determine which comments are useful and which are not.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
B
burt
Oct 30, 2007
pico wrote:

"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

Have you seen the hundreds of photos aready made of the Mono Lake area and teh structure in particular? Do any of them give you clues as to what makes them more attractive, evocative, enticing?

I looked at them before going… and almost didn’t go as a result. They were downright scary in how good they were.

A wise woman (a tenant) then told me "whenever I try to replicate an expert, I get down on myself and think what a dolt I am. When I try and do it my own way, I find I am often happy with my work though."

Thus, I went. I rather like this photo I presented here, but I realize it is not showroom quality. I am not sure exactly what to do to bridge that gap. Not surprising, since this is (almost) the first photograph I have taken in 30 years.

I plan on going back to Mono Lake quarterly for the next year to catch it in different seasons. I am hoping people here can give me some suggestions on what to do differently next time.

I have had a few good suggestions so far, but am always open to others.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
TC
tony cooper
Oct 30, 2007
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:19:29 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

pico wrote:

Thanks for adding to my killfile. Being new here, I am still filtering on who is interested in helping and who just likes to pretend they know some Great Secret that the rest of us have to labor to discover.

If you are so sensitive then it might be best to return to http://photo.net where sycophantic comments are utterly required lest one be booted from the site.

Not at all. I can take _constructive_ criticism with constructive comments on how to improve the photos. That is exactly what I asked for.

You want constructive? Solve that problem of your tripod being 4 degrees out of kilter. That’s all that’s keeping you out of _National Geographic_ and _Arizona Highways_.

On that minor point of composition, stand, sit, squat, lie, or move somewhere else and look through the lens.



Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL
D
Dave
Oct 30, 2007
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:34:57 -0400, tony cooper
On that minor point of composition, stand, sit, squat, lie, or move somewhere else…

somewhere else than here…

Dave
D
Dave
Oct 30, 2007
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:19:30 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

Not surprising, since this is (almost) the first photograph I have taken in 30 years.

Excuses excuses… but at least, that is obvious.

Dave
B
burt
Oct 30, 2007
Dave wrote:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:19:30 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

Not surprising, since this is (almost) the first photograph I have taken in 30 years.

Excuses excuses… but at least, that is obvious.

Sigh… another killfile entry. This newsgroup does seem to have a higher percentage of Wannabe Gurus who excel at nothing other than insults and have nothing valid to contribute than most other newsgroups I frequent.

Too bad. Both for the losers who think bullying is the same as teaching, and for the group in general.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
A
Auspics
Oct 30, 2007
"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
Dave wrote:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:19:30 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

Not surprising, since this is (almost) the first photograph I have taken in 30 years.

Excuses excuses… but at least, that is obvious.

Sigh… another killfile entry. This newsgroup does seem to have a higher percentage of Wannabe Gurus who excel at nothing other than insults and have nothing valid to contribute than most other newsgroups I frequent.

Too bad. Both for the losers who think bullying is the same as teaching, and for the group in general.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

Toughen up mate…
It is a normality on Usenet. Deal with it or find a moderated forum. For my part I can’t see the pic after 2 minutes of trying to load the page I gave up. How big is the image anyway?

Douglas
D
Dave
Oct 30, 2007
Not surprising, since this is (almost) the first photograph I have taken in 30 years.

Excuses excuses… but at least, that is obvious.

Sigh… another killfile entry.

LOL… you killfilers never ever killfile anybody.
Don’t want to miss anything said..:-)
Wanna bet?

Dave
P
pico
Oct 30, 2007
"tony cooper" wrote in message

You want constructive? Solve that problem of your tripod being 4 degrees out of kilter. That’s all that’s keeping you out of _National Geographic_ and _Arizona Highways_.

Has Arizona Highways dropped their LF and MF requirements?
J
Jim
Oct 30, 2007
"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

OK, I am throwing myself at your mercy — and hopefully helpful discussion. I am very new to photography, having purchased my first camera (a Canon 5D) 2 months ago after a 30 year hiatus from photography. (I have done dozens of commercial videos in the interim, 52 of which can be viewed and purchased from my web site in my link or from Amazon).

At any rate, I recently took a weekend trip to Mono Lake in California. With 500 or so shots, I deleted about half, and am happy with maybe half a dozen. This is one that I am happy with.

I am interested to hear what others here have to say about this shot.
1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? I couldn’t control the weather, so don’t bother with that. Given the conditions, what would you have done different?

2) What could I have done better/different in Lightroom/Photoshop to improve it?

For the record, this was shot in Raw format. The result was leveled (my tripod was 4 degrees out of kilter in the sand — I need a level on it), and the exposure/clarity very slightly tweaked in Lightroom. It was then cropped to be a tad shorter vertically than the camera made it. Other than that, it is pretty much as my camera recorded it.
If you just want to say it is terrible or boring, don’t bother wasting the bandwidth. I am interested in learning, not in hearing some snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is (drop dead UC — you are on my killfile anyway)


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/
How many shots of this subject did you take? There is more than one good image of almost any subject.

Take shots of the subject from various locations. Take shots at each position both high and low.

Eventually you may get enough images of the subject to permit selecting the very best one.

You might try increasing the saturation. Sometimes that makes an image come to life.

Jim
B
burt
Oct 30, 2007
Douglas wrote:

Toughen up mate…
It is a normality on Usenet. Deal with it or find a moderated forum.

Most forums I visit regularly have one or two trolls that get their kicks by trying to vandalize the threads. This is the first forum that I have put more than 2 people in the killfile though. Not sure if a couple of them are really the same dolt though. (UC seems to have a clone roaming the thresds)

For my
part I can’t see the pic after 2 minutes of trying to load the page I gave up. How big is the image anyway?

hmmm… I did upload the full size, but I thought Flickr automatically showed a lower rez? At least it shows up to me in sub-second time here, right along with the 140 other images that I have marked for "friends and family" relating to a whitewater rafting slideshow from the 70’s.

Maybe you just hit Flickr when it was slow for some reason? Anyone else here having it show up too slowly? (fwiw, the rafting show was also uploaded "as is" and none of the half-dozen people that watched it made any mention of speed issues) This is my first foray into Flickr though, and it is possible I need to change the process I use…


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
B
burt
Oct 30, 2007
Jim wrote:

How many shots of this subject did you take? There is more than one good image of almost any subject.

A couple dozen, over a half hour, while waiting for the sunset. This is best of that batch, parly because the wind suddenly died down and the reflection cleared up. Earlier there was enough wind that there was no reflection. 15 minutes after this, the sun had set and the colors dimmed.

Take shots of the subject from various locations. Take shots at each position both high and low.

I do have different vantages, but there is another tufa to the right that was distracting from other angles. In this shot, you can just see a small tip of it in a dip on the right. Small enough that it looks to be part of the foreground tufa unless you look closely.

Unfortunately, they were all at eye-level though. Next time, I will certainly make a point of trying different elevations. That was a serious oversight in retrospect.

Eventually you may get enough images of the subject to permit selecting the very best one.

Yeah. I am thinking of returning every 3 months or so for the next year and getting the lake in different seasons. Hopefully each trip will give me better images. That was part of the point of asking for feedback here — finding out from more experienced photographers what I could have done differently.

You might try increasing the saturation. Sometimes that makes an image come to life.

When I tried that, it seemed cartoonish to me. I may go back and try again though, as a couple of people have made a similar suggestion.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
J
Jim
Oct 30, 2007
"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
Jim wrote:

How many shots of this subject did you take? There is more than one good image of almost any subject.

A couple dozen, over a half hour, while waiting for the sunset. This is best of that batch, parly because the wind suddenly died down and the reflection cleared up. Earlier there was enough wind that there was no reflection. 15 minutes after this, the sun had set and the colors dimmed.

Take shots of the subject from various locations. Take shots at each position both high and low.

I do have different vantages, but there is another tufa to the right that was distracting from other angles. In this shot, you can just see a small tip of it in a dip on the right. Small enough that it looks to be part of the foreground tufa unless you look closely.

Unfortunately, they were all at eye-level though. Next time, I will certainly make a point of trying different elevations. That was a serious oversight in retrospect.

Eventually you may get enough images of the subject to permit selecting the
very best one.

Yeah. I am thinking of returning every 3 months or so for the next year and getting the lake in different seasons. Hopefully each trip will give me better images. That was part of the point of asking for feedback here — finding out from more experienced photographers what I could have done differently.

You might try increasing the saturation. Sometimes that makes an image come
to life.

When I tried that, it seemed cartoonish to me. I may go back and try again though, as a couple of people have made a similar suggestion.

– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
Yes, increasing the saturation can quite easily cause more problems than it solves…

I thought that this photo might be the best of the batch, but I asked to make certain. The days when we could only afford one shot per scene are long gone.

Jim
TC
tony cooper
Oct 30, 2007
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:08:58 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

Douglas wrote:

Toughen up mate…
It is a normality on Usenet. Deal with it or find a moderated forum.

Most forums I visit regularly have one or two trolls that get their kicks by trying to vandalize the threads. This is the first forum that I have put more than 2 people in the killfile though. Not sure if a couple of them are really the same dolt though. (UC seems to have a clone roaming the thresds)
You might try reading the other postings of the people you think are dolts to see if they are a) always doltish, or b) just not highly complimentary of your efforts, or in agreement with a particular comment of yours.

You posted a link to a rather blah tourist snapshot that is no better or no worse than the average Instamatic snap, and then you started to bristle when it wasn’t praised.

You can request that only positive and constructive comments be made, but it doesn’t work that way in a public forum. When you post a link, you are saying "Judge me". If you are judged harshly, it’s not vandalism; it’s honest appraisal.



Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL
EC
el Condor loco
Oct 31, 2007
On Oct 30, 11:19 am, (Burt Johnson) wrote:

Thus, I went. I rather like this photo I presented here, but I realize it is not showroom quality. I am not sure exactly what to do to bridge that gap. Not surprising, since this is (almost) the first photograph I have taken in 30 years.

I plan on going back to Mono Lake quarterly for the next year to catch it in different seasons. I am hoping people here can give me some suggestions on what to do differently next time.

I have had a few good suggestions so far, but am always open to others.

– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

Burt,

I took the liberty to make a few modifications to your Mono Lake photo. If you like the direction these mods lead you, I would be glad to let you know what I did. Literally millions of tweaks you can do to any photo post production, it just depends on what you like or what your clients like. I personally like the HDR format now for some photos but some purists don’t. Should be room for all types of preferences.

I will only have your photo "up" on FLICKR for a few days for you to look at, but would certainly take your photo down immediately if you do not wish to have it on "the Web".

It should be the last photo I uploaded onto this site, the URL is: http://www.flickr.com/photos/el_condor_loco/

I live in Australia, so with the time differences, let me know immediately if you wish me to take your photo down straight away…..

Curt Hakl
"el Condor loco" GRAPHIX
Townsville, Queensland – Australia
B
burt
Oct 31, 2007
el Condor loco wrote:

I took the liberty to make a few modifications to your Mono Lake photo. If you like the direction these mods lead you, I would be glad to let you know what I did. Literally millions of tweaks you can do to any photo post production, it just depends on what you like or what your clients like. I personally like the HDR format now for some photos but some purists don’t. Should be room for all types of preferences.

That is not the effect I had in mind, but I gotta say — wow! That is a really nice change, and one that I would never have thought of!

I will only have your photo "up" on FLICKR for a few days for you to look at, but would certainly take your photo down immediately if you do not wish to have it on "the Web".

No problem at all. I posted it asking for suggestions, and your mod tops the cake for sure.

I would love to hear what steps you took to get that effect from my rather ordinary photo. If possible, I’d like to repeat your steps on my photo, to see how the intermediate steps looked and how you progressed.

Gotta say, your edit blows me away and reminds me again now little I know. Thanks!


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
G
granny
Oct 31, 2007
"Burt Johnson" wrote in message
Being new here, I am still filtering
on who is interested in helping and who just likes to pretend they know
some Great Secret that the rest of us have to labor to discover. – Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

I have the Great Secret (JK) and I am WAY over 50 (No JK)

I have been following this thread and decided to respond.. Hopefully with some positive input (I don’t want to be Killed!)

1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? Given the conditions,
what would you have done different?

I don’t know about your 5d but most SLRs have bracket capabilities If not then I would have done it manually or use the bracket setting using aperture priority at the smallest opening possible, for landscape DOF. In my day it was F64, Now I understand you have F91 with the right lens..
Get off automatic because each snap might be at a different focus or exposure… bracket a minimum 3 shots, I write down the exposure settings for at least the sky, the highlights, and the shadow areas for use post shoot.. I usually do brackets of 5 to 7 and the only change would be shutter speed… Focus and everything stays the same because it is on manual and a sturdy, heavy duty tripod.. I bracket because I like the HDR look and feel of landscapes and I sometimes use the different exposures in Photoshop to just to bring out a certain part of a photo that would have been lost or blocked out with just one shot.. When looking through the lens.. be the camera.. look at the background, subject, the entire field contained on the viewfinder.. form your picture there, do not take a snap to be fixed later in Photoshop, Proper Setup saves hours later.. Did you notice the different textures to the right of the bush and the rose flower looking colors in the shadow area there?
You captured the reflection very well but disregarded the sky and background.. there were also many other possibilities to shoot, at least 500 according to you, so you may have had tunnel vision while you were composing as you were running out of time.. Then again you may have done everything perfectly right but just didn’t have a good photographic day.. in that case I would say Practice, practice, practice.. nowadays anyone can take a technically good picture.. but a photographers eye is all about composition first and lighting second or visa-versa (my students learned composition using throwaway, fixed plastic lens, pieces of s–t cameras, they had to crop and compose in those little bitty viewfinders and come up with WOW pictures) If you just had a few good photos from the hundreds you took looking through the lens, then that tells me that you need to work on capturing what your minds eye sees.. which is just a matter of practicing and learning the intricacies of your camera and lenses or just plain luck.. I would set aside at least half an hour each day just for snapping pictures to see if you can get that WOW picture that looks exactly like you think you saw it in the lens.. Lighting and composition can be very subjective topics.. Some like dark shadows and contrasty highlights others want to see in the shadows and have muted highlights, Some want the subject centered and prominent and others swear by the golden triangle or thirds as you can tell by the discussion of your horizon, sky and water placement in your pic.. In the end… Tis up to you!

Oh, what would I do different.. probably a Panorama first to establish a reference for the midrange and close-up shots.. trying to tell a photo story instead of looking for 1 great shot (of course they would ALL be great)

2) What could I have done better/different in Lightroom/Photoshop to improve it?

I understand you were going for the reflection and ambiance of the onset of evening but after getting your picture into photoshop there were a bunch of possibilities and for me none of which involved the reflection … I was looking for a good crop to make the pic POP and to me the cropping situation was limited by the composition and placement of all the different areas of interest.. So, I submit the following: Pic #1:
http://img152.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cropshadowhighlight gr7.jpg As a real quick fix I cropped out most of the reflection and focused on the tufa and looked into the shadows using Image> Adjustments> Shadow/Highlight at default settings.. Masked and brought the highlights on the tufa back down to almost normal then darkened the background and sky a bit
Pic #2: http://img152.imageshack.us/my.php?image=defaulthdrncropqk4. jpg did a bad variation of HDR using only one photo… levels, curves, sharpened but am going to post it anyway..

Dang, Do I hear that Kill File door slamming on me!!

Here are a few good references to get you back into the photographic groove :

http://www.dimagemaker.com/specials/fototips.php

http://www.fredmiranda.com/

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/

http://www.naturephotographers.net/articles0807/cn0807-1.htm l

http://www.naturescapes.net/072006/rh0706_1.htm

http://www.dptutorial.com/

http://photoinf.com/

http://news.deviantart.com/article/36626/

Have fun and practice, practice, practice.. Looking forward to some great Photographs!!
You Can Do IT !!

"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy
Q
Quintsys
Oct 31, 2007
Burt Johnson schreef:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? I couldn’t control the weather, so don’t bother with that. Given the conditions, what would you have done different?
What strikes me, every time I look at the shot (did it a couple of times) is that I have the feeling that the rock is pushing through the ceiling. it gives me an awkward feeling. Maybe adding 1/4 inch of air on the top, would do the trick.
The funny thing is that I don’ have the feeling so much in the over-PS-ed image el Condor loco made, probably because of the frame.

And yes, I agree with everyone who said that you should lie on the floor every now and then.

Best,
Carlo
B
burt
Oct 31, 2007
granny wrote:

I have been following this thread and decided to respond.. Hopefully with some positive input (I don’t want to be Killed!)

The only people I put in killfiles are those that just toss juvinile insults with no attempt to actually have an intelligent conversation. Nobody that writes this much could fit that description… 🙂

1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? Given the conditions,
what would you have done different?

I don’t know about your 5d but most SLRs have bracket capabilities If not then I would have done it manually or use the bracket setting using aperture priority at the smallest opening possible, for landscape DOF. In my day it was F64, Now I understand you have F91 with the right lens..

The 5D is a top-of-the-line 10MP canon. It has every feature I can think of wanting to use. And yes, it has bracketing. Many of the shots taken that day were bracketed, and occasionally I used one of the edge exposures. In this case, I thought the exposure was correct though.

Get off automatic because each snap might be at a different focus or exposure… bracket a minimum 3 shots, I write down the exposure settings for at least the sky, the highlights, and the shadow areas for use post shoot.. I usually do brackets of 5 to 7 and the only change would be shutter speed… Focus and everything stays the same because it is on manual and a sturdy, heavy duty tripod.. I bracket because I like the HDR look and feel of landscapes and I sometimes use the different exposures in Photoshop to just to bring out a certain part of a photo that would have been lost or blocked out with just one shot..

I agree, and did that on a lot of shots for that reason. This particular image did not have a dynamic range sufficient to benefit from a HDR treatment though.

btw, when I say I do that on shots, I mean that I bracket with the intent of doing HDR. To date, I have several HDR shots that seem technically good to me, but none that are worth showing anyone else. I think I have the technical aspects down, and am now keeping my eye out for some scene(s) where HDR will add the punch to make the image something I want to show off.

When looking through the lens.. be the camera.. look at the background, subject, the entire field contained on the viewfinder.. form your picture there, do not take a snap to be fixed later in Photoshop, Proper Setup saves hours later.. Did you notice the different textures to the right of the bush and the rose flower looking colors in the shadow area there?

Yeah, I remember those lessons from wwwaaayyy back in the 70’s when I was last active in photography and had a bedroom converted into a darkroom.

Sometimes I feel blind as a bat though. Even studying the image now (it is my desktop image at the moment), I don’t see the rose looking colors you are referring to…? 🙁

You captured the reflection very well but disregarded the sky and background..

Actually the camera image had a lot more sky. There is no interest in it though, being a cloudless day. When I looked at the image, I decided to crop that down, to focus on the tufa and its reflection.

I know several people (including you) have said to get low, and I will definitely keep that in mind next I am there. However, I really wonder if the reflection would have lost its impact in doing that, since it would have been squashed by the new angle. I won’r really know for sure till I try it.

For the background, I didn’t see anything I could do about it. This is a low lake, surrounded by hills. There is no angle that would not include the hills. To the right is another tufa. In fact, you can see it if you look closely in this image. No angle gives just this one alone without bringing other junk into the background.

fwiw, I have searched the web and found a few other shots of this same tufa. They have "something" I don’t, but I can’t put my finger on it. However, they all have the same hills in the background.

there were also many other possibilities to shoot, at
least 500 according to you, so you may have had tunnel vision while you were composing as you were running out of time..

For clarification, that was 500 shots over the weekend. There were about 15 shots of this particular tufa as sunset approached.

Then again you may have
done everything perfectly right but just didn’t have a good photographic day.. in that case I would say Practice, practice, practice.. nowadays anyone can take a technically good picture.. but a photographers eye is all about composition first and lighting second or visa-versa

Yeah, I have been telling my wife that for years. She is a natural artist, while I am a natural engineer. She can shoot wonderful images, but have no idea how the camera works. On the other hand, I can teach a class on how cameras work, how aperture, shutter speed and ISO interact to affect the image, etc. I don’t have that artist touch to add to the technical knowledge to bring it all together into a Wow! shot though.

She insists I can learn it though, so I have started this venture. figure I have around 30 years or so to see if she is right. 🙂

Lighting and composition can be very subjective topics.. Some like dark shadows and contrasty highlights others want to see in the shadows and have muted highlights, Some want the subject centered and prominent and others swear by the golden triangle or thirds as you can tell by the discussion of your horizon, sky and water placement in your pic.. In the end… Tis up to you!

I am still trying to find "my style" here. I rather like the idea of concentrating on HDR and panoramas, but don’t yet have a single result in either category that I would want to thrust on anyone. Again, technically good, but boring…

I understand you were going for the reflection and ambiance of the onset of evening but after getting your picture into photoshop there were a bunch of possibilities and for me none of which involved the reflection .. I was looking for a good crop to make the pic POP and to me the cropping situation was limited by the composition and placement of all the different areas of interest.. So, I submit the following: Pic #1:
http://img152.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cropshadowhighlight gr7.jpg

That is REALLY GOOD! This is an example of where I looked at the picture and never even saw that possibility.

As
a real quick fix I cropped out most of the reflection and focused on the tufa and looked into the shadows using Image> Adjustments> Shadow/Highlight at default settings.. Masked and brought the highlights on the tufa back down to almost normal then darkened the background and sky a bit
Pic #2: http://img152.imageshack.us/my.php?image=defaulthdrncropqk4. jpg

I don’t like that one quite as much. As you say, entirely subjective, and of course you were trying for HDR with only a single image to work from.

I do now see the rose colored texture you described above though. I was totally blind to it till seeing this treatment!

Dang, Do I hear that Kill File door slamming on me!!

Whyever would you think that? Your suggestions are good, your images are good. More to the point, you are trying to help instead of just trying to a bully in the playground putting down anyone else trying to learn.

Here are a few good references to get you back into the photographic groove :

http://www.dimagemaker.com/specials/fototips.php

http://www.fredmiranda.com/

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/

http://www.naturephotographers.net/articles0807/cn0807-1.htm l
http://www.naturescapes.net/072006/rh0706_1.htm

http://www.dptutorial.com/

http://photoinf.com/

http://news.deviantart.com/article/36626/

Already running late. Your comment screamed out for me to respond right away, and now I’m going to miss a meeting I set up at work. Will read those a bit later. 🙂

Thanks again for taking the time and effort here!


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
B
burt
Nov 1, 2007
Quintsys wrote:

Burt Johnson schreef:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? I couldn’t control the weather, so don’t bother with that. Given the conditions, what would you have done different?
What strikes me, every time I look at the shot (did it a couple of times) is that I have the feeling that the rock is pushing through the ceiling. it gives me an awkward feeling. Maybe adding 1/4 inch of air on the top, would do the trick.
The funny thing is that I don’ have the feeling so much in the over-PS-ed image el Condor loco made, probably because of the frame.

Interesting. The camera shot had a lot more headroom. Because the sky was so bland, I decided to crop most of it out though. Perhaps I cropped a bit too much?

And yes, I am Wow’d by el Condor’s version too. I am waiting anxiously for his explanation of what steps he did. I can picture some of it, but then I get stuck (mentally) trying to picture what controls to tweak to get that effect.

I also agree that the frame added quite a bit to it. I always add frames when using photos in a Christmas newsletter or the like, but didn’t think about it here. Even the frames I have created don’t have the punch of his though, so even that detail is another place I can learn. 🙂

And yes, I agree with everyone who said that you should lie on the floor every now and then.

I will definitely keep that in mind for future shots. Not sure why I didn’t do it here. I often changed elevation when doing video shoots, to add interest and variety for documentaries I shot. I guess I always thought of those as cut-aways and change-of-pace rather than mainstream shots, and since these photos were meant to stand alone, didn’t think of doing it here.

Oh well, just one of the lessons I have picked up in this thread.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
D
Dave
Nov 1, 2007
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:01:58 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:
And yes, I agree with everyone who said that you should lie on the floor every now and then.

and you reply with:
I often changed elevation when doing video shoots,
to add interest and variety for documentaries I shot.

If you do not understand what was said in this single sentence, how on earth would you be able to understand Granny’s
sophisticated explanation?

Dave
E
egon379
Nov 2, 2007
On Oct 31, 4:48 pm, (Burt Johnson) wrote:
el Condor loco wrote:

I took the liberty to make a few modifications to your Mono Lake photo. If you like the direction these mods lead you, I would be glad to let you know what I did. Literally millions of tweaks you can do to anyphotopost production, it just depends on what you like or what your clients like. I personally like the HDR format now for some photos but some purists don’t. Should be room for all types of preferences.

That is not the effect I had in mind, but I gotta say — wow! That is a really nice change, and one that I would never have thought of!

I will only have yourphoto"up" on FLICKR for a few days for you to look at, but would certainly take yourphotodown immediately if you do not wish to have it on "the Web".

No problem at all. I posted it asking for suggestions, and your mod tops the cake for sure.

I would love to hear what steps you took to get that effect from my rather ordinaryphoto. If possible, I’d like to repeat your steps on myphoto, to see how the intermediate steps looked and how you progressed.

Gotta say, your edit blows me away and reminds me again now little I know. Thanks!


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

WinPhotoSliderShow
www.ikicsoft.com
Q
Quintsys
Nov 2, 2007
Dave schreef:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:01:58 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:
And yes, I agree with everyone who said that you should lie on the floor every now and then.

and you reply with:
I often changed elevation when doing video shoots,
to add interest and variety for documentaries I shot.

If you do not understand what was said in this single sentence, how on earth would you be able to understand Granny’s
sophisticated explanation?

Dave
Actually, I think Burt did understand what I mean. But I’m a foreigner and thus expert in awkward expressions 🙂

Carlo
B
burt
Nov 3, 2007
Quintsys wrote:

Actually, I think Burt did understand what I mean. But I’m a foreigner and thus expert in awkward expressions 🙂

Yep. Very easy to understand you.

Only paranoid children who think all non-Americans are evil would think otherwise.

Oh yeah, we just described Dave, didn’t we? Of course, he is in my killfile, so I only now see what others respond to, so I can’t even comment on any other spittle in his diatribe this time.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
D
Dave
Nov 3, 2007
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:17:04 GMT, (Burt
Johnson) wrote:

Quintsys wrote:

Actually, I think Burt did understand what I mean. But I’m a foreigner and thus expert in awkward expressions 🙂

Yep. Very easy to understand you.

Only paranoid children who think all non-Americans are evil would think otherwise.

Oh yeah, we just described Dave, didn’t we? Of course, he is in my killfile, so I only now see what others respond to, so I can’t even comment on any other spittle in his diatribe this time.

Pleeez Burt, remove it from your kill file – pleeeeez. I promise to compliment your work next time. More people are telling lies on this newsgroup anyway, so I will not be the only one:-)

PS.
Ever heard the song ‘ag please Daddy, take me to the zoo…’ ? I very much doubt ’cause it’s not an American or European song:-)
SH
Shawn Hirn
Nov 4, 2007
In article <1i6malw.b9tzqb38l0clN%>,
(Burt Johnson) wrote:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mindstorm/1771582802/

OK, I am throwing myself at your mercy — and hopefully helpful discussion. I am very new to photography, having purchased my first camera (a Canon 5D) 2 months ago after a 30 year hiatus from photography. (I have done dozens of commercial videos in the interim, 52 of which can be viewed and purchased from my web site in my link or from Amazon).

At any rate, I recently took a weekend trip to Mono Lake in California. With 500 or so shots, I deleted about half, and am happy with maybe half a dozen. This is one that I am happy with.

I am interested to hear what others here have to say about this shot.
1) What could I have done better/different in the camera? I couldn’t control the weather, so don’t bother with that. Given the conditions, what would you have done different?

I am no expert, but I think your photo is fantastic. If you want to punch it up a bit, perhaps you can make the sky a bit brighter and blue, like on a nice day.

2) What could I have done better/different in Lightroom/Photoshop to improve it?

See my above comment.

For the record, this was shot in Raw format. The result was leveled (my tripod was 4 degrees out of kilter in the sand — I need a level on it), and the exposure/clarity very slightly tweaked in Lightroom. It was then cropped to be a tad shorter vertically than the camera made it. Other than that, it is pretty much as my camera recorded it.
If you just want to say it is terrible or boring, don’t bother wasting the bandwidth. I am interested in learning, not in hearing some snot nosed kid who claims to be 50+ bragging how smart he is (drop dead UC — you are on my killfile anyway)

Hardly! Its a beautiful image. If you did nothing more to that photo, it would still be beautiful.
B
burt
Nov 4, 2007
Shawn Hirn wrote:
I am no expert, but I think your photo is fantastic. If you want to punch it up a bit, perhaps you can make the sky a bit brighter and blue, like on a nice day.

Thanks! Before posting it, I tried to punch up the sky, but did not like the resuls. A couple people have sent me edits of this photo with the sky more blue though, and the resuls are great. Clearly, I need to learn the selective color adjustment bettter, and that appeats to be the key to making that work in this case.

Hardly! Its a beautiful image. If you did nothing more to that photo, it would still be beautiful.

Thanks again. 🙂

I liked it when I posted it, but now that I have seen what others have been able to do with it, I much less pleased with it. But then, that was the whole point of asking — to find out what could be done to make it better.


– Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections