Control key not working in CS

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote:

Hi-de-ho
PS 7 allowed me to do many things by pressing the control (Ctrl) key and other keys. Copy a selection = Ctrl+c, paste the selection= Ctrl+v. CS doesn’t seem to have this native windows functionality enabled. Can some kind sole point me in the right direction please?

Contact Adobe Technical Support. For some odd reason your system believes that you are using a stolen, beta version of the software which had this functionality disabled, or a poorly cracked pirate copy. Since you certainly wouldn’t be foolish enough post this question here unless your copy is legitimate you must have a technical problem. Adobe can fix you right up … hi-de-ho!

——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:51:11 GMT, (Tom Thomas)
wrote:

Contact Adobe Technical Support. For some odd reason your system believes that you are using a stolen, beta version of the software which had this functionality disabled, or a poorly cracked pirate copy. Since you certainly wouldn’t be foolish enough post this question here unless your copy is legitimate you must have a technical problem. Adobe can fix you right up … hi-de-ho!

——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

Oh – for fucks sake – grow up and stop accusing everybody before you know the facts – Some cheaper keyboards – esp. Logitec ones with older drivers show this symptom as well. Maybe he has got a pirate copy, but since that crack was replaced shortly after it was released, what are the chances ???????? Don’t you EVER read these groups apart from your own posts???

phil <> wrote:

Oh – for fucks sake – grow up and stop accusing everybody before you know the facts – Some cheaper keyboards – esp. Logitec ones with older drivers show this symptom as well. Maybe he has got a pirate copy, but since that crack was replaced shortly after it was released, what are the chances ???????? Don’t you EVER read these groups apart from your own posts???

I accused nobody, and I certainly have never accused "everybody" as you claim. I gave him correct advice — call tech support. As for "growing up," well, let’s just say that your well reasoned, logical and polite response (as well as your vocabulary) speaks volumes in that department.
——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

phil <> wrote:

Oh – for fucks sake – grow up

Hilarious … Mr. Anonymous (AKA Phil) has a hair up his tiny bunghole.

—
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

My exact thoughts. The theft isn’t half so annoying as the stupidity that seems to go hand-in-hand with it. It’s not that ethical people are all geniuses and all thieves are retarded, but there are enough to add credence to my maxim:

"It’s not the theft, it’s the stupidity".

Given that people like "Phil" like to post from anonymizers, maybe I should change that last part to "cowardly stupidity".

—
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

Thank you Tom,
I do indeed have a beta version installed on this PC. I don’t normally use PCs in the firm I’m at. It would seem that the company’s system administrator installed it. Take heart and rest easy in your quest for total and complete submission from all PS users… The boxed copy (several of them actually) was in the Sys. Admin’s cupboard, never been installed! He has installed a copy for me today and (thankfully) the problem is not evident now. Much better photograph handling than PS 6.0, too.

One of the problems legitimate Photographers have when confused about features in Photoshop is the unbelievable attitude of people like yourself who for some reason unknown to me is prepared to judge others by what they themselves are capable of. Anyone who presumes a total stranger has stolen something just because they ask for help using it, truly is a very sick individual. But hey… It takes all kinds to fill a world. If anyone ever offers you advise on how to correct your personality problems… Take it! MR

"Tom Thomas" wrote in message

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote:

Hi-de-ho
PS 7 allowed me to do many things by pressing the control (Ctrl) key and other keys. Copy a selection = Ctrl+c, paste the selection= Ctrl+v. CS doesn’t seem to have this native windows functionality enabled. Can some kind sole point me in the right direction please?

Contact Adobe Technical Support. For some odd reason your system believes that you are using a stolen, beta version of the software which had this functionality disabled, or a poorly cracked pirate copy. Since you certainly wouldn’t be foolish enough post this question here unless your copy is legitimate you must have a technical problem. Adobe can fix you right up … hi-de-ho!

——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

Pirate.

Nice story though, you get an A for originality.

—
Regards,
Ian Firth

Where it came from and who installed it is unknown to me. I started work in a new job last Monday and need to edit my photographs.

The PC allocated to me had a working version 6 on it and this CS which doesn’t have full functionality. Once "Tom" pointed out it could be a pirated copy or a beta version, I reported this to my supervisor, he went to the sysadmin and now there is a fresh version installed which has the functionality missing from the previous one.

Before I believe a stranger, I’ll believe my boss. Think what you will. You are as bad as the other poster for up front, believing the worst of a stranger. The Internet has introduced me to some real oddballs but it also taught me about anarchy and the treacherous mindset of Internet adicts who really ought to get a life.

I shoot raw and instead of converting pics to TIFF before editing, CS offered me direct access to my work otherwise I’d happily keep using version
6. When I asked in this group for help, some of you claim I pirated the
software. Hell, you don’t even know me yet you are willing to defame me.

I guess it never occurred to such evil minds as yours and Tom’s that even if it was a pirated copy, once discovered a licensed version would be purchased. As it turned out, there were several un-opened, un-installed packs of PS CS in the company. The advise I gave to Tom also applies to you. I’ll add: Get a life to it.

"Ian Firth" wrote in message

Pirate.

Nice story though, you get an A for originality.

—
Regards,
Ian Firth

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote in message

Where it came from and who installed it is unknown to me. I started work in a new job last Monday and need to edit my photographs.
The PC allocated to me had a working version 6 on it and this CS which doesn’t have full functionality. Once "Tom" pointed out it could be a pirated copy or a beta version, I reported this to my supervisor, he went to the sysadmin and now there is a fresh version installed which has the functionality missing from the previous one.

Before I believe a stranger, I’ll believe my boss. Think what you will. You are as bad as the other poster for up front, believing the worst of a stranger. The Internet has introduced me to some real oddballs but it also taught me about anarchy and the treacherous mindset of Internet adicts who really ought to get a life.

Amen. As if proselytizing accomplishes anything, other than to make proselytizers feel better about not having a life.

Just ask Tony Spadaro.

Rick

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote:

One of the problems legitimate Photographers have when confused about features in Photoshop is the unbelievable attitude of people like yourself who for some reason unknown to me is prepared to judge others by what they themselves are capable of. Anyone who presumes a total stranger has stolen something just because they ask for help using it, truly is a very sick individual. But hey… It takes all kinds to fill a world. If anyone ever offers you advise on how to correct your personality problems… Take it! MR

Thou protesteth too much. Re–read my post. I offered
straightforward advice and made no accusations whatsoever. I was willing to believe that you had a technical problem and offered the appropriate advice — "contact technical support." I even said that you must have a legitimate copy or you wouldn’t be posting in this group (implication: you _believed_ you had a legitimate copy.)

Now that you have gone so far overboard protesting non-existent accusations I have to wonder what makes you so insecure? Something to hide?

——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:38:22 GMT, (Tom Thomas)
wrote:>

Thou protesteth too much. Re–read my post. I offered
straightforward advice and made no accusations whatsoever. I was willing to believe that you had a technical problem and offered the appropriate advice — "contact technical support." I even said that you must have a legitimate copy or you wouldn’t be posting in this group (implication: you _believed_ you had a legitimate copy.)
Now that you have gone so far overboard protesting non-existent accusations I have to wonder what makes you so insecure? Something to hide?

——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.

Reread your post, it would appear from the general tone, the childish end statement and the fact you give no alternative to piracy, that you where indeed accusing someone of this. The fact that you gave the standard correct response, is no excuse – You could have answered, "Contact Adobe" and not mentioned piracy at all. If you’re a good boy, mommy might buy you a policemans play outfit for christmas, as this is what you clearly want to be. Tom is now plonked

In article <gqCBb.47263$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

Where it came from and who installed it is unknown to me. I started work in a new job last Monday and need to edit my photographs.
The PC allocated to me had a working version 6 on it and this CS which doesn’t have full functionality. Once "Tom" pointed out it could be a pirated copy or a beta version, I reported this to my supervisor, he went to the sysadmin and now there is a fresh version installed which has the functionality missing from the previous one.

Before I believe a stranger, I’ll believe my boss. […]

Looks like "Tom" might have been right – the CS installation wasn’t standard. Perhaps it was hacked. Why didn’t you go to your boss to begin with before pestering the rest of us?

phil <> wrote:

Tom is now plonked

<> will stamp his little foot and tell his mommy what a mean person Tom is.

Meanwhile, back in the jungle …

—
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

(jjs) wrote:

Why didn’t you go to your boss to begin
with before pestering the rest of us?

Didn’t you know? We are the "free tech support" for the stupid and lazy. I add a cost to this "free support" though.

—
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

jjs wrote:

In article <gqCBb.47263$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

Looks like "Tom" might have been right – the CS installation wasn’t standard. Perhaps it was hacked. Why didn’t you go to your boss to begin with before pestering the rest of us?

Good question jjs? People seem to come to the board before contacting technical support.

Stuart

I have a question for all.
What is it about a few posters here who think the topics cannot ask for help?
Those same few posters are attempting to hi-jack the news group for their own perverse reasons.
Where ever do these people get the idea they are so expert as to be able to charge for their (often questionable) advise?
Calling Adobe for help in Australia is like going to the zoo in search of wildlife subjects. I can post to this group in my meal breaks. I’ll be blown over by a frog sneeze before I’ll spend that time hanging on a phone waiting my turn for help.

I’ll give "Tom" his dues and say he is the only replier to actually offer any help at all. I can overlook his presumption of guilt attitude. What I really do have trouble with is the others who without having any knowledge of a person or their ethics, have the same ‘presumption of guilt’ attitude as a blanket over their minds. I think I’ll go buy a book on Photoshop rather than ask for help from this highly bigoted bunch of "experts".

MR
———–
"Farlo" wrote in message

phil <> wrote:

Tom is now plonked

<> will stamp his little foot and tell his mommy what a mean person Tom

is.

Meanwhile, back in the jungle …

—
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

Milo,
As with any group, there are some jerks, but hopefully, most of the readers here are eager to actually help. Unfortunately, lately there have been more replies from the jerks . I hate to see any good people leave this group because of a few.
Lynn

I have a question for all.
What is it about a few posters here who think the topics cannot ask for help?
Those same few posters are attempting to hi-jack the news group for their own perverse reasons.
Where ever do these people get the idea they are so expert as to be able to charge for their (often questionable) advise?
Calling Adobe for help in Australia is like going to the zoo in search of wildlife subjects. I can post to this group in my meal breaks. I’ll be blown over by a frog sneeze before I’ll spend that time hanging on a phone waiting my turn for help.

I’ll give "Tom" his dues and say he is the only replier to actually offer any help at all. I can overlook his presumption of guilt attitude. What I really do have trouble with is the others who without having any knowledge of a person or their ethics, have the same ‘presumption of guilt’ attitude as a blanket over their minds. I think I’ll go buy a book on Photoshop rather than ask for help from this highly bigoted bunch of "experts".
MR
———–
"Farlo" wrote in message

phil <> wrote:

Tom is now plonked

<> will stamp his little foot and tell his mommy what a mean person Tom is.
Meanwhile, back in the jungle …
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

"LLutton" wrote in message

Milo,
As with any group, there are some jerks, but hopefully, most of the

readers

here are eager to actually help. Unfortunately, lately there have been

more

replies from the jerks . I hate to see any good people leave this group because of a few.
Lynn

You don’t _know_ who, if anyone, is leaving so quit the innuendo.

The meek may inherit the earth! – But the righteous amongst the Photoshop worshippers will inhabit the Photoshop newsgroups, where they shall indulge their
superiority above all others!!

"jjs" wrote in message

"LLutton" wrote in message

Milo,
As with any group, there are some jerks, but hopefully, most of the

readers

here are eager to actually help. Unfortunately, lately there have been

more

replies from the jerks . I hate to see any good people leave this group because of a few.
Lynn

You don’t _know_ who, if anyone, is leaving so quit the innuendo.

"Farlo" wrote in message

(jjs) wrote:

Why didn’t you go to your boss to begin
with before pestering the rest of us?

Didn’t you know? We are the "free tech support" for the stupid and lazy. I add a cost to this "free support" though.

—
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

Why is that? No one is forcing you to respond to the "stupid and lazy" post asking for the "free support".
james

"james" wrote:

No one is forcing you to respond to the "stupid and lazy" post asking for the "free support".

That’s correct, Captain Obvious.

—
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote in message

CS doesn’t seem to have this native windows functionality enabled.

This one always >>>cracks<<< me up!!!

In case anyone is interested…
Further investigation about the PS CS installation in question turned up that it was indeed a pirate copy – or it had a pirate serial number at least! Of course no one here is willing to admit ‘they’ installed it!

Anyway, during the investigation our compliance auditors put up the question (after reading the replies in this group) "how come these self rightious people challenging your ethics know so much about how to obtain and alter Photoshop if they themselves have not actually done it?"

So there’s an interesting thought, isn’t it? I wouldn’t have a clue how to obtain one of these copies. We pay 19 cents per megabyte for our Data so downloading one would send alerts to our security people. And then how do you get the information to alter the program? Or is it altered when you get it? What about viruses, too?

My own personal conclusion is that anyone making a living from using a program like Photoshop wouldn’t have the time to discover the underground tunnels of the Internet unless they actually made their living from that underground. So to all you people who so willingly defamed me: Get a life! If someone has to ask about a broken feature, they are hardly equipped to have stolen the application in the first place.

MR

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote in message
[snip]

If someone has to ask about a broken feature, they are hardly equipped to have stolen the application in the first place.

Unfortunately, that’s not true at all. The ‘net’ is far more easily accessible playhouse than you would like to believe.

—–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–== Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

From: "Milo Rambaldi"

I have a question for all. What is it about a few posters here who think the topics cannot ask for help?

You asked a question (that’s been asked several times before) and you got the correct answer. You should thank Tom and get over your hurt feelings and get on with your life.

Those same few posters are attempting to hi-jack the news group for their own perverse reasons.

Who is hi-jacking the newsgroup? This is ridiculous.

Where ever do these people get the idea they are so expert as to be able to charge for their (often questionable) advise?

As they used to say in Soviet Russia, "We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us". Did you get an invoice? If not don’t worry about it.

Calling Adobe for help in Australia is like going to the zoo in search of wildlife subjects.

Especially once they figure out you have a pirated version of Photoshop.

I’ll give "Tom" his dues and say he is the only replier to actually offer any help at all.

He told you the truth. How many other people need to tell you the same thing before you get the picture?

What I
really do have trouble with is the others who without having any knowledge of a person or their ethics, have the same ‘presumption of guilt’ attitude

But you DID have a stolen copy of Photoshop, right? So get off your high horse. You WERE guilty as charged.

Lobo

In article <6O7Cb.48925$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

Anyway, during the investigation our compliance auditors put up the question (after reading the replies in this group) "how come these self rightious people challenging your ethics know so much about how to obtain and alter Photoshop if they themselves have not actually done it?"

Are the auditor idiots or are you just making this up? They should know what ‘common knowledge’ means. We know because we are informed. We care about PS.

So there’s an interesting thought, isn’t it?

No, not at all interesting. The question they should ask you, the "professional" who got the pirated software, is "Why don’t YOU know what you are doing?" And pray tell how did you manage to get what you consider a legitimate copy without going through Activation?

I call bulls*it on you.

From: "Milo Rambaldi"

In case anyone is interested…
Further investigation about the PS CS installation in question turned up that it was indeed a pirate copy – or it had a pirate serial number

So Tom was right and you were guilty of using pirate software, as charged. You should apologize to him.

Anyway, during the investigation our compliance auditors put up the question (after reading the replies in this group) "how come these self rightious people challenging your ethics know so much about how to obtain and alter Photoshop if they themselves have not actually done it?"

Because when CS came out a dozen or so clueless turkeys posted the same thing you did … ‘duh dude, why don’t my keyboard shortcuts work no more? doh’ … if you had checked you’d have seen a lot of similar posts.

You are just the latest in a long line of turkeys to ask the same dumb question. Most of us have seen the reply several times by now. It’s pretty stupid to think the only way we’d know is to do it ourselves.

My own personal conclusion is that anyone making a living from using a program like Photoshop wouldn’t have the time to discover the underground tunnels of the Internet unless they actually made their living from that underground.

Or unless they had been reading the newsgroup for a couple of weeks and saw the same stupid question get answered a dozen times already.

If someone has to ask about a broken feature, they are hardly equipped to have stolen the application in the first place.

And yet they still keep coming with the same clueless question …

Lobo

The boxed copy that was installed after the post was activated according to Adobe’s proceedures.
MR
———–
"jjs" wrote in message

So there’s an interesting thought, isn’t it?

No, not at all interesting. The question they should ask you, the "professional" who got the pirated software, is "Why don’t YOU know what you are doing?" And pray tell how did you manage to get what you consider a legitimate copy without going through Activation?

I call bulls*it on you.

If what you say is true, I must be the only person reading this group who hasn’t seen such a post in the past month (my Internet time) I guess then I do owe Tom an appology. I was using a pirate version. Innocence is no defense, is it? Sorry Tom. You were right.
Thank you.
My question may have been clueless to you, to me it was genuine. Maybe I ought to just refrain from posting here again?
MR
———————————-
"DurangoLobo" wrote in message

So Tom was right and you were guilty of using pirate software, as charged.

You

should apologize to him.

You are just the latest in a long line of turkeys to ask the same dumb question. Most of us have seen the reply several times by now. It’s

pretty

stupid to think the only way we’d know is to do it ourselves.
And yet they still keep coming with the same clueless question …
Lobo

In article <Q0aCb.49030$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

The boxed copy that was installed after the post was activated according to Adobe’s proceedures.

So you got a shrink-wraped boxed copy of CS that had an ID that Adobe went ahead and activated and the software actually worked, albeit with the problem with the control-keys, and it turned out to be pirated software. Is that what you are saying? Manuals in shrink wrap, the whole nine yards. Right? A professionally counterfeited version like that at this relatively early stage of distribution would be a collector’s item, or at least some very cool evidence possibly pointing to some perps that want to go to jail real bad.

Or you are just a liar.

How would you like produce that box, manual, CDROM under an administrative supboena?

In article <D6aCb.49034$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

If what you say is true, I must be the only person reading this group who hasn’t seen such a post in the past month (my Internet time) I guess then I do owe Tom an appology. I was using a pirate version. Innocence is no defense, is it? Sorry Tom. You were right.
Thank you.
My question may have been clueless to you, to me it was genuine. Maybe I ought to just refrain from posting here again?

If you are a legit user now, then stick around, or at least long enough to tell us how it went with the cops.

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote:

The boxed copy that was installed after the post was activated according to Adobe’s proceedures.

From: (jjs)

So you got a shrink-wraped boxed copy of CS that had an ID that Adobe went ahead and activated and the software actually worked, albeit with the problem with the control-keys, and it turned out to be pirated software. Is that what you are saying? Manuals in shrink wrap, the whole nine yards. Right? A professionally counterfeited version like that at this relatively early stage of distribution would be a collector’s item, or at least some very cool evidence possibly pointing to some perps that want to go to jail real bad.

Or you are just a liar.

Down boy … I think he’s saying the copy he originally used was indeed a pirated copy, maybe a beta or something, and once the kind fellows on this newsgroup explained why the keyboard shortcuts didn’t work the sys admin unboxed the legit copy they had laying around but hadn’t yet installed, and that works fine.

At least that’s how I’m interpreting it …

Bill

No that’s not what I’m saying.
Post := to send an item (post to news group)
After:= something that happens after something else. (Like a post for help). "Boxed copy that was installed after"
Did you bother to read my earlier posts or just butting in for entertainment?
Tom alerted me to the possibility of the copy on the workstation being a pirate…
That was a post.
After then a boxed copy was installed and the problem fixed. What exactly is your problem jjs?
Run out of games to play and trolling?
Get a life man… The cupboard you live in must stink by now. MR

"jjs" wrote in message

In article <Q0aCb.49030$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

The boxed copy that was installed after the post was activated according

to

Adobe’s proceedures.

So you got a shrink-wraped boxed copy of CS that had an ID that Adobe went ahead and activated and the software actually worked, albeit with the problem with the control-keys, and it turned out to be pirated software. Is that what you are saying? Manuals in shrink wrap, the whole nine yards. Right? A professionally counterfeited version like that at this relatively early stage of distribution would be a collector’s item, or at least some very cool evidence possibly pointing to some perps that want to go to jail real bad.

Or you are just a liar.

How would you like produce that box, manual, CDROM under an administrative supboena?

"Stuart" wrote in message

jjs wrote:

In article <gqCBb.47263$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

Looks like "Tom" might have been right – the CS installation wasn’t standard. Perhaps it was hacked. Why didn’t you go to your boss to begin with before pestering the rest of us?

Good question jjs? People seem to come to the board before contacting technical support.

Every man to his own choice. If it upsets you that people do this, just don’t answer their posts…..

JL

Hey! I have a pirate copy with ALL functions working.
Somebody can help me to understand why??
ued

"jjs" wrote in message

In article <D6aCb.49034$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

If what you say is true, I must be the only person reading this group

who

hasn’t seen such a post in the past month (my Internet time) I guess

then I

do owe Tom an appology. I was using a pirate version. Innocence is no defense, is it? Sorry Tom. You were right.
Thank you.
My question may have been clueless to you, to me it was genuine. Maybe I ought to just refrain from posting here again?

If you are a legit user now, then stick around, or at least long enough to tell us how it went with the cops.

Because you have the ‘crackfix’

—
=]====>Greetingzzz Blade<====[=
Jesus is coming!! Look busy

In article ,
(Bill Hilton) wrote:

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote:

The boxed copy that was installed after the post was activated according to Adobe’s proceedures.

From: (jjs)

[…]

Or you are just a liar.

Down boy … I think he’s saying the copy he originally used was indeed a pirated copy, maybe a beta or something, and once the kind fellows on this newsgroup explained why the keyboard shortcuts didn’t work the sys admin unboxed the legit copy they had laying around but hadn’t yet installed, and that works fine.

My bad!

In article <0JeCb.49386$>, "Milo
Rambaldi" wrote:

[… proper admonishment (or something) accepted…]

What exactly is your problem jjs?
Run out of games to play and trolling?
Get a life man… The cupboard you live in must stink by now.

Help! I’m being held prisoner in an unactivated shrink-wrapped box of CS!

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote in message

If what you say is true, I must be the only person reading this group who hasn’t seen such a post in the past month (my Internet time)

Yep. You are the only one. Funny thing, that? Eh?

I guess then I
do owe Tom an appology. I was using a pirate version. Innocence is no defense, is it?

If you were using a pirated version, you were not "innocent" were you?

Sorry Tom. You were right.
Thank you.
My question may have been clueless to you, to me it was genuine. Maybe I ought to just refrain from posting here again?

Suit yourself.

Tom
(A different ‘Tom’)

"Milo Rambaldi" wrote:

If what you say is true, I must be the only person reading this group who hasn’t seen such a post in the past month (my Internet time) I guess then I do owe Tom an appology. I was using a pirate version. Innocence is no defense, is it? Sorry Tom. You were right.
Thank you.

Apology accepted Milo. I hardly expected this to be such an entertaining thread.

Genuine advice here: Stick around and read and learn. Don’t post until you’re certain you’re not repeating a frequently asked question (FAQ) as you did. If you read regularly you’ll find in unnecessary to ask repeated questions. Also, become acquainted with the various personalities of the posters here and learn to live with it. Don’t feed the trolls. Learn who provides solid answers. If your internet experience is one month then you have a lot to learn.

You walked into the lion’s den wearing a pork chop suit!

Good luck.
——————————-
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.