CRT vs. LCD?

S
Posted By
Sweet-P
Mar 11, 2005
Views
465
Replies
10
Status
Closed
I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use for professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not easily visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the best for this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are now almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work on the computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as to which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of money and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye discomfort of the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P

MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥

– in 4 materials (clay versions included)

– 12 scenes

– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups

– 6000 x 4500 px

A
ai-lover
Mar 11, 2005
I have used both, I prefer and currently work on a LaCie 22 Blue CRT. My entire department has switched to them and love them. We work in Photoshop much of the time. Good Luck!

Sweet-P wrote:
I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use
for
professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not
easily
visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the
best for
this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are
now
almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work
on the
computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as
to
which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of
money
and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the
Mitsubishi
Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye
discomfort of
the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P
A
adykes
Mar 11, 2005
In article ,
ai-lover wrote:
I have used both, I prefer and currently work on a LaCie 22 Blue CRT. My entire department has switched to them and love them. We work in Photoshop much of the time. Good Luck!

Sweet-P wrote:
I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use
for
professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not
easily
visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the
best for
this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are
now
almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work
on the
computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as
to
which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of
money
and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the
Mitsubishi
Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye
discomfort of
the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P

I had a chat with the guy who’s in charge of graphics for a major magazine publisher, about a month ago. He said that CRTs are better, but LCDs are very very good. The last major shortcomming of LCDs is off-angle color shift.



a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m

Don’t blame me. I voted for Gore.
B
Brian
Mar 11, 2005
Al Dykes wrote:

In article ,
ai-lover wrote:

I have used both, I prefer and currently work on a LaCie 22 Blue CRT. My entire department has switched to them and love them. We work in Photoshop much of the time. Good Luck!

Sweet-P wrote:

I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use

for

professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not

easily

visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the

best for

this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are

now

almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work

on the

computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as

to

which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of

money

and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the

Mitsubishi

Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye

discomfort of

the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P

I had a chat with the guy who’s in charge of graphics for a major magazine publisher, about a month ago. He said that CRTs are better, but LCDs are very very good. The last major shortcomming of LCDs is off-angle color shift.
One other thing to keep in mind is price. I don’t know about where you are, but in Australia an average LCD in say a 17" size is about twice the price of a 17" CRT screen (approx $400+ compared to $190). That is comparing a good quality CRT to a cheap LCD at that! Unless you need to save the space, why pay so much more? Side by side the 2 monitors I compared were equivalent in sharpness.

Brian.
R
Rick
Mar 11, 2005
"Sweet-P" wrote in message
I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use for professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not easily visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the best for this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are now almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work on the computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as to which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of money and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye discomfort of the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P

We tried a couple and went back to 19"/21" crts.
GC
Graeme Cogger
Mar 11, 2005
In article <UA9Yd.865$
says…
I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use for professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not easily visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the best for this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are now almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work on the computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as to which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of money and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye discomfort of the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P
Some of the LCDs are pretty good. The best are the Eizo Coloredge series, but they are EXPENSIVE! Some of the ‘cheaper’ Eizo screens are also quite good in Photoshop.
Good CRTs are still better – the Sony Artisan is the best of all, if you can find (and afford) one. The Lacie or decent Mitsubishi screens are very good for the money and probably better than the best LCDs (with the possible exception of the Eizo Coloredge screens).
Bear in mind that a 20" LCD will have a similar viewing area to a 22" CRT, so be sure to compare prices accordingly.
GC
Graeme Cogger
Mar 11, 2005
In article ,
says…
In article <UA9Yd.865$
says…
I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use for professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not easily visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the best for this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are now almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work on the computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as to which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of money and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye discomfort of the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P
Some of the LCDs are pretty good. The best are the Eizo Coloredge series, but they are EXPENSIVE! Some of the ‘cheaper’ Eizo screens are also quite good in Photoshop.
Good CRTs are still better – the Sony Artisan is the best of all, if you can find (and afford) one. The Lacie or decent Mitsubishi screens are very good for the money and probably better than the best LCDs (with the possible exception of the Eizo Coloredge screens).
Bear in mind that a 20" LCD will have a similar viewing area to a 22" CRT, so be sure to compare prices accordingly.
I forgot to mention – make sure you allocate some funds for a hardware calibration system for the monitor. If you don’t get this, then it’s not worth bothering with a decent monitor 🙂 Ethan Hansen has a good review of a number of systems on:
http://www.drycreekphoto.com/
S
Sweet-P
Mar 11, 2005
Thank you ALL so very much for your very informative posts. I guess I knew all along that I was going to have to go to a CRT to get the best function for my work.

And, I also appreciate the link for the calibration hardware as well. I was looking into the different systems as well prior to making a decision regarding what type of monitor to purchase.

Newsgroups are wonderful to get all kinds of help and information 🙂

Sweet-P
H
Hecate
Mar 11, 2005
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:59:32 GMT, "Sweet-P" wrote:

I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use for professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not easily visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the best for this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are now almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work on the computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as to which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of money and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye discomfort of the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P
Bit late but:

Unless you’re willing to spend enormous amounts of money on an Eizo LCD (for which you could have a triple CRT monitor set up) buy a CRT, preferably two or three.

Someone mentioned calibration – Gretag MacBeth are, IMHO, the best you can get.



Hecate – The Real One

veni, vidi, reliqui
B
Brian
Mar 12, 2005
Hecate wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:59:32 GMT, "Sweet-P" wrote:

I would like to know if the CRT is still the ultimate monitor to use for professional graphic work in Photoshop.
I am about to make a purchase of a new monitor as I notice I cannot calibrate my LCD and the distinct shades of black to gray are not easily visible. From what I’ve been reading it appears that CRTs are the best for this type of work; however, I have also read that some new LCDs are now almost up to the ability of CRTs and are competent for graphic work on the computer.
I would like to know from people who have had experience with both as to which is the best route to go as I will be investing quite a bit of money and don’t want to regret it later. The CRT I am looking at is the Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 22". However, I do like the slim size and no eye discomfort of the LCDs.

Thanks in advance,
Sweet-P

Bit late but:

Unless you’re willing to spend enormous amounts of money on an Eizo LCD (for which you could have a triple CRT monitor set up) buy a CRT, preferably two or three.

Someone mentioned calibration – Gretag MacBeth are, IMHO, the best you can get.



Hecate – The Real One

veni, vidi, reliqui

Hey Hecate,

back to haunt you. "IMHO" – that is a funny expression really, is that different to IMDO? Using superfluous words now, unusual for a smart chap like you.

Just stirring you, as usual.

Brian.
H
Hecate
Mar 12, 2005
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:33:04 +1100, Brian
wrote:

Hey Hecate,

back to haunt you. "IMHO" – that is a funny expression really, is that different to IMDO? Using superfluous words now, unusual for a smart chap like you.

Just stirring you, as usual.
LOL! Well, I could have used IMNSHO 😉

(In My Not So Humble Opinion)

Brian – look up Hecate Mythology on Google and then tell me I’m a smart *chap* 😉



Hecate – The Real One

veni, vidi, reliqui

How to Improve Photoshop Performance

Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections