the size of my web pictures in your monitor

RBB wrote:

i have arranged the size and resolution of my web photos. i would like to know if you can see them right at yor monitor.
i am using a 19" and 1280×1024 screen resolution,
i guess if you use same resolution you will see the full picture, even if you have an smaller monitor, but not sure about it
check it out and tell me
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/burch

thanks
richard

First off nice photo.
I am running at 1280 x 1024 and can see the whole photo at once but I have to scroll a bit to see the whole web page, I am using Internet Exporer.

The size of the monitor will not matter but the screen resolution will.

Scott

"RBB" wrote in message

i have arranged the size and resolution of my web photos. i would like to know if you can see them right at yor monitor.
i am using a 19" and 1280×1024 screen resolution,
i guess if you use same resolution you will see the full picture, even if you have an smaller monitor, but not sure about it

Perfect on my 21" with 1280×1024.

Gummo

As you point out, the displayed area depends on the resolution of the monitor, not on its size. The size only makes the displayed area appear bigger or smaller.

This tool allows you to check what a viewer would see at a given screen resolution: http://www.brianapps.net/sizer.html For example, if you set it to 800 by 600, it will resize the window to that size. That’s what a viewer would see with a monitor set to that resolutions and with the window occupying the entire screen.

Note that not all pixels on the viewing monitor are available for displaying the actual web page content because of the scroll bar, status bar, window title, menu bar, etc.

Nice photos

Roger

"RBB" wrote:

i have arranged the size and resolution of my web photos. i would like to know if you can see them right at yor monitor.
i am using a 19" and 1280×1024 screen resolution,
i guess if you use same resolution you will see the full picture, even if you have an smaller monitor, but not sure about it
check it out and tell me
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/burch

thanks
richard

I’m using Firefox, 1280×1024 res.
The image menu is hidden and the right hand side of the page is cut off. Love this photo though, it fits nicely in the viewport as long as I turn off any extra toolbars that I may have open. If I turn on a couple more toolbars I need to scroll to see the bottom edge of the photo. Here’s a screen shot
members – optusnet – com – au/~caisse – com – au/images/Clipboard01.jpg (replace " – " with dot)
The webpage and viewport dimensions are being reported by Firefox if that’s any help.

MitchAU

RBB wrote:

i have arranged the size and resolution of my web photos. i would like to know if you can see them right at yor monitor.
i am using a 19" and 1280×1024 screen resolution,
i guess if you use same resolution you will see the full picture, even if you have an smaller monitor, but not sure about it
check it out and tell me
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/burch

thanks
richard

Have you tried setting your picture width in terms of percentage instead of absolute widths in pixels?

—
www.micromountain.com

"RBB" wrote in message

i have arranged the size and resolution of my web photos. i would like to know if you can see them right at yor monitor.
i am using a 19" and 1280×1024 screen resolution,
i guess if you use same resolution you will see the full picture, even if you have an smaller monitor, but not sure about it
check it out and tell me
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/burch

thanks
richard

thanks to all,
thats ok for me, i only wanted that the picture
takes the whole screen, if you have to scroll in some ones for the numbers, weel thats not a big deal, never mind,

anyway each time i replace the photos i adjust everything better, besides i still have to writte things to each picture,
i sow i have made a mistake in the last one, is at 300 ppp and then becomes too big

richard

"RBB" escribi

"broga" wrote in message

"RBB" wrote in message

i have arranged the size and resolution of my web photos. i would like to know if you can see them right at yor monitor.
i am using a 19" and 1280×1024 screen resolution,
i guess if you use same resolution you will see the full picture, even if you have an smaller monitor, but not sure about it
check it out and tell me
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/burch

thanks
richard

Have you tried setting your picture width in terms of percentage instead

of

absolute widths in pixels?

That will work but on some machines it will cause significant degradation to the image. YMMV
Film best,
me

PS: The alt.photography gang hate it when I say film best. They first attacked me on 10/29/04 in "Camera for my Wife": http://tinyurl.com/5brkq

RBB wrote:

thanks to all,
thats ok for me, i only wanted that the picture
takes the whole screen, if you have to scroll in some ones for the numbers, weel thats not a big deal, never mind,

Why do you want to post your pictures so big? That’s a mistake, IMO – easier to steal and print. You want them much smaller.

—
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ Mike Kohary mike at kohary dot com http://www.kohary.com

Karma Photography: http://www.karmaphotography.com
Seahawks Historical Database: http://www.kohary.com/seahawks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:51:34 -0600, "me" wrote:

PS: The alt.photography gang hate it when I say film best. They first attacked me on 10/29/04 in "Camera for my Wife": http://tinyurl.com/5brkq

Technically it is. The smallest part of an image with digital is a single pixel. With film it’s the smallest part of a dye cloud or a silver atom.

Perceptually, it’s a lot closer 🙂

—

Hecate – The Real One

Fashion: Buying things you don’t need, with money
you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like…

me wrote:

"broga" wrote in message

"RBB" wrote in message

i have arranged the size and resolution of my web photos. i would like to know if you can see them right at yor monitor.
i am using a 19" and 1280×1024 screen resolution,
i guess if you use same resolution you will see the full picture, even if you have an smaller monitor, but not sure about it
check it out and tell me
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/burch

thanks
richard

Have you tried setting your picture width in terms of percentage instead

of

absolute widths in pixels?

That will work but on some machines it will cause significant degradation to the image. YMMV
Film best,
me

PS: The alt.photography gang hate it when I say film best. They first attacked me on 10/29/04 in "Camera for my Wife": http://tinyurl.com/5brkq

hey "me",

I am not arguing with you btw, but what do you feel is better about film?

Brian

In article <d1bc3t$8c9$>,
"RBB" wrote:

i am using a 19" and 1280×1024 screen resolution,
i guess if you use same resolution you will see the full picture, even if you have an smaller monitor, but not sure about it

Forget about the physical size of the monitor; it makes absolutely no difference.

The only thing that matters is the total number of pixels in the image and the total number of pixels on a monitor. A monitor set to 1024×768 displays 1,024 pixels across and 768 pixels down. It displays 1,024 pixels across and 768 pixels down no matter what its size; that’s what 1024×768 means.

When you make an image for the Web, do not worry about or even think about the resolution in terms of pixels per inch. The only thing that matters is the total number of pixels. To a browser, a 600×400 picture at 300 pixels per inch is identical to a 600×400 picture at 72 pixels per inch is identical to a 600×400 picture at 2,000,000,000,000 pixels per inch. Nothing matters but the number of pixels.

—
Art, photography, shareware, polyamory, literature, kink: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html