In article ,
says…
In article <fdhre.55803$>,
"r.winks" wrote:
I am using ASUS p4pe board
now with Pentium 4- 2.4 GHz with 512 meg of Ram. I figure increasing my
ram
won’t give me that much more speed.
You figure wrong; increasing RAM is the best and cheapest possible way to increase Photoshop speed, and for large images 512MB of RAM is just a tiny pittance.
The second most effective way to increase speed is to add a second, fast hard drive and use it as a Photoshop scratch drive.
Building a new system will cost you more but will not offer you better performance unless you add more RAM.
Photoshop is strictly a 2D image manipulation program. It can not use and does not benefit in any way from fast accelerated 3D graphics cards; you can, if you like, throw a $600 graphics card in there, and it won’t make even the tiniest bit of difference to Photoshop.
—
Art, photography, shareware, polyamory, literature, kink: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Exactly! If you want Mboard models, I can’t help with what is tops today, and it will change tomorrow, but:
1.) near top-of-line processor (either Intel or AMD if you run M$ Win OS). Don’t get hung up on multi-threading for PS, though it will help with several other apps open. Bus speed is more important than MT support, in MHO.
2.) as much RAM as you, and your OS, or pocketbook, can stand. More is better
– always with PS
3.) HDDs – physical, not just partitioned logical drives. I’d opt for about 4 fast biggies, in two RAID arrangements. Keep your OS, programs, and image files on one striped set, and leave the other one (2 HDDs) just for Scratch Disk. PSCS & CS2 can use ALL that you supply it with – no way to build with more than it can use. SCSI is still slightly faster but much more expensive. SATA is very, very close, and cost less. Make sure that you get either the best controller card, or that your Mboard has a really good one built-in. Even with one on the Mb, I’d opt for a separate controller.
4.) dual-monitors (or even 3, if you can fit them on your desktop). Any good
vid-card with dual-monitor support will be just fine, unless you also do 3-D and/or gaming. I still like Matrox for the 2-D performance and dual-head support.
Hunt