Who Do You Think Bombed London?

PZ
Posted By
Pete Zahut
Jul 7, 2005
Views
7114
Replies
183
Status
Closed
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.

Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 7, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

Happy FOAD.

Oh you only care about people you know? I see your friends might have just fucked off and died and you tell me to fuck off and die? Wow man, grow up.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 7, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:44:39 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Kingdom catapaulted the
following boulder:
Pete Zahut wrote in
news::

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Your not a troll, your a FUCKING MONSTER

FUCK OFF

It’s Steven Perkoff, he’s a psychopath.

http://us.geocities.yahoo.com/gb/view?member=flutterby_britt y

OMG!! Who is that Steven Perkoff guy? He’s so bad, he signed a guestbook.

Besides having a pretty crappy last name, I don’t see what he did wrong.

Can you explain numb nuts?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
S
Shobha
Jul 7, 2005
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

For now … the only thing that can help a little is … knowledge. Try and reduce the ignorance thats so widespread around you. Ignorance is the most dangerous thing on earth !
BW
Bad Wolf
Jul 7, 2005
In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

Happy FOAD.

David Silverman F.L.A.H.N. aa #2208
BW
Bad Wolf
Jul 7, 2005
In the great debate about "Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, "Shobha" catapaulted the
following boulder:
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

For now … the only thing that can help a little is … knowledge. Try and reduce the ignorance thats so widespread around you. Ignorance is the most dangerous thing on earth !

The only thing that can help is getting rid of religion.
K
Kingdom
Jul 7, 2005
Pete Zahut wrote in
news::

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Your not a troll, your a FUCKING MONSTER

FUCK OFF


f=Ma well, nearly…
TW
Therion Ware
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400 in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut (Pete Zahut ) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

As yet we don’t know. But in due course we probably will.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?


"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage.

#442. Want food NOW? Then try http://www.rtios.com/
– Yep, currently under test… Your opinion welcome.
S
Shobha
Jul 7, 2005
<< The only thing that can help is getting rid of religion. >>

Agreed. Thats a temporary solution. But its not the root cause solution.
The human predisposition towards ethnocentrism/xenophobia is the real culprit. Thats the reason we latch on so easily to dividing labels … like religion, language, nationality, race, skin-colour etc.

Thats the reason why even young children like to split themselves up into groups … identify with one group and compete/fight against and mistrust the other. This "Us vs. Them" can go to extreme lengths resulting in mass murder and destruction.

The root problem is in human nature.
BW
Bad Wolf
Jul 7, 2005
In the great debate about "Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

Happy FOAD.

Oh you only care about people you know? I see your friends might have just fucked off and died and you tell me to fuck off and die? Wow man, grow up.

I don’t need advice about behaving like an adult from a psychopath.

David Silverman F.L.A.H.N. aa #2208
R
Rick
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Tell those fucking terrorrists to stop murdering innocent people, then, you wanker.
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 7, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:07:38 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

Happy FOAD.

Oh you only care about people you know? I see your friends might have just fucked off and died and you tell me to fuck off and die? Wow man, grow up.

I don’t need advice about behaving like an adult from a psychopath.

Your opinion that you are better than me is wrong. Actually I’m better than you.

Anything else you need cleared up immature guy?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
MD
Mark Darrah
Jul 7, 2005
The Frenh – I said it first

"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 7, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and JPG On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:21:01 +0100 this person wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Tell those fucking terrorrists to stop murdering innocent people, then, you wanker.

What’s a wanker? You sound like a real jackoff typing words like "wanker".


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
JA
James Ascher
Jul 7, 2005
Pete Zahut wrote:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

Mossad, the CIA or M5

James
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 7, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Christopher A. Lee On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:37:12 -0400 this
person wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Isn’t it a bit premature to ask this question before there is any evidence?

If they would have been asking questions before hand none of this would have happened in the second place.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
G
GregoryD
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:26:18 +0100, Bad Wolf wrote:

In the great debate about "Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, "Shobha" catapaulted the
following boulder:
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

For now … the only thing that can help a little is … knowledge. Try and reduce the ignorance thats so widespread around you. Ignorance is the most dangerous thing on earth !

The only thing that can help is getting rid of religion.

How many Jedis are there in Britain again?

GregoryD
BW
Bad Wolf
Jul 7, 2005
In the great debate about "Re: Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, GregoryD <*@*.net> catapaulted the following boulder:

How many Jedis are there in Britain again?

De facto? None. Quite a few people put it on their census form as a joke, others may have claimed that for legal reasons, that doesn’t make anybody a Jedi. For a start, there is no such thing as ‘the Force’, unless they are wearing navy blue serge uniforms with funny hats.

David Silverman F.L.A.H.N. aa #2208
M
Mephisto
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100, Bad Wolf
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I’m getting through to people OK now with texts. I think a lot of people were just too panicked to reply straight away. I hope everyone you know is OK.

Mephisto
G
GregoryD
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:58:22 +0100, Bad Wolf wrote:

In the great debate about "Re: Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, GregoryD <*@*.net> catapaulted the following boulder:
How many Jedis are there in Britain again?

De facto? None. Quite a few people put it on their census form as a joke, others may have claimed that for legal reasons, that doesn’t make anybody a Jedi. For a start, there is no such thing as ‘the Force’, unless they are wearing navy blue serge uniforms with funny hats.

I don’t thinK George Lucas would lie to us, do you? L. Ron Hubbard, sure, but George Lucas?

GregoryD
LM
Lukas Mariman
Jul 7, 2005
"Bad Wolf" schreef in bericht
In the great debate about "Re: Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, GregoryD <*@*.net> catapaulted the following boulder:
How many Jedis are there in Britain again?

De facto? None. Quite a few people put it on their census form as a joke, others may have claimed that for legal reasons, that doesn’t make anybody a Jedi. For a start, there is no such thing as ‘the Force’, unless they are wearing navy blue serge uniforms with funny hats.

So what’s the difference with "real" religions? There are no gods either, until proven otherwise…
C
calee
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Isn’t it a bit premature to ask this question before there is any evidence?
B
Benrand
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.

Exactly, soes we could get the oil buried underneath Picadilly Square.

Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
S
Shobha
Jul 7, 2005
Stupid me …. I thought this was a legit discussion.
Turns out its just 2 people using a thread to ad hom each other to death !

So … whats new ? <yawn>
R
Robibnikoff
Jul 7, 2005
"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

Happy FOAD.

Oh you only care about people you know? I see your friends might have just fucked off and died and you tell me to fuck off and die? Wow man, grow up.

Insenstive prick PLONK!

——
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn’t burn people at the stake for disagreeing – Vic Sagerquist
HS
hiv_steve
Jul 7, 2005
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

Happy FOAD.

Oh you only care about people you know? I see your friends might have just fucked off and died and you tell me to fuck off and die? Wow man, grow up.

Insenstive prick PLONK!

Still eating worms I see.
R
Robibnikoff
Jul 7, 2005
"H.I.V. Steve" wrote in message
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

Happy FOAD.

Oh you only care about people you know? I see your friends might have just fucked off and died and you tell me to fuck off and die? Wow man, grow up.

Insenstive prick PLONK!

Still eating worms I see.

Sorry, but I’m not interested in what you had for breakfast – PLONK —
——
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn’t burn people at the stake for disagreeing – Vic Sagerquist
D
DianaC
Jul 7, 2005
"Bad Wolf" wrote in message
In the great debate about "Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, "Shobha" catapaulted the
following boulder:
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

For now … the only thing that can help a little is … knowledge. Try and reduce the ignorance thats so widespread around you. Ignorance is the most dangerous thing on earth !

The only thing that can help is getting rid of religion.

Stalin tried that. The results were….unfortunate.
K
KK
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:52:58 +0000, DianaC wrote:

Try
and reduce the ignorance thats so widespread around you. Ignorance is the most dangerous thing on earth !

The only thing that can help is getting rid of religion.

That’s redundant.
D
DianaC
Jul 7, 2005
"Robibnikoff" wrote in message
<snip to>

Insenstive prick PLONK!

Still eating worms I see.

Sorry, but I’m not interested in what you had for breakfast – PLONK

Not that I disagree with her plonking choices this time, but dang, woman, you keep this up and there won’t be anybody left on AA for you to talk to!
S
Spungo
Jul 7, 2005
"Shobha" wrote in message
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

Maybe we should all hold hand and tip toe through the tulips. The "quick solution" is extermination of sub-human savages. You can’t reason with an animal.
S
Spungo
Jul 7, 2005
"Shobha" wrote in message

The root problem is the human nature of Arabs.

Fixed.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 7, 2005
Of all the Spungos I’ve known, "Spungo" is the Spungoiest.

"Shobha" wrote in message

The root problem is the human nature of Arabs.

Fixed.

I’d go so far as to say that the root of all our problems is skin pigment.
M
Mephisto
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:59:35 -0400, "Spungo" wrote:

"Shobha" wrote in message
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

Maybe we should all hold hand and tip toe through the tulips. The "quick solution" is extermination of sub-human savages. You can’t reason with an animal.

Absolutely – so are you going to walk over a cliff, or shall we have a whip-round for a bumper bottle of barbs for you?

Mephisto
LH
Lord Hatred
Jul 7, 2005
In article ,
"Spungo" wrote:

"Shobha" wrote in message
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

Maybe we should all hold hand and tip toe through the tulips. The "quick solution" is extermination of sub-human savages. You can’t reason with an animal.

You’re right. Stupidity is an animal. PLONK


Stefan
http://pillartopost.blogspot.com
http://www.livejournal.com/users/lord_hatred/
S
Spungo
Jul 7, 2005
"Wavy G" wrote in message
Of all the Spungos I’ve known, "Spungo" is the Spungoiest.
"Shobha" wrote in message

The root problem is the human nature of Arabs.

Fixed.

I’d go so far as to say that the root of all our problems is the skin pigment of > of Arabs.

Fixed.
S
Spungo
Jul 7, 2005
"Lord Hatred" wrote in message
In article ,
"Spungo" wrote:

"Shobha" wrote in message
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

Maybe we should all hold hand and tip toe through the tulips. The "quick solution" is extermination of sub-human savages. You can’t reason with an animal.

You’re right. Stupidity is an animal. PLONK

Plonk. Plink. Poolunk. You’re a moron.
PI
Penn Itentiary
Jul 7, 2005
Pete Zahut wrote:
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

To repete a post!
"THIS ISN’T SOMETHING TO JOKE AROUND ABOUT, YOU STUPID IDIOT.

I’m serious, grow the hell up." HIV Steve

Happy FOAD.

Oh you only care about people you know? I see your friends might have just fucked off and died and you tell me to fuck off and die? Wow man, grow up.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
S
Spungo
Jul 7, 2005
"Mephisto" wrote in message
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:59:35 -0400, "Spungo" wrote:
"Shobha" wrote in message
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

Maybe we should all hold hand and tip toe through the tulips. The "quick solution" is extermination of sub-human savages. You can’t reason with an animal.

Absolutely – so are you going to walk over a cliff, or shall we have a whip-round for a bumper bottle of barbs for you?

Sorry, I’ve never bombed a bus full of innocent men, women and children yet. So I don’t qualify as a savage animal quite yet. Have fun defending these savages though. I’m sure they are just "misunderstood". Just like the Nazi’s, right? There is no right or wrong, just people who are "misunderstood".
VV
Vic Vega
Jul 7, 2005
Sand niggers

"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
PI
Penn Itentiary
Jul 7, 2005
Vic Vega wrote:

Sand niggers

Maybe regular niggers and sand niggers!
PI
Penn Itentiary
Jul 7, 2005
Pete Zahut wrote:

There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:44:39 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Kingdom catapaulted the
following boulder:

Pete Zahut wrote in
news::

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Your not a troll, your a FUCKING MONSTER

FUCK OFF

It’s Steven Perkoff, he’s a psychopath.

http://us.geocities.yahoo.com/gb/view?member=flutterby_britt y

OMG!! Who is that Steven Perkoff guy? He’s so bad, he signed a guestbook.

Besides having a pretty crappy last name, I don’t see what he did wrong.

Can you explain numb nuts?

Prayers and condolences. From our cell block.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
S
Shobha
Jul 7, 2005
<< Stalin tried that. The results were….unfortunate. >>

Stalin tried genetic engineering ?? LOL !! Not the Stalin I know 🙂
S
Shobha
Jul 7, 2005
<< You can’t reason with an animal. >>

All of us are animals. Look at us trying our best to "reason" with one another 🙂
G
Gitface
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:41:22 -0400, Benrand
wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.

We’ve been taking shit in London for years. From WWII to the IRA

Just reading a few of the smug posts here I have one thing to say to all you who are living in poky little secure towns around the world…..
These murderers ain’t going to stop at big cities.

Comiing to a transit system in your town soon….
G
GregoryD
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:35:02 -0400, Spungo wrote:

"Wavy G" wrote in message
Of all the Spungos I’ve known, "Spungo" is the Spungoiest.
"Shobha" wrote in message

The root problem is the human nature of Arabs.

Fixed.

I’d go so far as to say that the root of all our problems is the skin pigment of > of Arabs.

Fixed.

I thought that it was untold generations eating meals cooked over a smoldering pile of camel crap.

GregoryD
— I’d be upset too
G
Greywolf
Jul 7, 2005
"Spungo" wrote in message
"Shobha" wrote in message

The root problem is the human nature of Arabs.

Fixed.
The root problem of man is religion. It inserts itself into practically every war we fight.

Greywolf
D
DianaC
Jul 7, 2005
"Shobha" wrote in message
<< Stalin tried that. The results were….unfortunate. >>
Stalin tried genetic engineering ?? LOL !! Not the Stalin I know 🙂

Stalin tried getting rid of religion. Do learn to read.
FM
Flipper Mike
Jul 7, 2005
Penn Itentiary wrote:

Vic Vega wrote:

Sand niggers

Maybe regular niggers and sand niggers!

Prayers and condolences to the innocent families involved. FM…
B
Benrand
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:04:09 -0500, GregoryD <*@*.net> wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:35:02 -0400, Spungo wrote:

"Wavy G" wrote in message
Of all the Spungos I’ve known, "Spungo" is the Spungoiest.
"Shobha" wrote in message

The root problem is the human nature of Arabs.

Fixed.

I’d go so far as to say that the root of all our problems is the skin pigment of > of Arabs.

Fixed.

I thought that it was untold generations eating meals cooked over a smoldering pile of camel crap.

I hear there’s a new restaurant in Tribeca that offers that.

GregoryD
— I’d be upset too
S
Scruff
Jul 7, 2005
"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I think NoName was doing a big pull on his freebase pipe and it exploded.
S
Scruff
Jul 7, 2005
See what you started, NoName?
You have all the animals in the zoo sounding off!!!
Me? I’m the laughing hyena.

"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Christopher A. Lee On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:37:12 -0400 this
person wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Isn’t it a bit premature to ask this question before there is any evidence?

If they would have been asking questions before hand none of this would have happened in the second place.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
S
Scruff
Jul 7, 2005
"Flipper Mike" wrote in message
Penn Itentiary wrote:

Vic Vega wrote:

Sand niggers

Maybe regular niggers and sand niggers!

Prayers and condolences to the innocent families involved. FM…

I agree. For once.
M
Mephisto
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:37:57 -0400, "Spungo" wrote:

"Mephisto" wrote in message
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:59:35 -0400, "Spungo" wrote:
"Shobha" wrote in message
Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

Maybe we should all hold hand and tip toe through the tulips. The "quick solution" is extermination of sub-human savages. You can’t reason with an animal.

Absolutely – so are you going to walk over a cliff, or shall we have a whip-round for a bumper bottle of barbs for you?

Sorry, I’ve never bombed a bus full of innocent men, women and children yet.

Yet? You’re planning to?

So I don’t qualify as a savage animal quite yet. Have fun defending these savages though. I’m sure they are just "misunderstood". Just like the Nazi’s, right? There is no right or wrong, just people who are "misunderstood".

I disagree with that assessment, but it makes as much sense as your other ravings. You seem to be having an argument with yourself here. Good luck with it. <plonk>

Mephisto
B
baldycotton
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

Just kidding, what do you think?

I think you’re a fucking fool.
K
KK
Jul 7, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:03:36 -0400, Scruff wrote:

Prayers and condolences to the innocent families involved. FM…

I agree. For once.

yeah, pray. That’s not too empty a gesture.
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 8, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Penn Itentiary On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:37:46 GMT this person wrote:

Pete Zahut wrote:
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

To repete a post!
"THIS ISN’T SOMETHING TO JOKE AROUND ABOUT, YOU STUPID IDIOT.
I’m serious, grow the hell up." HIV Steve

That wasn’t me, that was HIV Steve, as you quoted.

DUH!


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 8, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Penn Itentiary On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:45:30 GMT this person wrote:

Vic Vega wrote:

Sand niggers

Maybe regular niggers and sand niggers!

RACIST!


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
F
F0RVA
Jul 8, 2005
JIM NEIDHART DID NOT


Never shit a shitter.

————–
"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Penn Itentiary On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:45:30 GMT this person wrote:

Vic Vega wrote:

Sand niggers

Maybe regular niggers and sand niggers!

RACIST!


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 8, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Russell B On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:33:57 -0700 this
person wrote:

Also, the Jamaicans, judging by their skin
pigment, should be constantly killing one another,

Jamaicans look down on American blacks. They hate them.

There was this one guy this one guy had to introduce this black guy and he said "Here is a great African American" but the guy wasn’t African he was from Jamaica, anyway it’s sort of like those guys from Puerto Rico that look like they are black, they’re not black, they are hispanic.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
RH
Red Herring
Jul 8, 2005
Pete Zahut wrote:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

Well, besides you having a very eerie Chad Bryant impression with that post, I’m betting it was Al-Queda. The only thing I can see coming out of it is one weird-ass coincidence that it happened the day after they get the Olympics. What — they had the bombs, but if Paris had gotten the Olympics, it’d be the Eifel Tower in pieces right now? I don’t think so. Shit like this took months of planning. Just a lucky break for the terrorists that it’s the day after the announcement, that’s all. Kind of like finding a penny on the ground the day the Feds lower interest rates.
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Ghost of Lord HaHa
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 20:01:43 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Penn Itentiary On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:45:30 GMT this person wrote:

Vic Vega wrote:

Sand niggers

Maybe regular niggers and sand niggers!

RACIST!

Racist sand niggers and racist regular niggers …
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
On 7 Jul 2005 18:22:53 -0700, "Red Herring"
wrote:


French dwelling sewer trash known as Muslims..
S
Scruff
Jul 8, 2005
"Russell B" wrote in message
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "Wavy G"
Come on, "Wavy G", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

Of all the Spungos I’ve known, "Spungo" is the Spungoiest.
"Shobha" wrote in message

The root problem is the human nature of Arabs.

It’s all about the religion. Killing in the name of god. Nothing new. Just more advances available to kill more, faster. That God can really be some kind of cool guy to let all this free will bullshit happen, eh?
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Neville Chamberlains hair dresser
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Mr. Humphries..on hisway back to his apartment before his mother locks him and his paddington bear out for the night
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Don Murraco on a minibike
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Evil Roy Slade
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Out of work Kung-fu voice dubber
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Pink Floyd in retaliation for being interupted on live8.
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Hyacinth Bucket (pronounced "bouquet") trying to get away from Rose and Onslow.
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Turf war between mods and rockers!!
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Turf war between "Goodies" fans and "Monty Python" fans.
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Gang war between "Cloud Cloddies" and "Gophs"
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Dr. Who and a Dalek
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Reverend Superstar Billy Graham.. brutha!!!
O
Odin
Jul 8, 2005
Rebecca Loos wanking off pigs…..again.
D
DaveJohnson12
Jul 8, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:37:46 GMT, Penn Itentiary wrote:

Pete Zahut wrote:
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Bad Wolf On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:22:09 +0100 this person
wrote:

In the great debate about "Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, Pete Zahut catapaulted the
following boulder:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I’m sat here worried sick about several friends who work in central London, and there’s no mobile phone network, so thanks very much for that thought, Jerkoff.

I hope your friends aren’t dead.

To repete a post!
"THIS ISN’T SOMETHING TO JOKE AROUND ABOUT, YOU STUPID IDIOT.
I’m serious, grow the hell up." HIV Steve

Does a guy who thinks it’s funny to pretend he has AIDS sound like someone who will grow up?

Happy FOAD.

Oh you only care about people you know? I see your friends might have just fucked off and died and you tell me to fuck off and die? Wow man, grow up.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 8, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 03:32:13 GMT this person
wrote:

Does a guy who thinks it’s funny to pretend he has AIDS sound like someone who will grow up?

I think he really has AIDS.

That’s what it said on his website http://hivsteve.builtfree.org/


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 8, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Gitface On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 05:12:05 GMT this person
wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:33:57 -0700, Russell B
wrote:

Also, the Jamaicans, judging by their skin
pigment, should be constantly killing one another, stealing parts off of cars, and having illegitimate children. But in fact, they’re very "laid back" and they spend most of their time listening to reggae music and saying things like "conscious, mon." Your theory, however carefully constructed, simply doesn’t bear up under scrutiny.

You’ve obviously NEVER been to Jamaica

You can trade Nike shirts for weed there.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
G
Gitface
Jul 8, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:33:57 -0700, Russell B
wrote:

Also, the Jamaicans, judging by their skin
pigment, should be constantly killing one another, stealing parts off of cars, and having illegitimate children. But in fact, they’re very "laid back" and they spend most of their time listening to reggae music and saying things like "conscious, mon." Your theory, however carefully constructed, simply doesn’t bear up under scrutiny.

You’ve obviously NEVER been to Jamaica
G
Gitface
Jul 8, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 21:59:21 -0500, Odin <odin’s > wrote:

Gang war between "Cloud Cloddies" and "Gophs"

I bet your boyfriend and that weird guy who has worked at the garden centre for 40 years think you’re fukkin hilarious.

99% of people who live in London think you’re a cunt
R
Rick
Jul 8, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 07:31:22 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and JPG On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:21:01 +0100 this person wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Tell those fucking terrorrists to stop murdering innocent people, then, you wanker.

What’s a wanker? You sound like a real jackoff typing words like "wanker".

What’s a jackoff? You sound like a real wanker typing words like "jackoff"


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
S
Shobha
Jul 8, 2005
Stalin tried genetic engineering ?? LOL !! Not the Stalin I know 🙂

Stalin tried getting rid of religion. Do learn to read.

———————————–

Probably (I can argue that point, but thats matter for another thread) ….. but he introduced/propogated his own brand of religion – communism. One religion (communism) for another (theism) does not help !
S
Shobha
Jul 8, 2005
CLARIFICATION !

I did NOT make this statement :
The root problem is the human nature of Arabs.

Someone twisted my statement "The root problem is human nature" into this … and more smartass stuff.

Just wanted to clarify.
B
bg12345
Jul 8, 2005
Pete Zahut wrote:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Here’s a better question:

Q: Who caused the London bombing?

A: Those living at #10 and 1600.

Bob Dog
Atheist #153 = 1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3
EAC’s chief cook and brainwasher

—–

"You won’t find any opposition to the idea of evolution among sophisticated, educated theologians. It comes from an
exceedingly retarded, primitive version of religion, which unfortunately is at present undergoing an epidemic in the United States."
– Richard Dawkins
BO
Barry OGrady
Jul 8, 2005
Israel.

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
RB
Russell B
Jul 8, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "Gitface"
Come on, "Gitface", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:33:57 -0700, Russell B
wrote:

Also, the Jamaicans, judging by their skin
pigment, should be constantly killing one another, stealing parts off of cars, and having illegitimate children. But in fact, they’re very "laid back" and they spend most of their time listening to reggae music and saying things like "conscious, mon." Your theory, however carefully constructed, simply doesn’t bear up under scrutiny.

You’ve obviously NEVER been to Jamaica

"I’m quitting History class, Mr. Karg. You’ve obviously NEVER been to Tudor England."
D
DianaC
Jul 8, 2005
"Shobha" wrote in message
Stalin tried genetic engineering ?? LOL !! Not the Stalin I know 🙂

Stalin tried getting rid of religion. Do learn to read.

———————————–

Probably (I can argue that point, but thats matter for another thread) …. but he introduced/propogated his own brand of religion – communism. One religion (communism) for another (theism) does not help

Communism is not a religion. Sorry. Communism can be supported BY a religion, as well as it can be an atheist system, but it is not a religion by itself.
DG
Dubh Ghall
Jul 8, 2005
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I think that many a true word, is spoken in jest.


Puck Greenman
The spelling, Like any opinion stated here,
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.

Plonked by Rob Duncan

Na bister 500,000
S
Scruff
Jul 8, 2005
"Dubh Ghall" wrote in message
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I think that many a true word, is spoken in jest.

And many a moron, speaks without thinking.
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 8, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and baldycotton On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 20:48:51 GMT this person
wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

Just kidding, what do you think?

I think you’re a fucking fool.

What an asshole.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
PZ
Pete Zahut
Jul 8, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and JPG On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 09:15:34 +0100 this person wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 07:31:22 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and JPG On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:21:01 +0100 this person wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick them into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them up.
Just kidding, what do you think?


Can we stop fighting, and start living?

Tell those fucking terrorrists to stop murdering innocent people, then, you wanker.

What’s a wanker? You sound like a real jackoff typing words like "wanker".

What’s a jackoff? You sound like a real wanker typing words like "jackoff"

Thanks for copying what I said.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
D
DaveJohnson12
Jul 9, 2005
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:05:39 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 03:32:13 GMT this person
wrote:

Does a guy who thinks it’s funny to pretend he has AIDS sound like someone who will grow up?

I think he really has AIDS.

That’s what it said on his website http://hivsteve.builtfree.org/

If you really want to know since you are him you can ask yourself. Kind of like Norman Bates having a conversation with his mother.
HS
hiv_steve
Jul 9, 2005
wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:05:39 -0400, Pete Zahut wrote:

There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 03:32:13 GMT this person
wrote:

Does a guy who thinks it’s funny to pretend he has AIDS sound like someone who will grow up?

I think he really has AIDS.

That’s what it said on his website http://hivsteve.builtfree.org/

If you really want to know since you are him you can ask yourself. Kind of like Norman Bates having a conversation with his mother.

I think someone confused you.
JM
Jiggy McGee
Jul 9, 2005
In article ,
Gitface wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:33:57 -0700, Russell B
wrote:

Also, the Jamaicans, judging by their skin
pigment, should be constantly killing one another, stealing parts off of cars, and having illegitimate children. But in fact, they’re very "laid back" and they spend most of their time listening to reggae music and saying things like "conscious, mon." Your theory, however carefully constructed, simply doesn’t bear up under scrutiny.

You’ve obviously NEVER been to Jamaica

Heh you beat me to it… Jamaicans are some crazy mofos. Arming an entire nation with machetes isn’t a pretty thing when it comes to nieghbourhood squabbles.
UB
Uncle Buck
Jul 9, 2005
On 7 Jul 2005 03:07:48 -0700, "Shobha"
wrote:

Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

For now … the only thing that can help a little is … knowledge. Try and reduce the ignorance thats so widespread around you. Ignorance is the most dangerous thing on earth !

It cannot be denied that so many will defend their ignorance to the death. Even if the death is not their own. <sigh>
R
RicSeyler
Jul 9, 2005
Or just forcing it onto others………
Whether it be theirs, ours, this or that.
I am repulsed by the Muslum factions trying to force theirs on others and repulsed by the Far Right Neo-Con Fanatics in American trying to force theirs on others, also.

Bad Wolf wrote:

In the great debate about "Re: Who Do You Think Bombed London?" in alt.atheism, "Shobha" catapaulted the
following boulder:

Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !

For now … the only thing that can help a little is … knowledge. Try and reduce the ignorance thats so widespread around you. Ignorance is the most dangerous thing on earth !

The only thing that can help is getting rid of religion.


Ric Seyler

R
RicSeyler
Jul 9, 2005
There are savages in all walks of life……..

The Muslums just haven’t helped themselves
by loudly denouncing the savages in their particular group so the broad brushes are brought out. And that is understandable, not correct or right but understandable.

Not much different than the nuts in our government at this time…. They just haven’t stooped to the terror tactics of suicide bombings. But they are out for force their religion and morals on you.

Spungo wrote:

"Mephisto" wrote in message

On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:59:35 -0400, "Spungo" wrote:

"Shobha" wrote in message

Well … the core problem is human nature.
So there are no quick solutions unless you’re talking genetic engineering. And even there … we have a long way to go before perfecting that !
Maybe we should all hold hand and tip toe through the tulips. The "quick solution" is extermination of sub-human savages. You can’t reason with an animal.
Absolutely – so are you going to walk over a cliff, or shall we have a whip-round for a bumper bottle of barbs for you?

Sorry, I’ve never bombed a bus full of innocent men, women and children yet. So I don’t qualify as a savage animal quite yet. Have fun defending these savages though. I’m sure they are just "misunderstood". Just like the Nazi’s, right? There is no right or wrong, just people who are "misunderstood".


Ric Seyler

O
Odin
Jul 10, 2005
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:46:33 -0500, RicSeyler
wrote:

There are savages in all walks of life……..

The Muslums just haven’t helped themselves
by loudly denouncing the savages in their particular group so the broad brushes are brought out. And that is understandable, not correct or right but understandable.

Not much different than the nuts in our government at this time…. They just haven’t stooped to the terror tactics of suicide bombings. But they are out for force their religion and morals on you.

Or the leftist atheist/faerie crowd that wants everyone to be gay and pacifist… yeah.. pacifism helped the buddhist monks didnt it..

and Great Britans bending over backwards to pacify those loud mouthed, street-corner hatred shouting muslim fantics really really helped in London …
G
Gitface
Jul 10, 2005
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 22:31:09 -0500, Odin <odin’s > wrote:

and Great Britans bending over backwards to pacify those loud mouthed, street-corner hatred shouting muslim fantics really really helped in London …

As a born and bred Londoner who used to be proud to be one, sadly I have to agree with that.
C
cspring
Jul 16, 2005
I think someone has a potty mouth and face.

"baldycotton" wrote in message
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

Just kidding, what do you think?

I think you’re a fucking fool.

TB
the Bede
Jul 16, 2005
it’s "whom", you idiots.

"cspring" wrote in message
I think someone has a potty mouth and face.

"baldycotton" wrote in message
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

Just kidding, what do you think?

I think you’re a fucking fool.

T
Toosano
Jul 16, 2005
"the Bede" wrote in message
it’s "whom", you idiots.

"cspring" wrote in message
I think someone has a potty mouth and face.

"baldycotton" wrote in message
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

Just kidding, what do you think?

I think you’re a fucking fool.

Doesn’t matter, they found "whom"did it.
S
Soulis
Jul 16, 2005
Strangely enough, they found out who bombed London, but they couldn’t find the appropriate ng to post their discovery.
Fucking retards!

"Toosano" <!!!> wrote in message
"the Bede" wrote in message
it’s "whom", you idiots.

"cspring" wrote in message
I think someone has a potty mouth and face.

"baldycotton" wrote in message
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

Just kidding, what do you think?

I think you’re a fucking fool.

Doesn’t matter, they found "whom"did it.

RB
Russell B
Jul 16, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.
PH
Pizza Hut
Jul 16, 2005
There are 4 things I hate, Girls, Women, Bitches, and Russell B On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700 this
person wrote:

Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

Everyone knows that. No seriously I just never hear anyone use the word whom except for people that get laughed at behind their backs "Hey did you hear the guy, he said whom instead of who."


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
T
Toosano
Jul 16, 2005
Do they ever?

"CR" <@> wrote in message
Strangely enough, they found out who bombed London, but they couldn’t find the appropriate ng to post their discovery.
Fucking retards!

"Toosano" <!!!> wrote in message
"the Bede" wrote in message
it’s "whom", you idiots.

"cspring" wrote in message
I think someone has a potty mouth and face.

"baldycotton" wrote in message
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

Just kidding, what do you think?

I think you’re a fucking fool.

Doesn’t matter, they found "whom"did it.

T
Toosano
Jul 16, 2005
"Russell B" wrote in message
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.
It’s not "you dingledorf", it’s "you’s dingledorf".
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 17, 2005
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 17, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

L
Liqscrotus
Jul 17, 2005
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?
WG
Wavy G
Jul 18, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 19, 2005
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE
RB
Russell B
Jul 19, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

I don’t think we have ablative in English. But if you go in for surgery, it’s the kind where they zap you.
RB
Russell B
Jul 19, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

How about Karl Rove? Like, if he were your cellmate (it could happen) and so for all intents and purposes, he was the "last man on earth" so to speak?
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 20, 2005
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

That was fun. Do another won.
BR
Big Red Shark
Jul 21, 2005
"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick
them
into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them
up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I think it was Alan Moore. He was trying to shut down production on V for Vendetta.
Think about it…..just like Ozymandias in Watchmen, he used extreme tactics and
"outside the box" thinking to cut the Gordian knot. He was just sick and tired of Hollywood
from ruining yet another one of his works.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
LH
Lord Hatred
Jul 21, 2005
In article ,
"Big Red Shark" wrote:

"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick
them
into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them
up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I think it was Alan Moore. He was trying to shut down production on V for Vendetta.
Think about it…..just like Ozymandias in Watchmen, he used extreme tactics and
"outside the box" thinking to cut the Gordian knot. He was just sick and tired of Hollywood
from ruining yet another one of his works.

Why would you use Ozymandias as an example when you could have used V? It was a terrorist act not hiding what it was. Now if his snake god became flesh and exploded in London then I could go with Ozymandias.


Stefan
http://pillartopost.blogspot.com
http://www.livejournal.com/users/lord_hatred/
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 21, 2005
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:00:29 -0400, "Big Red Shark" wrote:
"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick
them
into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them
up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I think it was Alan Moore. He was trying to shut down production on V for Vendetta.
Think about it…..just like Ozymandias in Watchmen, he used extreme tactics and
"outside the box" thinking to cut the Gordian knot. He was just sick and tired of Hollywood
from ruining yet another one of his works.

Oh the shark bites, with his teeth dear…
D
David
Jul 21, 2005
No. It was Chad Bryant that did it.

The Wizard

"Big Red Shark" wrote in message
"Pete Zahut" wrote in message
I think it was the United States, we probably did it to trick
them
into thinking it was the Arabs, so they’ll help us blow them
up.
Just kidding, what do you think?

I think it was Alan Moore. He was trying to shut down production on V for Vendetta.
Think about it…..just like Ozymandias in Watchmen, he used extreme tactics and
"outside the box" thinking to cut the Gordian knot. He was just sick and tired of Hollywood
from ruining yet another one of his works.


Can we stop fighting, and start living?
RB
Russell B
Jul 21, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

That was fun. Do another won.

I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 21, 2005
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.
RB
Russell B
Jul 21, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 22, 2005
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I think I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.

Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound" on Boomerang.
RB
Russell B
Jul 22, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I think I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound" on Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in answering more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall the specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was along those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or you’re being coy, neither of which is attractive.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 22, 2005
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:49:24 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I think I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound" on Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in answering more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall the specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was along those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or you’re being coy, neither of which is attractive.

Not scared, not coy, just stupid. I forgot, after just glancing at it for a second. So what was it?
RB
Russell B
Jul 22, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:49:24 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I think I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound" on Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in answering more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall the specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was along those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or you’re being coy, neither of which is attractive.

Not scared, not coy, just stupid. I forgot, after just glancing at it for a second. So what was it?

How should I know? Fucking Google it.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 23, 2005
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:16:06 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:49:24 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I think I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound" on Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in answering more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall the specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was along those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or you’re being coy, neither of which is attractive.

Not scared, not coy, just stupid. I forgot, after just glancing at it for a second. So what was it?

How should I know? Fucking Google it.

Quit trying to assign work for me to do. I’m not your little helper.
RB
Russell B
Jul 23, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:16:06 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:49:24 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I think I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound" on Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in answering more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall the specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was along those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or you’re being coy, neither of which is attractive.

Not scared, not coy, just stupid. I forgot, after just glancing at it for a second. So what was it?

How should I know? Fucking Google it.

Quit trying to assign work for me to do. I’m not your little helper.

Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 23, 2005
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:23:00 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:16:06 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:49:24 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I think I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound" on Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in answering more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall the specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was along those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or you’re being coy, neither of which is attractive.

Not scared, not coy, just stupid. I forgot, after just glancing at it for a second. So what was it?

How should I know? Fucking Google it.

Quit trying to assign work for me to do. I’m not your little helper.

Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.
RB
Russell B
Jul 23, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:23:00 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:16:06 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:49:24 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year old girl with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I think I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound" on Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in answering more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall the specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was along those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or you’re being coy, neither of which is attractive.

Not scared, not coy, just stupid. I forgot, after just glancing at it for a second. So what was it?

How should I know? Fucking Google it.

Quit trying to assign work for me to do. I’m not your little helper.

Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.

Whoa, that’s really compelling. It’s like, I can’t wait to see where Brad’s boner takes him next.
S
SCRUFF
Jul 23, 2005
"DAVIDHERO" wrote in message
Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.
Don’t quit your day job. I’m sure cleaning bedpans pays more than your future
in writing will.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 23, 2005
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:55:40 -0400, "Scruff" wrote:
"DAVIDHERO" wrote in message
Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.
Don’t quit your day job. I’m sure cleaning bedpans pays more than your future
in writing will.

No, I’m not going to write wills, silly, a lawyer does that. I want to be a novelist.
RB
Raspberry Beret
Jul 24, 2005
"DAVIDHERO" wrote in message
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:23:00 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:16:06 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:49:24 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year
old girl
with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I
think
I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound"
on
Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in
answering
more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall
the
specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was
along
those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or
you’re
being coy, neither of which is attractive.

Not scared, not coy, just stupid. I forgot, after just glancing at it for a second. So what was it?

How should I know? Fucking Google it.

Quit trying to assign work for me to do. I’m not your little helper.

Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.

Could you send me a personalized, autographed copy when the book comes out?
WG
Wavy G
Jul 25, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:55:40 -0400, "Scruff" wrote:
"DAVIDHERO" wrote in message
Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.
Don’t quit your day job. I’m sure cleaning bedpans pays more than your future
in writing will.

No, I’m not going to write wills, silly, a lawyer does that. I want to be a novelist.

Whatever happened to your stint at law school?
WG
Wavy G
Jul 25, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

That was fun. Do another won.

OK, who would you do:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005024/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0702809/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026364/
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 25, 2005
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:45:10 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

That was fun. Do another won.

OK, who would you do:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005024/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0702809/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026364/

djq….do another wo n!
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 25, 2005
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:40:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:55:40 -0400, "Scruff" wrote:
"DAVIDHERO" wrote in message
Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.
Don’t quit your day job. I’m sure cleaning bedpans pays more than your future
in writing will.

No, I’m not going to write wills, silly, a lawyer does that. I want to be a novelist.

Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 25, 2005
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:05:43 -0400, "Raspberry Beret" wrote:
"DAVIDHERO" wrote in message
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:23:00 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:16:06 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:49:24 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:30:58 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:52:16 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
I did, but you’re avoiding the question like a little girl.

Now I forgot the question.

Me too, but it was a good won. And you shirked it like a six year
old girl
with the flu.

Since I don’t remember the question, I can’t say for sure, but I
think
I remember thinking it was real stupid and a waste of my time.
Now if you will excuse me I’m going to go watch "Huckleberry Hound"
on
Boomerang.

Yeah? Well, if I’m not mistaken, you expressed an interest in
answering
more questions about whom you would "do." And while I can’t recall
the
specifics of it right now, I’m pretty certain that my question was
along
those lines. So it looks like either you’re scared of something, or
you’re
being coy, neither of which is attractive.

Not scared, not coy, just stupid. I forgot, after just glancing at it for a second. So what was it?

How should I know? Fucking Google it.

Quit trying to assign work for me to do. I’m not your little helper.

Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.

Could you send me a personalized, autographed copy when the book comes out?

Om….sure.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 25, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:40:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:55:40 -0400, "Scruff" wrote:
"DAVIDHERO" wrote in message
Oh. Sorry. I forgot you’re a Republican. OK, hire somebody from the third world as cheaply as possible to fucking Google it.

Now you are telling me to hire people and spend money. Quit telling me what to do. If your "funny" isn’t worth repeating then don’t try to trick me into spending time on this. I’m a very busy man. I’ll go ahead and tell you: I’m writing my own novel!!!

It starts out like this:

"As the moon glowed with almighty beams, weaving, whirling, and nestled ‘neath the piedmont pines, Brad detected a distinct boner in his britches. With the strength of 500 horses, Brad’s boner pulled him towards the destination he was going to."

This is going to be great. So quit fucking with me. Everywon has a novel in them, and this is mine, and I don’t want you fucking it up with senseless google searches. So until my novel is done I am BANNING you from my posts.
Don’t quit your day job. I’m sure cleaning bedpans pays more than your future
in writing will.

No, I’m not going to write wills, silly, a lawyer does that. I want to be a novelist.

Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 25, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:45:10 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

That was fun. Do another won.

OK, who would you do:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005024/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0702809/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026364/

djq

Seriously>?????
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 25, 2005
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 25, 2005
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:21:19 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:45:10 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

That was fun. Do another won.

OK, who would you do:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005024/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0702809/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026364/

djq

Seriously>?????

No, that was a bad won. Give me a good won.
RB
Russell B
Jul 25, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "Wavy G"
Come on, "Wavy G", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:45:10 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

That was fun. Do another won.

OK, who would you do:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005024/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0702809/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026364/

djq

Seriously>?????

Could you please not bother DH with these stupid questions? The man is trying to work on a novel, and is far too busy for this sort of frivolity.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 25, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Then you *are* a lawyer, and not some pamby-mamby novel writer. Now get busy and start writing my will.
MP
Mike Painter
Jul 25, 2005
Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Then you *are* a lawyer, and not some pamby-mamby novel writer. Now get busy and start writing my will.

Graduation does not imply he is a lawyer, just that he graduated.
G
george
Jul 25, 2005
Some of the many sand niggers that infest the city no doubt.

the Bede wrote:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

"cspring" wrote in message
I think someone has a potty mouth and face.

"baldycotton" wrote in message
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:00:31 -0400, Pete Zahut
wrote:

Just kidding, what do you think?

I think you’re a fucking fool.

WG
Wavy G
Jul 25, 2005
Of all the Mike Painters I’ve known, "Mike Painter" is the Mike Painteriest.

Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Then you *are* a lawyer, and not some pamby-mamby novel writer. Now get busy and start writing my will.

Graduation does not imply he is a lawyer, just that he graduated.

Don’t you have something to do, like painting the fence or something, LOL?

L
Liqscrotus
Jul 25, 2005
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:04:35 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the Mike Painters I’ve known, "Mike Painter" is the Mike Painteriest.

Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Then you *are* a lawyer, and not some pamby-mamby novel writer. Now get busy and start writing my will.

Graduation does not imply he is a lawyer, just that he graduated.

Don’t you have something to do, like painting the fence or something, LOL?

Or painting a mike ("microphone") LOL?
WG
Wavy G
Jul 25, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:04:35 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the Mike Painters I’ve known, "Mike Painter" is the Mike Painteriest.

Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Then you *are* a lawyer, and not some pamby-mamby novel writer. Now get busy and start writing my will.

Graduation does not imply he is a lawyer, just that he graduated.

Don’t you have something to do, like painting the fence or something, LOL?

Or painting a mike ("microphone") LOL?

Wouldn’t it be funny if he had a brother named Mark, and he was a grafitti artist, (like, as in, he paints his "mark" all over), LOL?
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 26, 2005
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:54:06 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:04:35 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the Mike Painters I’ve known, "Mike Painter" is the Mike Painteriest.

Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Then you *are* a lawyer, and not some pamby-mamby novel writer. Now get busy and start writing my will.

Graduation does not imply he is a lawyer, just that he graduated.

Don’t you have something to do, like painting the fence or something, LOL?

Or painting a mike ("microphone") LOL?

Wouldn’t it be funny if he had a brother named Mark, and he was a grafitti artist, (like, as in, he paints his "mark" all over), LOL?

Or if he had a cousin named "Mexican", lol?
RB
Russell B
Jul 26, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 26, 2005
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?
S
SCRUFF
Jul 26, 2005
"DAVIDHERO" wrote in message
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you
pick
the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?
Yea, handle my AGP suit against Flipper and Billy. I want to sue them for being
utterly stupid.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 26, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Can I call myself the "Honourable Judge Wavy G" now?
WG
Wavy G
Jul 26, 2005
Of all the Russell Bs I’ve known, "Russell B" is the Russell Biest.

Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "Wavy G"
Come on, "Wavy G", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:45:10 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:42:29 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:34:23 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "the Bede"
Come on, "the Bede", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

it’s "whom", you idiots.

No, it’s not. The subject of a clause always takes the nominative case, you dingledorf, even when the clause is the object of a verb or preposition.

"Nominative" meaning "name" meaning "the name of the subject of the verb"?

What’s ablative?

Nominative, deitive, ablative, accusative, perfect, pluperfect, hung. That’s all I remember.

What the hell are you jiving about, Hero? PS, Did you ever answer my question?

Hey chump, you need to "went out" of this grammar thread, and what question?

My "Who Would You Do" Celebrity Poll:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.real-world/msg/95 b6d1c6618bc8c5?hl=en&

CE

That was fun. Do another won.

OK, who would you do:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005024/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0702809/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026364/

djq

Seriously>?????

Could you please not bother DH with these stupid questions? The man is trying to work on a novel, and is far too busy for this sort of frivolity.

Oh, I see. You want to play too. OK, Russell B. Who would you do:

http://www.imdb.com/gallery/granitz/2444/SopiaVerga_Grani_27 45281_400.jpg?path=pgallery&path_key=Vergara,%20Sofía&a mp;seq=3

(Note: I’m only giving you won option, and you’ll see why when you click this link. YOWZA YOWZA YOWZA, mucho boobos!!!)
RB
Russell B
Jul 26, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 26, 2005
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?
RB
Russell B
Jul 27, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 27, 2005
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.
RB
Russell B
Jul 27, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 27, 2005
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:51 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.

Ok, let’s do a Perry Mason case, "The Case of the Drowning Duck", and I’ll be Perry Mason, and you be that won who loses every time.

I do not agree that EF should be the judge.
RB
Russell B
Jul 27, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:51 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.

Ok, let’s do a Perry Mason case, "The Case of the Drowning Duck", and I’ll be Perry Mason, and you be that won who loses every time.
I do not agree that EF should be the judge.

Explain your reasons so that we might negotiate.
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 28, 2005
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:40:03 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:51 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.

Ok, let’s do a Perry Mason case, "The Case of the Drowning Duck", and I’ll be Perry Mason, and you be that won who loses every time.
I do not agree that EF should be the judge.

Explain your reasons so that we might negotiate.

I insist on a strict constructionist, and EF is a well-known liberal judical activist.
CC
Comcast Customer
Jul 28, 2005
Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G
wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Can I call myself the "Honourable Judge Wavy G" now?

What’s the sentence, Judge? lol
WG
Wavy G
Jul 28, 2005
Of all the Comcast Customers I’ve known, "Comcast Customer" is the Comcast Customeriest.

Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G
wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Can I call myself the "Honourable Judge Wavy G" now?

What’s the sentence, Judge? lol

Three weeks of Googling David Hero’s "Alonzo Crafonzo Hamhock" schtick, lol.

WG
Wavy G
Jul 28, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:51 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.

Ok, let’s do a Perry Mason case, "The Case of the Drowning Duck", and I’ll be Perry Mason, and you be that won who loses every time.
I do not agree that EF should be the judge.

FU. Case closed. <bangs gavel>
HO
h0plibbb_oili
Jul 28, 2005
Russell B wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Celebrity judges.

You need UseNet celebrity judges.


http://www.bedoper.com/snuh

——-
/ \
/ \ /—–\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,
HO
h0plibbb_oili
Jul 28, 2005
DAVIDHERO wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

EF Hutton – they *listen*.


http://www.bedoper.com/snuh

——-
/ \
/ \ /—–\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,
HO
h0plibbb_oili
Jul 28, 2005
Russell B wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I always wondered if he read alt.flame, now I know.


http://www.bedoper.com/snuh

——-
/ \
/ \ /—–\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,
HO
h0plibbb_oili
Jul 28, 2005
Russell B wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.

Gak!


http://www.bedoper.com/snuh

——-
/ \
/ \ /—–\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,
RB
Russell B
Jul 28, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:40:03 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:51 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.

Ok, let’s do a Perry Mason case, "The Case of the Drowning Duck", and I’ll be Perry Mason, and you be that won who loses every time.
I do not agree that EF should be the judge.

Explain your reasons so that we might negotiate.

I insist on a strict constructionist, and EF is a well-known liberal judical activist.

He’s a centrist. You guys (gay Republicans, I mean) just think that everybody who isn’t in the Federalist Society is a JA. Come on, work with me here. Let’s not "play politics" and divide this great newsgroup even further. Also, it makes you look like you’re afraid of me.
RB
Russell B
Jul 28, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "±"
Come on, "±", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

Russell B wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I always wondered if he read alt.flame, now I know.

Shhh. This is different from that other thing, over there. We only need won judge, and he’s already agreed to do it. There’s no way this will turn into a fiasco. No WAY.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 28, 2005
Of all the ±s I’ve known, "±" is the ±iest.

DAVIDHERO wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

EF Hutton – they *listen*.

Shut up, DH. We’re not listening to you, lol.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 28, 2005
Of all the Russell Bs I’ve known, "Russell B" is the Russell Biest.

Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "±"
Come on, "±", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

Russell B wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I always wondered if he read alt.flame, now I know.

Shhh. This is different from that other thing, over there. We only need won judge, and he’s already agreed to do it. There’s no way this will turn into a fiasco. No WAY.

SILENCE. <bang bang> I will have no further disruptions in my courtroom!
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 28, 2005
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:30:54 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:40:03 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:51 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.

Ok, let’s do a Perry Mason case, "The Case of the Drowning Duck", and I’ll be Perry Mason, and you be that won who loses every time.
I do not agree that EF should be the judge.

Explain your reasons so that we might negotiate.

I insist on a strict constructionist, and EF is a well-known liberal judical activist.

He’s a centrist. You guys (gay Republicans, I mean) just think that everybody who isn’t in the Federalist Society is a JA. Come on, work with me here. Let’s not "play politics" and divide this great newsgroup even further. Also, it makes you look like you’re afraid of me.

This would have been fun, however it is obvious if you were a lawyer you would be Perry Meowson.
HO
h0plibbb_oili
Jul 29, 2005
Wavy G wrote:
Of all the ±s I’ve known, "±" is the ±iest.
DAVIDHERO wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

EF Hutton – they *listen*.

Shut up, DH. We’re not listening to you, lol.

Who’s "we"?


http://www.bedoper.com/snuh

——-
/ \
/ \ /—–\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,
RB
Russell B
Jul 29, 2005
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:30:54 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:40:03 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:51 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:26:01 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:35:42 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

Yeah, I hear ya. But that’s the best I can do. So, what do you say?

I say "Who is EF"?

Yes, I get the point. Do we have a deal or not?

Well we need to agree on some preliminaries, such as what case or issue, who will be the judge, how will the judgement be made (i.e., how you will realize you have lost), standards of evidence, etc. The entire framework.

I look forward to pulverizing you, though I seriously doubt you could be a challenge.

But it looks like you are trying to avoid the contest by not saying who EF is.

I have already included all of this in my original offer. Please don’t stall; it’s unseemly.

Ok, let’s do a Perry Mason case, "The Case of the Drowning Duck", and I’ll be Perry Mason, and you be that won who loses every time.
I do not agree that EF should be the judge.

Explain your reasons so that we might negotiate.

I insist on a strict constructionist, and EF is a well-known liberal judical activist.

He’s a centrist. You guys (gay Republicans, I mean) just think that everybody who isn’t in the Federalist Society is a JA. Come on, work with me here. Let’s not "play politics" and divide this great newsgroup even further. Also, it makes you look like you’re afraid of me.

This would have been fun, however it is obvious if you were a lawyer you would be Perry Meowson.

I didn’t think you would make it past the opening arguments. However, I must confess that I thought you would at least make it TO the opening arguments.
WG
Wavy G
Jul 29, 2005
Of all the ±s I’ve known, "±" is the ±iest.

Wavy G wrote:
Of all the ±s I’ve known, "±" is the ±iest.
DAVIDHERO wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

EF Hutton – they *listen*.

Shut up, DH. We’re not listening to you, lol.

Who’s "we"?

Me and my alter ego, lol?
WG
Wavy G
Jul 29, 2005
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:54:06 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:04:35 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the Mike Painters I’ve known, "Mike Painter" is the Mike Painteriest.

Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Then you *are* a lawyer, and not some pamby-mamby novel writer. Now get busy and start writing my will.

Graduation does not imply he is a lawyer, just that he graduated.

Don’t you have something to do, like painting the fence or something, LOL?

Or painting a mike ("microphone") LOL?

Wouldn’t it be funny if he had a brother named Mark, and he was a grafitti artist, (like, as in, he paints his "mark" all over), LOL?

Or if he had a cousin named "Mexican", lol?

I didn’t get this won. (Forgive me, but I am from from Ohio, and there are not a lot of Mexicans here.)
L
Liqscrotus
Jul 29, 2005
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:14:59 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:54:06 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:04:35 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Of all the Mike Painters I’ve known, "Mike Painter" is the Mike Painteriest.

Wavy G wrote:
Of all the DAVIDHEROs I’ve known, "DAVIDHERO" is the DAVIDHEROiest.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Then you *are* a lawyer, and not some pamby-mamby novel writer. Now get busy and start writing my will.

Graduation does not imply he is a lawyer, just that he graduated.

Don’t you have something to do, like painting the fence or something, LOL?

Or painting a mike ("microphone") LOL?

Wouldn’t it be funny if he had a brother named Mark, and he was a grafitti artist, (like, as in, he paints his "mark" all over), LOL?

Or if he had a cousin named "Mexican", lol?

I didn’t get this won. (Forgive me, but I am from from Ohio, and there are not a lot of Mexicans here.)

Pretend like Mexicans crammed in pickup trucks with about 20 ladders tied to it are all over the place.
HO
h0plibbb_oili
Jul 30, 2005
Wavy G wrote:
Of all the ±s I’ve known, "±" is the ±iest.
Wavy G wrote:
Of all the ±s I’ve known, "±" is the ±iest.
DAVIDHERO wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:21:35 -0700, Russell B
wrote:
Well, so far you’ve heard my voice
But I’ve brought some friends along
And next on the mike is my man "DAVIDHERO"
Come on, "DAVIDHERO", sing that song!

Uh check it out:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0400, Wavy G wrote:
Whatever happened to your stint at law school?

Oh, it’s over. I’m an atorney now.

Seriously, joker.

Seriously, I graduated!!

Prove it. Let’s try a case, right here in the NG. I’ll even let you pick the case, *and* you can pick which side you want to represent. EF can be the judge (not because he’s wise or intelligent but because he’s impartial). What say you?

Who is EF?

EF Hutton – they *listen*.

Shut up, DH. We’re not listening to you, lol.

Who’s "we"?

Me and my alter ego, lol?

Let go your eggo.


http://www.bedoper.com/snuh

——-
/ \
/ \ /—–\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections