Jessica Simpson, Photoshop or Drawing?

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukesofhazzard/walldisplay.html? size=1&id=dukes_wall_jessica800

I see too much detail in the muscle structure for it to be a drawing, but I’m positive
1) The car is a drawing
2) Her photo was added to the drawing in something like Photoshop.

Norm

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?

Either way, I think those are fake tits.

http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukesofhazzard/walldisplay.html? size=1&id=dukes_wall_jessica800

"Kinon O’Cann" wrote in message

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?

Either way, I think those are fake tits.

———
They’re probably fake in real life too.

Journalist

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukesofhazzard/walldisplay.html? size=1&id=dukes_wall_jessica800

I don’t know but that chin is making me nervous.

What a bimbo!

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukesofhazzard/walldisplay.html? size=1&id=dukes_wall_jessica800

Who cares if they are fake??? I like them….(8->)

Bobo
"Journalist-North" wrote in message

"Kinon O’Cann" wrote in message

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?

Either way, I think those are fake tits.

———
They’re probably fake in real life too.

Journalist

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:25:10 GMT, "Norm Dresner" scribbled:

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukesofhazzard/walldisplay.html? size=1&id=dukes_wall_jessica800

I see too much detail in the muscle structure for it to be a drawing, but I’m positive
1) The car is a drawing

The car’s a photograph, while her image in particular the face and chest is just air brushed insanity.

Look at the larger image:
http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukesofhazzard/walldisplay.html? size=3&id=dukes_wall_jessica1280

2) Her photo was added to the drawing in something like Photoshop.

Aren’t you brilliant.

Good call Rodger. Watch out Bruce Forsyth!

"Roger McDoogal" wrote in message

I don’t know but that chin is making me nervous.

"Voivod" wrote in message

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:25:10 GMT, "Norm Dresner" scribbled:

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?

http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukesofhazzard/walldisplay.html? size=1&id=dukes_wall_jessica800

I see too much detail in the muscle structure for it to be a drawing, but I’m positive
1) The car is a drawing

The car’s a photograph, while her image in particular the face and chest is just air brushed insanity.

Look at the larger image:

http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukesofhazzard/walldisplay.html? size=3&id=dukes_wall_jessica1280

2) Her photo was added to the drawing in something like Photoshop.

Aren’t you brilliant.

GOOD GRIEF! VOIVOD IS RESURRECTED???

In article <BLOKe.4318$>, Bobo
wrote:

Who cares if they are fake??? I like them….(8->)

The phrase I use is "Surgically modified to resemble someone more attractive."

but I bet if she offered you a I love you wouldn’t say no 🙂 just sayin’ LOL

"Journalist-North" wrote in message

"Kinon O’Cann" wrote in message

"Anthony" wrote in message

Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?

Either way, I think those are fake tits.

———
They’re probably fake in real life too.

Journalist

In article <42fca9d5$0$12027$>, Fresh_n00b
wrote:

but I bet if she offered you a I love you wouldn’t say no 🙂

Not really interested. I had to look up a few pictures to remind myself of exactly who she was; and I must say, the boobs look kind of silly on her frame. The rest is just generic blonde celebrity. I prefer someone with a personality; or who at least looks like they have a personality.

When everyone has perfect teeth/figure/eyes/face (thanks to modern technology) there’s no distinction in any of it.

Veering wildly back on topic, the same can be said of Photoshop manipulation of images.

hehehe OK so I lost that bet, but your true, the digital touching up of celebs is in some cases downright criminal and mildly annoying in most. I was holidaying on the Gold Coast a couple of years ago and the amount of women who all looked the same was disheartening, they all had the same hair/teeth/boobs/figure. While I wouldn’t knock back a "ride" with Jessica Simpson, I don’t think I could be married to her, you would loose her in a shopping mall because she would just blend into the other "Plastic" celeb wannabe’s

"Scott Schuckert" wrote in message

In article <42fca9d5$0$12027$>, Fresh_n00b
wrote:

but I bet if she offered you a I love you wouldn’t say no 🙂

Not really interested. I had to look up a few pictures to remind myself of exactly who she was; and I must say, the boobs look kind of silly on her frame. The rest is just generic blonde celebrity. I prefer someone with a personality; or who at least looks like they have a personality.
When everyone has perfect teeth/figure/eyes/face (thanks to modern technology) there’s no distinction in any of it.

Veering wildly back on topic, the same can be said of Photoshop manipulation of images.

"Fresh_n00b" wrote in message

hehehe OK so I lost that bet, but your true, the digital touching up of celebs is in some cases downright criminal and mildly annoying in most. I was holidaying on the Gold Coast a couple of years ago and the amount of women who all looked the same was disheartening, they all had the same hair/teeth/boobs/figure. While I wouldn’t knock back a "ride" with Jessica Simpson, I don’t think I could be married to her, you would loose her in a shopping mall because she would just blend into the other "Plastic" celeb wannabe’s

So you’re saying that if you walked around the beach looking at a bunch of ugly sows
you’d be more ok with that? The world needs more men like you.

I don’t know but that chin is making me nervous.

Yeah, you would think a little airbrushing on the old Jimmy Hill was in order 🙁

Fresh,
I want to shop where you do! She’d stand out around here. But seriously she looks a lot better on TV then that poster. Something about the face just looks plastic which isn’t the case the few times I’ve seen her on TV. Paul

Fresh_n00b wrote:

snipped

I don’t think I could be married to her, you would loose her in a

shopping mall because she would just blend into the other "Plastic" celeb wannabe’s

anywhere in Surfers Paradise on the Goldcoast of Queensland Australia will just about do it, the place if crawling with Models and wannbe Models 🙂

"Paul Schilter" wrote in message

Fresh,
I want to shop where you do! She’d stand out around here. But seriously she looks a lot better on TV then that poster. Something about the face just looks plastic which isn’t the case the few times I’ve seen her on TV. Paul

Fresh_n00b wrote:

snipped

I don’t think I could be married to her, you would loose her in a

shopping mall because she would just blend into the other "Plastic" celeb wannabe’s

no Im saying that I thought I was looking at the same woman walking around the beaches because they all have exactly the same facial features, hair style and colour and boob size, variety is the spice of life and unfortunately beauty has become a homogenised product now days, if you don’t look a certain way, you wont get the good gigs.

"Scruff" wrote in message

"Fresh_n00b" wrote in message

hehehe OK so I lost that bet, but your true, the digital touching up of celebs is in some cases downright criminal and mildly annoying in most. I was holidaying on the Gold Coast a couple of years ago and the amount of
women who all looked the same was disheartening, they all had the same hair/teeth/boobs/figure. While I wouldn’t knock back a "ride" with Jessica
Simpson, I don’t think I could be married to her, you would loose her in a
shopping mall because she would just blend into the other "Plastic" celeb wannabe’s

So you’re saying that if you walked around the beach looking at a bunch of ugly sows
you’d be more ok with that? The world needs more men like you.

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:25:41 -0400, Paul Schilter
wrote:

Fresh,
I want to shop where you do! She’d stand out around here. But seriously she looks a lot better on TV then that poster. Something about the face just looks plastic which isn’t the case the few times I’ve seen her on TV. Paul

Whoever did whatever to the photo didn’t do anything to the ankles or did it all wrong. Big lumpy masses. And, while the rest of her photo looks delicate (except the overly large breasts), the legs look like a marathon runner. The result isn’t consistent throughout.

Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli
email: (strip the .invalid to email)

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:28:58 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

Whoever did whatever to the photo didn’t do anything to the ankles or did it all wrong. Big lumpy masses. And, while the rest of her photo looks delicate (except the overly large breasts), the legs look like a marathon runner. The result isn’t consistent throughout.
Cyli

bullshit! She is no petit woman, but she must have petit ankles? And this while the rest of her is quite musclelar? Let me repeat myself, bullshit! Most probably there is some editing done to the photo, but that gets done to most of the photos of models.

Dave

DD wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:28:58 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

Whoever did whatever to the photo didn’t do anything to the ankles or
did it all wrong. Big lumpy masses. And, while the rest of her photo looks delicate (except the overly large breasts), the legs look like a marathon runner. The result isn’t consistent throughout.

Cyli

bullshit! She is no petit woman, but she must have petit ankles? And this while the rest of her is quite musclelar? Let me repeat myself, bullshit! Most probably there is some editing done to the photo, but that gets done to most of the photos of models.
Dave

shh

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:30:53 +0200, DD wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:28:58 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

Whoever did whatever to the photo didn’t do anything to the ankles or did it all wrong. Big lumpy masses. And, while the rest of her photo looks delicate (except the overly large breasts), the legs look like a marathon runner. The result isn’t consistent throughout.
Cyli

bullshit! She is no petit woman, but she must have petit ankles? And this while the rest of her is quite musclelar? Let me repeat myself, bullshit! Most probably there is some editing done to the photo, but that gets done to most of the photos of models.
Dave

I’d agree with you except for the obscenity and the spelling _IF_ the rest of the thing made her look muscular. It doesn’t. It makes her look dainty and slim. While she may be muscular in real life, the work in question doesn’t make her look it until it gets below the knee. Had they shown the muscle that she probably has (it’s fashionable for women to be buff these days), I’d have had no problem with it.

By the by, petite, at least in the clothing industry, merely means short. She doesn’t look short either in real life or in the work in question.

Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli
email: (strip the .invalid to email)

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:06:40 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:30:53 +0200, DD wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:28:58 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

Whoever did whatever to the photo didn’t do anything to the ankles or did it all wrong. Big lumpy masses. And, while the rest of her photo looks delicate (except the overly large breasts), the legs look like a marathon runner. The result isn’t consistent throughout.
Cyli

bullshit! She is no petit woman, but she must have petit ankles? And this while the rest of her is quite musclelar? Let me repeat myself, bullshit! Most probably there is some editing done to the photo, but that gets done to most of the photos of models.
Dave

I’d agree with you except for the obscenity and the spelling _IF_ the rest of the thing made her look muscular. It doesn’t. It makes her look dainty and slim. While she may be muscular in real life, the work in question doesn’t make her look it until it gets below the knee. Had they shown the muscle that she probably has (it’s fashionable for women to be buff these days), I’d have had no problem with it.

Cyyli, this was the first time I saw the woman! And she makes one lovely wallpaper:-)))

I don’t live in Europe or the USA, neither in the East.
I doubt that she’s on our TV, and I would not really know, my PC is my TV:-)

My expression was only concerning what I see
in the photo. ‘obscenity? cause I said "bullshit"? ‘kay, sorry:-) Spelling? English is one of three
languages I can communicate in, but not
my home language. I know I know there is
a spell checker on my news reader, but I
am not even going to use it now. Busy working
on something else, and apart from that, it is
1.00 am here, so Good Bye:-)

Dave

"Cyli" wrote in message

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:30:53 +0200, DD wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:28:58 -0500, Cyli
wrote:

Whoever did whatever to the photo didn’t do anything to the ankles or did it all wrong. Big lumpy masses. And, while the rest of her photo looks delicate (except the overly large breasts), the legs look like a marathon runner. The result isn’t consistent throughout.
Cyli

bullshit! She is no petit woman, but she must have petit ankles? And this while the rest of her is quite musclelar? Let me repeat myself, bullshit! Most probably there is some editing done to the photo, but that gets done to most of the photos of models.
Dave

I’d agree with you except for the obscenity ….

Bullshit is an obscenity? BULLSHIT, you thin skinned moron.