"Marsupilami" wrote in message
Greg N. wrote:
Marsupilami wrote:
http://www.kaydesign.be/retouches/retouches17.html
(the "before" of course)
I think, though their after images well retouched, their "before" images are somewhat bogus, too. I would bet that the "before" image in the example above was blurred to show off a more impressive sharpness in the "after" image.
Or maybe the bad shoot was done in purpose?
I hope so…
—
Houba, houba !
Marsupilami
the super- sharpness makes the knuckles look MORE wrinkly not less. it most likely blurry because it’s blown up from a small part of the original?
nice job on the nails though
in general I liked her stuff
most glamour clients want you to make them look how they’d like to look ,not how they are.
In almost every model shot I do, I think I over retouch it, but in 6 of 10 cases they ask for more retouching.
I encourage models to be more representative of what they actually look like, so many of their comp cards represent a fantasy.
At most castings now they take (hideous, badly lit) digital snapshots for the client to see what the models "really" look like.