Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!
I am doing the standard 300 dpi on Satin Paper.
Same resolution for canvas?
In article
wrote:
I am doing the standard 300 dpi on Satin Paper.
Same resolution for canvas?
Yes.
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:48:16 GMT, Tacit wrote:
In article
wrote:
I am doing the standard 300 dpi on Satin Paper.
Same resolution for canvas?
Yes.
thanx Tacit.
Dave
In article , says…
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:48:16 GMT, Tacit wrote:
In article
wrote:
I am doing the standard 300 dpi on Satin Paper.
Same resolution for canvas?
Yes.
thanx Tacit.
Dave
Only thing you might want to consider beyond dpi is the profile of the particular "canvas" paper v the "satin" paper for your printer, and maybe be prepared to bump up the saturation a little. That, however, depends on the look that you wish to achieve.
Hunt
On 4 Nov 2005 15:16:04 GMT, (Hunt) wrote:Is she referring to the process that puts a paint-like texture over the prints? I have seen that in some frame shops. They make re-prints of fine art and paint over with a clear but built up surface to simulate thick paints. I think it’s kind of cheap and tacky, I prefer my photos as photos not fake paintings.
In article , says…
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:48:16 GMT, Tacit wrote:
In article
wrote:
I am doing the standard 300 dpi on Satin Paper.
Same resolution for canvas?
Yes.
thanx Tacit.
Dave
Only thing you might want to consider beyond dpi is the profile of the particular "canvas" paper v the "satin" paper for your printer, and maybe be
prepared to bump up the saturation a little. That, however, depends on the look that you wish to achieve.
Hunt
What I really want is Giclee and, like you said, maybe I must bump the saturation up a little. This is a sea scene and the lady asking me therefore, (owner of the gallery doing the framing of the one on satin) said it must have kind of a painting effect.
Dave
What I really want is Giclee and, like you said, maybe I must bump the saturation up a little. This is a sea scene and the lady asking me therefore, (owner of the gallery doing the framing of the one on satin) said it must have kind of a painting effect.Is she referring to the process that puts a paint-like texture over the prints? I have seen that in some frame shops. They make re-prints of fine art and paint over with a clear but built up surface to simulate thick paints. I think it’s kind of cheap and tacky, I prefer my photos as photos not fake paintings.
Dave
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 13:57:02 -0500, "KatWoman"
wrote:What I really want is Giclee and, like you said, maybe I must bump the saturation up a little. This is a sea scene and the lady asking me therefore, (owner of the gallery doing the framing of the one on satin) said it must have kind of a painting effect.
"DD" wrote in message
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 13:57:02 -0500, "KatWoman"
wrote:What I really want is Giclee and, like you said, maybe I must bump the saturation up a little. This is a sea scene and the lady asking me therefore, (owner of the gallery doing the framing of the one on satin) said it must have kind of a painting effect.
You can include texture effect into pictures
Filter > Texture > Textureiser > and then one of the 4 presets! Is that what you mean – I use this a lot, and I was thinking of trying it commercially!!
http://static.flickr.com/28/55684044_157d2b6474_b.jpg
You can include texture effect into pictures
Filter > Texture > Textureiser > and then one of the 4 presets! Is that what you mean – I use this a lot, and I was thinking of trying it commercially!!
http://static.flickr.com/28/55684044_157d2b6474_b.jpg
"KatWoman"
I think…
I prefer…
Dave (patienly)
I am 101% in agreement with you – full stop.
but
but
but
and another
but
… when the client want a fake
painting. Then my dear KatWoman, the client gets a
fake painting. The prices are not cheap & tacky.
Dave
with ‘angler’ I found it is quite difficult to drawGet rid of the popcorn puffy ones or blur them and spread them horizontally. For sure get rid of the big white one on the horizon. It’s not so much that they’re bad, though they aren’t good, as that they don’t form like that in real life. You _could_ find a cumulus cloud on the horizon, but it wouldn’t look like that. You’ve got haze and vague horizontal ones that look right. The horizontal smeary ones look right for that kind of day. The others are too white all over and just not right for that sort of weather.
realistic clouds. Here is the result so far:-)
http://home.intekom.com/davesplace/angler.jpg
I did not give up on this- still working on it:-)
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:19:53 +0200, DD wrote:with ‘angler’ I found it is quite difficult to drawGet rid of the popcorn puffy ones or blur them and spread them horizontally. For sure get rid of the big white one on the horizon. It’s not so much that they’re bad, though they aren’t good, as that they don’t form like that in real life. You _could_ find a cumulus cloud on the horizon, but it wouldn’t look like that. You’ve got haze and vague horizontal ones that look right. The horizontal smeary ones look right for that kind of day. The others are too white all over and just not right for that sort of weather.
realistic clouds. Here is the result so far:-)
http://home.intekom.com/davesplace/angler.jpg
I did not give up on this- still working on it:-)
Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless.
http://www.visi.com/~cyli
email: (strip the .invalid to email)
Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.
Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections
