A question about resolution/printing/resizing

J
Posted By
JM
Feb 12, 2006
Views
503
Replies
7
Status
Closed
I’ve got a PC, Photoshop 7, Windows XP Pro, Epson R200 printer.

I’m printing out some user guides (u/g) that are in PDF format. I open each page of the 2-page user guide in PS, with the reso set to 240 (recommended for my Epson printer). The page opens at 17" w x 11" h. I want the printed u/g to be one page, so I need to resize each original page to 8" w x 5" h. I’ve tried it two ways with significantly different results; I’d like to understand what is going on:

First, I did a print preview of the first u/g page at 17" x 11". Of course, it spilled outside the printable area, so I resized it within the print window. I simply chose "8 in" as my width, which fit it nicely on the page, centered. Then I unchecked the "center image" option and moved the image to the top half of the page. Then I printed it out that way (using Epson’s Photo Quality Inkjet Paper). Next I did the second u/g page the same way, positioned it on the bottom of the page, reinsterted the half-printed page into the printer, and printed it out. The result was excellent – exactly what I was looking for. [by the way, this kind of thing looks fantastic on the Epson PQIP paper. I’ve never liked Epson text, especially on regular paper, but using Epson’s own paper makes a tremendous difference – near laser quality at even 6-8 pt fonts)

Next time, wanting to get it all in one print pass, I resized each u/g page using the "image size" option from the PS toolbar. I kept the reso at 240 and told it to maintain proportions. I did a "select all," copy, and pasted on a new document opened at 240 reso (is that my mistake?), 8.5 x 11 in. I then resized, copied and pasted the 2nd u/g page onto the bottom half of the new document. When I printed out with this method, the result was good, but noticeably less sharp than the first method.

What is going on here?

thank you for input,

jm

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

T
Tacit
Feb 12, 2006
In article <cGJHf.97980$>,
"JM" wrote:

I’m printing out some user guides (u/g) that are in PDF format. I open each page of the 2-page user guide in PS, with the reso set to 240 (recommended for my Epson printer). The page opens at 17" w x 11" h. I want the printed u/g to be one page, so I need to resize each original page to 8" w x 5" h. I’ve tried it two ways with significantly different results; I’d like to understand what is going on:

First of all, why are you doing this from Photoshop?

You will get better results by printing from Acrobat Reader, because when you bring the PDF into Photoshop, everything (including text) is broken up into pixels. If you print from Acrobat, the line work and text will remain line work and text.

First, I did a print preview of the first u/g page at 17" x 11". Of course, it spilled outside the printable area, so I resized it within the print window. I simply chose "8 in" as my width, which fit it nicely on the page, centered. Then I unchecked the "center image" option and moved the image to the top half of the page. Then I printed it out that way (using Epson’s Photo Quality Inkjet Paper). Next I did the second u/g page the same way, positioned it on the bottom of the page, reinsterted the half-printed page into the printer, and printed it out. The result was excellent – exactly what I was looking for. [by the way, this kind of thing looks fantastic on the Epson PQIP paper. I’ve never liked Epson text, especially on regular paper, but using Epson’s own paper makes a tremendous difference – near laser quality at even 6-8 pt fonts)

This is because when you reduced the page this way, the resolution increased above 240 pixels per inch.


Art, photography, shareware, polyamory, literature, kink: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Nanohazard, Geek shirts, and more: http://www.villaintees.com
Z
zarrookez
Feb 12, 2006
I’m printing out some user guides (u/g) that are in PDF format. I open
each
page of the 2-page user guide in PS, with the reso set to 240 (recommended for my Epson printer). The page opens at 17" w x 11" h. I want the
printed
u/g to be one page, so I need to resize each original page to 8" w x 5" h. I’ve tried it two ways with significantly different results; I’d like to understand what is going on:

First, I did a print preview of the first u/g page at 17" x 11". Of
course,
it spilled outside the printable area, so I resized it within the print window. I simply chose "8 in" as my width, which fit it nicely on the
page,
centered. Then I unchecked the "center image" option and moved the image
to
the top half of the page. Then I printed it out that way (using Epson’s Photo Quality Inkjet Paper). Next I did the second u/g page the same way, positioned it on the bottom of the page, reinsterted the half-printed page into the printer, and printed it out. The result was excellent – exactly what I was looking for. [by the way, this kind of thing looks fantastic on the Epson PQIP paper. I’ve never liked Epson text, especially on regular paper, but using Epson’s own paper makes a tremendous difference – near laser quality at even 6-8 pt fonts)

Next time, wanting to get it all in one print pass, I resized each u/g
page
using the "image size" option from the PS toolbar. I kept the reso at 240 and told it to maintain proportions. I did a "select all," copy, and
pasted
on a new document opened at 240 reso (is that my mistake?), 8.5 x 11 in.
I
then resized, copied and pasted the 2nd u/g page onto the bottom half of
the
new document. When I printed out with this method, the result was good,
but
noticeably less sharp than the first method.

What is going on here?

thank you for input,

jm
Theoretically what you did sounds correct. However, what I think happened is this:
Your original image & print job remained vectorized text. The moment you reduced, copied and pasted the pages it became rasterized image.
If I’m correct in my theory, this is a classic example of why photoshop shouldn’t be used to set text other than as a last resort, or other circumstances where the user is aware and can deal with the variances that can occur.

Text should have been set in InDesign or Illustrator (or any number of other like programs). There could be work-arounds to salvage what you’ve done but without knowing what applications you have it’s hard to direct you to the appropriate solution. Maybe someone else here has a better plan.
K.
J
JM
Feb 12, 2006
"tacit" wrote in message
In article <cGJHf.97980$>,
"JM" wrote:

I’m printing out some user guides (u/g) that are in PDF format. I open each
page of the 2-page user guide in PS, with the reso set to 240 (recommended
for my Epson printer). The page opens at 17" w x 11" h. I want the printed
u/g to be one page, so I need to resize each original page to 8" w x 5"
h.
I’ve tried it two ways with significantly different results; I’d like to understand what is going on:

First of all, why are you doing this from Photoshop?

You will get better results by printing from Acrobat Reader, because when you bring the PDF into Photoshop, everything (including text) is broken up into pixels. If you print from Acrobat, the line work and text will remain line work and text.

I will now reveal my ignorance regarding Reader, but my problem is that I want to resize the material to fit on one page. If I open the orginal u/g in Reader, it takes up an entire page, which is not what I want. PS allows me to resize the image and place two resized images onto one printable page. Like I said, the result from the first method is excellent, but it requires two printer passes. The resize/copy/paste onto new document method solves that but produces inferior quality.

Given these factors, is Reader a good solution?

First, I did a print preview of the first u/g page at 17" x 11". Of course,
it spilled outside the printable area, so I resized it within the print window. I simply chose "8 in" as my width, which fit it nicely on the page,
centered. Then I unchecked the "center image" option and moved the image to
the top half of the page. Then I printed it out that way (using Epson’s Photo Quality Inkjet Paper). Next I did the second u/g page the same way,
positioned it on the bottom of the page, reinsterted the half-printed page
into the printer, and printed it out. The result was excellent – exactly what I was looking for. [by the way, this kind of thing looks fantastic on
the Epson PQIP paper. I’ve never liked Epson text, especially on regular paper, but using Epson’s own paper makes a tremendous difference – near laser quality at even 6-8 pt fonts)

This is because when you reduced the page this way, the resolution increased above 240 pixels per inch.

So is this saying that resizing from within PS’s print dialog box retains the desired reso, while resizing within PS does not?

thank you again,

jm


Art, photography, shareware, polyamory, literature, kink: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Nanohazard, Geek shirts, and more: http://www.villaintees.com
J
JM
Feb 12, 2006
"_+arroo" wrote in message
I’m printing out some user guides (u/g) that are in PDF format. I open
each
page of the 2-page user guide in PS, with the reso set to 240 (recommended
for my Epson printer). The page opens at 17" w x 11" h. I want the
printed
u/g to be one page, so I need to resize each original page to 8" w x 5"
h.
I’ve tried it two ways with significantly different results; I’d like to understand what is going on:

First, I did a print preview of the first u/g page at 17" x 11". Of
course,
it spilled outside the printable area, so I resized it within the print window. I simply chose "8 in" as my width, which fit it nicely on the
page,
centered. Then I unchecked the "center image" option and moved the image
to
the top half of the page. Then I printed it out that way (using Epson’s Photo Quality Inkjet Paper). Next I did the second u/g page the same way,
positioned it on the bottom of the page, reinsterted the half-printed page
into the printer, and printed it out. The result was excellent – exactly what I was looking for. [by the way, this kind of thing looks fantastic on
the Epson PQIP paper. I’ve never liked Epson text, especially on regular paper, but using Epson’s own paper makes a tremendous difference – near laser quality at even 6-8 pt fonts)

Next time, wanting to get it all in one print pass, I resized each u/g
page
using the "image size" option from the PS toolbar. I kept the reso at 240
and told it to maintain proportions. I did a "select all," copy, and
pasted
on a new document opened at 240 reso (is that my mistake?), 8.5 x 11 in.
I
then resized, copied and pasted the 2nd u/g page onto the bottom half of
the
new document. When I printed out with this method, the result was good,
but
noticeably less sharp than the first method.

What is going on here?

thank you for input,

jm
Theoretically what you did sounds correct. However, what I think happened is
this:
Your original image & print job remained vectorized text. The moment you reduced, copied and pasted the pages it became rasterized image.
If I’m correct in my theory, this is a classic example of why photoshop shouldn’t be used to set text other than as a last resort, or other circumstances where the user is aware and can deal with the variances that can occur.

Text should have been set in InDesign or Illustrator (or any number of other
like programs). There could be work-arounds to salvage what you’ve done but
without knowing what applications you have it’s hard to direct you to the appropriate solution. Maybe someone else here has a better plan.
K.

Your explanation sounds reasonable, but I noted that the PDFs are rasterized upon opening in PS, so it appears that they are rasterized image files prior to any other editing.

I’m trying to understand why the quality is different when I resize in the print preview dialog box, as opposed to resizing using PS "image size" dialog box.

jm

U
usenet
Feb 12, 2006
JM wrote:

"tacit" wrote in message
In article <cGJHf.97980$>, "JM"
wrote:

I’m printing out some user guides (u/g) that are in PDF format. I open each page of the 2-page user guide in PS, with the reso set to 240 (recommended for my Epson printer). The page opens at 17" w x 11" h. I want the printed u/g to be one page, so I need to resize each original page to 8" w x 5" h. I’ve tried it two ways with significantly different results; I’d like to understand what is going on:

First of all, why are you doing this from Photoshop?

You will get better results by printing from Acrobat Reader, because when you bring the PDF into Photoshop, everything (including text) is broken up into pixels. If you print from Acrobat, the line work and text will remain line work and text.

I will now reveal my ignorance regarding Reader, but my problem is that I want to resize the material to fit on one page. If I open the orginal u/g in Reader, it takes up an entire page, which is not what I want. [..]

On the Mac, this is trivial, and I’d assume it would be on Windows, as well. You do it in the printing dialogue, telling it to layout 2-up on 8/11 paper, regardless of how the document appears on the screen.
T
Tacit
Feb 13, 2006
In article <11LHf.98158$>,
"JM" wrote:

So is this saying that resizing from within PS’s print dialog box retains the desired reso, while resizing within PS does not?

Resizing in the Print dialog does the same thing as using the Image Size command with "Resample Image" turned off. That is, if you use the Print command to scale down to 50%, you double the resolution; if you print a 200 pixel per inch image at 50%, it prints at 400 pixels per inch.


Art, photography, shareware, polyamory, literature, kink: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Nanohazard, Geek shirts, and more: http://www.villaintees.com
T
Tacit
Feb 13, 2006
In article <1dKHf.261$>,
"_+arroo" wrote:

Theoretically what you did sounds correct. However, what I think happened is this:
Your original image & print job remained vectorized text. The moment you reduced, copied and pasted the pages it became rasterized image.
If I’m correct in my theory,…

Nope.

Opening a PDF that was not produced by Photoshop in Photoshop reduces everything to raster. If you open a PDF in Photoshop, the text and line work become raster.

The original poster is noticing better quality when he prints each Photoshop image at 50% size because printing something at 50% size doubles its resolution.


Art, photography, shareware, polyamory, literature, kink: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Nanohazard, Geek shirts, and more: http://www.villaintees.com

Must-have mockup pack for every graphic designer 🔥🔥🔥

Easy-to-use drag-n-drop Photoshop scene creator with more than 2800 items.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections