Immediate help CS2 vs PE Working Space

DC
Posted By
Duncan Chesley
Jul 1, 2006
Views
242
Replies
6
Status
Closed
Hi,

I’m dealing long distance with a print lab this morning. I sent him a 16-bit psd file w/ Adobe 1998 profile. He opens it in PE and the colors look all washed out. He couldn’t find any PE equivalent to the CS2 dialogs that specify the working space to use and the options for handling color space mismatch.

Can you set the working space in PE to Adobe RGB? How?

TIA
Duncan
Related Tags
photoshop elements help space vs work

How to Improve Photoshop Performance

Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!

DC
Duncan Chesley
Jul 1, 2006
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 13:26:23 GMT, I wrote:

Can you set the working space in PE to Adobe RGB? How?

Never mind. I found out the answer. Thanks for reading, anyway.

DuncanC
R
richard
Jul 3, 2006
I am working with 8mb images that ultimately need to be increased to 50mb using PS bicubic. I am adding new layers like replacement skies and flowers etc. and I need really good convincing edges. My query is, for the best possible result, should I make my additions and changes at the 8mb stage, or increase to 50mb and then make my changes there? Many thanks for any help.
Richard

—
richard
ND
Norm Dresner
Jul 3, 2006
"richard" wrote in message
|
| I am working with 8mb images that ultimately need to be increased to | 50mb using PS bicubic. I am adding new layers like replacement skies | and flowers etc. and I need really good convincing edges. My query is, | for the best possible result, should I make my additions and changes at | the 8mb stage, or increase to 50mb and then make my changes there? | Many thanks for any help.
| Richard
|

Too many times I’ve resized first and then decided that I wanted to print the picture in a second or third size bigger than the first crop. I’ve adopted the strategy of resizing for printing last because memory and disk space are cheaper than my time to recreate the picture in a larger size.

Norm
J
jaSPAMc
Jul 4, 2006
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 14:26:46 GMT, "Norm Dresner" found these unused words floating about:

"richard" wrote in message
|
| I am working with 8mb images that ultimately need to be increased to | 50mb using PS bicubic. I am adding new layers like replacement skies | and flowers etc. and I need really good convincing edges. My query is, | for the best possible result, should I make my additions and changes at | the 8mb stage, or increase to 50mb and then make my changes there? | Many thanks for any help.
| Richard
|

Too many times I’ve resized first and then decided that I wanted to print the picture in a second or third size bigger than the first crop. I’ve adopted the strategy of resizing for printing last because memory and disk space are cheaper than my time to recreate the picture in a larger size.

When did you last discover that 50 MB is -=smaller=- than 8 MB ???
ND
Norm Dresner
Jul 4, 2006
"Sir F. A. Rien" wrote in message
| On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 14:26:46 GMT, "Norm Dresner" found these
| unused words floating about:
|
| >"richard" wrote in message
| > | >|
| >| I am working with 8mb images that ultimately need to be increased to | >| 50mb using PS bicubic. I am adding new layers like replacement skies | >| and flowers etc. and I need really good convincing edges. My query is, | >| for the best possible result, should I make my additions and changes at | >| the 8mb stage, or increase to 50mb and then make my changes there? | >| Many thanks for any help.
| >| Richard
| >|
| >
| >Too many times I’ve resized first and then decided that I wanted to print | >the picture in a second or third size bigger than the first crop. I’ve | >adopted the strategy of resizing for printing last because memory and disk
| >space are cheaper than my time to recreate the picture in a larger size. | >
|
| When did you last discover that 50 MB is -=smaller=- than 8 MB ???

The point wasn’t which was bigger or smaller but to preserve the work in preparing the image before the resizing is done.
J
jaSPAMc
Jul 4, 2006
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 13:29:11 GMT, "Norm Dresner" found these unused words floating about:

"Sir F. A. Rien" wrote in message
| On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 14:26:46 GMT, "Norm Dresner" found these
| unused words floating about:
|
| >"richard" wrote in message
| > | >|
| >| I am working with 8mb images that ultimately need to be increased to | >| 50mb using PS bicubic. I am adding new layers like replacement skies | >| and flowers etc. and I need really good convincing edges. My query is, | >| for the best possible result, should I make my additions and changes at | >| the 8mb stage, or increase to 50mb and then make my changes there? | >| Many thanks for any help.
| >| Richard
| >|
| >
| >Too many times I’ve resized first and then decided that I wanted to print | >the picture in a second or third size bigger than the first crop. I’ve | >adopted the strategy of resizing for printing last because memory and disk
| >space are cheaper than my time to recreate the picture in a larger size. | >
|
| When did you last discover that 50 MB is -=smaller=- than 8 MB ???
The point wasn’t which was bigger or smaller but to preserve the work in preparing the image before the resizing is done.

Try reading the OP’s statement again without a preconcieved notion of how -=you=- work.

HINT: -=IF=- you know you’re going to resize LARGER at the start, then it’s much easier to do the detail additions in the LARGER size, than have them also be resized LARGER later.

MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥

– in 4 materials (clay versions included)

– 12 scenes

– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups

– 6000 x 4500 px

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections