IMHO–Better than Dreamweaver for sites that don’t need a lot of dynamic code! Tight intergration with Photoshop and ImageReady (the program that hides behind Photoshop for creating web graphics!)
Nothing like the layout grid for doing quick and dirty tables and then converting them to clean code!
golive is crap dreamweaver mx 2004 rocks the world
Walwin,
Everybody has their different opinions. Certainly both programs have various uses?
Regards
Mark
And it took you hours to think that one up? 8/
Regards
Mark
Yes, if you want rocks use Dreamweaver. If you want integration with Photoshop, and a piece of software that is more for the graphic and artistic minded folk, then I would suggest GoLive.
The biggest problem with GoLive is that Adobe has crippled GoLive in some important ways (dynamic content for one) and apparently is not going to spend much effort upgrading it.
DreamWeaver probably has a better future.
Jake
wordpad is my html editor of choice. no chance for "unexpected" behaviour. of course ms visual studio is nice because you get the syntax checking and color coding.
if you HAVE to lay out tables etc graphically, mozilla includes a decent free wysiwyg web page editor.
I have it. I use it more for grep’ing than anything else. it’s mighty fast at finding occurences of say, a function call, across several thousand class files. XD
Dave
I coded for years in Notepad. Then I discovered Homesite (now from Macromedia, although I got my copy from Allaire). Just the color coding it throws onto code helps … fewer missed quote marks and end tags. Built in preview and programmable shortcut keys save typing time.
I would never go back.
visual studio for serious work. hand coding for play. 🙂
speaking of play, I just DL’d Visual Studio.NET and am ready to install it! Whoo hoo! 1.6gig of install files! full access msdn subscription is da’ bomb!
Yes, the regex support is great – but so is the ability to load syntax files for most programming languages, whether HTML or C++ and most things in between.
The case-change options get a lot of use here, to <g>…especially as I’m now beginning to look at XHTML
I have the html module at work, but don’t use it much.