Resampling question

NM
Posted By
Nick Mirro
Jul 20, 2003
Views
323
Replies
2
Status
Closed
Does resampling tifs twice result in lower image quality than 1 step with the same final res?

(2 separate resamples)

4000 x 6000 (slide scan) … 1300 x 867 … 600 x 400

(1 step)

4000 x 6000 (slide scan) … 600 x 400

Would either 600 x 400 tif be better?
Related Tags
question resample

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

WS
Warren Sarle
Jul 20, 2003
"Nick Mirro" wrote in message
Does resampling tifs twice result in lower image quality than 1 step with the same final res?

Several Photoshop experts claim that resampling (either up or down) in several
small steps, sharpening a little after each step, produces better results than
doing it in one step. I’ve never been able to see much advantage.

Why don’t you try it both ways and compare the images?
NM
Nick Mirro
Jul 21, 2003
….than the other 600 x 400.

Funny I was thinking I’d lose quality. This is good news. I save a compressed archive tif at about 1300 x 800 pixels, requiring the extra step.

Nick

"Stephan" wrote in message
"Nick Mirro" wrote in message
Does resampling tifs twice result in lower image quality than 1 step
with
the same final res?

(2 separate resamples)

4000 x 6000 (slide scan) … 1300 x 867 … 600 x 400

(1 step)

4000 x 6000 (slide scan) … 600 x 400

From my own experience I’d say that two steps will look better than a big step
I sharpen after each step also.

Would either 600 x 400 tif be better?
Better than what?

Stephan

Must-have mockup pack for every graphic designer 🔥🔥🔥

Easy-to-use drag-n-drop Photoshop scene creator with more than 2800 items.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections