W98SE/Pagemaker – Linking vs. Pasting Graphic Files

F
Posted By
Fred
Oct 28, 2004
Views
576
Replies
12
Status
Closed
Cain’t somebidy hep this pore man!?

I’m having one heck of a time getting high resolution PDF’s with linked TIF files. When I place a TIF file (File > Place), and then convert to PDF, the result is very low resolution. This happens whether the entire file is embedded or just linked.

On the other hand, when I copy the same file from a paint program (Edit > Copy), then paste it (Edit > Paste) and then make a PDF file, the resulting PDF is the same high resolution as the original file.

I know there must be a basic setting somewhere that I am missing, but (and this is a big butt) I sure can’t fine it. I’m using Windows 98SE.

Thanks.

Fred

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

F
Fred
Oct 28, 2004
PS — I should’ve added….. I also tried this with EPS files and no better result.

"Fred" wrote in message
Cain’t somebidy hep this pore man!?

I’m having one heck of a time getting high resolution PDF’s with linked
TIF
files. When I place a TIF file (File > Place), and then convert to PDF, the result is very low resolution. This happens whether the entire file
is
embedded or just linked.

On the other hand, when I copy the same file from a paint program (Edit > Copy), then paste it (Edit > Paste) and then make a PDF file, the
resulting
PDF is the same high resolution as the original file.

I know there must be a basic setting somewhere that I am missing, but (and this is a big butt) I sure can’t fine it. I’m using Windows 98SE.
Thanks.

Fred

DM
Dick Margulis
Oct 28, 2004
Fred wrote:
PS — I should’ve added….. I also tried this with EPS files and no better result.

"Fred" wrote in message

Cain’t somebidy hep this pore man!?

I’m having one heck of a time getting high resolution PDF’s with linked

TIF

files. When I place a TIF file (File > Place), and then convert to PDF, the result is very low resolution. This happens whether the entire file

is

embedded or just linked.

On the other hand, when I copy the same file from a paint program (Edit > Copy), then paste it (Edit > Paste) and then make a PDF file, the

resulting

PDF is the same high resolution as the original file.

I know there must be a basic setting somewhere that I am missing, but (and this is a big butt) I sure can’t fine it. I’m using Windows 98SE.
Thanks.

Fred

Fred,

It sounds like the problem is when you convert to PDF. Check your Distiller Job Options settings, especially the Compression tab.

Also, you don’t say which of the several possible paths you are using to make the PDF, nor do you mention what version of PageMaker or what version of Distiller you are using.

To help isolate the problem, try this:

Use the Print dialog (rather than the wizard). Select Acrobat Distiller as your printer, and ensure that the Adobe Distiller PPD is selected. Print that way and see if you still have the problem.
S
sp1keandme
Oct 29, 2004
And in the Pagemaker Print options menu, make sure the setting for ‘TIF images’ is set to ‘Normal’ not the default ‘Optimised’ which just sends the low-rez preview. What is the resolution of the TIF files you are using?

"Fred" …
Cain’t somebidy hep this pore man!?

I’m having one heck of a time getting high resolution PDF’s with linked TIF files. When I place a TIF file (File > Place), and then convert to PDF, the result is very low resolution. This happens whether the entire file is embedded or just linked.

On the other hand, when I copy the same file from a paint program (Edit > Copy), then paste it (Edit > Paste) and then make a PDF file, the resulting PDF is the same high resolution as the original file.

I know there must be a basic setting somewhere that I am missing, but (and this is a big butt) I sure can’t fine it. I’m using Windows 98SE.
Thanks.

Fred
F
Fred
Oct 29, 2004
Thanks. I checked the compression tab and everything looks fine. I am creating a PS file, then using Distiller to make a PDF files.

Maybe this new info will help isolate the problem…

Under File > Document Setup, the target resolution is set to 600 dpi, which is the minimum I need for offset printing. When I place a TIF file (460 x 460), the size of the image on the page is roughly 1.5 x 1.5 inches. Then if I go to Paint Shop and copy the TIF file, the pasted image is roughly 5 x 5 inches.

I was thinking that the image as placed on the page was just for location and not the high res image. Looks like when the PS is made, it is using the "for position" image and not the original file. Is this possible?

"Dick Margulis" wrote in message
Fred wrote:
PS — I should’ve added….. I also tried this with EPS files and no
better
result.

"Fred" wrote in message

Cain’t somebidy hep this pore man!?

I’m having one heck of a time getting high resolution PDF’s with linked

TIF

files. When I place a TIF file (File > Place), and then convert to
PDF,
the result is very low resolution. This happens whether the entire file

is

embedded or just linked.

On the other hand, when I copy the same file from a paint program (Edit

Copy), then paste it (Edit > Paste) and then make a PDF file, the

resulting

PDF is the same high resolution as the original file.

I know there must be a basic setting somewhere that I am missing, but
(and
this is a big butt) I sure can’t fine it. I’m using Windows 98SE.
Thanks.

Fred

Fred,

It sounds like the problem is when you convert to PDF. Check your Distiller Job Options settings, especially the Compression tab.
Also, you don’t say which of the several possible paths you are using to make the PDF, nor do you mention what version of PageMaker or what version of Distiller you are using.

To help isolate the problem, try this:

Use the Print dialog (rather than the wizard). Select Acrobat Distiller as your printer, and ensure that the Adobe Distiller PPD is selected. Print that way and see if you still have the problem.
F
Fred
Oct 29, 2004
LYN, YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!! That is exactly what the problem was. Pretty basic, eh… but (and this is a big butt) I always though "optimized" was better than "normal".

And, it gives me great pleasure to bestow upon you, as your well deserved reward, this here…

http://www.geocities.com/lexmark8792/pagemkr.html

I am forever indebted to you – up to $2.95 max.

Fred

"Lyn Eggleston" wrote in message
And in the Pagemaker Print options menu, make sure the setting for ‘TIF images’ is set to ‘Normal’ not the default ‘Optimised’ which just sends the low-rez preview. What is the resolution of the TIF files you are using?

"Fred" wrote in message
news:<MJ%fd.4431$>…
Cain’t somebidy hep this pore man!?

I’m having one heck of a time getting high resolution PDF’s with linked
TIF
files. When I place a TIF file (File > Place), and then convert to
PDF,
the result is very low resolution. This happens whether the entire file
is
embedded or just linked.

On the other hand, when I copy the same file from a paint program (Edit

Copy), then paste it (Edit > Paste) and then make a PDF file, the
resulting
PDF is the same high resolution as the original file.

I know there must be a basic setting somewhere that I am missing, but
(and
this is a big butt) I sure can’t fine it. I’m using Windows 98SE.
Thanks.

Fred
E
elmop
Oct 29, 2004
In article <kyugd.43$>,
"Fred" wrote:

Thanks. I checked the compression tab and everything looks fine. I am creating a PS file, then using Distiller to make a PDF files.
Maybe this new info will help isolate the problem…

Under File > Document Setup, the target resolution is set to 600 dpi, which is the minimum I need for offset printing. When I place a TIF file (460 x 460), the size of the image on the page is roughly 1.5 x 1.5 inches. Then if I go to Paint Shop and copy the TIF file, the pasted image is roughly 5 x 5 inches.

I was thinking that the image as placed on the page was just for location and not the high res image. Looks like when the PS is made, it is using the "for position" image and not the original file. Is this possible?

Read the Pagemaker documentation, particularly the chapter on the Print dialog box, VERY carefully.

In the Print dialog box, on the right hand side, is a button labeled "options". Hit that button. The print dialog changes. At the top is a drop-down menu for "send image data". The choice you have selected is "optimized subsampling."

Pull that menu down and choose "normal".
E
elmop
Oct 29, 2004
In article <l7vgd.32$>,
"Fred" wrote:

LYN, YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!! That is exactly what the problem was. Pretty basic, eh… but (and this is a big butt) I always though "optimized" was better than "normal".

As I said, read carefully the chapter on the print dialog box.

Pagemaker has many, many high end controls. If you don’t know what they do, you’re likely to crash and burn as you use Pagemaker.
F
Fred
Oct 30, 2004
Thanks Elmo!!! That was it!

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote in message
In article <kyugd.43$>,
"Fred" wrote:

Thanks. I checked the compression tab and everything looks fine. I am creating a PS file, then using Distiller to make a PDF files.
Maybe this new info will help isolate the problem…

Under File > Document Setup, the target resolution is set to 600 dpi,
which
is the minimum I need for offset printing. When I place a TIF file (460
x
460), the size of the image on the page is roughly 1.5 x 1.5 inches.
Then if
I go to Paint Shop and copy the TIF file, the pasted image is roughly 5
x 5
inches.

I was thinking that the image as placed on the page was just for
location
and not the high res image. Looks like when the PS is made, it is using
the
"for position" image and not the original file. Is this possible?

Read the Pagemaker documentation, particularly the chapter on the Print dialog box, VERY carefully.

In the Print dialog box, on the right hand side, is a button labeled "options". Hit that button. The print dialog changes. At the top is a drop-down menu for "send image data". The choice you have selected is "optimized subsampling."

Pull that menu down and choose "normal".
DM
Dan_Musicant
Nov 1, 2004
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:30:57 GMT, "Fred"
wrote:

:LYN, YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!! That is exactly what the problem was. Pretty :basic, eh… but (and this is a big butt) I always though "optimized" was :better than "normal".
:
:And, it gives me great pleasure to bestow upon you, as your well deserved :reward, this here…
:
:http://www.geocities.com/lexmark8792/pagemkr.html
:
:I am forever indebted to you – up to $2.95 max.
:
:Fred

Yes, Fred, I too mistakenly assumed that Optimezed was better than Normal. Who would have thunk it?

Can I ask what version of Pagemaker you are using?

Dan

:"Lyn Eggleston" wrote in message
: :> And in the Pagemaker Print options menu, make sure the setting for :> ‘TIF images’ is set to ‘Normal’ not the default ‘Optimised’ which just :> sends the low-rez preview. What is the resolution of the TIF files you :> are using?
:>
:> "Fred" wrote in message
:news:<MJ%fd.4431$>…
:> > Cain’t somebidy hep this pore man!?
:> >
:> > I’m having one heck of a time getting high resolution PDF’s with linked :TIF
:> > files. When I place a TIF file (File > Place), and then convert to :PDF,
:> > the result is very low resolution. This happens whether the entire file :is
:> > embedded or just linked.
:> >
:> > On the other hand, when I copy the same file from a paint program (Edit :>
:> > Copy), then paste it (Edit > Paste) and then make a PDF file, the :resulting
:> > PDF is the same high resolution as the original file. :> >
:> > I know there must be a basic setting somewhere that I am missing, but :(and
:> > this is a big butt) I sure can’t fine it. I’m using Windows 98SE. :> >
:> > Thanks.
:> >
:> > Fred
:
DM
Dan_Musicant
Nov 1, 2004
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:54:17 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote:

:In article <l7vgd.32$>,
: "Fred" wrote:
:
:> LYN, YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!! That is exactly what the problem was. Pretty :> basic, eh… but (and this is a big butt) I always though "optimized" was :> better than "normal".
:
:As I said, read carefully the chapter on the print dialog box. :
:Pagemaker has many, many high end controls. If you don’t know what they :do, you’re likely to crash and burn as you use Pagemaker.

Did Adobe do anything to improve/change things or is this all inherited from Aldus?
DM
Dick Margulis
Nov 1, 2004
Dan_Musicant wrote:

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:54:17 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote:

:In article <l7vgd.32$>,
: "Fred" wrote:
:
:> LYN, YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!! That is exactly what the problem was. Pretty :> basic, eh… but (and this is a big butt) I always though "optimized" was :> better than "normal".
:
:As I said, read carefully the chapter on the print dialog box. :
:Pagemaker has many, many high end controls. If you don’t know what they :do, you’re likely to crash and burn as you use Pagemaker.
Did Adobe do anything to improve/change things or is this all inherited from Aldus?

All inherited from Aldus, and why would it need to be improved?

Remember, PageMaker was designed for the purpose of preparing pages for offset printing. The desktop printing equipment available at the time was satisfactory for proofing and for preparing camera copy for things like weekly shopper ads, house newsletters, etc.; but for anything serious, especially color work, PM let you design on the desktop for high-end filmsetters.

The fact that you don’t need all those fancy controls in order to send a PDF to your inkjet printer is no reason to eliminate them in the name of simplifying the user interface. They provide real value for the professional who still uses them.
F
Fred
Nov 1, 2004
I’m using 7.0. Last download I think made it 7.01 or 7.10 or something like that. Not on this computer though.

By the way, when I loaded it on a new laptop with XP, it works fine except when I make the PDF file. Then the text comes up as though it were in code. Before I find the fonts on the Win98 machine and copy them over, I’d like to ask if anyone thinks that would do the trick?

(I am using only very basic fonts – arial, times new roman… that’s all – now fancy stuff.).

"Dan_Musicant" wrote in message
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:30:57 GMT, "Fred"
wrote:

:LYN, YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!! That is exactly what the problem was. Pretty :basic, eh… but (and this is a big butt) I always though "optimized" was :better than "normal".
:
:And, it gives me great pleasure to bestow upon you, as your well deserved :reward, this here…
:
:http://www.geocities.com/lexmark8792/pagemkr.html
:
:I am forever indebted to you – up to $2.95 max.
:
:Fred

Yes, Fred, I too mistakenly assumed that Optimezed was better than Normal. Who would have thunk it?

Can I ask what version of Pagemaker you are using?

Dan

:"Lyn Eggleston" wrote in message
: :> And in the Pagemaker Print options menu, make sure the setting for :> ‘TIF images’ is set to ‘Normal’ not the default ‘Optimised’ which just :> sends the low-rez preview. What is the resolution of the TIF files you :> are using?
:>
:> "Fred" wrote in message
:news:<MJ%fd.4431$>…
:> > Cain’t somebidy hep this pore man!?
:> >
:> > I’m having one heck of a time getting high resolution PDF’s with
linked
:TIF
:> > files. When I place a TIF file (File > Place), and then convert to :PDF,
:> > the result is very low resolution. This happens whether the entire
file
:is
:> > embedded or just linked.
:> >
:> > On the other hand, when I copy the same file from a paint program
(Edit
:>
:> > Copy), then paste it (Edit > Paste) and then make a PDF file, the :resulting
:> > PDF is the same high resolution as the original file. :> >
:> > I know there must be a basic setting somewhere that I am missing, but :(and
:> > this is a big butt) I sure can’t fine it. I’m using Windows 98SE. :> >
:> > Thanks.
:> >
:> > Fred
:

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections