Newbie with a problem

K
Posted By
kermit
Nov 6, 2009
Views
777
Replies
17
Status
Closed
I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

Regards,

Bill

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

K
keith
Nov 6, 2009
On Nov 5, 9:19 pm, "kermit" wrote:
I’ve got a problem.  I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time.  But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind.  I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind.  I can’t just crop it.  The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right.  The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that.  Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop?    I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor.  Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right.  What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?
Regards,

Bill

Wouldn’t it be easier to place a matte inside the frame to border the picture?
I suspect the blinds & floor will have light reflections, shadows etc. that would require blending in if you were to tackle it with Photoshop.

Keith
TC
tony cooper
Nov 6, 2009
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:19:36 GMT, "kermit"
wrote:

I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

What you want to do can be done in Photoshop, but it’s a complex project that requires skill to accomplish. I’d look to other solutions.

The simplest is to place the image – in the present ratio – on a canvas of the dimension that will fit the frame. ("Canvas" being the Photoshop term for the print size) You may have to reduce the size of the image to get a good balance of white space around it.

In effect, it is the same as mounting it in a frame that is larger than the picture with a matte filling the rest of the frame.


Tony Cooper – Orlando, Florida
K
kermit
Nov 6, 2009
Hi,
I’ve tried mattes but visually they don’t work. The basic image just badly proportioned. It’s too tall for its width – it may well have been physically cropped to fit its existing (and to my mind totally unsuitable) frame. I can’t crop anything off the height to adjust this because I need every scrap of the image to preserve the proportions of main subject : tiles. It’s the width (or lack of it) of the image that requires additional ‘padding’ so as to improve the the position and proportions of the main subject within the overall composition. I’ve a feeling that the original print was probably a 6 x 8 and was physically trimmed to fit its frame. So. it’s Photoshop or nothing!!

Bill
"tony cooper" wrote in message
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:19:36 GMT, "kermit"
wrote:

I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image
editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals!
I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to
browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent
request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph
that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to
360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored.
In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of
the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still
be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

What you want to do can be done in Photoshop, but it’s a complex project that requires skill to accomplish. I’d look to other solutions.

The simplest is to place the image – in the present ratio – on a canvas of the dimension that will fit the frame. ("Canvas" being the Photoshop term for the print size) You may have to reduce the size of the image to get a good balance of white space around it.
In effect, it is the same as mounting it in a frame that is larger than the picture with a matte filling the rest of the frame.


Tony Cooper – Orlando, Florida
K
kermit
Nov 6, 2009
Hi,
I’ve tried mattes but visually they don’t work. The basic image just badly proportioned. It’s too tall for its width – it may well have been physically cropped to fit its existing (and to my mind totally unsuitable) frame. I can’t crop anything off the height to adjust this because I need every scrap of the image to preserve the proportions of main subject : tiles. It’s the width (or lack of it) of the image that requires additional ‘padding’ so as to improve the the position and proportions of the main subject within the overall composition. I’ve a feeling that the original print was probably a 6 x 8 and was physically trimmed to fit its frame. So. it’s Photoshop or nothing!!

Bill

"tony cooper" wrote in message
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:19:36 GMT, "kermit"
wrote:

I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image
editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals!
I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to
browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent
request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph
that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to
360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored.
In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of
the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still
be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

What you want to do can be done in Photoshop, but it’s a complex project that requires skill to accomplish. I’d look to other solutions.

The simplest is to place the image – in the present ratio – on a canvas of the dimension that will fit the frame. ("Canvas" being the Photoshop term for the print size) You may have to reduce the size of the image to get a good balance of white space around it.
In effect, it is the same as mounting it in a frame that is larger than the picture with a matte filling the rest of the frame.


Tony Cooper – Orlando, Florida
S
Sam
Nov 6, 2009
"kermit" wrote in message
I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

If I understand your situation, you should be able to do this reasonably easily and effectively using the clone tool. (That’s the button on the tool-bar that looks like a little rubber stamp.)

You’ll need to be certain that the background you’re cloning from is fairly regular in terms of colour, brightness and contrast etc, but you’ve already said that’s the case, so we’ll assume we’re good to go.

Okay, so you first need to ammend your canvas size and shape. Go to *Image>Adjust>Canvas Size*, and alter the aspect ratio. You can set the direction of expansion if you want to keep the main subject off-centre for composition purposes.

Now, select your clone tool, and go to the top of the window, and set a reasonably big brush size with a soft feathered edge.
You want it to be big enough to paint smoothly and easily, but you want it to be small enough to fit within the existing area of background, allowing room for movement without encroaching onto other surrounding areas.

Now place your clone tool over an existing good area of background, hold down the alt key, and click with yor mouse/pen there.
This is the start point for your clone sampling.

Now, go to the point where you want to clone the background into and start to paint the background in.
The brush and sample point will always remain relative to each other, and you’re effectively painting with a pattern instead of with a colour. It’s as if you had a tin of tartan paint, LOL.

You’ll probably need to reset your sample point several times, and you need to be constantly aware of colours, tones, textures, brightness etc to make sure you get a good match, and you’ll brobably have to do it a few times before you get the hang of it, but it is a very effective method.

Hope this helps a bit.
S
Sam
Nov 6, 2009
"kermit" wrote in message
I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

It would help in giving an accurate answer if you could post a small preview of the image
J
jjs
Nov 6, 2009
In essence you need content-aware scaling, or you can stretch it proportionally rather than in a linear manner.

Is the picture really worth the trouble?
BL
Bob LaBlawgh
Nov 6, 2009
Doing the clone thing will work, but it’s trial and error to get things to look right. You can also select an entire area via the marquee tool and duplicate that. That might work for replicating (widening?) the blinds. And you could also add a vignette effect so the expanded blinds will fade to white, obviating the need to duplicate content to the edge of the canvas.


Bob LaBlawgh
“It’s never too late to have a happy childhood.”
J
JD
Nov 6, 2009
kermit wrote:
I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

Regards,

Bill

You can do the same thing you did with your enlargements using PS.

Open your image and select Image, Canvas Size. Enlarge the canvas to the size you need.

Then use the Rectangular Marquee tool, hit m on your keyboard for this tool. Drag it around the area you need more of and then hit Ctrl-c on your keyboard or use Edit, Copy. Click outside the selected area to make the outline go away, click on v on your keyboard and then hit Crtl-v or Edit, Paste and there is a copy of your selection. Now use your mouse to move it into place.

This should give you a place to start. The joints may show but I’ll leave it to you to find out how to use the Healing Brush, if CS2 has that. I’m using CS3 on a Windows XP. If you’re using a Mac then I don’t know if the keyboard shortcuts are the same.


JD..
S
Sam
Nov 6, 2009
"Bob LaBlawgh" wrote in message
Doing the clone thing will work, but it’s trial and error to get things to look right. You can also select an entire area via the marquee tool and duplicate that. That might work for replicating (widening?) the blinds. And you could also add a vignette effect so the expanded blinds will fade to white, obviating the need to duplicate content to the edge of the canvas.

Yes, it requires some practice to get right, as poorly done cloning is painfull to the eyes, but with a little practice, he should have no problem, especially as it’s a reasonably regular pattern of vertical lines. Where he’s likely tp encounter problems is with the floor, as he’ll have problems with perspective the further out to the ends he goes.
K
kermit
Nov 7, 2009
I think that’s it! Even a rough and ready first go shows that the colors, tones, textures, brightness etc are fine. The original lighting was lovely and flat and soft and there are no patterns on either blinds or tiles, all of which simplifies cloning immeasurably. There aren’t too many lines to bother about either and with fine tuning, a high zoom setting, and several practice sessions I’m sure this will be cracked.

Excellent advice and help.

Many thanks Sam.

"Sam" wrote in message
"kermit" wrote in message
I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

If I understand your situation, you should be able to do this reasonably easily and effectively using the clone tool. (That’s the button on the tool-bar that looks like a little rubber stamp.)

You’ll need to be certain that the background you’re cloning from is fairly regular in terms of colour, brightness and contrast etc, but you’ve already said that’s the case, so we’ll assume we’re good to go.
Okay, so you first need to ammend your canvas size and shape. Go to *Image>Adjust>Canvas Size*, and alter the aspect ratio. You can set the direction of expansion if you want to keep the main subject off-centre for composition purposes.

Now, select your clone tool, and go to the top of the window, and set a reasonably big brush size with a soft feathered edge.
You want it to be big enough to paint smoothly and easily, but you want it to be small enough to fit within the existing area of background, allowing room for movement without encroaching onto other surrounding areas.
Now place your clone tool over an existing good area of background, hold down the alt key, and click with yor mouse/pen there.
This is the start point for your clone sampling.

Now, go to the point where you want to clone the background into and start to paint the background in.
The brush and sample point will always remain relative to each other, and you’re effectively painting with a pattern instead of with a colour. It’s as if you had a tin of tartan paint, LOL.

You’ll probably need to reset your sample point several times, and you need to be constantly aware of colours, tones, textures, brightness etc to make sure you get a good match, and you’ll brobably have to do it a few times before you get the hang of it, but it is a very effective method.
Hope this helps a bit.

K
kermit
Nov 7, 2009
Probably not.. It would be easier to re-stage the whole thing, and reshoot. But it’s become a challenge which involves my doing it myself, albeit with advice!

"John Stafford" wrote in message
In essence you need content-aware scaling, or you can stretch it proportionally rather than in a linear manner.

Is the picture really worth the trouble?
K
kermit
Nov 7, 2009
I’m going to try this too, as well as following Sam’s advice. A point I’ve read in more than one book that’s proving to be true is that there are often several ways of doing the same thing in PS!
Although improving the original print remains the main objective I am, just out of interest, going to have a stab at placing the subject, (clean well defined edges, no intricate fine detail) against a newly shot background!

"JD" wrote in message
kermit wrote:
I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

Regards,

Bill

You can do the same thing you did with your enlargements using PS.
Open your image and select Image, Canvas Size. Enlarge the canvas to the size you need.

Then use the Rectangular Marquee tool, hit m on your keyboard for this tool. Drag it around the area you need more of and then hit Ctrl-c on your keyboard or use Edit, Copy. Click outside the selected area to make the outline go away, click on v on your keyboard and then hit Crtl-v or Edit, Paste and there is a copy of your selection. Now use your mouse to move it into place.

This should give you a place to start. The joints may show but I’ll leave it to you to find out how to use the Healing Brush, if CS2 has that. I’m using CS3 on a Windows XP. If you’re using a Mac then I don’t know if the keyboard shortcuts are the same.


JD..
J
JD
Nov 7, 2009
That is the beauty of PS, there can more than one way to do the same thing. And the best way to learn PS is to sit there and screw around with it. Save your photo as a copy and experiment. You’re not goig to break anything. 😉 And ask questions in this newsgroup.

I’m not complaining but I personally find it’s easier to follow the "thread" when everyone bottom posts but as you can see I will top post when the original person is a top poster. Minor point.

Once you become familiar with PS, you’ll wonder why you waited so long to learn how to use it.

kermit wrote:
I’m going to try this too, as well as following Sam’s advice. A point I’ve read in more than one book that’s proving to be true is that there are often several ways of doing the same thing in PS!
Although improving the original print remains the main objective I am, just out of interest, going to have a stab at placing the subject, (clean well defined edges, no intricate fine detail) against a newly shot background!

"JD" wrote in message
kermit wrote:
I’ve got a problem. I’m a complete newbie to Photoshop, or any other image editor for that matter. In fact I’ve only just abandoned film and chemicals! I’ve got PS CS2, a training video and a number of books from the library to browse through before deciding which to buy.

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

I don’t have the original film negative. The print image has been scanned to 360dpi and saved as a tiff file. It depicts a subject standing on a tiled floor with vertical blinds behind. I can’t just crop it. The composition would suffer and neither the composition or the aspect ratio is right. Basically I need to make the whole image wider by adding approx 15% of the blinds and tiles to the left-hand side and about 10% to the right. The exposure of the blinds and tiles is pretty even but both are light colored. In the past I’d probably have made a few enlargements, preferably from the original negative, cut and pasted the extra material to the sides and then spent hours with an airbrush to try and achieve as seamless a finish as possible before re-photographing the doctored print and producing a print of the correct dimensions from that. Messy, and probably the joins would still be visible – if subject to too close an inspection!

The question is; how do I best do the same result in Photoshop? I would like to keep the existing colors although I could produce a good image by changing to a dark, plain background instead of light colored blinds and removing the tile edges so as to have a plain shiny floor. Initially, however, I’d like to have a go at "adding" extra blinds/tiles to the left and right. What would be the best Photoshop techniques to use to do this?

Regards,

Bill

You can do the same thing you did with your enlargements using PS.
Open your image and select Image, Canvas Size. Enlarge the canvas to the size you need.

Then use the Rectangular Marquee tool, hit m on your keyboard for this tool. Drag it around the area you need more of and then hit Ctrl-c on your keyboard or use Edit, Copy. Click outside the selected area to make the outline go away, click on v on your keyboard and then hit Crtl-v or Edit, Paste and there is a copy of your selection. Now use your mouse to move it into place.

This should give you a place to start. The joints may show but I’ll leave it to you to find out how to use the Healing Brush, if CS2 has that. I’m using CS3 on a Windows XP. If you’re using a Mac then I don’t know if the keyboard shortcuts are the same.


JD..


JD..
K
keepout
Nov 7, 2009
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:12:03 GMT, "kermit"
wrote:

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind. I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

Photoshop is the wrong tool for this. The right one would be after effects, or Premiere. After effects was created just for this type project.
MJ
Michael J Davis
Nov 9, 2009
kermit was inspired to say
I think that’s it! Even a rough and ready first go shows that the colors, tones, textures, brightness etc are fine. The original lighting was lovely and flat and soft and there are no patterns on either blinds or tiles, all of which simplifies cloning immeasurably. There aren’t too many lines to bother about either and with fine tuning, a high zoom setting, and several practice sessions I’m sure this will be cracked.

If you’ve done the cloning, you may wish to use a vignette and both blur and darken (or lighten) the cloned area to reduce the emphasis on the added material.

Use elliptical marquee to choose the untouched area.
Feather to say 100 pixels (less if your image is small)
Invert selection
Apply small amount of Gaussian blur
Use camera distortion correction to apply dark or light vignette to taste.

In effect that’s what I’ve done here to reduce a confusing background (except I used layers to produce an out of focus glow effect).

http://www.flickr.com/photos/watchman/3928852204/

HIH

Mike

Michael J Davis

<><
"I never have taken a picture I’ve intended.
They’re always better or worse."
Diane Arbus
<><
S
Sam
Nov 11, 2009
wrote in message
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:12:03 GMT, "kermit"
wrote:

What has become immediately clear is that getting to grips even with the basics of Photoshop will take a considerable time. But I do have an urgent request from my nearest and dearest to produce a replacement of a photograph that is of the wrong dimensions for the frame she has in mind.
I could of course cheat and get a photo friend to help out – but most of them are pretty new to Photoshop themselves!

Photoshop is the wrong tool for this. The right one would be after effects, or
Premiere. After effects was created just for this type project.

Moron.

MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥

– in 4 materials (clay versions included)

– 12 scenes

– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups

– 6000 x 4500 px

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections