Certainly not! a necessity. One reason to go for the more expensive 100mm over a 50mm macro is the ‘working distance’ which allows easier lighting for the front-side (rather than side).
Like many things- depends on what you do. And how portable you need to be. I have the lens and the ring light (for film camera). It served me very well. Latest cameras don’t support the ring light, you need to buy a NEW one. That makes the expense for a ring light overly expensive imho, unless you use it All the time, rather than casually. I would consider the ring light only if you have a Canon digital camera less than 18 months old.
Dave, doing closeups of roses. contact me at if I can help more.
"FStart" wrote in message I’m about to purchase a Canon 100 mm 2.8 macro lens. Does anyone know if a ring light is a necessity??
Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.
Related Discussion Topics
Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections