Fonts not displaying straight (vertical)

CA
Posted By
C Andros
Nov 9, 2006
Views
1668
Replies
18
Status
Closed
Hello and Thank you….
I am using CS2. I have tested this problem with a varitey of fonts (TT, Adobe, PS) all with the same results….as follows

Any normal typeface (no bold, no italics, etc) does not display perfectly vertically….the letters are always a bit slanted to the right (not as much as italics, but distinctly not straight up and down). I find I need to generate text objects in Illustrator….and copy them to photoshop.

I have also tried ALL anti-aliasing settings…no difference.

Here’s a link to a sample
www.pulaki.com/textprob.htm

Any thoughts? Thank you kindly….
Cynthia-

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

JZ
Joe_Zydeco
Nov 9, 2006
Cynthia, open the Window > Character palette and click the flyout triangle near the upper right corner. I bet you have Faux Italic checked. Click on it and your text will stand up straight.
B
Bernie
Nov 9, 2006
FYI, the proper term is Roman (as opposed to Italic)
JZ
Joe_Zydeco
Nov 9, 2006
Ok then, Cynthia, you heard the man. Turn off Faux Roman (Italics mine). 🙂
JJ
John Joslin
Nov 9, 2006
To be fair, the Fly-out menu says "Faux Italic".
DM
Don_McCahill
Nov 9, 2006
And Roman and Italics are opposites, not synonyms. What did you mean, Nomad?
JZ
Joe_Zydeco
Nov 9, 2006
But since the city of Roman is in the country of Italic, are not all Romans also Italics?
DM
Don_McCahill
Nov 9, 2006
🙂

Well, as a historian I can let you know that a Roman and an Italian were very different things until the last 150 years or so. During the Roman Empire, you had to be born in the city of Rome to be a citizen.

Then, Rome was a city state until after 1850, when the national movements started and Italy was created as a nation.

<lecture over>
B
Bernie
Nov 9, 2006
I mean you don’t say "perfectly vertical", you say Roman and you don’t say "slanted to the right", you say Italics

Edit: my intent was simply to inform the OP of the proper terms to use
EH
Ed_Hannigan
Nov 9, 2006
Made perfect sense to me. A whole lot of mis-reading going on here perhaps?
JZ
Joe_Zydeco
Nov 9, 2006
Nomad, no offense taken — it was all in good fun. But Cynthia did properly point out that her text was not in italics, so I think her ancillary descriptions were both clear and appropriate.

Now I’m going to shut up and give Cynthia a chance to get a word in edgewise (maybe even slanted)…
JZ
Joe_Zydeco
Nov 9, 2006
<Rhetorical>
Ed, which part made perfect sense to you? Did I mis-read something? 🙂 </Rhetorical>

Oops, I said I was gonna shut up, so let me be quiet and get started with that…
B
Bernie
Nov 9, 2006
But Cynthia did properly point out that her text was not in italics

She did indeed, as I said, my intent was simply to inform that there were words to describe exactly what she meant.

Now I’m going to shut up and give Cynthia a chance to get a word in edgewise

What? give the OP the chance to say someting, why would we ever want to do that? <G>
EH
Ed_Hannigan
Nov 9, 2006
Joe,

This made perfect sense to me:

"Cybernetic Nomad – 4:11am Nov 9, 06 PST (#2 of 13)

FYI, the proper term is Roman (as opposed to Italic)"

This, and some of the posts that followed, struck me as misreads:

Joe Zydeco – 5:50am Nov 9, 06 PST (#3 of 13)

"Ok then, Cynthia, you heard the man. Turn off Faux Roman (Italics mine)."
B
Bernie
Nov 9, 2006
Actually, I can see (now) how my statement could be misread.

When I said "as opposed to", I meant Roman and Italic being two different and mutually exclusive things.

Joe read it as meaning "you should have said Roman and not Italic" (which is not what I meant)

CN (who just want to prevent the OP from getting a word in edgewise <G>)
DM
Don_McCahill
Nov 9, 2006
If not edgewise, at least at a slant.

🙂
RK
Rob_Keijzer
Nov 10, 2006
Slanted? Moi?
CA
C Andros
Nov 13, 2006
Thank you, Joe Zydeco, for the suggestion (without superfluous grammatical tutorials). The "faux italics" was in fact turned on. I was completely unaware of that setting. It must have a keyboard equiv. that I accidentally hit at some point.

Whew! This has been bothering me for a long time.

Your kindness is most appreciated.

Fare thee well,
Cynthia
JZ
Joe_Zydeco
Nov 13, 2006
Cynthia, thanks for the feedback–I was afraid we (I) had run you off for good! I am happy to have helped, though many others here could have told you the same thing. I’m not implying that you should have found it on your own, though. Photoshop’s myriad features carry the risk of hidden "gotchas," things you have to learn as you encounter them.

Now, a word about the "superfluous grammatical tutorials." For U.S. residents, the Thanksgiving holidays are coming up in a couple of weeks, and the Grammar Police will be out in full force. They will be on the lookout for slanted serifs and slurred syntax, so be especially careful with your syllabication and lexical articulation during that period. 🙂

Best to you,
Joe

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections