Views
855
Replies
0
Status
Closed
Hi,
I have a small website with basic info on image manipulation using APS and PSP. I am currently updating and re-writing it. I have been experimenting, trying to find a way to more or less "profile" a system using just the system itself. My website is not aimed at people who have a lot of experience or high end equipment. It is more for the person who is just starting out. I am doing this because I figure someone like this will not have profiling software available to them, nor will they want to spend what such a system will cost.
My thinking goes something like this. Essentially, what we are trying to do is to assure that none of the elements of our system (scanner, monitor, printer) is introducing color shifts. Realistically, we know that some shifts are going on, and that the various elements of the system do not reproduce color the same way, nor are they capable of doing so. But what we want is to get them as close to each other as possible, so that we can be reasonable sure that what we scan looks like what we see on the screen, and what we see looks like what we print.
We have a way to measure color composition, the eyedropper tool. So, if we had a standard sample that we knew the color composition, we could use it to determine where color shifts are occurring and create curves to adjust for them.
The problem is that we do not have such a color sample. But I reason that we could make one. All we would need are some samples that we KNOW are neutral. I am reasonably sure that just about any good quality photo paper will be neutral. It might not be absolute white, but it will be neutral. I think the same could be said for just about any good quality black printer ink. The people that make these know that neutrality is important, so (I would assume) they try to keep their products neutral.
So if I can assume this, then I have a white and black sample. I don’t really know what the values for these samples will be, but I do know that they should be fairly neutral no matter what values they actually are. For a neutral gray sample, I suggest an 18% gray card used in photography.
Now, suppose I scan these and measure the colors. If they are not neutral, I know my scanner is introducing a color cast, I can identify the cast, adn I can create a set of curves to adjust for it. If i then save these curves, I can apply them to any image I scan to remove the cast.
By the same token, I can create an image has various shades of black, white and gray, themn print it. I can then scan this print, apply my correction curves, and determine if my printer has a color shift. I can then create another set of curves to remove this.
Does this make sense? I am writing a page for my site about this, and I would appreciate any suggestions that you might have, Please remember, this is not a site for professionals who have profiling software and equipment, and so I try to think of ways of doing without.
guntcher
I have a small website with basic info on image manipulation using APS and PSP. I am currently updating and re-writing it. I have been experimenting, trying to find a way to more or less "profile" a system using just the system itself. My website is not aimed at people who have a lot of experience or high end equipment. It is more for the person who is just starting out. I am doing this because I figure someone like this will not have profiling software available to them, nor will they want to spend what such a system will cost.
My thinking goes something like this. Essentially, what we are trying to do is to assure that none of the elements of our system (scanner, monitor, printer) is introducing color shifts. Realistically, we know that some shifts are going on, and that the various elements of the system do not reproduce color the same way, nor are they capable of doing so. But what we want is to get them as close to each other as possible, so that we can be reasonable sure that what we scan looks like what we see on the screen, and what we see looks like what we print.
We have a way to measure color composition, the eyedropper tool. So, if we had a standard sample that we knew the color composition, we could use it to determine where color shifts are occurring and create curves to adjust for them.
The problem is that we do not have such a color sample. But I reason that we could make one. All we would need are some samples that we KNOW are neutral. I am reasonably sure that just about any good quality photo paper will be neutral. It might not be absolute white, but it will be neutral. I think the same could be said for just about any good quality black printer ink. The people that make these know that neutrality is important, so (I would assume) they try to keep their products neutral.
So if I can assume this, then I have a white and black sample. I don’t really know what the values for these samples will be, but I do know that they should be fairly neutral no matter what values they actually are. For a neutral gray sample, I suggest an 18% gray card used in photography.
Now, suppose I scan these and measure the colors. If they are not neutral, I know my scanner is introducing a color cast, I can identify the cast, adn I can create a set of curves to adjust for it. If i then save these curves, I can apply them to any image I scan to remove the cast.
By the same token, I can create an image has various shades of black, white and gray, themn print it. I can then scan this print, apply my correction curves, and determine if my printer has a color shift. I can then create another set of curves to remove this.
Does this make sense? I am writing a page for my site about this, and I would appreciate any suggestions that you might have, Please remember, this is not a site for professionals who have profiling software and equipment, and so I try to think of ways of doing without.
guntcher
How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop
Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.