How to view a PSD file in thumbnail view

JG
Posted By
Jeff_Gillispie
Jan 22, 2007
Views
681
Replies
25
Status
Closed
I used to be able to open my Adobe folder and be able to preview my PSD files in a thumbnail format. Now, I cant see the picture of the PSD just the file icon itself. Does anyone know where I go to change the setting for this? (It changed several days ago by itself, have no idea how..)
I am using PS CS2, and Win XP Pro. Thanks for any help.

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

AC
Art Campbell
Jan 22, 2007
Basically, it boils down to a disagreement between MS and Adobe over how to implement this feature.

The not-supported-by-Adobe fix is available at:

< http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/adobe-cs2-and-the- case-of-the-disappearing-thumbnails/>

I’ve been using this fix for months without any problems, as have a number of others, but Adobe warns that it may corrupt files.

Art
JG
Jeff_Gillispie
Jan 22, 2007
Thanks for the link Art. You know as I was reading about how to change back to thumbnail view I remembered something. I had PS7 installed first then CS2. I kept PS7 on my system (PS7 allows thumbnail view). Once I uninstalled PS7 the capability of seeing the thumbnails went with it. Now I need to decide on whether to reinstall PS7 or use the link you provided and do as instructed. Thanks for the reply.
JG
Jeff_Gillispie
Jan 22, 2007
I just reinstalled PS7 then after installation took out redundent files that I don’t need. Thumbnails are restored.
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 23, 2007
but Adobe warns that it may corrupt files.

we’ve seen it here. it was all over the place before cs came out. most people have no problems but some people lose their work.
RB
Robert_Barnett
Jan 23, 2007
The link I believe provides the part of Photoshop 7 that allowed the thumbnail views. So installing all of 7 is pointless. I believe it all boils down to a DLL file and nothing more.

Robert


Do not assume that because I didn’t reply to your comments that you are correct or that I am wrong or that I am correct and your are wrong. You can assume that you bore me!
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 23, 2007
I believe it all boils down to a DLL file and nothing more.

true. and it’s that interaction between that dll and win explorer that causes the problem for some users where the file becomes "locked" as the dll and explorer and photoshop all fight to update it and the user can’t save changes and so loses work.
BL
Bob Levine
Jan 23, 2007
With Bridge available I fail to see the wisdom of using the dll workaround. It’s simply too risky.

Bob
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 23, 2007
<nodding>
H
Ho
Jan 23, 2007
If bridge had all the speed and functionality of Explorer, I would agree. But it doesn’t and so I like seeing my PS thumbs when managing my files. I guess I’m one of the lucky ones for whom it is not an issue.
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 23, 2007
bridge is just as fast as explorer.
AC
Art Campbell
Jan 23, 2007
ROTFLMAO!

Good one Dave! Pass the bong over here, please.

Art
JW
John_Waller
Jan 23, 2007
bridge is just as fast as explorer.

Experiences obviously differ here.

For me it’s not. That’s why I gave up on it.

P4 3GHz, 1.5GB RAM. Win XP Pro SP2, fully patched.

Explorer is almost instant. A few mouseclicks and I’m done.

I’ve had no issues with the .dll workaround in over 12 months of daily use.

Bridge is…waiting…waiting…


Regards

John Waller
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 23, 2007
not my fault if you have a slow box. <TonyShrug>
BL
Bob Levine
Jan 23, 2007
It does require some horsepower.

Bob
AC
Art Campbell
Jan 23, 2007
Basically what John said.

I’m running on several boxes, all late model machines with XP Pro.

One dual core, with dual drives and 4 M RAM. The others are single chip, but fast, and generally with dual drives and 3 or more RAM. Explorer flies; Bridge lumbers on all of them. I run Bridge for the few unique things that it does well, but for file browsing and manipulation outside the image database, Explorer runs rings around it.

And I too haven’t had any problems with the .dll …

Art
H
Ho
Jan 24, 2007
It does require some horsepower.

Yeah, I’ve got the horsepower&#8212;and bridge is still a slug compared to Explorer. It’s fast for a slug, but it’s still a slug.

Face it, bridge wasn’t built to be a file manager.
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 24, 2007
Face it, bridge wasn’t built to be an all-purpose file manager.

well duh! 🙂 that wasn’t the question, was it? i thought it was about viewing image thumbnails?

have you guys built the cache up? start at the root and let it go all night? do that and when you come back it’s pretty quick.
H
Ho
Jan 24, 2007
No, it wasn’t the question. I muddied the waters when I said that IF bridge had the speed, etc. of Explorer I would use it as opposed to relying on my PS thumbs (in Explorer)…

So, as others have said, I use bridge only when I have to. I’m not really complaining, but I would be if I couldn’t have my PS thumbs.
S
stevent
Jan 24, 2007
Of course, as long as the files are saved with a composite layer, then image viewers like Irfanview, Picasa etc, are able to view thumbnails of PSD files.
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 24, 2007
No, it wasn’t the question

ok. 🙂 of course i use explorer daily. often multiple occurances at a time pointing to mulitple drives and folders. i just use bridge for the most part when viewing my psd’s.

moral: pick the right tool for the right job. 🙂
C
chrisjbirchall
Jan 24, 2007
Here are two of the biggest mistakes some users make – and then blame Bridge for being slow:

* They allocate too much memory in Photoshop’s Preferences. Bridge is a separate application. If PS hogs too much of the resources there won’t be enough for everything else which is running concurrently. Once the OS starts paging out to Virtual Memory, you can expect things to go real slow. The default 55% is about right for a machine with up to 2GB of RAM.

* Make sure "Maximize Compatibility" is checked in Photoshop’s preferences. This saves PSDs with a composite layer so that other applications can display them faster. Bridge is one such "other application".

Finally, as Dave has already recommended, point Bridge at the Root of your image directories. Set it to "Cache all Subfolders" – then go to bed!

Hope this helps.

Chris.
JJ
John Joslin
Jan 25, 2007
I am still adding to my list of things I do in Explorer that Bridge can’t do (or does slowly). CS3 hasn’t done anything to improve these issues – I wish they’d concentrated more on speed and functionality instead of adding more bells and whistles like that bloody loupe thing.
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 25, 2007
I wish they’d moved the delete file icon away from the minimize icon!
D
davidbanks2000
Apr 25, 2007
Does the PSD Icon link given in this thread work with Vista?
DM
dave_milbut
Apr 26, 2007
I doubt david, it as it’s based on the xp registry. you’d be better off using bridge to browse psds.

How to Improve Photoshop Performance

Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections