Views
404
Replies
3
Status
Closed
Hi All.
I haven’t found this subject anywhere, which seems weird to me because I can’t imagine that such a silly behaviour has never been noticed by anyone before. So I just would like to confirm the existence of the behaviour.
Here’s the description:
Make a new document of say 5000×5000 pix and zoom out to 12.5% or less. Now set the eyedropper tool to 5 by 5 average and use it…
At 12.5%, it yields 197/197/197 and at 8.33% it yields 236/235/236 etc. Strangely, the 3 by 3 average and point sample settings do yield correct values at these zoom levels.
I wonder if this is normal and if it isn’t, if it has been fixed in CS3.
It ‘t not a really big problem, but it took me at least half an hour before I realized the incorrect readout was due to the zoom factor and I was amazed I couldn’t find this strange bug/feature described anywhere. :-/
Regards,
Frank
I haven’t found this subject anywhere, which seems weird to me because I can’t imagine that such a silly behaviour has never been noticed by anyone before. So I just would like to confirm the existence of the behaviour.
Here’s the description:
Make a new document of say 5000×5000 pix and zoom out to 12.5% or less. Now set the eyedropper tool to 5 by 5 average and use it…
At 12.5%, it yields 197/197/197 and at 8.33% it yields 236/235/236 etc. Strangely, the 3 by 3 average and point sample settings do yield correct values at these zoom levels.
I wonder if this is normal and if it isn’t, if it has been fixed in CS3.
It ‘t not a really big problem, but it took me at least half an hour before I realized the incorrect readout was due to the zoom factor and I was amazed I couldn’t find this strange bug/feature described anywhere. :-/
Regards,
Frank
Related Tags
Master Retouching Hair
Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.