Views
217
Replies
2
Status
Closed
I think the answer is ‘no’ but thought I’d check anyway.
I have two sequences of images, such as a_001.bmp, a_002.bmp, …, and b_001.bmp, b_002.bmp, … They are in different folders now, but could easily be put into the same folder if it would make the action work. All of the images are 500 x 500 pixels.
From these two sequences I want to generate a 3rd sequence, c_001.bmp, c_002.bmp, …., where each image is 1000 x 500 pixels. c_001.bmp would simply be a_001 placed next to b_001 with no overlap.
It’s easy to do manually with PS (using CS2), but I can’t figure out how to do it as an action in batch mode. Thanks for your help. I’m working on a Windows PC. In the meantime I’ll be looking at Gimp to see if it can do this.
I have two sequences of images, such as a_001.bmp, a_002.bmp, …, and b_001.bmp, b_002.bmp, … They are in different folders now, but could easily be put into the same folder if it would make the action work. All of the images are 500 x 500 pixels.
From these two sequences I want to generate a 3rd sequence, c_001.bmp, c_002.bmp, …., where each image is 1000 x 500 pixels. c_001.bmp would simply be a_001 placed next to b_001 with no overlap.
It’s easy to do manually with PS (using CS2), but I can’t figure out how to do it as an action in batch mode. Thanks for your help. I’m working on a Windows PC. In the meantime I’ll be looking at Gimp to see if it can do this.
How to Improve Photoshop Performance
Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!
