I don’t know if either of these gentlemen are responsible, but my response to one of these posts netted me a piece of spam with a subject line "blur correction" that started out "In response to your request in comp.graphics.apps.photoshop, here is the information you asked for."
Well, darlin’ if you actually read my post, (instead of just harvesting my e-mail for spam purposes) I didn’t request a freaking thing. I said, basically, "tried it, didn’t like it for my own work, but maybe it’s OK for someone else doing different things."
Now, sure, I could munge my address, but I’ve been around longer than Usenet and never have done so before, so I don’t plan to now. Besides, that isn’t the point. It was a slimy contact that had me sorry I’d taken the time to respond to the question.
"Harry Limey" wrote in message
Does anyone else detect a connection with this post from Larry Preuss! (who I do not remember posting before!)
and the post from Tony Jeffs
(Re: Blurred old photograph -portrait 7 posts earlier- who I don’t
remember
posting before!)
Both of whom mention Focus Magic
(a product I have never heard mention of before!)
Or am I becoming a little paranoid about marketing techniques!!!
My apologies to you both if this is a coincidence
Harry
"Larry Preuss" wrote in message
The web site of Focus Magic, http://www.focusmagic.com/ tells me that
their
program will correct image blur caused by camera shake. Their examples
look
good. I am aware that there are ways to correct blur, but this program
is
so
inexpensive that I am skeptical. Has anyone had experience with it? Can anyone here give a critical evaluation of it?
Larry
