Until then the likes of ‘Bill Hilton’ will argue the leg off a wooden chair that pixels rule… Personally, I go for the dot because I can use one on my offset press.
Dots and pixels are not the same thing. A device like a printing press, which does not print continuous-tone images, prints dots, not pixels; a scanned image, which is a continuous-tone image, is made up of pixels, not dots. Using "dpi" to refer to a color digital image is incorrect; using "ppi" to refer to output from a device like an imagesetter or output printed on a press is not correct.
When a digital image such as a scan is printed on an imagesetter and run on a press, the continuous-tone image is converted to a halftone, and the pixels become dots. Normally, for maximum quality, the resolution of the image in pixels should be double the line screen frequency of the halftone dots; this means that if you are printing with a 150-line halftone–the dots are 1/150 of an inch apart–then the image should be 300 pixels per inch.
When a device like a digital camera takes an image, there is no resolution. The image is defined only in terms of pixel dimension–for example, my camera makes an image 1600 pixels wide by 1200 pixels deep, with no reference to how big each piixel is. Photoshop arbitrarily assigns a resolution of 72 pixels per inch when the image is opened, for historical reasons.
You control what the resolution is. a 1600×1200 pixel image at 300 pixels per inch will be a bit over 5 inches wide, and 4 inches deep. A 1600×1200 pixel image at 200 pixels per inch will be 8 inches wide and 6 inches deep. A 1600×1200 pixel image at 400 pixels per inch will be 4 inches wide and 3 inches deep.
—
Biohazard? Radiation hazard? SO last-century.
Nanohazard T-shirts now available!
http://www.villaintees.com Art, literature, shareware, polyamory, kink, and more:
http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html