CS3 or Elements 6?

BG
Posted By
ben_grewen
May 18, 2008
Views
390
Replies
4
Status
Closed
Hi all,

I am trying to find out if it is worth buying CS3 in stead of elements 6. Surprisingly, nobody has been able to tell me what the difference exactly is.
The best I got so far was that elements is a trimmed down version of CS3 but what more can I do with CS3?
As I am in England, CS3 would cost me about $1100, as opposed to $650 in the US, which is a bit much if you don’t know exactly what you get for that amount.
It says something on the adobe features section about BETTER raw processing, but not compared to what. Old version? Other software? Better than nothing?

I will be running it under XP, and the only use will be to optimise images from a digital camera in RAW format, 90%, and a jpeg (10)%, partially for web use, partially for prints.
The most common things are:
Correcting exposure when pics are unevenly lit.
Correcting color temperature.
Removing unwanted parts of a picture e.g. somebody stepping into the picture, advertising signs or copyrighted material.
Altering color of small parts of an image like that of a single flower in a bouquet. Removing blemishes in portraits.

The photos will always stay single photos, I can not foresee any use for slide shows, animations, video or anything related.

From what I have been able to find out so far, it seems that Elements 6 will do all this and I don’t need to spend the extra $1000, or should I?

MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥

– in 4 materials (clay versions included)

– 12 scenes

– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups

– 6000 x 4500 px

JJ
John Joslin
May 18, 2008
Elements will do what you said you want.

It is true that the version of Adobe Camera Raw that installs with Elements has limited functions but it may be enough. Someone in the ACR forum may know exactly what is missed compared with Photoshop CS3.

If in doubt, I would download the trials.

You can always use the software that comes with the camera too.
C
Curvemeister
May 18, 2008
I don’t know of a chart or matrix style list of features that the two programs support, but some of the big ones are:

CS3 supports real curves, and the Lab and CMYK color spaces. The cloning and healing tools are more comprehensive. There is better control of embedded profiles, and you can edit profiles to some extent. Masking and adjustment layers are more powerful. Smart filters allow a larger number of filters to be used non-destructively. You mentioned better Raw capability.

Does this add up to enough functionality to be worth the price difference? If you are a professional and get paid for your work, then I’d say yes, this is a no brainer. Otherwise, you can answer that yourself by installing the 30 day trial version.
EG
Ed_Grenzig
May 18, 2008
Ben

See this link for a comparison
<http://thephotofinishes.com/adpsel6b.htm>

Ed
S2
Sean_2me
May 18, 2008
It depnds on what you want. If you want the top of the range software then purchase CS3 as it will adequetly cater for all of your editing needs. If it is just for fun then don’t bother spending the $1000

MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥

– in 4 materials (clay versions included)

– 12 scenes

– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups

– 6000 x 4500 px

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections