Laptop specs for using PS
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
:: E-mail to friend 
suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
The more - the better!!!
  |
  |
scribbled:
>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>
>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>The more - the better!!!
Wow:
Arctic Silver 5 Thermal Compound - CPU + GPU [+$45.00]
$45 for a $9 tube of Arctic Silver. Since money's not an object I guess
you don't mind being ripped off.
| |
|
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>
>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>The more - the better!!!
Graphics != Graphics
It's a generic term for imagery.
What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
field use.
Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
out.
>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>
>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>The more - the better!!!
Graphics != Graphics
It's a generic term for imagery.
What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
field use.
Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
out.
| |
|
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
<jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>
>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
>> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>>
>>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>>The more - the better!!!
>
>Graphics != Graphics
>
>It's a generic term for imagery.
>
>What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
>
>I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
>field use.
>
>Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
>out.
>
I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
please?
<jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>
>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
>> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>>
>>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>>The more - the better!!!
>
>Graphics != Graphics
>
>It's a generic term for imagery.
>
>What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
>
>I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
>field use.
>
>Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
>out.
>
I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
please?
| |
|
"The Learner" <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote in message
news:6eh7p59so8bt7qbbrc4i4hcoafrf9f6k2q@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>
>>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>>
>>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>>>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>>>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>>>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
>>> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>>>
>>>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>>>The more - the better!!!
>>
>>Graphics != Graphics
>>
>>It's a generic term for imagery.
>>
>>What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
>>
>>I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo
>>creation
>>field use.
>>
>>Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't
>>work
>>out.
>>
>
> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> please?
I'm no expert, but my Toshiba Satellite laptop runs CS3 fine...quite
quick...it only has 1Gb ram. However, if I upgrade to CS4 or even CS5 I will
probably go with something that has a minimum of 4GB ram (for 32 bit
operating system) and a suitable dedicated graphics card like a Nvidia
GeForce. See http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405711.html in orde to take
advantage of the 3D capabilities of CS4. My next desktop will be win 7,
64bit o/s with at least 8Gb ram.(and maybe even a solid state hard drive)
Good luck,
Paul
news:6eh7p59so8bt7qbbrc4i4hcoafrf9f6k2q@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>
>>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>>
>>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>>>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>>>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>>>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
>>> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>>>
>>>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>>>The more - the better!!!
>>
>>Graphics != Graphics
>>
>>It's a generic term for imagery.
>>
>>What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
>>
>>I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo
>>creation
>>field use.
>>
>>Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't
>>work
>>out.
>>
>
> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> please?
I'm no expert, but my Toshiba Satellite laptop runs CS3 fine...quite
quick...it only has 1Gb ram. However, if I upgrade to CS4 or even CS5 I will
probably go with something that has a minimum of 4GB ram (for 32 bit
operating system) and a suitable dedicated graphics card like a Nvidia
GeForce. See http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405711.html in orde to take
advantage of the 3D capabilities of CS4. My next desktop will be win 7,
64bit o/s with at least 8Gb ram.(and maybe even a solid state hard drive)
Good luck,
Paul
| |
|
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 06:20:30 +1000, "Paul Burdett"
<pburdett@optusnet.com.au> scribbled:
>something that has a minimum of 4GB ram (for 32 bit
>operating system)
Windows 32 bit OS won't even use the full four gigs so MINIMUM is the
wrong word.
<pburdett@optusnet.com.au> scribbled:
>something that has a minimum of 4GB ram (for 32 bit
>operating system)
Windows 32 bit OS won't even use the full four gigs so MINIMUM is the
wrong word.
| |
|
"Voivod" <Voi@vod.con> wrote in message
news:hl38p5de4eu1h9uui4kb5mm9ircrj30eci@isp5.newshosting.com...
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 06:20:30 +1000, "Paul Burdett"
> <pburdett@optusnet.com.au> scribbled:
>
>>something that has a minimum of 4GB ram (for 32 bit
>>operating system)
>
> Windows 32 bit OS won't even use the full four gigs so MINIMUM is the
> wrong word.
Yes, this is true,,,my mistake.
>
news:hl38p5de4eu1h9uui4kb5mm9ircrj30eci@isp5.newshosting.com...
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 06:20:30 +1000, "Paul Burdett"
> <pburdett@optusnet.com.au> scribbled:
>
>>something that has a minimum of 4GB ram (for 32 bit
>>operating system)
>
> Windows 32 bit OS won't even use the full four gigs so MINIMUM is the
> wrong word.
Yes, this is true,,,my mistake.
>
| |
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:31:35 -0500, The Learner wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>
>>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>>
>>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>>suggestions.
....
> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> please?
The basics would be a Windows 7 machine that can upgrade to 4 or even 8
Gigs of memory. Photoshop's use of graphics acceleration is relatively
modest. Get one with a DVI monitor output. A MacBook Pro is also an
excellent possibility.
Solid state disk drives are still rather expensive and small, but they can
make a dazzling difference in speed - consider one for a future upgrade
when Moore's law kicks in a bit more.
The big issue with notebooks that has not been mentioned yet is the display
quality. A common solution, and my recommendation, is to use an external
monitor while at home, and use the notebook display as space for tool
palettes, and while traveling. That said, there are some notebooks with
excellent displays, notably the Lenovo ThinkPad W700. The MacBook Pro's
have excellent displays too.
Here's an article by Rob Galbraith that you might find interesting:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-9320-9 876
or go to www.robgalbraith.com and search for laptop display.
--
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>
>>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>>
>>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>>suggestions.
....
> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> please?
The basics would be a Windows 7 machine that can upgrade to 4 or even 8
Gigs of memory. Photoshop's use of graphics acceleration is relatively
modest. Get one with a DVI monitor output. A MacBook Pro is also an
excellent possibility.
Solid state disk drives are still rather expensive and small, but they can
make a dazzling difference in speed - consider one for a future upgrade
when Moore's law kicks in a bit more.
The big issue with notebooks that has not been mentioned yet is the display
quality. A common solution, and my recommendation, is to use an external
monitor while at home, and use the notebook display as space for tool
palettes, and while traveling. That said, there are some notebooks with
excellent displays, notably the Lenovo ThinkPad W700. The MacBook Pro's
have excellent displays too.
Here's an article by Rob Galbraith that you might find interesting:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-9320-9 876
or go to www.robgalbraith.com and search for laptop display.
--
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
| |
|
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 06:20:30 +1000, "Paul Burdett"
<pburdett@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
>"The Learner" <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote in message
>news:6eh7p59so8bt7qbbrc4i4hcoafrf9f6k2q@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
>> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>>
>>>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>>>
>>>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>>>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>>>>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>>>>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>>>>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
>>>> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>>>>
>>>>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>>>>The more - the better!!!
>>>
>>>Graphics != Graphics
>>>
>>>It's a generic term for imagery.
>>>
>>>What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
>>>
>>>I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo
>>>creation
>>>field use.
>>>
>>>Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't
>>>work
>>>out.
>>>
>>
>> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
>> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
>> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
>> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
>> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
>> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
>> please?
>
>I'm no expert, but my Toshiba Satellite laptop runs CS3 fine...quite
>quick...it only has 1Gb ram. However, if I upgrade to CS4 or even CS5 I will
>probably go with something that has a minimum of 4GB ram (for 32 bit
>operating system) and a suitable dedicated graphics card like a Nvidia
>GeForce. See http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405711.html in orde to take
>advantage of the 3D capabilities of CS4. My next desktop will be win 7,
>64bit o/s with at least 8Gb ram.(and maybe even a solid state hard drive)
>
>Good luck,
>
>Paul
>
That's what I'm looking to get with a laptop. I also want USB3.
<pburdett@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
>"The Learner" <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote in message
>news:6eh7p59so8bt7qbbrc4i4hcoafrf9f6k2q@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
>> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>>
>>>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>>>
>>>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>>>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>>>>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>>>>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>>>>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
>>>> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>>>>
>>>>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>>>>The more - the better!!!
>>>
>>>Graphics != Graphics
>>>
>>>It's a generic term for imagery.
>>>
>>>What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
>>>
>>>I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo
>>>creation
>>>field use.
>>>
>>>Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't
>>>work
>>>out.
>>>
>>
>> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
>> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
>> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
>> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
>> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
>> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
>> please?
>
>I'm no expert, but my Toshiba Satellite laptop runs CS3 fine...quite
>quick...it only has 1Gb ram. However, if I upgrade to CS4 or even CS5 I will
>probably go with something that has a minimum of 4GB ram (for 32 bit
>operating system) and a suitable dedicated graphics card like a Nvidia
>GeForce. See http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405711.html in orde to take
>advantage of the 3D capabilities of CS4. My next desktop will be win 7,
>64bit o/s with at least 8Gb ram.(and maybe even a solid state hard drive)
>
>Good luck,
>
>Paul
>
That's what I'm looking to get with a laptop. I also want USB3.
| |
|
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:58:13 -0800, Mike Russell
<groupsRE@MOVEcurvemeister.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:31:35 -0500, The Learner wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
>> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>>
>>>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>>>
>>>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>>>suggestions.
>
>...
>> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
>> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
>> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
>> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
>> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
>> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
>> please?
>
>The basics would be a Windows 7 machine that can upgrade to 4 or even 8
>Gigs of memory. Photoshop's use of graphics acceleration is relatively
>modest. Get one with a DVI monitor output. A MacBook Pro is also an
>excellent possibility.
>
>Solid state disk drives are still rather expensive and small, but they can
>make a dazzling difference in speed - consider one for a future upgrade
>when Moore's law kicks in a bit more.
>
>The big issue with notebooks that has not been mentioned yet is the display
>quality. A common solution, and my recommendation, is to use an external
>monitor while at home, and use the notebook display as space for tool
>palettes, and while traveling. That said, there are some notebooks with
>excellent displays, notably the Lenovo ThinkPad W700. The MacBook Pro's
>have excellent displays too.
>
>Here's an article by Rob Galbraith that you might find interesting:
> http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-9320-9 876
>or go to www.robgalbraith.com and search for laptop display.
Mike, could you be a little more specific about where to look for a
laptop on robgalbraith.com? I feel a little stupid - but, with my
headpain, I couldn't zero in on that information. Thanks......
<groupsRE@MOVEcurvemeister.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:31:35 -0500, The Learner wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
>> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>>
>>>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>>>
>>>>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>>>>suggestions.
>
>...
>> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
>> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
>> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
>> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
>> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
>> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
>> please?
>
>The basics would be a Windows 7 machine that can upgrade to 4 or even 8
>Gigs of memory. Photoshop's use of graphics acceleration is relatively
>modest. Get one with a DVI monitor output. A MacBook Pro is also an
>excellent possibility.
>
>Solid state disk drives are still rather expensive and small, but they can
>make a dazzling difference in speed - consider one for a future upgrade
>when Moore's law kicks in a bit more.
>
>The big issue with notebooks that has not been mentioned yet is the display
>quality. A common solution, and my recommendation, is to use an external
>monitor while at home, and use the notebook display as space for tool
>palettes, and while traveling. That said, there are some notebooks with
>excellent displays, notably the Lenovo ThinkPad W700. The MacBook Pro's
>have excellent displays too.
>
>Here's an article by Rob Galbraith that you might find interesting:
> http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-9320-9 876
>or go to www.robgalbraith.com and search for laptop display.
Mike, could you be a little more specific about where to look for a
laptop on robgalbraith.com? I feel a little stupid - but, with my
headpain, I couldn't zero in on that information. Thanks......
| |
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:51:47 -0500, The Learner wrote:
[re Rob Galbraith notebook review]
> Mike, could you be a little more specific about where to look for a
> laptop on robgalbraith.com? I feel a little stupid - but, with my
> headpain, I couldn't zero in on that information. Thanks......
Here's the article:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-9320-9 876
If that link goes stale at some time in the future, there is a search box
in the left column of the main page:
www.robgalbraith.com
I should mention that Roger's article is from earlier last year, and there
may be new models out there.
--
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
[re Rob Galbraith notebook review]
> Mike, could you be a little more specific about where to look for a
> laptop on robgalbraith.com? I feel a little stupid - but, with my
> headpain, I couldn't zero in on that information. Thanks......
Here's the article:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-9320-9 876
If that link goes stale at some time in the future, there is a search box
in the left column of the main page:
www.robgalbraith.com
I should mention that Roger's article is from earlier last year, and there
may be new models out there.
--
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
| |
|
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>
> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
> >
> >>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
> >>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
> >>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
> >>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
> >>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
> >> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
> >>
> >>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
> >>The more - the better!!!
> >
> >Graphics != Graphics
> >
> >It's a generic term for imagery.
> >
> >What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
> >
> >I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
> >field use.
> >
> >Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
> >out.
> >
>
> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> please?
Well, if you really want the best and latest technology then I would
suggest you not to buy anything right now but WAIT for a better and cheaper
one. I bet you that 10-20 years from now you may slap in the face of anyone
who tries to give you the current best.
I started computing before IBM was born so I know WAITING should be the
answer, and I should have saved tens of thousands of US$ (or probably
somewhere around 50-70K?)
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>
> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
> >
> >>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
> >>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
> >>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
> >>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
> >>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
> >> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
> >>
> >>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
> >>The more - the better!!!
> >
> >Graphics != Graphics
> >
> >It's a generic term for imagery.
> >
> >What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
> >
> >I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
> >field use.
> >
> >Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
> >out.
> >
>
> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> please?
Well, if you really want the best and latest technology then I would
suggest you not to buy anything right now but WAIT for a better and cheaper
one. I bet you that 10-20 years from now you may slap in the face of anyone
who tries to give you the current best.
I started computing before IBM was born so I know WAITING should be the
answer, and I should have saved tens of thousands of US$ (or probably
somewhere around 50-70K?)
| |
|
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:24:05 -0600, Joel <Joel@NoSpam.com> wrote:
>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
>> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>>
>> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>> >
>> >>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>> >>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>> >>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>> >>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>> >>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
>> >> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>> >>
>> >>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>> >>The more - the better!!!
>> >
>> >Graphics != Graphics
>> >
>> >It's a generic term for imagery.
>> >
>> >What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
>> >
>> >I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
>> >field use.
>> >
>> >Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
>> >out.
>> >
>>
>> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
>> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
>> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
>> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
>> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
>> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
>> please?
>
> Well, if you really want the best and latest technology then I would
>suggest you not to buy anything right now but WAIT for a better and cheaper
>one. I bet you that 10-20 years from now you may slap in the face of anyone
>who tries to give you the current best.
>
> I started computing before IBM was born so I know WAITING should be the
>answer, and I should have saved tens of thousands of US$ (or probably
>somewhere around 50-70K?)
The only thing I'm waiting for is USB3 - and it's here now. I just want
to be sure it gets proven out in the field - but thanks for your comment.
I take it as a positive :)
>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
>> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
>>
>> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
>> >
>> >>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
>> >>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
>> >>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
>> >>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
>> >>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
>> >> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
>> >>
>> >>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
>> >>The more - the better!!!
>> >
>> >Graphics != Graphics
>> >
>> >It's a generic term for imagery.
>> >
>> >What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
>> >
>> >I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
>> >field use.
>> >
>> >Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
>> >out.
>> >
>>
>> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
>> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
>> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
>> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
>> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
>> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
>> please?
>
> Well, if you really want the best and latest technology then I would
>suggest you not to buy anything right now but WAIT for a better and cheaper
>one. I bet you that 10-20 years from now you may slap in the face of anyone
>who tries to give you the current best.
>
> I started computing before IBM was born so I know WAITING should be the
>answer, and I should have saved tens of thousands of US$ (or probably
>somewhere around 50-70K?)
The only thing I'm waiting for is USB3 - and it's here now. I just want
to be sure it gets proven out in the field - but thanks for your comment.
I take it as a positive :)
| |
|
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:24:05 -0600, Joel <Joel@NoSpam.com> wrote:
>
> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
> >> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
> >> >
> >> >>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
> >> >>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
> >> >>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
> >> >>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
> >> >>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
> >> >> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
> >> >>
> >> >>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
> >> >>The more - the better!!!
> >> >
> >> >Graphics != Graphics
> >> >
> >> >It's a generic term for imagery.
> >> >
> >> >What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
> >> >
> >> >I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
> >> >field use.
> >> >
> >> >Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
> >> >out.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> >> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> >> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> >> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> >> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> >> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> >> please?
> >
> > Well, if you really want the best and latest technology then I would
> >suggest you not to buy anything right now but WAIT for a better and cheaper
> >one. I bet you that 10-20 years from now you may slap in the face of anyone
> >who tries to give you the current best.
> >
> > I started computing before IBM was born so I know WAITING should be the
> >answer, and I should have saved tens of thousands of US$ (or probably
> >somewhere around 50-70K?)
>
> The only thing I'm waiting for is USB3 - and it's here now. I just want
> to be sure it gets proven out in the field - but thanks for your comment.
> I take it as a positive :)
I just built a new system few weeks ago (or over a month ago?) and I had
no idea about USB3, and I am pretty sure mine has USB2. Heck, I don't even
know how many USB2 port it has, but pretty sure more than 4 (or more than
6-7 ?).
Hmmm, now I look at the new built computer I have noticed that I don't
connect the the front-USB2 ports like used too. And I don't remember ...
oh.. I do remember I did hooked (2) USB2 set of connectors.. and I think it
has 2-4 more including at least 2-4 in the back.
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:24:05 -0600, Joel <Joel@NoSpam.com> wrote:
>
> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:10:59 -0800, Sir F. A. Rien
> >> <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> found these unused words:
> >> >
> >> >>I soon intend to buy a laptop suitable for Photoshop and am looking for
> >> >>suggestions. I also have a question: Since a gaming computer is so good
> >> >>at graphics, would I be wise to consider one of these? I usually use a
> >> >>laptop as a desktop and money is not an object. I am cuurently looking
> >> >>at a Sager gaming laptop - the NP8121
> >> >> http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=258533
> >> >>
> >> >>It has a lot of hardware which I would put to good use. Comments please?
> >> >>The more - the better!!!
> >> >
> >> >Graphics != Graphics
> >> >
> >> >It's a generic term for imagery.
> >> >
> >> >What you are doing with PS isn't the same a rendering fast action games.
> >> >
> >> >I'd suggest checking out what designers and those in the art/photo creation
> >> >field use.
> >> >
> >> >Of course, with £££ no objext, you can always buy another if it doesn't work
> >> >out.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> >> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> >> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> >> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> >> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> >> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> >> please?
> >
> > Well, if you really want the best and latest technology then I would
> >suggest you not to buy anything right now but WAIT for a better and cheaper
> >one. I bet you that 10-20 years from now you may slap in the face of anyone
> >who tries to give you the current best.
> >
> > I started computing before IBM was born so I know WAITING should be the
> >answer, and I should have saved tens of thousands of US$ (or probably
> >somewhere around 50-70K?)
>
> The only thing I'm waiting for is USB3 - and it's here now. I just want
> to be sure it gets proven out in the field - but thanks for your comment.
> I take it as a positive :)
I just built a new system few weeks ago (or over a month ago?) and I had
no idea about USB3, and I am pretty sure mine has USB2. Heck, I don't even
know how many USB2 port it has, but pretty sure more than 4 (or more than
6-7 ?).
Hmmm, now I look at the new built computer I have noticed that I don't
connect the the front-USB2 ports like used too. And I don't remember ...
oh.. I do remember I did hooked (2) USB2 set of connectors.. and I think it
has 2-4 more including at least 2-4 in the back.
| |
|
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> please?
A month or so ago we had a thread here on the best laptop for graphics
and a graphics designer responded with a brand I had never heard of. You
might search for that thread. I can try, too, if you do not succeed.
Photoshop is using more of the graphics processor (GPU) (if it is
adequate and compatible) for more routines than ever, but (IMHO), none
are critical to 2D work. One that uses the GPU and is moderately useful
is 'Enable OpenGL Drawing', but frankly, most people don't ever need it.
So, I would shop for a laptop that runs an OS you can appreciate, one
that has 4gb RAM and a decent GPU. I use a Toshiba Tecra with 4gb, a
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M monitor adapter. It's adequate for field use of
CS4. And it is affordable.
I will repeat Mike Russell's advice to get a good, large desktop monitor
to use at home, on a desk. A SATA external drive is helpful, too. (The
model above supports all that.)
My wife is a graphics professional (layout, design, pre-press) and her
portable is a MacBook Pro, loaded. It is great, and spendy.
I hope this helps.
Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
communication devices.
>
> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
> please?
A month or so ago we had a thread here on the best laptop for graphics
and a graphics designer responded with a brand I had never heard of. You
might search for that thread. I can try, too, if you do not succeed.
Photoshop is using more of the graphics processor (GPU) (if it is
adequate and compatible) for more routines than ever, but (IMHO), none
are critical to 2D work. One that uses the GPU and is moderately useful
is 'Enable OpenGL Drawing', but frankly, most people don't ever need it.
So, I would shop for a laptop that runs an OS you can appreciate, one
that has 4gb RAM and a decent GPU. I use a Toshiba Tecra with 4gb, a
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M monitor adapter. It's adequate for field use of
CS4. And it is affordable.
I will repeat Mike Russell's advice to get a good, large desktop monitor
to use at home, on a desk. A SATA external drive is helpful, too. (The
model above supports all that.)
My wife is a graphics professional (layout, design, pre-press) and her
portable is a MacBook Pro, loaded. It is great, and spendy.
I hope this helps.
Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
communication devices.
| |
|
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:58:41 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
wrote:
>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>>
>> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
>> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
>> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
>> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
>> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
>> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
>> please?
>
>A month or so ago we had a thread here on the best laptop for graphics
>and a graphics designer responded with a brand I had never heard of. You
>might search for that thread. I can try, too, if you do not succeed.
>
>Photoshop is using more of the graphics processor (GPU) (if it is
>adequate and compatible) for more routines than ever, but (IMHO), none
>are critical to 2D work. One that uses the GPU and is moderately useful
>is 'Enable OpenGL Drawing', but frankly, most people don't ever need it.
>
>So, I would shop for a laptop that runs an OS you can appreciate, one
>that has 4gb RAM and a decent GPU. I use a Toshiba Tecra with 4gb, a
>NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M monitor adapter. It's adequate for field use of
>CS4. And it is affordable.
>
>I will repeat Mike Russell's advice to get a good, large desktop monitor
>to use at home, on a desk. A SATA external drive is helpful, too. (The
>model above supports all that.)
>
>My wife is a graphics professional (layout, design, pre-press) and her
>portable is a MacBook Pro, loaded. It is great, and spendy.
>
>I hope this helps.
>
>Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
>year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
>to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
>will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
>$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
>become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
>the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
>communication devices.
Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
wrote:
>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>>
>> I shouldn't have said money is no object. I don't have the money to
>> waste. But, I'm 65 years old and this might be the last PC I ever buy -
>> so I want it to be a really good one (for use with PS). I thought the
>> Photoshop groups would be the best place to ask - but I'm not getting the
>> responses I hoped for. You mentioned the art/photo creation field. Do
>> you know of any forums or groups I could try? Any other suggestions,
>> please?
>
>A month or so ago we had a thread here on the best laptop for graphics
>and a graphics designer responded with a brand I had never heard of. You
>might search for that thread. I can try, too, if you do not succeed.
>
>Photoshop is using more of the graphics processor (GPU) (if it is
>adequate and compatible) for more routines than ever, but (IMHO), none
>are critical to 2D work. One that uses the GPU and is moderately useful
>is 'Enable OpenGL Drawing', but frankly, most people don't ever need it.
>
>So, I would shop for a laptop that runs an OS you can appreciate, one
>that has 4gb RAM and a decent GPU. I use a Toshiba Tecra with 4gb, a
>NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M monitor adapter. It's adequate for field use of
>CS4. And it is affordable.
>
>I will repeat Mike Russell's advice to get a good, large desktop monitor
>to use at home, on a desk. A SATA external drive is helpful, too. (The
>model above supports all that.)
>
>My wife is a graphics professional (layout, design, pre-press) and her
>portable is a MacBook Pro, loaded. It is great, and spendy.
>
>I hope this helps.
>
>Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
>year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
>to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
>will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
>$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
>become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
>the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
>communication devices.
Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
| |
|
In article <nhcfp518idcfh8am52m53dghtbk5n5852n@4ax.com>,
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
I saw it on alt.graphics.photoshop
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
I saw it on alt.graphics.photoshop
| |
|
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:24:29 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
wrote:
>In article <nhcfp518idcfh8am52m53dghtbk5n5852n@4ax.com>,
> The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
>> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
>> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
>> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
>> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
>
>I saw it on alt.graphics.photoshop
OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
(or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
you might get one.
wrote:
>In article <nhcfp518idcfh8am52m53dghtbk5n5852n@4ax.com>,
> The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
>> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
>> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
>> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
>> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
>
>I saw it on alt.graphics.photoshop
OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
(or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
you might get one.
| |
|
In article <eiogp5tddaj5puaj62ngtus20kfkappqed@4ax.com>,
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:24:29 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <nhcfp518idcfh8am52m53dghtbk5n5852n@4ax.com>,
> > The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
> >> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
> >> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
> >> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
> >> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
> >
> >I saw it on alt.graphics.photoshop
>
> OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
> machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
> is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
> it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
> expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
> retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
> (or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
> you might get one.
I am not getting one. After some consideration I found that it will
probably have the same lifetime any other decent laptop has, and
therefore will not be cost-effective.
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:24:29 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <nhcfp518idcfh8am52m53dghtbk5n5852n@4ax.com>,
> > The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
> >> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
> >> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
> >> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
> >> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
> >
> >I saw it on alt.graphics.photoshop
>
> OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
> machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
> is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
> it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
> expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
> retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
> (or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
> you might get one.
I am not getting one. After some consideration I found that it will
probably have the same lifetime any other decent laptop has, and
therefore will not be cost-effective.
| |
|
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:02:10 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.ten>
wrote:
>In article <eiogp5tddaj5puaj62ngtus20kfkappqed@4ax.com>,
> The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:24:29 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <nhcfp518idcfh8am52m53dghtbk5n5852n@4ax.com>,
>> > The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
>> >> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
>> >> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
>> >> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
>> >> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
>> >
>> >I saw it on alt.graphics.photoshop
>>
>> OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
>> machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
>> is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
>> it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
>> expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
>> retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
>> (or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
>> you might get one.
>
>I am not getting one. After some consideration I found that it will
>probably have the same lifetime any other decent laptop has, and
>therefore will not be cost-effective.
Yes, it IS very, very expensive. I'm torn between getting it and
settling for something less. Are you looking at something specific at
this time? I ask because I would probably look at it too. Thanks.
wrote:
>In article <eiogp5tddaj5puaj62ngtus20kfkappqed@4ax.com>,
> The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:24:29 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <nhcfp518idcfh8am52m53dghtbk5n5852n@4ax.com>,
>> > The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
>> >> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
>> >> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
>> >> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
>> >> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
>> >
>> >I saw it on alt.graphics.photoshop
>>
>> OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
>> machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
>> is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
>> it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
>> expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
>> retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
>> (or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
>> you might get one.
>
>I am not getting one. After some consideration I found that it will
>probably have the same lifetime any other decent laptop has, and
>therefore will not be cost-effective.
Yes, it IS very, very expensive. I'm torn between getting it and
settling for something less. Are you looking at something specific at
this time? I ask because I would probably look at it too. Thanks.
| |
|
In article <ph3ip5djv1g5op8pp6tcus8s5tdgk2sli2@4ax.com>,
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:02:10 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.ten>
> wrote:
> >> OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
> >> machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
> >> is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
> >> it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
> >> expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
> >> retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
> >> (or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
> >> you might get one.
> >
> >I am not getting one. After some consideration I found that it will
> >probably have the same lifetime any other decent laptop has, and
> >therefore will not be cost-effective.
>
> Yes, it IS very, very expensive. I'm torn between getting it and
> settling for something less. Are you looking at something specific at
> this time? I ask because I would probably look at it too. Thanks.
I already have a Toshiba Tecra - the one I mentioned in an earlier post.
I find it just fine with CS4 and the average image I have to process
when in the field.
For production work at the day-job I use an earlier Mac Pro (a tower
model).
Model Name: Mac Pro
Model Identifier: MacPro1,1
Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon
Processor Speed: 3 GHz
Number Of Processors: 2
Total Number Of Cores: 4
L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB
Memory: 8 GB
Bus Speed: 1.33 GHz
Boot ROM Version: MP11.005C.B08
SMC Version (system): 1.7f10
....and I'm going to be getting another, later model with the faster RAM
and better GPU.
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:02:10 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.ten>
> wrote:
> >> OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
> >> machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
> >> is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
> >> it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
> >> expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
> >> retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
> >> (or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
> >> you might get one.
> >
> >I am not getting one. After some consideration I found that it will
> >probably have the same lifetime any other decent laptop has, and
> >therefore will not be cost-effective.
>
> Yes, it IS very, very expensive. I'm torn between getting it and
> settling for something less. Are you looking at something specific at
> this time? I ask because I would probably look at it too. Thanks.
I already have a Toshiba Tecra - the one I mentioned in an earlier post.
I find it just fine with CS4 and the average image I have to process
when in the field.
For production work at the day-job I use an earlier Mac Pro (a tower
model).
Model Name: Mac Pro
Model Identifier: MacPro1,1
Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon
Processor Speed: 3 GHz
Number Of Processors: 2
Total Number Of Cores: 4
L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB
Memory: 8 GB
Bus Speed: 1.33 GHz
Boot ROM Version: MP11.005C.B08
SMC Version (system): 1.7f10
....and I'm going to be getting another, later model with the faster RAM
and better GPU.
| |
|
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:38:17 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
wrote:
>In article <ph3ip5djv1g5op8pp6tcus8s5tdgk2sli2@4ax.com>,
> The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:02:10 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.ten>
>> wrote:
>
>> >> OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
>> >> machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
>> >> is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
>> >> it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
>> >> expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
>> >> retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
>> >> (or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
>> >> you might get one.
>> >
>> >I am not getting one. After some consideration I found that it will
>> >probably have the same lifetime any other decent laptop has, and
>> >therefore will not be cost-effective.
>>
>> Yes, it IS very, very expensive. I'm torn between getting it and
>> settling for something less. Are you looking at something specific at
>> this time? I ask because I would probably look at it too. Thanks.
>
>I already have a Toshiba Tecra - the one I mentioned in an earlier post.
>I find it just fine with CS4 and the average image I have to process
>when in the field.
>
>For production work at the day-job I use an earlier Mac Pro (a tower
>model).
>
> Model Name: Mac Pro
> Model Identifier: MacPro1,1
> Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon
> Processor Speed: 3 GHz
> Number Of Processors: 2
> Total Number Of Cores: 4
> L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB
> Memory: 8 GB
> Bus Speed: 1.33 GHz
> Boot ROM Version: MP11.005C.B08
> SMC Version (system): 1.7f10
>
>...and I'm going to be getting another, later model with the faster RAM
>and better GPU.
Thanks, John - but I'm going to stick with a Windows OS / PC. I have a
lot of legacy programs I like and I'm just not into learning a new OS. I
realize that a Mac is preferred for graphics but I'll just have to make
do. Besides, there are far more programs for the PC and I really like to
try many of them. It's like a hobby. However, I used to use Photoshop
and really like it. But I've been ill for the past siz years and haven't
used it in that period. Now, I'm getting better and intend to get back
into using PS. So, the computer I purchase will be "built" around PS -
but capable of running everything else. Once in a while, I have asked on
the Usenet for recommendations - but don't usually find someone who knows
what they're talking about. You sound like you do - so I'm trying to
pick your brain to learn more about what I SHOULD consider and what I
shouldn't consider. I like to 'learn.' I want something very good /
fast but I can't afford to throw money away. I'm between a rock and a
hardplace. I hope we can stay in touch for when I have more specific
questions. In the meantime, you have been very helpful - whether you
believe it or not. Every little bit of information helps. I'm pretty
good with computers but don't know much about external monitors,
calibrating the monitor to the printer, know absolutely nothing about
graphics cards (never had one), and need to become informed. If you are
willing to help me when I have questions, are you also willing to give me
your email address. Mine is rmo555@cox.net. Thanks very much.........
wrote:
>In article <ph3ip5djv1g5op8pp6tcus8s5tdgk2sli2@4ax.com>,
> The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:02:10 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.ten>
>> wrote:
>
>> >> OK, I found it. Seems to say that the Lenovo Thinkpad W700 is a great
>> >> machine - and I think you've looked into it. The only other thing I want
>> >> is USB3. Sounds like the Thinkpad is what I've been looking for. But
>> >> it's pretty pricey. I didn't know they made notebooks that were that
>> >> expensive. I don't mind paying that price at this time. But, I'm
>> >> retired and therefore want a machine that will last at least five years
>> >> (or so). Do you have any other opinions on the Lenovo? I think you said
>> >> you might get one.
>> >
>> >I am not getting one. After some consideration I found that it will
>> >probably have the same lifetime any other decent laptop has, and
>> >therefore will not be cost-effective.
>>
>> Yes, it IS very, very expensive. I'm torn between getting it and
>> settling for something less. Are you looking at something specific at
>> this time? I ask because I would probably look at it too. Thanks.
>
>I already have a Toshiba Tecra - the one I mentioned in an earlier post.
>I find it just fine with CS4 and the average image I have to process
>when in the field.
>
>For production work at the day-job I use an earlier Mac Pro (a tower
>model).
>
> Model Name: Mac Pro
> Model Identifier: MacPro1,1
> Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon
> Processor Speed: 3 GHz
> Number Of Processors: 2
> Total Number Of Cores: 4
> L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB
> Memory: 8 GB
> Bus Speed: 1.33 GHz
> Boot ROM Version: MP11.005C.B08
> SMC Version (system): 1.7f10
>
>...and I'm going to be getting another, later model with the faster RAM
>and better GPU.
Thanks, John - but I'm going to stick with a Windows OS / PC. I have a
lot of legacy programs I like and I'm just not into learning a new OS. I
realize that a Mac is preferred for graphics but I'll just have to make
do. Besides, there are far more programs for the PC and I really like to
try many of them. It's like a hobby. However, I used to use Photoshop
and really like it. But I've been ill for the past siz years and haven't
used it in that period. Now, I'm getting better and intend to get back
into using PS. So, the computer I purchase will be "built" around PS -
but capable of running everything else. Once in a while, I have asked on
the Usenet for recommendations - but don't usually find someone who knows
what they're talking about. You sound like you do - so I'm trying to
pick your brain to learn more about what I SHOULD consider and what I
shouldn't consider. I like to 'learn.' I want something very good /
fast but I can't afford to throw money away. I'm between a rock and a
hardplace. I hope we can stay in touch for when I have more specific
questions. In the meantime, you have been very helpful - whether you
believe it or not. Every little bit of information helps. I'm pretty
good with computers but don't know much about external monitors,
calibrating the monitor to the printer, know absolutely nothing about
graphics cards (never had one), and need to become informed. If you are
willing to help me when I have questions, are you also willing to give me
your email address. Mine is rmo555@cox.net. Thanks very much.........
| |
|
In article <04eip5t203j8o0nk2tc1b258ehrkrcd8i8@4ax.com>,
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:38:17 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
> wrote:
> [... mentioned using Mac ...]
> Thanks, John - but I'm going to stick with a Windows OS / PC. I have a
> lot of legacy programs I like and I'm just not into learning a new OS. I
> realize that a Mac is preferred for graphics but I'll just have to make
> do. Besides, there are far more programs for the PC [...]
FWIW, I use both WindoZe and Mac and now I run both operating systems on
the Mac using VMware Fusion.
Photoshop works the same under Windoze and Mac. No problem.
As for calibrating monitors - I don't even bother. If I need to tune a
photo for a commercial printer, I let them do it. If I am doing
illustration (Illustrator program), I color by the numbers.
As far as graphics cards, I still have to dive into the vendors'
literature and then cross-critique their position. Then I listen to
folks here. An example - recently I was looking for a powerful graphics
card for the Mac Pro (earlier one). Apple said the particular card would
work with my setup. What Apple did NOT mention is that it would work,
but make hardly any difference because the RAM that I got with the
computer was too slow to support the card properly. The vendor made that
quite clear. So, I did not upgrade.
I'm not a hardware person.
My address is in the header above. Just reverse it.
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:38:17 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
> wrote:
> [... mentioned using Mac ...]
> Thanks, John - but I'm going to stick with a Windows OS / PC. I have a
> lot of legacy programs I like and I'm just not into learning a new OS. I
> realize that a Mac is preferred for graphics but I'll just have to make
> do. Besides, there are far more programs for the PC [...]
FWIW, I use both WindoZe and Mac and now I run both operating systems on
the Mac using VMware Fusion.
Photoshop works the same under Windoze and Mac. No problem.
As for calibrating monitors - I don't even bother. If I need to tune a
photo for a commercial printer, I let them do it. If I am doing
illustration (Illustrator program), I color by the numbers.
As far as graphics cards, I still have to dive into the vendors'
literature and then cross-critique their position. Then I listen to
folks here. An example - recently I was looking for a powerful graphics
card for the Mac Pro (earlier one). Apple said the particular card would
work with my setup. What Apple did NOT mention is that it would work,
but make hardly any difference because the RAM that I got with the
computer was too slow to support the card properly. The vendor made that
quite clear. So, I did not upgrade.
I'm not a hardware person.
My address is in the header above. Just reverse it.
| |
|
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:33:23 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
wrote:
>In article <04eip5t203j8o0nk2tc1b258ehrkrcd8i8@4ax.com>,
> The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:38:17 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
>> wrote:
>> [... mentioned using Mac ...]
>
>> Thanks, John - but I'm going to stick with a Windows OS / PC. I have a
>> lot of legacy programs I like and I'm just not into learning a new OS. I
>> realize that a Mac is preferred for graphics but I'll just have to make
>> do. Besides, there are far more programs for the PC [...]
>
>FWIW, I use both WindoZe and Mac and now I run both operating systems on
>the Mac using VMware Fusion.
>
>Photoshop works the same under Windoze and Mac. No problem.
>
>As for calibrating monitors - I don't even bother. If I need to tune a
>photo for a commercial printer, I let them do it. If I am doing
>illustration (Illustrator program), I color by the numbers.
>
>As far as graphics cards, I still have to dive into the vendors'
>literature and then cross-critique their position. Then I listen to
>folks here. An example - recently I was looking for a powerful graphics
>card for the Mac Pro (earlier one). Apple said the particular card would
>work with my setup. What Apple did NOT mention is that it would work,
>but make hardly any difference because the RAM that I got with the
>computer was too slow to support the card properly. The vendor made that
>quite clear. So, I did not upgrade.
>
>I'm not a hardware person.
>
>My address is in the header above. Just reverse it.
Kind of a thinly veiled disguise, no??? Heh-heh
wrote:
>In article <04eip5t203j8o0nk2tc1b258ehrkrcd8i8@4ax.com>,
> The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:38:17 -0600, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.net>
>> wrote:
>> [... mentioned using Mac ...]
>
>> Thanks, John - but I'm going to stick with a Windows OS / PC. I have a
>> lot of legacy programs I like and I'm just not into learning a new OS. I
>> realize that a Mac is preferred for graphics but I'll just have to make
>> do. Besides, there are far more programs for the PC [...]
>
>FWIW, I use both WindoZe and Mac and now I run both operating systems on
>the Mac using VMware Fusion.
>
>Photoshop works the same under Windoze and Mac. No problem.
>
>As for calibrating monitors - I don't even bother. If I need to tune a
>photo for a commercial printer, I let them do it. If I am doing
>illustration (Illustrator program), I color by the numbers.
>
>As far as graphics cards, I still have to dive into the vendors'
>literature and then cross-critique their position. Then I listen to
>folks here. An example - recently I was looking for a powerful graphics
>card for the Mac Pro (earlier one). Apple said the particular card would
>work with my setup. What Apple did NOT mention is that it would work,
>but make hardly any difference because the RAM that I got with the
>computer was too slow to support the card properly. The vendor made that
>quite clear. So, I did not upgrade.
>
>I'm not a hardware person.
>
>My address is in the header above. Just reverse it.
Kind of a thinly veiled disguise, no??? Heh-heh
| |
|
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
<snip>
> >Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
> >year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
> >to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
> >will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
> >$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
> >become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
> >the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
> >communication devices.
>
> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
65 years young? You are more than 1/2 decade younger than I am (I just
had my 72nd birthday), and unless you hang yourself before me then it would
be your last system.
<snip>
> >Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
> >year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
> >to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
> >will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
> >$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
> >become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
> >the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
> >communication devices.
>
> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
65 years young? You are more than 1/2 decade younger than I am (I just
had my 72nd birthday), and unless you hang yourself before me then it would
be your last system.
| |
|
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:44:06 -0600, Joel <Joel@NoSpam.com> wrote:
>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
><snip>
>> >Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
>> >year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
>> >to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
>> >will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
>> >$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
>> >become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
>> >the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
>> >communication devices.
>>
>> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
>> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
>> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
>> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
>> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
>
> 65 years young? You are more than 1/2 decade younger than I am (I just
>had my 72nd birthday), and unless you hang yourself before me then it would
>be your last system.
Let's hope that doesn't happen........
>The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
>
><snip>
>> >Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
>> >year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
>> >to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
>> >will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
>> >$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
>> >become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
>> >the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
>> >communication devices.
>>
>> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
>> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
>> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
>> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
>> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
>
> 65 years young? You are more than 1/2 decade younger than I am (I just
>had my 72nd birthday), and unless you hang yourself before me then it would
>be your last system.
Let's hope that doesn't happen........
| |
|
The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:44:06 -0600, Joel <Joel@NoSpam.com> wrote:
>
> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> >
> ><snip>
> >> >Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
> >> >year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
> >> >to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
> >> >will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
> >> >$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
> >> >become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
> >> >the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
> >> >communication devices.
> >>
> >> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
> >> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
> >> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
> >> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
> >> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
> >
> > 65 years young? You are more than 1/2 decade younger than I am (I just
> >had my 72nd birthday), and unless you hang yourself before me then it would
> >be your last system.
>
> Let's hope that doesn't happen........
Then live healthy to enjoy more newer technology. 30 some years ago after
spent many thousands of US$ (I am talking about nearly 10K) for the latest
and greatest computer system, I thought it would be the last one. Or I
didn't think there would be any better one.
And I have been building newer systems every 2-3 years (we often have
around 2-3 desktops and 5-6 laptops in my house). And I am talking about
the ones we use, or I may have around 5-6 older laptops collecting dirt.
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:44:06 -0600, Joel <Joel@NoSpam.com> wrote:
>
> >The Learner <moron@newsgroups.net> wrote:
> >
> ><snip>
> >> >Oh, about this being the last computer you will buy, let this 64
> >> >year-old suggest that it won't be your last. New laptops will continue
> >> >to be more capable at about the same price for a long time. In fact, I
> >> >will go to the edge and say that in four years you won't spend more than
> >> >$500 for an equivalent to the MacBook Pro, then they will begin to
> >> >become more expensive as dedicated computers as we know them today are,
> >> >the average consumer, going to the dumpster, taken over by specialized
> >> >communication devices.
> >>
> >> Thanks so much for your reply (I'm 65 years old BTW). I HOPE this isn't
> >> the last computer I buy (I was just sort of kidding). At this age, you
> >> never know! I'm going to look for that thread. However, I crossposted
> >> the original post - so, if you don't mind, please tell me which group you
> >> are referring to. Thanks (old buddy)
> >
> > 65 years young? You are more than 1/2 decade younger than I am (I just
> >had my 72nd birthday), and unless you hang yourself before me then it would
> >be your last system.
>
> Let's hope that doesn't happen........
Then live healthy to enjoy more newer technology. 30 some years ago after
spent many thousands of US$ (I am talking about nearly 10K) for the latest
and greatest computer system, I thought it would be the last one. Or I
didn't think there would be any better one.
And I have been building newer systems every 2-3 years (we often have
around 2-3 desktops and 5-6 laptops in my house). And I am talking about
the ones we use, or I may have around 5-6 older laptops collecting dirt.
| |
|
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:30:12 -0500, Joel <Joel@NoSpam.com> scribbled:
>And I am talking about
>the ones we use, or I may have around 5-6 older laptops collecting dirt.
There are many programs around the country matching needy students with
out dated computer equipment. You should donate the paperweights to such
a program instead of letting them sit there gathering dust.
>And I am talking about
>the ones we use, or I may have around 5-6 older laptops collecting dirt.
There are many programs around the country matching needy students with
out dated computer equipment. You should donate the paperweights to such
a program instead of letting them sit there gathering dust.
| |
|
| |
| Previous Topic: | Extract Filter - CS4 |
| Next Topic: | Selection from text |
Adobe Photoshop plug-ins, tools, tutorials and user discussions