Re Photoshop min version & XP-Pro

EG
Posted By
Eric Gill
Aug 3, 2004
Views
342
Replies
5
Status
Closed
"Dorothy Bradbury" wrote in
news:q%SPc.1188$:

Having moved from NT4 to XP-Pro mid last year, I’ve not been able to run Photoshop 4.1 – it simply bombs out on handling jpgs.

You have more than 512MB of RAM.

Q: It seems the earliest version of P/S that is XP-ok is 7.0?

5.5 (maybe 5 – I haven’t gotten the desire up to check.)

<snip>

Will also try XP Pro Remote-Desktop with it, but I’m not sure about both the latency (bandwidth would be copper gigabit) in terms of usability.

I’ve found it to be quite useable (though I’d rather not) over 100-base. I’m assuming you have a good reason for running remote at short range?
Related Tags
pro version

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

DB
Dorothy Bradbury
Aug 3, 2004
Having moved from NT4 to XP-Pro mid last year, I’ve not been able to run Photoshop 4.1 – it simply bombs out on handling jpgs.

Q: It seems the earliest version of P/S that is XP-ok is 7.0?

A colleague is moving to Illustrator exclusively as their work has changed, with work providing P/S CS (and nice twin CRTs). So they are offering their complete P/S 7.0 & a larger WACOM to me cheaply. I made do with the old A5 unit, which was a bit small for fine work.

Will also try XP Pro Remote-Desktop with it, but I’m not sure about both the latency (bandwidth would be copper gigabit) in terms of usability.

Thanks.
—
Dorothy Bradbury
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/dorothy.bradbury/panaflo.htm (Direct)
DB
Dorothy Bradbury
Aug 3, 2004
Having moved from NT4 to XP-Pro mid last year, I’ve not been able to run Photoshop 4.1 – it simply bombs out on handling jpgs.

You have more than 512MB of RAM.

No, I had 256MB – and later does the same under 384MB.

Q: It seems the earliest version of P/S that is XP-ok is 7.0?

5.5 (maybe 5 – I haven’t gotten the desire up to check.)

Ah, that would be interesting.
Had done a few hours Googling (and learning a lot of new tricks too in the process, which I can’t wait to try out), some more to do.

I’ve found it to be quite useable (though I’d rather not) over 100-base. I’m assuming you have a good reason for running remote at short range?

Only as backup, ie, 2 PCs & 1 monitor.

Thanks for you reply.
—
DB.
T
toby
Aug 4, 2004
Eric Gill …
"Dorothy Bradbury" wrote in
news:q%SPc.1188$:

…
Q: It seems the earliest version of P/S that is XP-ok is 7.0?

5.5 (maybe 5 – I haven’t gotten the desire up to check.)

5.0 works.

–Toby
DB
Dorothy Bradbury
Aug 4, 2004
5.0 works.

Thanks, that gives me a range of options.

I don’t need much more than was available in 4.1 – only for it to work 🙂 Lots of artwork & old photos, slides & so on to work on. —
DB.
DW
Diane Wilson
Aug 6, 2004
In article <HWTPc.1245$>,
says…

I’ve found it to be quite useable (though I’d rather not) over 100-base. I’m assuming you have a good reason for running remote at short range?

Only as backup, ie, 2 PCs & 1 monitor.

A KVM switch would be a better choice. They’re made to connect one monitor, keyboard, and mouse to multiple machines, and to switch them as a group. You can get them with PS/2 or USB connections, for 2, 4, or 8 machines.

Diane

MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥

– in 4 materials (clay versions included)

– 12 scenes

– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups

– 6000 x 4500 px

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections