Shadow/Highlight Adjustment causing lots of noise?

D
Posted By
dkperez
Jan 31, 2004
Views
855
Replies
26
Status
Closed
This may be an old question so feel free to send me elsewhere if its been answered…

I’ve started using the Shadow/Highlight adjustment in CS and I THINK its causing a lot of noise or what appears like grain in my images. I had an image that appeared very noisy when displayed so I went back through my steps from the initial .psd file. It APPEARS that when I did the shadow adjustment I introduced a lot of noise. It DOESN’T appear that the highlight adjustment caused a problem.

Is this normal? Am I doing too much adjusting on the shadows? Am I wrong and only THINK this is where the noise is coming from?

I haven’t checked the EXIF data but I suspect I’d find that I was at ISO 400 or greater. Would THIS account for the noise being created? Am I barking up the wrong tree? Is the question too nebulous? Are other people having trouble with the Shadow/Highlight adjustment?

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

J
JasonSmith
Jan 31, 2004
It’s possible that yes, you are applying too much adjustment with the shadows.

typically digital photo shots can have extreme amounts of noise in the shadows, most of which appears in the blue channel.

try preview the before image, and in the channels palette view each channel individually.
DM
dave_milbut
Jan 31, 2004
I agree with jason (wouldn’t dream of disagreeing with him, except on football!). Just wanted to make clear that the S&H adjustment didn’t create the noise, rather brought it out, or made it more apparent.
MM
Mick_Murphy
Jan 31, 2004
So is there any advantage in using Shadow Highlight in terms of noise over good old fashioned levels or curves to lighten shadow areas?
PC
Philo_Calhoun
Jan 31, 2004
Shadow highlight is much superior to curves to lighten shadow areas and maintain good colour, but the quality of the image will depend on the quality of the shadow pixels. Cheap cameras will have more noise in shadows than better ones.
MM
Mick_Murphy
Jan 31, 2004
Can anybody recommend any good reviews, comparisons, tutorials on SH then?
P
pope
Jan 31, 2004
Mick…try: <http://www.digitalretouch.org>
download the Photoshop CS chapter 45 pages 4.1MB PDF

by Katrin Eismann
MM
Mick_Murphy
Jan 31, 2004
Thanks Pope. That’s a good review of a lot of new PSCS features. I did a Google search and came up with a few other bits as well.
J
JasonSmith
Feb 2, 2004
I’m actually diggin the new shadow/highlights.

too bad it doesnt work in CMYK mode.
MM
Mick_Murphy
Feb 2, 2004
Too bad there isn’t an SH adjustment layer. I like to keep my options open indefinitely. Guess I’ll have to get into new habits if I want to benefit from this.
MV
Mathias_Vejerslev
Feb 2, 2004
Too bad there isn’t an SH adjustment layer.

Ditto. Thats almost a showstopper as far as I am concerned (but hey, I dont have CS so my problem is moot).
DM
dave_milbut
Feb 3, 2004
Too bad there isn’t an SH adjustment layer

Amen brudda!
AP
Alpha_Papa
Feb 3, 2004
Ok a totally related post here – what is the tablet Katrin is using in her biography pic?! Is it 12×18 Intuos 2 with a photo in the cover or something with a screen?
J
JasonSmith
Feb 3, 2004
"Too bad there isn’t an SH adjustment layer."

I know, I put it in the FR (mac side) last week!

Along with the adjustment>photo filter.
SB
Scott_Byer
Feb 3, 2004
Hm? There is a Photo Filter adjustment layer. It’s in the middle of the Adjustment Layer menu, but it’s there.

Don’t expect Shadow/Highlight to be an adjustment layer any time soon. What it’s doing is more complicated than what an adjustment layer is allowed to do.

-Scott

Along with the adjustment>photo filter.
MM
Mick_Murphy
Feb 3, 2004
Thanks for the info Scott and may I say aww! I’ll just have to start working with duped backgrounds I guess.
DM
dave_milbut
Feb 3, 2004
Don’t expect Shadow/Highlight to be an adjustment layer any time soon.

No problem. March or April is fine! Whenever you can get to it! 🙂
J
JasonSmith
Feb 3, 2004
Scott, yes sorry, I didnt see the photofilter adjusment layer the first go around.
D
dkperez
Feb 5, 2004
Thanks for the replies… I went in and did some more experimentation about the shadow(s) and noise and all such…

What I’m finding odd is that if I go into the shadow/highlight and bring up some detail from the shadows I get a LOT of grain/noise EVERYWHERE, not just in the shadow area. The highlight adjustment doesn’t seem to cause noise, just the shadow. So, I’m now being VERY judicious in the amount of shadow manipulation I’m doing. Keeping it down as much as possible seems to minimize the noise.

In one case I brought up the shadow detail and then used Neat Image to clean up the noise. It worked but its hell on sharpness… So, now I’ve worked by tail off to get a clean, SHARP photo and than I use a tool that softens it to remove the noise that I caused earlier! Good grief! Oh well, nobody said this was gonna be easy!
BL
Bill_Lamp
Feb 5, 2004
SH adjustment layer.

I have 7 not CS, but can’t this be approximated by new layer (copy merged if needed), performing the adjustment, then moving the sliders to lower the opacity/partially erase where not wanted/etc?

Bill
J
JasonSmith
Feb 5, 2004
It’s not an adjustment *layer*, and according to the folks at Adobe it likely never will be one.

But – you can FADE the adjustment, very similar to what Bill is referring to.
BH
bryan_hughes
Feb 5, 2004
regarding dkperez’ comments above, "What I’m finding odd is that if I go into the shadow/highlight and bring up some detail from the shadows I get a LOT of grain/noise EVERYWHERE, not just in the shadow area. The highlight adjustment doesn’t seem to cause noise, just the shadow. So, I’m now being VERY judicious in the amount of shadow manipulation I’m doing. Keeping it down as much as possible seems to minimize the noise. "

This is just a shot in the dark (if you’ll forgive the pun), but I imagine that your camera’s ISO is pretty high. 200 or 400+? Is that the case? Reducing that, whether through the use of a tripod, flash or more light will help the most with this. S/H isn’t "causing noise", but rather making existing noise visible. I hope that helps. Thanks, -Bryan.
D
dkperez
Feb 10, 2004
Bryan, you’re correct. I was shooting at ISO 400 because I was shooting birds and needed to keep my shutter speed fairly high and still keep some depth of field… So, Yeah, I suspect that it IS noise that’s being made visible… When I can I use ISO 100 but that just isn’t always possible.

In GENERAL, if I’m careful with the shadow fiddling its possible to keep the noise down, although it’d be nice if it only made the noise visible in the shadow where I’m trying to get detail rather than everywhere…
CC
Chris_Cox
Feb 10, 2004
The adjustment can’t do anything about exisiting noise….
CK
Christine_Krof_Shock
Feb 10, 2004
To get rid of some of the grain I find it helpful to convert to L*A*B mode and slightly blur the a and b channels, then convert back to RGB-it can help reduce the high ISO noise quite a bit, then run your shadow/highlight.

I too would like to see shadow/highlight as an adjustment layer, then it could be targeted to an individual channel using layer styles. It would make this feature a lot more flexible then applying directly to channels!
PC
Philo_Calhoun
Feb 10, 2004
Blurring the a and b channels would help with chromatic but not luminosity noise. If you have significant noise, consider Neat Image or Noise Ninja.
DM
dave_milbut
Feb 11, 2004
I too would like to see shadow/highlight as an adjustment layer,

Yea! That would be awesome! 🙂

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections