Sharpening Tools

F
Posted By
fotoholico
Nov 13, 2005
Views
322
Replies
2
Status
Closed
With my appetite whetted by hearing about CS2’s Smart Sharpen, but not the budget to buy CS2, I’ve been looking at sharpening plug-ins, at the sub-$50 mark.

Has anyone done a comparison of plug-ins like Ultrasharpen, Focus Magic and Focal Blade?

The images I want help with are mainly when I’ve got motion blur due to too long an exposure, although sometimes lens blur when the auto-focus gets it wrong too….

Must-have mockup pack for every graphic designer 🔥🔥🔥

Easy-to-use drag-n-drop Photoshop scene creator with more than 2800 items.

C
Clyde
Nov 13, 2005
fotoholico wrote:
With my appetite whetted by hearing about CS2’s Smart Sharpen, but not the budget to buy CS2, I’ve been looking at sharpening plug-ins, at the sub-$50 mark.

Has anyone done a comparison of plug-ins like Ultrasharpen, Focus Magic and Focal Blade?

The images I want help with are mainly when I’ve got motion blur due to too long an exposure, although sometimes lens blur when the auto-focus gets it wrong too….

I use Focus Magic and wouldn’t be without it. It seems to find edge lines and then thin them. You can certainly over do it with this tool too, but it doesn’t look the same at USM. A line will begin to get a shadow. You do have to crank it a fair bit though. It always shows in the preview.

I used Focus Magic in 7, CS, and CS2. I think it’s way better than Smart Sharpen in CS2. I use FM on every picture that I edit. The sharper it is to start with the better it is. Once a picture starts to need more than 7 pixels of correction, the quality starts to go down.

The problem is that a picture that blurry is already missing a fair bit of detail. Nothing will add that detail back in. So sharpening that much tends to give an spooky look to your detail. You get blur in the middle of an object with over done edges.

This is particularly true when you are correcting for motion blur. With just a tad of motion blur, Focus Magic does a remarkable job. Over 7 pixels of correction it almost hopeless. I have very rarely found a motion blur correction of over 7 pixels that I found acceptable. Under that, it is a very handy tool to have.

Focus blur fixing has an automatic feature that makes it pretty fast to get the right settings. Motion blur fixing doesn’t. It takes a bit more work. For one thing, it isn’t always easy to tell which way the blur is moving. If it is just camera movement, you can usually find a degree that will work well. If it is subject movement or worse multiple movements, then you are in trouble.

I usually run focus blur correction twice on each picture that I edit. The first time I do it at the needed amount and the second at half that. For example, the first pass would be at 2 pixels and the second at 1 pixel. This just adds to the crispness of the picture.

While I haven’t used the others, I highly recommend Focus Magic.

Clyde
JH
Jim Hargan
Nov 14, 2005
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:01:53 -0600, Clyde wrote:

fotoholico wrote:
With my appetite whetted by hearing about CS2’s Smart Sharpen, but not the budget to buy CS2, I’ve been looking at sharpening plug-ins, at the sub-$50 mark.

Has anyone done a comparison of plug-ins like Ultrasharpen, Focus Magic and Focal Blade?

While I haven’t used the others, I highly recommend Focus Magic.
Clyde

Just a fast agreement with Clyde. I use Focus Magic with Photoshop 7.0.1, and I love it. Used with care, it can remove haziness from sharp lines without creating halos. I use it on every image I scan, and on every image I reduce. Never tried the others.


Jim Hargan
Freelance Photographer and Writer
www.harganonline.com

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections