What is the point of Image Ready? Anyone?

EG
Posted By
erik_gloor
Nov 1, 2005
Views
534
Replies
29
Status
Closed
I understand it’s designed for Web imaging.

I like the "Saving for the Web" part of PhotoShop which brings me into ImageReady briefly.

But what the heck else is it good for? What can be accomplished in it that can’t be accomplished in PhotoShop?

Help me understand. Someone?

How to Improve Photoshop Performance

Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!

ML
Mike_Logan
Nov 1, 2005
Try animated GIFs from your PSD files for a start….

Load any old animated GIF and select Window>Show Animation

Might give you some ideas…. dunno !!!
CN
Cybernetic Nomad
Nov 1, 2005
Rollovers, animated GIFs, slicing of images a just a few of the useful things Image Ready can do. OR so I’m told by the folks who do web stuff (I’m strickly print)
DM
Don_McCahill
Nov 1, 2005
Add in image maps.
EG
erik_gloor
Nov 1, 2005
Thanks all!
C
chrisjbirchall
Nov 1, 2005
Basically, all you need, to get your image ready for the web!

<g>
Y
YrbkMgr
Nov 1, 2005
<groan>
JJ
John Joslin
Nov 1, 2005
<twitch>
M
Marcel
Nov 1, 2005
Gasp….

"John Joslin" wrote in message
<twitch>
C
chrisjbirchall
Nov 2, 2005
….but it’s true I tell you. It’s true!
MV
Mathias_Vejerslev
Nov 2, 2005
I just use it for animated GIFs, and do everything regarding HTML code in a proper HTML program. But thats just my workflow…
JJ
Joe_Joe_Smith
Nov 2, 2005
It helps to occupy vacant space on your hard drive???
DB
David_Biddlecombe
Nov 2, 2005
It allows Adobe to pretend they also do products for the web while they’re waiting for the Macromedia merger to go through so they can get their hands on the real stuff.
JW
John_Waller
Nov 2, 2005
I just use it for animated GIFs, and do everything regarding HTML code in a proper HTML program. But thats just my workflow…

Mathias,

My workflow is the same – except I never use animated GIFs 😎


Regards

John Waller
DM
Don_McCahill
Nov 2, 2005
while they’re waiting for the Macromedia merger to go through

Which should be soon. The DOJ gave approval last month, and now it is just a matter of waiting for some European approvals.

Don
MV
Mathias_Vejerslev
Nov 2, 2005
GIFs are cool, man.
PC
Pierre_Courtejoie
Nov 2, 2005
Animated gifs can now be done in Photoshop CS2. There is an animation palette… Variables are now in Photoshop, there is a slicing tool… There is not that much left for IR…
MV
Mathias_Vejerslev
Nov 2, 2005
You´re right Pierre. No need for ImageReady at all, then.
DM
Don_McCahill
Nov 2, 2005
I won’t miss IR, but I hope after the merger that Fireworks is kept to replace it. It does have a lot of features that IR does not, primarily in making rollovers, image swaps, drop down menus, and other JavaScript options.

Don
MV
Mathias_Vejerslev
Nov 2, 2005
I hope Adobe takes a coding lesson from Macromedias products that are way more cross browser compatible and clean, than Adobes attempts. At least these are my, early, experience with slicing in Adobe software and embarrasingly watching it crumble and fall apart in public demonstrations. Since then I have not trusted Adobe to write my HTML.
DM
Don_McCahill
Nov 2, 2005
Since then I have not trusted Adobe to write my HTML

I never let anyone else write my HTML.

Don
D
deebs
Nov 2, 2005
LOL @ post 11!

I really, really, really, really, really, … , really hope that the merger creates a sweet Suite de Suite and allows the merged organization an opportunity to swoop us (eg consumers) off our feet.

Should I hold my breath?
Y
YrbkMgr
Nov 2, 2005
The tough part will be seemlessly integrating FW into automation routines with PS…
D
deebs
Nov 2, 2005
Naw – that’s just workflow. It’s human. We are all used to adaptive strategies now (or will be after Office 2006)

The tough part will be getting bean counters, marketing and image experts to agree on a package 🙂
DM
Don_McCahill
Nov 2, 2005
Deebs

I see the merger ending the single suite that CS created. Print dudes don’t want Flash and Dreamweaver, and web dudes don’t want InDesign. I see Print, Web, and Film suites reappearing.

Don
D
deebs
Nov 2, 2005
I see anothe approach based on a super-duper import/export library retaining functionality between apps

But I expect my vision is 10 years hence 🙁
Y
YrbkMgr
Nov 2, 2005
Naw – that’s just workflow. It’s human.

I’m sure Chris Cox agrees that it’s "just workflow". Uhm, have you explored Bridge? They’re working overtime, and this is with a product they themselves have created. To try and get to the root of legacy work created by someone else – another company, well, let’s say I admire you’re optimism.
D
deebs
Nov 2, 2005
CS2 IMHO rocks!

I do feel sorry for some experiencing difficulties though …

The dev team would do no harm in looking at Fast Stone Image Browser – it has some neat treats
MV
Mathias_Vejerslev
Nov 2, 2005
I never let anyone else write my HTML.

I find that I can trust Dreamweaver for most of the stuff.

Ofcourse I customize it in the end, but there´s no need for me to write every line of code.

I understand what you are saying, though.

This is what I´m saying: Macromedia is a web specialist company. Dont mess with what works, Adobe.

Mathias
D
deebs
Nov 2, 2005
IMHO any view to retain a "comfort zone" without improvement is doomed to obscelecence

How to Master Sharpening in Photoshop

Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections