Strange Monitor Colors

RK
Posted By
Rob_Keijzer
Feb 18, 2008
Views
216
Replies
7
Status
Closed
You skip that step with the Spyder

Now I’ve read the manual (how much can one do on one evening) I realise that.

It could fail, but you wrote that the monitor looked just as bad without a profile. That pretty much excludes the Spyder IMO.

Rob

How to Improve Photoshop Performance

Learn how to optimize Photoshop for maximum speed, troubleshoot common issues, and keep your projects organized so that you can work faster than ever before!

GS
Geo_S
Feb 18, 2008
Not exactly. Monitor looks great without a profile, and it looks great with an old profle made with the Spyder and CN CE. It only looks bad with Spyder profiles made with CN 5 (which are the most recent ones).

Update: I just remembered that I had run a profile with the Spyder’s own Colorvision software after I had done the CN 5’s. I just checked that one and it looks fine! That would indicate it is not the Spyder, but is totally the version 5 software.

George
RK
Rob_Keijzer
Feb 18, 2008
But my version 5 ran fine. I’m off to sleep now, so for the moment I quit. Check in tomorrow.

Rob
GS
Geo_S
Feb 19, 2008
OK, I completely purged 5 from my system and downloaded it again from the Eizo website. I ran a profile and the the green problem returned. I did that entire purge and reload process again, and still have the problem. I then reinstalled CE and ran two profiles, both of which were perfect. Clearly a problem with 5, but I have no idea why.
RK
Rob_Keijzer
Feb 19, 2008
Maybe it’s the combination of 5 and Spyder.

One little difference I noticed (between CE and Ver 5) is that when the software is instructed to put the black point on "minimum", CE puts it on 0.09 cd/m2, while Version 5 puts it on 0.14 cd/m2.

This makes "step one" (a black R0 G0 B0 screen with a square patch that’s R1 G1 B1)* not really visible, while it is just visible when 0.09 cd/m2 is the minimum.

* on the range 0 ~ 255, so not percentages.

I’ll try to manually set it to the latter value to see if it accepts it.

Rob
GS
Geo_S
Feb 19, 2008
Interesting idea. My problem does definitely seem to be at the far black end of the scale. I noticed in CE that you can choose to have it not adjust the black point, or to have it adjust it at either a number or at "minimum." I tried it with no adjustment and at minimum and it worked both ways. What I should do is what you suggest and take the minimum number shown in CE and try it in 5 set to that number.

George
RK
Rob_Keijzer
May 18, 2008
Things change.

Today I downloaded ColorNavigator v5.1 and none of the previously issues apply.

With this version (dated Mar 2008) I can set set the black point to "minimum", and end up with my Eizo returning 0.09 cd/m2, instead of 0.14 cd/m2 (automatic) or 0.2 cd/m2 (manual) that the previous version forced me to have.

< http://shop.colourconfidence.com/page.php?xPage=updates.html>

Rob
GS
Geo_S
May 18, 2008
Thanks Rob, I’ll give it a try.

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections