Views
410
Replies
11
Status
Closed
Hi all,
I normally scan photos and create various digital arts/designs "just for the web". So I am not too familiar with printing my works as to how it appears on paper. Now I need to print some of my works. I have to send my works to some printing press. I need to print with the width of 10in at 200 dpi.
What I’ve realised now is- for printing a 10in x 10in image at 200dpi, I need at least 2000 x 2000 pixels image. I normally create my images at the size of 800 x 800 pixels. Now it seems like if I am to print 10in x 10in image (maintaining good quality), either I’ll have to recreate my work (which seems tedious and virtually impossible) or I shouldn’t even bother printing at 10in x 10in. Am I right? Is there a better solution for this?
I’m also intrigued by the space it takes to save a 2000 x 2000 pixel image. One psd image can take 10MB or more if I am to save as 2000 x 2000 pixels. I can’t save my images as jpeg. I need to save them as psd format cause I need to preserve layers. Is there a way to optimise this or is this just a reality of print work that I’m not familiar with?
The more I think about it, the more I get confused. One more question about scanning. When I scan my photo (6in x 4in) to get output of 2000×2000 pixels, isn’t there a lot of interpolation done as compared to 800×600 pixels? Then what about the quality of 2000×2000 pixel image- isn’t it degraded? Then I guess it’s better to scan larger image to get a bigger resolution. Am I right?
Hope some of you can clarify…
Thanx
Ben
I normally scan photos and create various digital arts/designs "just for the web". So I am not too familiar with printing my works as to how it appears on paper. Now I need to print some of my works. I have to send my works to some printing press. I need to print with the width of 10in at 200 dpi.
What I’ve realised now is- for printing a 10in x 10in image at 200dpi, I need at least 2000 x 2000 pixels image. I normally create my images at the size of 800 x 800 pixels. Now it seems like if I am to print 10in x 10in image (maintaining good quality), either I’ll have to recreate my work (which seems tedious and virtually impossible) or I shouldn’t even bother printing at 10in x 10in. Am I right? Is there a better solution for this?
I’m also intrigued by the space it takes to save a 2000 x 2000 pixel image. One psd image can take 10MB or more if I am to save as 2000 x 2000 pixels. I can’t save my images as jpeg. I need to save them as psd format cause I need to preserve layers. Is there a way to optimise this or is this just a reality of print work that I’m not familiar with?
The more I think about it, the more I get confused. One more question about scanning. When I scan my photo (6in x 4in) to get output of 2000×2000 pixels, isn’t there a lot of interpolation done as compared to 800×600 pixels? Then what about the quality of 2000×2000 pixel image- isn’t it degraded? Then I guess it’s better to scan larger image to get a bigger resolution. Am I right?
Hope some of you can clarify…
Thanx
Ben
MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥
– in 4 materials (clay versions included)
– 12 scenes
– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups
– 6000 x 4500 px