SAVE AS… JPEG not available in Photoshop CS

in article , gilles at
wrote on 07/28/2004 6:53 PM:

If I scan an image, save it as .PSD (for safekeeping), then want to save it as JPEG, the SAVE AS command does not give me the option to save as Jpg or jpeg. Where am I going wrong?

What you are doing wrong is using software that you are not able to understand.

Hire someone to teach you or do the project for you.

You’re probably trying to save a 16 bit file. Convert to 8 bit then you will be able to

"gilles" wrote in message

If I scan an image, save it as .PSD (for safekeeping), then want to save it as JPEG, the SAVE AS command does not give me the option to save as Jpg or jpeg. Where am I going wrong?

If I bring in an image in .jpg, then it allows me many formats to save it in as.

Gil

Thank you so much. Everything is fine in 8-bit. It was too simple I guess for the previous response who simply insulted me. Why?

Thanks again
Gil

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:23:07 +1000, "WoZ"
wrote:

You’re probably trying to save a 16 bit file. Convert to 8 bit then you will be able to

"gilles" wrote in message

If I scan an image, save it as .PSD (for safekeeping), then want to save it as JPEG, the SAVE AS command does not give me the option to save as Jpg or jpeg. Where am I going wrong?

If I bring in an image in .jpg, then it allows me many formats to save it in as.

Gil

gilles wrote:

it was too simple I
guess for the previous response who simply insulted me. Why?

Your question was something that could have been easily researched by looking in your manual. Since you hadn’t done that much, your question implies that our time is less valuable than the effort required to casually flip through the manual looking for answers. It is disrespectful to ask for soemthing without even trying to help yourself.

The fact that you are now curious why you were insulted implies that you may feel any of us may owe you an answer. That, too, is not a sign of any respect.

You might have looked in the "help" file, in the manual, on the Web, in the Adobe forums – any of a half dozen resources on your own.

That’s why you are drawing abuse.

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

in article , gilles at
wrote on 07/28/2004 7:50 PM:

It was too simple I
guess for the previous response who simply insulted me.

It was so simple that you should have been able to figure it out, but you could not, because you were even more "simple".

Next time figure it out for yourself.

Why?

Why? Because we like you. We want you to be all that you can be.

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

gilles wrote:

it was too simple I
guess for the previous response who simply insulted me. Why?

Your question was something that could have been easily researched by looking in your manual. Since you hadn’t done that much, your question implies that our time is less valuable than the effort required to casually flip through the manual looking for answers. It is disrespectful to ask for soemthing without even trying to help yourself.
The fact that you are now curious why you were insulted implies that you may feel any of us may owe you an answer. That, too, is not a sign of any respect.

You might have looked in the "help" file, in the manual, on the Web, in the Adobe forums – any of a half dozen resources on your own.
That’s why you are drawing abuse.

The Doormouse

And you are drawing abuse for being an utter dumbass.

in article
wrote on 07/28/2004 8:27 PM:

And you are drawing abuse for being an utter dumbass.

So are you, goofball.

gilles wrote:

Thank you so much. Everything is fine in 8-bit. It was too simple I guess for the previous response who simply insulted me. Why?
Thanks again
Gil

Gil,

It has nothing to do with you, believe me.

A lot of us have been in this group for years, and I think there’s a sort of fraternity food fight going on for about a week now of seeing who can be the most insulting to each other, and to unsuspecting people who ask questions.

It’s hard to block the offenders in the usual way because the people doing it are changing their names fairly rapidly, even taking on the names of other members of the group. So it’s a food fight with halloween masks. There are even a couple of Nazi impersonators cruising around some of the other photography and computer groups, so really it’s not so bad here in
a.g.p. 🙂

No way to stop it, really, so my advice is just tough it out and ignore the insults, or come back in a week when hopefully the slugfest is over. Either that, or we all will have quit.

So far everyone seems to be losing. 🙂
—

Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
www.geigy.2y.net

in article Vg%Nc.99521$, Mike Russell at
wrote on 07/28/2004 9:44 PM:

gilles wrote:

Thank you so much. Everything is fine in 8-bit. It was too simple I guess for the previous response who simply insulted me. Why?
Thanks again
Gil

Gil,

It has nothing to do with you, believe me.

A lot of us have been in this group for years, and I think there’s a sort of fraternity food fight going on for about a week now of seeing who can be the most insulting to each other, and to unsuspecting people who ask questions.
It’s hard to block the offenders in the usual way because the people doing it are changing their names fairly rapidly, even taking on the names of other members of the group. So it’s a food fight with halloween masks. There are even a couple of Nazi impersonators cruising around some of the other photography and computer groups, so really it’s not so bad here in
a.g.p. 🙂

No way to stop it, really, so my advice is just tough it out and ignore the insults, or come back in a week when hopefully the slugfest is over. Either that, or we all will have quit.

So far everyone seems to be losing. 🙂

You still think there is something to win.

gilles wrote:

If I scan an image, save it as .PSD (for safekeeping), then want to save it as JPEG, the SAVE AS command does not give me the option to save as Jpg or jpeg. Where am I going wrong?

If I bring in an image in .jpg, then it allows me many formats to save it in as.

Gil

Don’t worry about the insulters. They all oughta know by now most questions are somewhere in a manual but still we are human and often find it quicker to ask our peers than to start a quest in the books. That’s how we are, and those who have nothing better to do than to start abusing, namecalling and pointing people to manuals are also a fact of life on usenet. They never understood they don’t have to reply to a question if they deem it beneath them. Luckily they are still a minority.

Probably something with crushed egos and relative anonymity of the net.

There are no stupid questions. And yes, it may be worthwile sometimes to use google/groups to see if a quation has been asked and answered before, but that doen’t make you or your question stupid. Hope you enjoy this group Gil! Pjotr

"Pjotr Wedersteers" wrote:

There are no stupid questions.

Yes, there are. 🙂

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

in article 4108ceaa$0$42417$, Pjotr Wedersteers at
wrote on 07/29/2004 3:18 AM:

There are no stupid questions.

Sure there are… just like there are stupid statements.

"Mike Russell" wrote in message

gilles wrote:

Thank you so much. Everything is fine in 8-bit. It was too simple I guess for the previous response who simply insulted me. Why?
Thanks again
Gil

Gil,

It has nothing to do with you, believe me.

A lot of us have been in this group for years, and I think there’s a sort

of

fraternity food fight going on for about a week now of seeing who can be

the

most insulting to each other, and to unsuspecting people who ask

questions.

It’s hard to block the offenders in the usual way because the people doing it are changing their names fairly rapidly, even taking on the names of other members of the group. So it’s a food fight with halloween masks. There are even a couple of Nazi impersonators cruising around some of the other photography and computer groups, so really it’s not so bad here in
a.g.p. 🙂

No way to stop it, really, so my advice is just tough it out and ignore

the

insults, or come back in a week when hopefully the slugfest is over.

Either

that, or we all will have quit.

So far everyone seems to be losing. 🙂
—

Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
www.geigy.2y.net

Huh! you don’t say?

Arty

Hi Gil

I am sorta new here too

If you have a droll sense of humour this is the place for you

Hang loose and have phun

(and just follow the thread… )

Arty

"gilles" wrote in message

If I scan an image, save it as .PSD (for safekeeping), then want to save it as JPEG, the SAVE AS command does not give me the option to save as Jpg or jpeg. Where am I going wrong?

If I bring in an image in .jpg, then it allows me many formats to save it in as.

Gil

Well i stole my computer , cracked windows xp , cracked photoshop , plug into the next door house for power , now where can i steal a manual

The Doormouse wrote:

"Pjotr Wedersteers" wrote:

There are no stupid questions.

Yes, there are. 🙂

The Doormouse

ramcan wrote:

Well i stole my computer , cracked windows xp , cracked photoshop , plug into the next door house for power , now where can i steal a manual

Good question! Try Kazaalite, or Overnet, or your local Adobe store, maybe you can impersonate an Adobe Manual Inspector!

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:00:31 -0400, "Toru" <TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net> found these unused words floating about:

-John McEnroe

10 is the answer …

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

The fact that you are now curious why you were insulted implies that you may feel any of us may owe you an answer. That, too, is not a sign of any respect.

That’s why you are drawing abuse.

I didn’t know that asking questions and being curious *should* draw abuse. What a novel concept!

"Pjotr Wedersteers" wrote in message

They never understood they don’t have to reply to a question if they deem

it beneath them. Luckily they are still a minority.
Yes. I always find it odd that they even bother responding to questions that they feel is beneath them — pity the fools!

Probably something with crushed egos and relative anonymity of the net.

Indeed. Inferority complexes. Really… who in the right mind behaves like dancing fools?

There are no stupid questions. And yes, it may be worthwile sometimes to

use

google/groups to see if a quation has been asked and answered before, but that doen’t make you or your question stupid. Hope you enjoy this group

Gil!
Indeed. No questions are stupid.

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

"Pjotr Wedersteers" wrote:

There are no stupid questions.

Yes, there are. 🙂

To you but not to the person. You are being a real dumbass! You know, the world doesn’t revolve around you.

"Arty Phacting" wrote in message

Hi Gil

I am sorta new here too

If you have a droll sense of humour this is the place for you
Hang loose and have phun

(and just follow the thread… )

This is Usenet and Usenet is a dangerous place to play in — play safe!

in article arURc.11253$, Toronto Web
Designer at wrote on 08/09/2004 5:14 PM:

Yes. I always find it odd

What you find odd is not important.

No questions are stupid.

Your statements are.

in article csURc.11256$, Toronto Web
Designer at wrote on 08/09/2004 5:15 PM:

You know, the
world doesn’t revolve around you.

Try to keep that in mind about yourself too.

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote:

I didn’t know that asking questions and being curious *should* draw abuse. What a novel concept!

I am sorry for your limits.

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

Combaticus wrote:

You know, the
world doesn’t revolve around you.

Try to keep that in mind about yourself too.

It’s part of his problem that he cannot.

After all, he is going to "lecture me", and
make me "behave".

It doesn’t get much sillier. 🙂

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote:

You know, the world doesn’t revolve around you.

More projection.

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote:

who in the right mind behaves like
dancing fools?

That’d be YOU, Sherlock. 🙂

No questions are stupid.

But WHY is the rum gone?

😉

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

-John McEnroe

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

It’s part of his problem that he cannot.

Really. lol

After all, he is going to "lecture me", and make me "behave".

Really. Don’t you find it rather interesting that you would use such words as "lecture me" and "behave"?

It doesn’t get much sillier. 🙂

No, it doesn’t. Many Usenet people are very silly AND abusive. I can only hope that doesn’t transfer to the off-line world.

"Combaticus" wrote in message
news:BD3D66BD.11AE3C%

You know, the
world doesn’t revolve around you.

Try to keep that in mind about yourself too.

Now why would I need to do that? The statement was in context. Have you decided to take it out of context?

Let the world not revolve around me Combaticus.

"Combaticus" wrote in message
news:BD3D6685.11AE3B%

Yes. I always find it odd

What you find odd is not important.

That statement is illogical.

No questions are stupid.

Your statements are.

And given your response, you know what to say about yours.

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

You know, the world doesn’t revolve around you.

More projection.

If only. I rather myself more like a mirror.

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote:

Don’t you find it rather interesting that you would use such words as "lecture me" and "behave"?

Not aT ALL. uNLIKE YOU, i CONTROL WHAT i TYPE.
– well, when I remember to not hit the "caps lock" key.

You are a funny.

Many Usenet people are very silly AND abusive. I can
only hope that doesn’t transfer to the off-line world.

You are your own spanking. That is why you are fun.

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote:

Let the world not revolve around me Combaticus.

Be assured, it does not. 🙂
"This world is MINE!"

LOL! What idiocy.
"Let the world …" Pfft!
ROFL …

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote:

More projection.

If only. I rather myself more like a mirror.

Mirrors are shadows played on a dense, brittle surface. You are like a real person, except only a shadow and as dense and brittle as glass.

It’s bedtime … goodnight, funky shadow of almost-thought …

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote:

What you find odd is not important.

That statement is illogical.

Ah, did Combaticus break you already? No matter. You are still a wind-up toy, and I look forward to your shininess in the morrow.

Wind him up, Comby!

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

in article PVXRc.12052$, Toronto Web
Designer at wrote on 08/09/2004 9:11 PM:

"Combaticus" wrote in message
news:BD3D66BD.11AE3C%

You know, the
world doesn’t revolve around you.

Try to keep that in mind about yourself too.

Now why would I need to do that?

Because it applies.

in article KWXRc.12053$, Toronto Web
Designer at wrote on 08/09/2004 9:12 PM:

"Combaticus" wrote in message
news:BD3D6685.11AE3B%

Yes. I always find it odd

What you find odd is not important.

That statement is illogical.

What you find "illogical" is not my concern.

No questions are stupid.

Your statements are.

And given your response, you know what to say about yours.

Now you know the value I place upon yours.

in article yXXRc.12054$, Toronto Web
Designer at wrote on 08/09/2004 9:13 PM:

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

You know, the world doesn’t revolve around you.

More projection.

If only. I rather myself more like a mirror.

Your cracked.

….

Indeed. No questions are stupid.

Gee officer, I was really going a lot faster than that. Shouldn’t you give me a bigger ticket? 🙂
—

Mike Russell
www.geigy.2y.net

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:09:38 -0400, "Toronto Web Designer" wrote:

Look at the number of replies to this thread. This NG has now officially been taken over by vultures.

That’s not abuse. It’s how vultures operate.

A simple problem should have been solved with maybe 1 or 2 replies.

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

The fact that you are now curious why you were insulted implies that you may feel any of us may owe you an answer. That, too, is not a sign of any respect.

That’s why you are drawing abuse.

I didn’t know that asking questions and being curious *should* draw abuse. What a novel concept!

more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:14:13 -0400, "Toronto Web Designer" scribbled:

No questions are stupid.

There are more stupid questions than there are stars in the night sky.

perhaps I should type with rubber gloves on?

the Arty one

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote in
message

"Arty Phacting" wrote in message

Hi Gil

I am sorta new here too

If you have a droll sense of humour this is the place for you
Hang loose and have phun

(and just follow the thread… )

This is Usenet and Usenet is a dangerous place to play in — play safe!

If they were like that in the off-line world they would all be cripples from the beatings they’d constantly get.
No bigger cowards than the ones that hide behind a monitor!

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote in
message

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

It’s part of his problem that he cannot.

Really. lol

After all, he is going to "lecture me", and make me "behave".

Really. Don’t you find it rather interesting that you would use such

words

as "lecture me" and "behave"?

It doesn’t get much sillier. 🙂

No, it doesn’t. Many Usenet people are very silly AND abusive. I can

only

hope that doesn’t transfer to the off-line world.

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 12:51 PM:

If they were like that in the off-line world they would all be cripples from the beatings they’d constantly get.
No bigger cowards than the ones that hide behind a monitor!

Thus you spout your rubbish.

"Hecete" wrote in message

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 12:51 PM:

If they were like that in the off-line world they would all be cripples from the beatings they’d constantly get.
No bigger cowards than the ones that hide behind a monitor!

Thus you spout your rubbish.

Ah! Here’s one now!

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 2:25 PM:

"Hecete" wrote in message

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 12:51 PM:

If they were like that in the off-line world they would all be cripples from the beatings they’d constantly get.
No bigger cowards than the ones that hide behind a monitor!

Thus you spout your rubbish.

Ah! Here’s one now!

Good that you know what you are.

Hecete wrote:

Good that you know what you are.

We all know what he is. It’s the two-week old troll that came before, and his pathetic sockpuppets.

I was hoping that it was something new, but no luck.

*shrug* Oh well 🙂

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:13:35 -0400, Husky scribbled:

A simple problem should have been solved with maybe 1 or 2 replies.

And who are you to decide that for anyone but yourself?

"Hecete" wrote in message

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 2:25 PM:

"Hecete" wrote in message

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 12:51 PM:

If they were like that in the off-line world they would all be

cripples

from the beatings they’d constantly get.
No bigger cowards than the ones that hide behind a monitor!

Thus you spout your rubbish.

Ah! Here’s one now!

Good that you know what you are.

You draw like flies.

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

Hecete wrote:

Good that you know what you are.

We all know what he is. It’s the two-week old troll that came before, and his pathetic sockpuppets.

I was hoping that it was something new, but no luck.

*shrug* Oh well 🙂

The Doormouse

—
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

So do you.

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:44:07 -0700, J. A. Mc.
wrote:

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:00:31 -0400, "Toru" <TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net> found these unused words floating about:

-John McEnroe

10 is the answer …

I thought it was 42

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 6:57 PM:

"Hecete" wrote in message

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 2:25 PM:

"Hecete" wrote in message

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 12:51 PM:

If they were like that in the off-line world they would all be

cripples

from the beatings they’d constantly get.
No bigger cowards than the ones that hide behind a monitor!

Thus you spout your rubbish.

Ah! Here’s one now!

Good that you know what you are.

You draw like flies.

I draw them with honey, but under bright lights they get mushy and run away.

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 6:57 PM:

So do you.

What is your excuse?

"Voivod" wrote in message

No questions are stupid.

There are more stupid questions than there are stars in the night sky.

Trolls love taking things out of context for their own pleasure. Pity. Ta ta.

in article rLhSc.21069$, Toronto Web
Designer at wrote on 08/10/2004 10:02
PM:

"Voivod" wrote in message

No questions are stupid.

There are more stupid questions than there are stars in the night sky.

I love taking things out of context for my own pleasure.

You should be having a great time then.

"Hecete" wrote in message

in article , Toru at
TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net wrote on 08/10/2004 6:57 PM:

So do you.

What is your excuse?

What’s your excuse?
Oh, your excuse is irrelevant.

with a Ford Anglia of course

Arts

"ZONED!" wrote in message

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:44:07 -0700, J. A. Mc.
wrote:

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:00:31 -0400, "Toru" <TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net> found these unused words floating about:

-John McEnroe

10 is the answer …

I thought it was 42

don’t dally

toodle-pip

Arts

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote in
message

"Voivod" wrote in message

No questions are stupid.

There are more stupid questions than there are stars in the night sky.

Trolls love taking things out of context for their own pleasure. Pity. Ta ta.

Better a dumb ass than a talking one?

Arts

"Toronto Web Designer" wrote in
message

"The Doormouse" wrote in message

"Pjotr Wedersteers" wrote:

There are no stupid questions.

Yes, there are. 🙂

To you but not to the person. You are being a real dumbass! You know,

the

world doesn’t revolve around you.

In article , "Toru"
<TheBuckStop@{delete}nuvox.net> wrote:

-John McEnroe

You left out the question mark.
It should have read "John McEnroe?"

And the answer is:
"You cannot be serious".

—
Andy D.
http://members.westnet.com.au/andydolphin/
Fine art gallery – online, Western Australia
Landscapes, seascapes and still life paintings in oils.