Any legal problems doing this?

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:09:09 -0400, BF scribbled:

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

Are you afraid they’ll turn you in to the Photoshop Police?

BF wrote:

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

Well……… if you are dealing with Mickey Mouse……. Disney will hunt you down to the ends of the earth and beyond!! LOLOLOLOL

—
Ric Seyler
Seyler Design & Printing
————————————–
"Homer no function beer well without."
– H.J. Simpson

"BF" wrote in message

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

look up the copyright statutes & rights managagement for your country it will differ from UK to USA

but usually if you are not re-selling or making money from this and it is not for wide public distribution, it isn’t an issue

it is always wise to ask the owner of the original if he/she minds you using it
in some cases not possible
also public domain >people in public as celebrities are not protected from parodies

on flickr there is an option for image owners to select the rights, many of the images are royalty free and some have some rights some grant none

look at this page
http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:11:38 -0400, "KatWoman" scribbled:

"BF" wrote in message

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

look up the copyright statutes & rights managagement for your country it will differ from UK to USA

but usually if you are not re-selling or making money from this and it is not for wide public distribution, it isn’t an issue

it is always wise to ask the owner of the original if he/she minds you using it
in some cases not possible
also public domain >people in public as celebrities are not protected from parodies

on flickr there is an option for image owners to select the rights, many of the images are royalty free and some have some rights some grant none
look at this page
http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/

What the fuck does Flickr’s user licensing have to do with anything? Do you ever have a clue what you’re prattling on about or do you have some imaginary posting quota you need to meet no matter how fucking stupid you sound?

BF wrote:

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot
person are there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

It might depend on whether you swiped the photo of the other person or they gave you the head.

—
dvus

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

You should only do this to friends.
If they are friends, they should be able to see the humor and not take you to court.
But technically, there probably are some legal issues with it. I never cared and had great fun. So had my friends.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:53:38 +0200, Fred wrote:

You should only do this to friends.
If they are friends, they should be able to see the humor and not take you to court.

Also, don’t do it to the president of your company, or your remaining time there may be shorter than you think. BTDT …
—
Mike Russell – http://www.curvemeister.com

"Fred" wrote:

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

You should only do this to friends.
If they are friends, they should be able to see the humor and not take you to court.
But technically, there probably are some legal issues with it. I never cared and had great fun. So had my friends.

Well, here in America almost 70% of Americans don’t think G. Bush is their friends, and they make the monkey out of this guy <bg>

"Joel" wrote in message

"Fred" wrote:

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do
this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are
there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

You should only do this to friends.
If they are friends, they should be able to see the humor and not take you
to court.
But technically, there probably are some legal issues with it. I never cared and had great fun. So had my friends.

Well, here in America almost 70% of Americans don’t think G. Bush is their friends, and they make the monkey out of this guy <bg>

you are a funny man>>> Joel
(not sarcasm)

"Fred" wrote:

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do
this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are
there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

You should only do this to friends.
If they are friends, they should be able to see the humor and not take you
to court.
But technically, there probably are some legal issues with it. I never cared and had great fun. So had my friends.

Well, here in America almost 70% of Americans don’t think G. Bush is their friends, and they make the monkey out of this guy <bg>

LOL. But he’s really asking for it!
Still, I’m hoping desperately this 70% will translate in your voting behaviour </politics>
Grtz from Europe.

"Fred" wrote:

"Fred" wrote:

As many fellow Photoshoppers know it can be a great challenge to take someones head and put it on a different body. As a joke, if one was to do
this and the only person that saw the picture was the head shot person are
there any legal problems doing this if only that person saw it?

You should only do this to friends.
If they are friends, they should be able to see the humor and not take you
to court.
But technically, there probably are some legal issues with it. I never cared and had great fun. So had my friends.

Well, here in America almost 70% of Americans don’t think G. Bush is their friends, and they make the monkey out of this guy <bg>

LOL. But he’s really asking for it!
Still, I’m hoping desperately this 70% will translate in your voting behaviour </politics>

I know, and a large percentage of Amerincans (Great British calls them the 51% of Dumb Americans <bg>) still very proud of what they have archived <bg>

Grtz from Europe.

I read European and people of many other countries in the world would like to see more of what America now have to bring America to its knee, and more peace to the world <bg>

I read European and people of many other countries in the world would like to see more of what America now have to bring America to its knee, and more
peace to the world <bg>

Euh, confusing sentence.
I’d like to see what America has to offer, minus the arrogance of some administrations.
Not bringing it to it’s knees. I guess most (non US) people think this way. But declaring yourself ‘leader of the free world’ (Bush senior) is not the way to make yourself popular!
Peace, indeed.

"Fred" wrote in message

I read European and people of many other countries in the world would like
to see more of what America now have to bring America to its knee, and more
peace to the world <bg>

Euh, confusing sentence.
I’d like to see what America has to offer, minus the arrogance of some administrations.
Not bringing it to it’s knees. I guess most (non US) people think this way.
But declaring yourself ‘leader of the free world’ (Bush senior) is not the way to make yourself popular!
Peace, indeed.

so electing the arrogant ELITIST from an ivy league school Obama will be amenable to you EU’s, LOL

ME and Joe are extremely happy you have NO VOTE HERE
LOL

that EU boat tied TIGHTLY to America better watch what you wish for IF we go down you going with us…………….

we’ve been down before under CARTER the dhimmi and we will rise up again NO DOUBT

poor EU’s lost their own places as world leaders
such UGLY JEALOUSY
WHO left USA to clean their ugly colonial messes in let’s see: let us look at WHO EXACTLY LEFT THIS LEGACY OF COLONIALISM THAT USA IS HAVING TO FIX AND GETTING BLAMED FOR

between France Uk and Spain Portugal and Holland

remnants of colonialism that create today’s conflicts::
Pal Israel British mandate
south Africa apartheid disaster
Zimbabwe
Haiti
Pakistan_India mess and wars and genocides
who divided the Mid east into fiefdoms by religion??? yes Morocco Iraq Iran not countries created by natural borders or group loyalty hodge podge put by YOUR POLS
so many many more

WE ARE CLEANING UP THE TRASH MESS YOU MADE EU
we will elect our own president without your opinion having any meaning

NO ONE TOPS EU for arrogance sir
and the world pays now for your LEGACY OF ARROGANCE

KatWoman wrote:

WE ARE CLEANING UP THE TRASH MESS YOU MADE EU
we will elect our own president without your opinion having any meaning

YOU, Kat, are doing no such thing.

NO ONE TOPS EU for arrogance sir
and the world pays now for your LEGACY OF ARROGANCE

The killing of a million Iraq and Afgan citizens and denying the same is not arrogance?

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:57:31 -0500, John scribbled:

KatWoman wrote:

WE ARE CLEANING UP THE TRASH MESS YOU MADE EU
we will elect our own president without your opinion having any meaning

YOU, Kat, are doing no such thing.

NO ONE TOPS EU for arrogance sir
and the world pays now for your LEGACY OF ARROGANCE

The killing of a million Iraq and Afgan citizens and denying the same is not arrogance?

This is alt.graphics.photoshop, why don’t you fucktards take the political diatribe to a group that gives a shit?

John wrote:

KatWoman wrote:

WE ARE CLEANING UP THE TRASH MESS YOU MADE EU
we will elect our own president without your opinion having any meaning

YOU, Kat, are doing no such thing.

NO ONE TOPS EU for arrogance sir
and the world pays now for your LEGACY OF ARROGANCE

The killing of a million Iraq and Afgan citizens and denying the same is not arrogance?

Folks may be interested in the new book called The Dark Side by Jane Mayer. Also, the correct number should be tens of millions (if you go beyond the invading and bombing). And this part Europe shares the same responsibility.

Peace, indeed.

so electing the arrogant ELITIST from an ivy league school Obama will be amenable to you EU’s, LOL

ME and Joe are extremely happy you have NO VOTE HERE
LOL

that EU boat tied TIGHTLY to America better watch what you wish for IF we go down you going with us…………….

we’ve been down before under CARTER the dhimmi and we will rise up again NO DOUBT

poor EU’s lost their own places as world leaders
such UGLY JEALOUSY
WHO left USA to clean their ugly colonial messes in let’s see: let us look at WHO EXACTLY LEFT THIS LEGACY OF COLONIALISM THAT USA IS HAVING TO FIX AND GETTING BLAMED FOR

between France Uk and Spain Portugal and Holland

remnants of colonialism that create today’s conflicts::
Pal Israel British mandate
south Africa apartheid disaster
Zimbabwe
Haiti
Pakistan_India mess and wars and genocides
who divided the Mid east into fiefdoms by religion??? yes Morocco Iraq Iran not countries created by natural borders or group loyalty hodge podge put by YOUR POLS
so many many more

WE ARE CLEANING UP THE TRASH MESS YOU MADE EU
we will elect our own president without your opinion having any meaning
NO ONE TOPS EU for arrogance sir
and the world pays now for your LEGACY OF ARROGANCE

You scare me, Katwoman. Didn’t mean to upset you this much. I stop here.
Bye

"Fred" wrote in message

Peace, indeed.

so electing the arrogant ELITIST from an ivy league school Obama will be amenable to you EU’s, LOL

ME and Joe are extremely happy you have NO VOTE HERE
LOL

that EU boat tied TIGHTLY to America better watch what you wish for IF we go down you going with us…………….

we’ve been down before under CARTER the dhimmi and we will rise up again NO DOUBT

poor EU’s lost their own places as world leaders
such UGLY JEALOUSY
WHO left USA to clean their ugly colonial messes in let’s see: let us look at WHO EXACTLY LEFT THIS LEGACY OF COLONIALISM THAT USA IS HAVING TO FIX AND GETTING BLAMED FOR

between France Uk and Spain Portugal and Holland

remnants of colonialism that create today’s conflicts::
Pal Israel British mandate
south Africa apartheid disaster
Zimbabwe
Haiti
Pakistan_India mess and wars and genocides
who divided the Mid east into fiefdoms by religion??? yes Morocco Iraq Iran not countries created by natural borders or group loyalty hodge podge put by YOUR POLS
so many many more

WE ARE CLEANING UP THE TRASH MESS YOU MADE EU
we will elect our own president without your opinion having any meaning
NO ONE TOPS EU for arrogance sir
and the world pays now for your LEGACY OF ARROGANCE

You scare me, Katwoman. Didn’t mean to upset you this much. I stop here.
Bye

good b/c america will continue to carry a big stick
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/5877/1186819204324kc7.png

"Lord, if I could only have talked with Hitler Ahmedinejad, all this might have been avoided . . ."
William Edgar Borah

KNOW YOUR ENEMY
TALK TO HIM IN A LANGUAGE HE CAN UNDERSTAND
GLOBAL PEACE THROUGH DEADLY FORCE

If the "peaceniks" of the early 70’s had succeeded in the leftist funded agendas of their times
USA would be looking a lot LIKE THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION where it did succeed where after killing their sponsors and funders and supporters the Russians you see what the Mullahs had in mind
FASCISM

and ignorant who did not read history didn’t get it last time those hippie values willnot make it inthe GLOBAL POLITICAL CLIMATE CHANGE Al Gore and the poor little greenies won’t have much to cry about if Iran gets the nukes
what part of DEATH TO AMERICA
do you not understand??

PUT IN BABEL FISH and use the translator for your EU language of choice If you’re BRIT vote BNP and stand up for your pathetic dhimmified selves

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:58:28 -0400, "KatWoman" scribbled:

good b/c america will continue to carry a big stick

Shut the fuck up already! You’re an embarrassment to other Americans. Christ you can’t even capitalize the country’s name you ignorant hack.

In article <RZKgk.4298$>,
says…

You scare me, Katwoman. Didn’t mean to upset you this much. I stop here.
Bye

good b/c america will continue to carry a big stick
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/5877/1186819204324kc7.png
"Lord, if I could only have talked with Hitler Ahmedinejad, all this might have been avoided . . ."
William Edgar Borah

KNOW YOUR ENEMY
TALK TO HIM IN A LANGUAGE HE CAN UNDERSTAND
GLOBAL PEACE THROUGH DEADLY FORCE

If the "peaceniks" of the early 70’s had succeeded in the leftist funded agendas of their times
USA would be looking a lot LIKE THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION where it did succeed where after killing their sponsors and funders and supporters the Russians you see what the Mullahs had in mind
FASCISM

and ignorant who did not read history didn’t get it last time those hippie values willnot make it inthe GLOBAL POLITICAL CLIMATE CHANGE Al Gore and the poor little greenies won’t have much to cry about if Iran gets the nukes
what part of DEATH TO AMERICA
do you not understand??

PUT IN BABEL FISH and use the translator for your EU language of choice If you’re BRIT vote BNP and stand up for your pathetic dhimmified selves

Which just goes to show that politics and Photoshop don’t mix.

Mike

I guess you won’t be voting democrate then.
I’m not your enemy, you seem to be mine.
I have no words for this.

In message <RZKgk.4298$>, KatWoman
writes

good b/c america will continue to carry a big stick
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/5877/1186819204324kc7.png

That’s rather a drastic Photoshop solution isn’t it? Why don’t you just use ‘erase’?

Mike

—
Michael J Davis

<><
"If you are offended by anything, whether intended or unintended, you do not know the way of peace…"
St. Maximus the Confessor
<><

"Fred" wrote:

I guess you won’t be voting democrate then.

That’s the problem we have in this country. Or many people worship their party’s but refuse to serve the nation.

I’m not your enemy, you seem to be mine.
I have no words for this.

Yes, you are! <bg> here they treat people of different party less than dog, they will chew the donkey out of the other side any chance they have <bg>

I have no words for this

of course you don’t like all good dhimmis
you like to surrender BEFORE YOU DEFEND your POINT OF VIEW

yes by all means SPEW YOUR SHIT-stand up and defend that BS you said BUT Don’t spew it out and run away
and you cannot EXPECT NOT TO GET HIT BY THE BLOWBACK

"Fred" wrote in message

I guess you won’t be voting democrate then.
I’m not your enemy, you seem to be mine.

..

"Michael J Davis" <?.?@trustsof.demon.co.uk> wrote in message

In message <RZKgk.4298$>, KatWoman
writes

good b/c america will continue to carry a big stick
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/5877/1186819204324kc7.png

That’s rather a drastic Photoshop solution isn’t it? Why don’t you just use ‘erase’?

Mike

Bullshit should not go unchallenged
the MYTH unfortunately is very contagious, similar to BDS syndrome and in this case DANGEROUS

you go on ignoring go on appeasing and WHAM
whole camel not only the NOSE but whole ass in your tent WAKE UP b4 it’s too late
and doofus FYI>>>>>. I have voted DEM since 1968 UNTIL NOW google P.U.M.A.

—
Michael J Davis

<><
"If you are offended by anything, whether intended or unintended, you do not know the way of peace…"
St. Maximus the Confessor

BUT Sorry to all except FRED who I was replying to
this is not the venue for this discussion
back to Photoshop

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:22:20 -0400, "KatWoman" scribbled:

of course you don’t like all good dhimmis
you like to surrender BEFORE YOU DEFEND your POINT OF VIEW
yes by all means SPEW YOUR SHIT-stand up and defend that BS you said BUT Don’t spew it out and run away
and you cannot EXPECT NOT TO GET HIT BY THE BLOWBACK

So… you’re referring to yourself as… vomit?

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:29:07 -0400, "KatWoman" scribbled:

"Michael J Davis" <?.?@trustsof.demon.co.uk> wrote in message

In message <RZKgk.4298$>, KatWoman
writes

good b/c america will continue to carry a big stick
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/5877/1186819204324kc7.png

That’s rather a drastic Photoshop solution isn’t it? Why don’t you just use ‘erase’?

Mike

Bullshit should not go unchallenged

It should when the respondant is an ignorant fucktard spewing vitrol and half facts.

the MYTH unfortunately is very contagious, similar to BDS syndrome and in this case DANGEROUS

you go on ignoring go on appeasing and WHAM
whole camel not only the NOSE but whole ass in your tent WAKE UP b4 it’s too late

Kill yourself before you breed more like you.

I have no words for this

of course you don’t like all good dhimmis
you like to surrender BEFORE YOU DEFEND your POINT OF VIEW
yes by all means SPEW YOUR SHIT-stand up and defend that BS you said BUT Don’t spew it out and run away
and you cannot EXPECT NOT TO GET HIT BY THE BLOWBACK

You shout a lot, Katwoman!
I won’t argue with you, I have more important things to do. It’s not called surrendering, it’s called thinking.
This has gone far enough in this group.

"Fred" wrote:

I have no words for this

of course you don’t like all good dhimmis
you like to surrender BEFORE YOU DEFEND your POINT OF VIEW
yes by all means SPEW YOUR SHIT-stand up and defend that BS you said BUT Don’t spew it out and run away
and you cannot EXPECT NOT TO GET HIT BY THE BLOWBACK

You shout a lot, Katwoman!
I won’t argue with you, I have more important things to do. It’s not called surrendering, it’s called thinking.
This has gone far enough in this group.

Hehehe you shouldn’t pay attention to an angry woman. Just by what I read, it seems like she is some kind of an anger Hillary’s woman which won’t serve the nation.

Hehehe I like talent sweet woman and putting the nation first would be a plus, else just another piece of dirt <bg>

KatWoman wrote:

I have no words for this

of course you don’t like all good dhimmis
you like to surrender BEFORE YOU DEFEND your POINT OF VIEW
yes by all means SPEW YOUR SHIT-stand up and defend that BS you said BUT Don’t spew it out and run away
and you cannot EXPECT NOT TO GET HIT BY THE BLOWBACK

"Fred" wrote in message

I guess you won’t be voting democrate then.
I’m not your enemy, you seem to be mine.

.

FWIW I figured McCain would be a giant step up from the horrible Bush/Cheney Admin, even with all the pandering he’s had to do to get this far. I think his heart is genuine for the most part. I just don’t think
Obama can pull it off, too much baggage with Rev Wright, Aires and if we are being honest, his race.

BUT McCain picking that Category 5 Moron for a running mate has me scared! That person being 1 step away from the button is very, very worrisome.

—
Ric Seyler
Online Racing: RicSeyler
GPL Handicap 6.35

http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler
remove -SPAM- from email address
————————————–
"Homer no function beer well without."
– H.J. Simpson

—